1
|
Ceriani CEJ, Silberstein SD. Current and Emerging Pharmacotherapy for Menstrual Migraine: A Narrative Review. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:617-627. [PMID: 36946205 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2023.2194487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In this article, we discuss menstrual migraine (MM), which can be categorized as menstrually related migraine (MRM) or pure menstrual migraine (PMM). MM attacks are often longer, more severe, and harder to treat than other migraine attacks. Appropriate treatment strategies include acute treatment, short term preventive treatment, and daily preventive treatment, depending on the patient's pattern of migraine and occurrence of migraine outside the menstrual period. AREAS COVERED A PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Ovid search from inception to October 2022 provided articles relating to MM pathophysiology and treatment. EXPERT OPINION In patients for whom standard acute therapy is inadequate, short term or daily preventive treatment should be considered. Patients with PMM may be adequately managed with short term preventive treatment started 2 days prior to the onset of migraine and continued for 5-6 days. Frovatriptan is the mainstay of short-term prevention. Patients who experience additional attacks outside the menstrual period may benefit from daily preventive treatment. Estrogen-containing contraceptive treatment may be effective in appropriately selected patients. Emerging research on the pathophysiology of MM indicates that oxytocin agonists and CGRP antagonists may prove to be effective treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire E J Ceriani
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stephen D Silberstein
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Verhagen IE, Spaink HA, van der Arend BW, van Casteren DS, MaassenVanDenBrink A, Terwindt GM. Validation of diagnostic ICHD-3 criteria for menstrual migraine. Cephalalgia 2022; 42:1184-1193. [PMID: 35514214 PMCID: PMC9535967 DOI: 10.1177/03331024221099031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective To assess validity of ICHD-3 diagnostic criteria for menstrual migraine. Methods We performed a longitudinal E-diary study in premenopausal women with migraine. Menstrual migraine diagnosis was self-reported at baseline, and verified according to diary based ICHD-3 criteria and a previous proposed statistical model. Validity of self-reported menstrual migraine was compared to diary based diagnosis and statistical diagnosis. Test-retest reliability and concordance between both methods were determined. Clinical characteristics of perimenstrual and non-perimenstrual migraine attacks were compared in women with and without menstrual migraine. Results We included 607 women. Both women who did and women who did not self-report to suffer from menstrual migraine fulfilled ICHD-3 criteria in the E-diary in two thirds of cases. Pure menstrual migraine was extremely rare (<1%). Concordance between statistical and diary based diagnosis was minimal (κ = 0.28, 95% CI:0.23–0.33). Women diagnosed with menstrual migraine showed 37–50% longer attack duration and increased triptan intake (OR 1.19–1.22, p < 0.001) during perimenstrual attacks. Conclusion Self-reported menstrual migraine diagnosis has extremely poor accuracy. Two thirds of women suffer from menstrual migraine, independent of self-reports. Pure menstrual migraine is rare. Women with menstrual migraine have longer attack duration and increased triptan intake during perimenstrual attacks, in contrast to women without menstrual migraine. Prospective headache (E-)diaries are required for a menstrual migraine diagnosis, also in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris E Verhagen
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hermes Aj Spaink
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Britt Wh van der Arend
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne S van Casteren
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gisela M Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
This review examines gender prevalence in orofacial pain to elucidate underlying factors that can explain such differences. This review highlights how gender affects (1) the association of hormonal factors and pain modulation; (2) the genetic aspects influencing pain sensitivity and pain perception; (3) the role of resting blood pressure and pain threshold; and (4) the impact of sociocultural, environmental, and psychological factors on pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffry Rowland Shaefer
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Pain, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | - Shehryar Nasir Khawaja
- Department of Internal Medicine, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, 7A Block R-3 M.A. Johar Town, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Paula Furlan Bavia
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Pain, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Allais G, Chiarle G, Sinigaglia S, Benedetto C. Menstrual migraine: a review of current and developing pharmacotherapies for women. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2017; 19:123-136. [PMID: 29212383 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2017.1414182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine is one of the most common neurological disorders in the general population. It affects 18% of women and 6% of men. In more than 50% of women migraineurs the occurrence of migraine attacks correlates strongly with the perimenstrual period. Menstrual migraine is highly debilitating, less responsive to therapy, and attacks are longer than those not correlated with menses. Menstrual migraine requires accurate evaluation and targeted therapy, that we aim to recommend in this review. AREAS COVERED This review of the literature provides an overview of currently available pharmacological therapies (especially with triptans, anti-inflammatory drugs, hormonal strategies) and drugs in development (in particular those acting on calcitonin gene-related peptide) for the treatment of acute migraine attacks and the prophylaxis of menstrual migraine. The studies reviewed here were retrieved from the Medline database as of June 2017. EXPERT OPINION The treatment of menstrual migraine is highly complex. Accurate evaluation of its characteristics is prerequisite to selecting appropriate therapy. An integrated approach involving neurologists and gynecologists is essential for patient management and for continuous updating on new therapies under development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Allais
- a Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics , University of Turin, Women's Headache Center , Turin , Italy
| | - Giulia Chiarle
- a Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics , University of Turin, Women's Headache Center , Turin , Italy
| | - Silvia Sinigaglia
- a Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics , University of Turin, Women's Headache Center , Turin , Italy
| | - Chiara Benedetto
- a Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics , University of Turin, Women's Headache Center , Turin , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maasumi K, Tepper SJ, Kriegler JS. Menstrual Migraine and Treatment Options: Review. Headache 2016; 57:194-208. [DOI: 10.1111/head.12978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2015] [Revised: 08/20/2016] [Accepted: 08/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kasra Maasumi
- Department of Neurology Headache Center; University of California at San Francisco; San Francisco CA USA
| | - Stewart J. Tepper
- Department of Neurology; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth; Hanover NH USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Silberstein S, Patel S. Menstrual migraine: an updated review on hormonal causes, prophylaxis and treatment. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2014; 15:2063-70. [PMID: 25100506 DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2014.947959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In this article, we will discuss pure menstrual migraine without aura (PMM) and menstrually related migraine without aura (MRM). Depending on the frequency and severity of their attacks, patients with PMM will likely need an acute treatment and/or short-term preventive plan. Of note, with the use of acute treatments and short-term preventive therapy there is risk of medication overuse if the patient does have pure menstrual migraine and is being treated for menstrually related migraine. AREAS COVERED A PubMed, Cochrane Central, Medline, Ovid search provided articles relating to menstrual migraine pathophysiology and treatment. EXPERT OPINION Long-term daily preventive treatment should be considered for patients with MRM and those with severe PMM. Miniprophylaxis can be used in PMM rather than daily preventive treatment. When considering the use of short-term miniprophylaxis, sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, naratriptan, and frovatriptan have shown efficacy; however, frovatriptan appears to be the triptan of choice based on overall efficacy. Oral contraceptives may be considered if patients do not respond to or cannot tolerate typical migraine preventive medications. In patients with migraine with aura, oral contraceptives should be used with caution as this may add to the risk of stroke in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Silberstein
- Jefferson Headache Center , 900 Walnut St, Suite 200, Philadelphia PA 19107 , USA +1 215 955 2243 ;
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
The objective of this review is to provide an overview of menstrual migraine (MM) and of frovatriptan and to assess clinical trial data regarding the efficacy and safety of frovatriptan for the acute and short-term prophylaxis of MM. Randomized controlled trials comparing frovatriptan with placebo or a triptan comparator for the acute or prophylactic treatment of MM were selected for review. MM affects up to 60% of women with migraine. Compared with attacks at other times of the cycle, menstrual attacks are longer, more severe, less responsive to treatment, more likely to relapse, and more disabling than attacks at other times of the cycle. No drugs are licensed for acute treatment of MM; triptans are recommended for treatment of moderate to severe attacks for menstrual and nonmenstrual attacks. Perimenstrual prophylaxis is indicated for patients with predictable MM that does not respond to symptomatic treatment alone. Treatment is unlicensed, but options include triptans, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and hormone manipulation. Frovatriptan is distinctive from other triptans due to its long elimination half-life of 26 hours, which confers a longer duration of action. Post hoc analyses from randomized trials of MM show similar pain relief and pain-free rates for frovatriptan compared with other triptans (2 hours pain-free: relative risk [RR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–1.76) but significantly lower relapse rates (24 hours sustained pain-free: RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18–0.62). Data from randomized controlled trials show a significant reduction in risk of MM in women using frovatriptan 2.5 mg once daily (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.31–1.86) or twice daily (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.68–2.34) for perimenstrual prophylaxis compared with placebo. The twice daily dosing was more effective than once daily (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11–1.46). These findings support the use of frovatriptan as a first-line acute treatment for MM and for perimenstrual prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Anne MacGregor
- Barts Sexual Health Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Centre for Neuroscience and Trauma, Blizard Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Affiliation(s)
- Howard S. Jacobs
- Department of Pediatrics; University of Maryland; Baltimore MD USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shaefer JR, Holland N, Whelan JS, Velly AM. Pain and temporomandibular disorders: a pharmaco-gender dilemma. Dent Clin North Am 2013; 57:233-62. [PMID: 23570804 DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2013.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Gender is the biggest risk factor in the development of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and orofacial pain. Gender differences in pain thresholds, temporal summation, pain expectations, and somatic awareness exist in patients with chronic TMD or orofacial pain. There are gender differences in pharmacokenetics and pharmacodynamics of medications used to treat pain. A better understanding of the mechanisms that contribute to the increased incidence and persistence of chronic pain in females is needed. Future research will elucidate the sex effects on factors that protect against developing pain or prevent debilitating pain. Gender-based treatments for TMD and orofacial pain treatment will evolve from the translational research stimulated by this knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffry R Shaefer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hershey A, Horn P, Kabbouche M, O'Brien H, Powers S. Genomic expression patterns in menstrual-related migraine in adolescents. Headache 2012; 52:68-79. [PMID: 22220971 PMCID: PMC3265619 DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.02049.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exacerbation of migraine with menses is common in adolescent girls and women with migraine, occurring in up to 60% of females with migraine. These migraines are oftentimes longer and more disabling and may be related to estrogen levels and hormonal fluctuations. OBJECTIVE This study identifies the unique genomic expression pattern of menstrual-related migraine (MRM) in comparison to migraine occurring outside the menstrual period and headache-free controls. METHODS Whole blood samples were obtained from female subjects having an acute migraine during their menstrual period (MRM) or outside of their menstrual period (non-MRM) and controls (C)--females having a menstrual period without any history of headache. The messenger RNA was isolated from these samples, and genomic profile was assessed. Affymetrix Human Exon ST 1.0 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) arrays were used to examine the genomic expression pattern differences between these 3 groups. RESULTS Blood genomic expression patterns were obtained on 56 subjects (MRM = 18, non-MRM = 18, and controls = 20). Unique genomic expression patterns were observed for both MRM and non-MRM. For MRM, 77 genes were identified that were unique to MRM, while 61 genes were commonly expressed for MRM and non-MRM, and 127 genes appeared to have a unique expression pattern for non-MRM. In addition, there were 279 genes that differentially expressed for MRM compared to non-MRM that were not differentially expressed for non-MRM. Gene ontology of these samples indicated many of these groups of genes were functionally related and included categories of immunomodulation/inflammation, mitochondrial function, and DNA homeostasis. CONCLUSIONS Blood genomic patterns can accurately differentiate MRM from non-MRM. These results indicate that MRM involves a unique molecular biology pathway that can be identified with a specific biomarker and suggest that individuals with MRM have a different underlying genetic etiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Hershey
- Children's Hospital Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sullivan E, Bushnell C. Management of menstrual migraine: a review of current abortive and prophylactic therapies. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2011; 14:376-84. [PMID: 20697846 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-010-0138-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
After menarche, women have an increased prevalence of migraine compared to men. There is significant variability in the frequency and severity of migraine throughout the menstrual cycle. Women report migraines occur more frequently during menses, and that those are more severe than other migraines. This creates a unique challenge of effectively treating menstrually related and pure menstrual migraines. As with treatment of other migraines, both abortive and prophylactic treatment regimens are used. Triptans demonstrate efficacy in the abortive management of menstrually related and pure menstrual migraines. For migraines that occur primarily during menses or that are particularly resistant to other therapies, intermittent prophylactic therapies can be used. Naproxen and estrogens have been studied for this use. More recently, triptans have been examined and have shown efficacy for intermittent prophylaxis of menstrual migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Sullivan
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
MacGregor EA, Pawsey SP, Campbell JC, Hu X. Safety and tolerability of frovatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine and prevention of menstrual migraine: Results of a new analysis of data from five previously published studies. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010; 7:88-108. [PMID: 20435272 DOI: 10.1016/j.genm.2010.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/26/2010] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triptans are a recommended first-line treatment for moderate to severe migraine. OBJECTIVE Using clinical trial data, we evaluated the safety and tolerability of frovatriptan as acute treatment (AT) and as short-term preventive (STP) therapy for menstrual migraine (MM). METHODS Data from 2 Phase III AT trials (AT1: randomized, placebo controlled, 1 attack; AT2: 12-months, noncomparative, open label) and 3 Phase IIIb STP trials in MM (MMP1 and MMP2: randomized, placebo controlled, double blind, 3 perimenstrual periods; MMP3: open label, noncomparative, 12 perimenstrual periods) were analyzed. In AT1, patients treated each attack with frovatriptan 2.5 mg, sumatriptan 100 mg, or placebo. In AT2, they used frovatriptan 2.5 mg. In MMP1 and MMP2, women administered frovatriptan 2.5 mg for 6 days during the perimenstrual period, taking a loading dose of 2 or 4 tablets on day 1, followed by once-daily or BID frovatriptan 2.5 mg, respectively; in MMP3, they used BID frovatriptan 2.5 mg. In AT1, which was previously published in part, group differences in adverse events (AEs) were analyzed using the Fisher exact test, and response rates were compared using logistic regression. Post hoc analyses of sustained pain-free status with no AEs (SNAE) and sustained pain response with no AEs (SPRNAE) were performed using a 2-sample test for equality of proportions without continuity correction. For AT2 and the STP studies, data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results of individual safety analyses for the STP studies were previously reported; the present report includes new results from a pooled analysis of MMP1 and MMP2 and a new analysis of MMP3 in which AEs were coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities version 8.0. RESULTS AT1 included 1206 patients in the safety group; AT2 included 496. In the STP studies, safety data were collected for 1487 women. In AT1 and AT2, 85.6% and 88.3%, respectively, of enrolled patients were women. Overall, AEs were generally mild to moderate (AT studies: 82.3%-90.0%; STP studies: 78.9%89.5%). In AT1, 27.3% (131/480) of frovatriptan patients, 33.4% (161/482) of sumatriptan patients, and 14.8% (36/244) of placebo patients experienced an AE considered possibly or probably related to treatment (P < 0.001 for either drug vs placebo).There were no significant differences between frovatriptan and sumatriptan in SNAE at 4 to 24 hours or in SPRNAE at 2 to 24 hours or at 4 to 24 hours. In randomized, controlled STP trials for MM, AEs were reported by 57.8% (166/287, BID) and 63.4% (210/331, once daily) of frovatriptan users versus 62.8% (216/344) of placebo recipients. There were no consistent differences in AEs reported by patients with potential cardiovascular risk or in AEs related to the use of estrogencontaining contraceptives (ECCs). CONCLUSIONS In randomized controlled trials and 12-month open-label studies, frovatriptan was well tolerated in these women during AT and STP therapy for MM. Subgroup analyses provide preliminary evidence of tolerability in women using ECCs and in women with comorbidities that do not contraindicate triptan use but may be suggestive of cardiovascular risk.
Collapse
|
13
|
Marcus DA, Bernstein CD, Sullivan EA, Rudy TE. Perimenstrual eletriptan prevents menstrual migraine: an open-label study. Headache 2010; 50:551-62. [PMID: 20236337 DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01628.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To prospectively evaluate the efficacy of perimenstrual prophylaxis with eletriptan to reduce headaches in women identified with menstrual migraine (MM). METHODS Female migraineurs self-reporting a substantial relationship between migraine and menses were evaluated with 3 consecutive months of daily headache recording diaries. A relationship between menses and migraine was evaluated using International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-II) criteria and a probability model called Probability MM. Women prospectively diagnosed with ICHD-II MM were treated for 3 consecutive months with perimenstrual eletriptan 20 mg 3 times daily starting 2 days prior to the expected onset of menstruation and continued for a total of 6 days. Headache activity was compared during the 3 months of recording prior to eletriptan therapy and 3 months with eletriptan perimenstrual prevention therapy. RESULTS Three months of pretreatment prospective diaries were completed by 126 women. ICHD-II menstrually related migraine was diagnosed in 74%, with pure MM in 7%. Among those women diagnosed with ICHD-II MM, 61 completed at least 1 treatment month. Overall change in headache activity was a 46% decrease. The mean percentage of treated menses without migraine occurring during the 6 days of treatment was 71%. The percentage of subjects with 1, 2, and 3 migraine-free menstrual periods (no migraines occurring 2 days before menses through the first 3 days of menstruation) with eletriptan, respectively, were 14%, 19%, and 53%. Among those subjects who remained headache-free during the 6 days of eletriptan treatment, migraine occurred during the 3 days immediately after discontinuing eletriptan for 9%. Perimenstrual eletriptan was generally tolerated and no abnormalities were identified on the 6(th) day of treatment using either blood pressure recording or electrocardiogram. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with prospectively identified MM, eletriptan 20 mg 3 times daily effectively reduced MM. A significant reduction in headache activity occurred for 53% of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn A Marcus
- Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
MacGregor EA, Brandes JL, Silberstein S, Jeka S, Czapinski P, Shaw B, Pawsey S. Safety and tolerability of short-term preventive frovatriptan: a combined analysis. Headache 2010; 49:1298-314. [PMID: 19788471 DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01513.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and tolerability profile of the 5-HT(1B/1D) agonist frovatriptan (Frova(R), Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Chadds Ford, PA, USA) when used as a 6-day regimen for the short-term prevention of menstrual migraine scheduled over multiple perimenstrual periods. BACKGROUND Two randomized controlled trials have established the efficacy of a 6-day regimen of frovatriptan for reducing the incidence and severity of menstrual migraine over 1 to 3 perimenstrual periods; long-term data are needed to further assess the safety and tolerability profile of this regimen. METHODS Two multinational trials were included in the analysis: Study 1 was a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind parallel trial (3 perimenstrual periods treated) with an open-label extension (3 additional perimenstrual periods treated), and Study 2 was a long-term (12 perimenstrual periods treated over 12-15 months) open-label study. Enrolled women experienced menstrual migraine defined as predictable migraine attacks that started -2 days to +3 (Study 1) or +4 (Study 2) days relative to the first day of menses and that occurred in at least 2 out of 3 menstrual cycles. Frovatriptan or placebo was given 2 days before anticipated menstrual migraine and continued for 6 days. Adverse events, serious adverse events, vital signs, cardiovascular events, electrocardiograms, and laboratory parameters were assessed and recorded periodically and summarized using descriptive statistics. Adverse event data from Study 1 and Study 2 were compared using event rates. RESULTS The demographic characteristics of the 2 study populations were similar: the mean age was approximately 38 years, > or =94% of participants were white, and 85% reported menstrual migraine began on days -2 to +1 of the menstrual cycle. The mean reported history of menstrual migraine was approximately 11 years. A large percentage of the respective safety populations completed each study or study period: 87% (362/416) and 88% (273/309) completed the double-blind period and open-label periods of Study 1, respectively, and 59% (308/525) completed treatment of 12 perimenstrual periods in Study 2. Major reasons for discontinuation in Study 1 included adverse events (5%, double-blind period) and "other" (10% double-blind period and 5% open-label period). In Study 2, major reasons for discontinuation included patient request (17.3%) and adverse event (10.2%). The most common treatment emergent adverse events in the double-blind period of Study 1 (placebo vs frovatriptan twice daily) were upper respiratory infection (9% vs 9%), nausea (6% vs 8%), dizziness (7% vs 7%), fatigue (4% vs 7%), dysmenorrhea (3% vs 7%), influenza (3% vs 6%), neck pain (4% vs 6%), and migraine (4% vs 4%). With the exception of migraine (which was reported using a different method in each study), prevalence rates for Studies 1 and 2 were numerically similar. The most frequently reported cardiovascular adverse events during double-blind treatment (placebo vs frovatriptan twice daily) were chest discomfort (2% and 3%), chest pain (2% and 2%), and hypertension (0 and 2%). The corresponding adverse event rates in Study 2 were 2% (chest pain), 3% (chest discomfort), and 3% (hypertension). In both studies, most adverse events were of mild or moderate intensity and their incidence numerically declined with each perimenstrual period/cycle, as did the incidence of menstrual migraine. The observed rate of intercurrent migraine in Study 2 over 12 perimenstrual periods was 1.5 per month, compared with 1.7 at baseline. There was no observable increase in the first occurrence of migraine in the 5 days following the perimenstrual period, indicating a lack of rebound headache. CONCLUSIONS During treatment of up to 12 perimenstrual periods over a 12- to 15-month period, the safety and tolerability of frovatriptan for short-term prevention of menstrual migraine was similar to that observed with acute use of triptans. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate in severity, there was no evidence of an increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events relative to acute treatment, and rebound headache was not evident. A short-term regimen with frovatriptan presents a safe and viable treatment option for preventing predictable migraine such as menstrual migraine.
Collapse
|