Effect of trimetazidine on the functional capacity of ischemic heart disease patients not suitable for revascularization: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

To explore the effect of adding trimetazidine to other anti-anginal drugs on the functional capacity of ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients not suitable for revascularization when compared to first-line antianginal drugs alone.

Methods

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for English-language peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing trimetazidine with first-line antianginal drugs alone or with placebo in IHD patients not suitable for revascularization and were included in this review. Quality of studies were assessed using the Cochrane collaboration “risk of bias” tool.

Results

Six RCTs, three were crossover studies. A total of 312 participants were included in this review. Overall quality of studies was moderate. Two studies found improvement in the 6-minute walking test (6-MWT) [standardized mean differences (SMD) 1.75; 95% CI 1.35 to 2.14; p <0.001], and two trials found improvement in the Canadian cardiovascular society (CCS) grading of angina class (SMD -1.37; 95% CI -1.89 to -0.84) in the trimetazidine group. Three of the better-quality trials found no increase in total exercise duration (TED) (SMD 0.34; 95% CI -0.10 to 0.78; p < 0.13). Significant heterogeneity was identified among trials describing outcomes for the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF %).

Conclusion

Trimetazidine improve walking time and angina severity in IHD patients not suitable for revascularization. Due to the inconsistency of available evidence, RCTs targeting IHD patients with “no option” to undergo coronary revascularization is required to clarify this review question.

Selection of optimal therapy for chronic stable angina

Patients with chronic stable angina (CSA) seek a medical opinion for relief of their symptoms and because of fear of having a heart attack. The underlying lesion responsible for CSA is often a severe narrowing of one or more coronary arteries. In addition, the coronary arteries of patients with CSA contain many more nonobstructive lesions, which progress at variable rates, and are prone to rupture and may manifest as acute coronary syndromes (myocardial infarction , unstable angina , or sudden ischemic death). Most patients with CSA can be managed with medical treatment. For angina relief, optimum doses of one of the antianginal drugs (beta blockers , long-acting organic nitrates, or calcium channel blockers ) should be used. If the patient remains symptomatic, combination treatment of BBs plus nitrates or BBs plus dihydropyridine CCBs, or nondihydropyridine CCBs plus nitrates should be tried. Triple therapy has not been shown to be more effective than treatment with two agents. To reduce the incidence of MI, UA, and sudden ischemic death, treatment strategies should include smoking cessation, daily aspirin, daily exercise, and pharmacologic therapy for dyslipidemias, and for elevated blood pressure. Patients who remain symptomatic despite medical therapy and those not willing to take or unable to tolerate antianginal drugs should be considered for percutaneous or surgical coronary revascularization. Patients who do not respond to medical therapy and are not candidates for a revascularization procedure may be considered for additional treatment with trimetazidine or nicorandil (these drugs are not available in the United States or approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, but are available in some other countries). Ranolazine also looks promising but is not yet available for clinical use. As a last resort, enhanced external counterpulsation, spinal cord stimulation, sympathectomy, or direct transmyocardial revascularization should be considered for symptom relief.