Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic study of a novel fentanyl-containing matrix transdermal patch system in Japanese patients with cancer pain

An Open-Label Study of the Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Once-a-Day Fentanyl Citrate Patch in Japanese Pediatric and Adolescent Patients with Cancer Pain

BACKGROUND

Transdermal fentanyl is not yet approved for pediatric and adolescent use in Japan.

OBJECTIVE

Serum fentanyl concentration and the safety and efficacy of once-a-day fentanyl citrate patch were investigated in pediatric and adolescent patients with cancer pain.

METHODS

In this open-label, uncontrolled study, cancer patients aged 2-19 years being treated with strong opioid analgesics were switched to fentanyl citrate patch for 2 weeks. Serum fentanyl concentration was measured at steady state, and severity of pain was evaluated.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (four patients aged 2-5 years and seven patients aged 6-19 years) were enrolled. No patient received a dose exceeding 2 mg. Mean serum fentanyl concentrations after administration of 0.5 mg, 1 mg, and 2 mg were 144 pg/mL (n = 4), 277 pg/mL (n = 3), and 2070 pg/mL (n = 4), respectively. All patients were included in the efficacy and safety analysis, but one patient was excluded from the pharmacokinetic analysis because blood was sampled on the day after blood transfusion. A subgroup analysis showed that the mean serum fentanyl concentration tended to be higher in pre-school patients (aged 2-5 years) than in school-aged and adolescent patients (aged 6-19 years) and than in reports of adult patients (aged 20 years and above) who received the same dose. No respiratory adverse events were observed, and pain was well controlled.

CONCLUSION

Fentanyl citrate patch tended to result in a higher serum fentanyl concentration in pre-school patients than in school-aged, adolescent, and adult patients who received the same dose. The patch provided adequate pain control, was well tolerated, and did not cause respiratory adverse events.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

JPRN-JapicCTI-183909.

Comparative evaluation of analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine transdermal patch and fentanyl patch in management of postoperative pain after arthroscopic lower limb surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Background and Aims

Transdermal opioids are newer modality in use for the control of postoperative pain, because of its noninvasiveness, longer duration of action, sustained blood levels, and with minimal side effects. The study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of analgesia of buprenorphine patch 10, 20 μg·h^-1 and fentanyl patch 25 μg·h^-1 for relief of pain in the postoperative period in patients undergoing arthroscopic lower limb surgeries.

Materials and Methods

It was a randomized, double-blinded, prospective study in which adult patients undergoing lower limb arthroscopic surgery were randomly segregated into three groups. In Group 1 (fentanyl patch 25 μg·h^-1), Group 2 (buprenorphine patch 10 μg·h^-1), and Group 3 (buprenorphine patch 20 μg·h^-1), transdermal patches were applied 12 h prior to surgery. Mean NRS score, total rescue analgesic requirement, drug-related adverse effects, and hemodynamic status were evaluated till 72 h in the postoperative period.

Results

Out of 175 screened patients, 150 patients were finally analyzed. Baseline characteristics were the same among all the three groups. Median NRS score was lowest in Group 3 [P value < 0.05 at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after surgery (Kruskal Wallis test). The total consumption of postoperative rescue analgesic diclofenac was the lowest in Group 3 as compared to other groups without any significant increase in adverse events.

Conclusions

In arthroscopic lower limb surgery, buprenorphine patch (20 μg·h^-1) applied 12 h prior to surgery is an effective postoperative analgesic and it is not associated with any significant adverse effects.

Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl Citrate Patch, Including a Low-Dose 0.5 mg Formulation, in Opioid-Naïve Patients with Cancer Pain

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The use of transdermal fentanyl for opioid-naïve patients is restricted, however, transdermal fentanyl is a useful opioid analgesic for patients in whom oral administration is difficult or for those with renal failure. In this study, the efficacy and safety of fentanyl citrate patches was evaluated in opioid-naïve patients suffering from cancer pain.

METHODS

An open-label uncontrolled study was conducted in opioid-naïve patients with cancer pain unable to be controlled by non-opioid analgesics. Fentanyl citrate patches starting at a low dose (0.5 mg/patch, corresponding to 6.25 μg/h fentanyl delivered) were applied once/day for up to 14 days. The analgesic effect was assessed every day from the visual analogue scale pain score and the number of doses of rescue medication. When improvement of the analgesic effect was "significant" or "moderate" at a certain dose for three consecutive days, the patient was classified as a "responder" and was considered to have "completed" the study.

RESULTS

A fentanyl citrate patch was administered to 208 of 209 enrolled patients. In the full-analysis set, 87.0% of the patients were "responders" (95% confidence interval 81.7-91.3%). In 148 patients, the optimum dose was low (0.5 mg in 99, and 1 mg in 49), with patients finishing the study on days 4-8. Following dose escalation to 4 mg, respiratory depression occurred in one patient; however, this was considered a mild adverse event.

CONCLUSION

A low-dose fentanyl citrate patch was effective in the management of cancer pain in opioid-naïve patients and was well tolerated.

STUDY REGISTRATION

JPRN-JapicCTI-173717.

Efficacy of transdermal buprenorphine patch on post-operative pain relief after elective spinal instrumentation surgery

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Transdermal buprenorphine patch (TDB) is increasingly used for chronic pain management because of non-invasive dosing, longer duration of action and minimal side effects. However its role in acute post-operative pain management for spinal instrumentation surgery is not well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine patch for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing spinal instrumentation surgery.

METHODS

In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, prospective study, 70 adult patients undergoing elective spinal instrumentation surgery were randomly allocated into two groups-TDB Group (buprenorphinepatch) and TDP Group (placebo patch). Time to first rescue analgesic requirement was the primary outcome. All patients also were monitored for total rescue analgesic requirement, drug-related adverse effect and haemodynamic status till 48 h after surgery. Statistical analysis was carried out using student independent t-test if normally distributed or with Mann-Whitney U-test if otherwise.

RESULTS

Time to first post-operative rescue analgesic (tramadol) requirement was much delayed in TDB Group than TDP Group (708.0 ± 6.98 min vs 54 ± 0.68 min, P < 0.001) and the total tramadol requirement was higher in TDB Group (490.60 ± 63.09 averagevs. 162.93 ± 63.91 mg, P < 0.001). Intra-and post-operative haemodynamic status was also stable in TDB Group without any adverse event.

CONCLUSION

A TDB patch (10 μg/hour) applied 24 hours before surgery can be used as a postoperative analgesic for lumber fixation surgery without any drug-related adverse effect.

Comparison between Transdermal Buprenorphine and Transdermal Fentanyl for Postoperative Pain Relief after Major Abdominal Surgeries

INTRODUCTION

Opioid is generally regarded as an important part of multimodal, perioperative analgesia, especially for moderate to severe pain. Amongst the various modes of delivery transdermal route has several potential benefits over oral and parentral administration. These include noninvasive dosing, better absorption and lack of first-pass metabolism. A transdermal drug delivery system provides steady and continuous drug delivery resulting in steady plasma concentration. Bolus dosing of systemic analgesic results in supra and sub therapeutic plasma resulting in toxic and sub analgesic plasma drug concentration. It also improves patient compliance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients undergoing major abdominal surgery under GA were randomly divided in two groups (n=30). Group A received buprenorphine 10 mcg/h TDS and group B received 25 mcg/h fentanyl TDS, 6 hours prior to surgery. Patients were followed for three days for postoperative pain relief and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Baseline and demographic variables are comparable in both groups. The mean level of VAS was significantly lower in group B as compared to group A at Day 1, 2 and 3. The mean level of sedation score was significantly lower in Group B than Group A. Haemodynamic variables in both groups (SBP, DBP and HR), shows comparable values in both groups and no significant difference was observed. Five out of 30 (16.7%) patients in group A required single dose of rescue analgesic while 0 out of 30 patients (0.00%) in group B required rescue analgesic. This difference in rescue analgesic requirement in not quiet statistically significant (p-value 0.0522). Twenty percent patient in fentanyl group and 16.7% patients in buprenorphine group experienced some adverse effects. Nausea and vomiting were main side effects of the drugs. The incidence of nausea and vomiting were 6.7% and 10% in buprenorphine and fentanyl group respectively.

CONCLUSION

Fentanyl and buprenorphine TDS were effective and safe in controlling postoperative pain. Fentanyl is better than buprenorphine in this respect.

Opioid switch from low dose of oral oxycodone to transdermal fentanyl matrix patch for patients with stable thoracic malignancy-related pain

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of switch from oral oxycodone to fentanyl patch is little known. Here, we investigated if early phase opioid switch from low dose of oral oxycodone to transdermal fentanyl matrix patch provided any benefits for patients with thoracic malignancy and stable cancer-related pain.

METHODS

This open-label two-centered prospective study enrolled patients with thoracic malignancy suffering persistent malignancy-related pain with numeric rating scale of pain intensity ≤ 3 which had been controlled by oral oxycodone ≤ 20 mg/day. Eligible patients switched from oral oxycodone to 12.5 μg/h of transdermal fentanyl matrix patch. The dose was allowed to be titrated upwards every 3 day by 25-50%, except for the first increase from 12.5 μg/hr to 25 μg/hr,until achieving adequate pain control. The data on patients' global assessment scores measured on a five-step scale, an 11-point numeric rating scale of pain intensity, the severity of adverse effects using a four-point categorical rating scale, and the Epworth sleepiness scale questionnaire were collected for 15 days.

RESULTS

Forty-nine eligible patients were analyzed. Overall patients' satisfaction score significantly improved from day 1 (2.7 ± 0.9) to day 15 (2.3 ± 0.9) (p < 0.05), and 90% and 78% of patients remained to receive the minimum dose of fentanyl patch on day 8 and 15 from the opioid switch. There was a significant difference in sleepiness throughout the study period, though no difference was detected in pain intensity and other adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Transdermal fentanyl matrix patch is an alternative analgesic option for a stable cancer pain in patients with thoracic malignancies.

Fentanyl transdermal matrix patch (Durotep MT patch; Durogesic DTrans; Durogesic SMAT): in adults with cancer-related pain

The fentanyl transdermal matrix patch is approved in Japan for the management of moderate to severe cancer-related pain in adults. Bioequivalence, in terms of exposure and the maximum and minimum serum concentrations, has been established between the fentanyl transdermal matrix patch 16.8 mg (100microg/h) and the fentanyl transdermal reservoir patch 10 mg (100microg/h) after single and multiple applications. The fentanyl transdermal matrix patch 2.1-8.4 mg (12.5-50microg/h) effectively managed chronic cancer-related pain in adults in a noncomparative, multicentre, phase II study; 89.4% of recipients rated their global assessment of pain as 'very satisfied', 'satisfied' or 'neither satisfied nor dissatisfied'. Adults with cancer- or non-cancer-related chronic pain were switched from fentanyl transdermal reservoir patch to fentanyl transdermal matrix patch therapy without compromising efficacy; no differences in pain intensity or sleep interference scores were seen between the two formulations in an nonblind, multicentre, switching pilot study. Given the nature of the therapy, the tolerability profile of the fentanyl transdermal matrix patch was generally acceptable. Topical adverse events included erythema, application-site irritation and pruritus. In general, patients and physicians preferred the fentanyl transdermal matrix patch over the fentanyl transdermal reservoir patch in the pilot study.