Lack of Pharmacokinetic Interaction between Esomeprazole and the Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Naproxen and Rofecoxib in Healthy Subjects

Pharmacokinetic interactions between fexuprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in healthy males

Fexuprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, is expected to be used for the prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) induced ulcer. This study aimed to evaluate pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between fexuprazan and NSAIDs in healthy subjects. A randomized, open-label, multicenter, six-sequence, one-way crossover study was conducted in healthy male subjects. Subjects randomly received one of the study drugs (fexuprazan 40 mg BID, celecoxib 200 mg BID, naproxen 500 mg BID, or meloxicam 15 mg QD) for 5 or 7 days in the first period followed by the combination of fexuprazan and one of NSAIDs for the same days and the perpetrator additionally administered for 1-2 days in the second period. Serial blood samples for PK analysis were collected until 48- or 72-h post-dose at steady state. PK parameters including maximum plasma concentration at steady state (Cmax,ss) and area under plasma concentration-time curve over dosing interval at steady state (AUCτ,ss) were compared between monotherapy and combination therapy. The PKs of NSAIDs were not significantly altered by fexuprazan. For fexuprazan, differences in PK parameters (22% in Cmax, 19% in AUCτ,ss) were observed when co-administered with naproxen, but not clinically significant. The geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of combination therapy to monotherapy for Cmax,ss and AUCτ,ss was 1.22 (1.02-1.46) and 1.19 (1.00-1.43), respectively. There were no significant changes in the systemic exposure of fexuprazan by celecoxib and meloxicam. Fexuprazan and NSAIDs did not show clinically meaningful PK interactions.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Tegoprazan and Naproxen, Aceclofenac, and Celecoxib in Healthy Korean Male Subjects

PURPOSE

Tegoprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker used for gastric acid suppression and may be used with NSAIDs to reduce gastrointestinal adverse effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction between tegoprazan and commonly used NSAIDS, namely, naproxen, aceclofenac, and celecoxib.

METHODS

An open-label, 3-cohort, randomized, multiple-dose, 3-way crossover study was conducted in healthy male subjects. In cohort 1, tegoprazan (50-mg tablet, once daily) and naproxen (500-mg tablet, twice daily) were administered separately or concurrently for 7 days in each period. In cohort 2, tegoprazan and aceclofenac (100-mg tablet, twice daily) were administered separately or concurrently for 7 days in each period. In cohort 3, tegoprazan and celecoxib (200-mg capsule, twice daily) were administered separately or concurrently for 7 days in each period. Pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the last dose.

FINDINGS

Seventeen subjects from cohort 1, sixteen subjects from cohort 2, and thirteen subjects from cohort 3 were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. In cohort 1, the geometric least squares mean ratios (90% CIs) for AUC_τ (AUC profiles over the dosing interval) and C_ss,max (C_max at steady state) were 1.01 (0.91-1.12) and 0.99 (0.83-1.17) for tegoprazan, and 1.00 (0.97-1.03) and 1.04 (0.99-1.09) for naproxen, respectively. The values in cohort 2 were 1.03 (0.93-1.13) and 0.94 (0.86-1.04) for tegoprazan, and 1.06 (1.00-1.12) and 1.31 (1.08-1.60) for aceclofenac. The values in cohort 3 were 1.01 (0.86-1.18) and 1.02 (0.87-1.19) for tegoprazan, and 1.08 (0.96-1.22) and 1.18 (0.97-1.43) for celecoxib.

IMPLICATIONS

Changes in the maximum aceclofenac or celecoxib concentrations were detected after concurrent administration with tegoprazan, which were considered mainly due to the pharmacodynamic effect of tegoprazan. Because systemic drug exposure (shown as AUC_τ) was unchanged after concurrent administration of any 3 NSAIDs with tegoprazan, the increase in aceclofenac or celecoxib C_ss,max when administered with tegoprazan would not be clinically significant in practice.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov Identifier: NCT04639804.

The pharmacology of esomeprazole and its role in gastric acid related diseases

Esomeprazole (S-isomer of omeprazole) demonstrates a better pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile than the racemic product omeprazole. Esomeprazole's pharmacological activity of gastric acid secretion is through proton pump inhibition. The pharmacokinetic properties provide for an enhanced pharmacological effect. Esomeprazole is rapidly absorbed and the extent of absorption is higher resulting in higher systemic absorption of esomeprazole (bioavailability), which coupled with reduced clearance results in greater systemic exposure. This pharmacodynamic profile then provides for a prolongation of inhibition of gastric acid output and correlates well with its more beneficial therapeutic efficacy over omeprazole and some of the other proton-pump inhibitors. It has been well proven as an effective agent in the treatment of gastro-esophagitis reflux disease, (reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease), NSAID-induced gastric-intestinal symptoms and ulcers, Helicobacter pylori infection and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Esomeprazole has a good tolerability profile and a low potential for drug interaction.

Proton pump inhibitors: an update of their clinical use and pharmacokinetics

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) represent drugs of first choice for treating peptic ulcer, Helicobacter pylori infection, gastrooesophageal reflux disease, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastrointestinal lesions (complications), and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

RESULTS

The available agents (omeprazole/esomeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole) differ somewhat in their pharmacokinetic properties (e.g., time-/dose-dependent bioavailability, metabolic pattern, interaction potential, genetic variability). For all PPIs, there is a clear relationship between drug exposure (area under the plasma concentration/time curve) and the pharmacodynamic response (inhibition of acid secretion). Furthermore, clinical outcome (e.g., healing and eradication rates) depends on maintaining intragastric pH values above certain threshold levels. Thus, any changes in drug disposition will subsequently be translated directly into clinical efficiency so that extensive metabolizers of CYP2C19 will demonstrate a higher rate of therapeutic nonresponse.

CONCLUSIONS

This update of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical data will provide the necessary guide by which to select between the various PPIs that differ-based on pharmacodynamic assessments-in their relative potencies (e.g., higher doses are needed for pantoprazole and lansoprazole compared with rabeprazole). Despite their well-documented clinical efficacy and safety, there is still a certain number of patients who are refractory to treatment with PPIs (nonresponder), which will leave sufficient space for future drug development and clinical research.

Correlation between in vitro and in vivo concentration-effect relationships of naproxen in rats and healthy volunteers

Understanding the mechanisms underlying the analgesic effect of new cyclooxygenase inhibitors is essential to identify dosing requirements in early stages of drug development. Accurate extrapolation to humans of in vitro and in vivo findings in preclinical species is needed to optimise dosing regimen in inflammatory conditions. The current investigation characterises the inhibition of prostaglandin E2 (PGE(2)) and thromboxane B2 (TXB(2)) by naproxen in vitro and in vivo in rat and human blood. The inhibition of PGE(2) in the absence or presence of increasing concentrations of naproxen (10(-8)-10(-1) M) was measured by ex vivo whole blood stimulation with LPS, whereas inhibition of TXB(2) was measured in serum following blood clotting. In further experiments, inhibition of PGE(2) and TXB(2) levels was also assessed ex vivo in animals treated with naproxen (2.5, 10, 25 mg kg(-1)). Subsequently, pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) modelling of in vitro and in vivo data was performed using nonlinear mixed effects in NONMEM (V). Inhibition of PGE(2) and TXB(2) was characterised by a sigmoid E(max) model. The exposure-response relationships in vitro and in vivo were of the same order of magnitude in both species. IC(80) estimates obtained in vitro were similar for PGE(2) inhibition (130.8 +/- 11 and 131.9 +/- 19 10(-6) M, mean +/- s.d. for humans and rats, respectively), but slightly different for TXB(2) inhibition (103.9+/-15 and 151.4 +/- 40 10(-6) M, mean +/- s.d. for humans and rats, respectively, P < 0.05). These differences, however, may not be biologically relevant. The results confirm the value of exposure-effect relationships determined in vitro as a means to predict the pharmacological activity in vivo. This analysis also highlights the need to parameterise concentration-effect relationships in early drug development, as indicated by the estimates of IC(80) for PGE(2) and TXB(2) inhibition.