Intravascular brachytherapy: indications and management of adverse events

Is Coronary Brachytherapy Staging a Comeback for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The catheter-based coronary intervention has become a well-established therapeutic modality for obstructive coronary artery disease. However, in-stent restenosis remains a significant limitation of coronary intervention despite the use of newer devices. Intravascular brachytherapy was introduced to treat recurrent in-stent restenosis but only modestly adopted. This review will discuss the mechanism of intracoronary brachytherapy, available clinical evidence of brachytherapy in recurrent in-stent restenosis treatment, and the future of coronary brachytherapy in coronary intervention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Drug-eluting stents have an inherent limitation as they leave a permanent metal layer inside an artery when deployed. Recently, drug-coated balloon technology has emerged to treat coronary artery disease as a combination of balloon angioplasty and local drug delivery without leaving a metal layer behind. Recent European guidelines recommended using drug-coated balloons when treating in-stent restenosis treatment, while the US guidelines have not yet addressed the use of drug-coated balloons in such cases. Coronary brachytherapy is a valuable addition to treat these challenging diseases despite several logistic issues. If there are newer technologies with easier setup, such as drug-coated balloons, coronary brachytherapy resurgence is improbable in the contemporary era, although it may not become obsolete.

Dose perturbation caused by stents: experiments with a model 90Sr/90Y source

PURPOSE

Biological effects of intravascular brachytherapy are very sensitive to discrepancies between the prescription and the applied dose. If brachytherapy is aimed at in-stent restenosis, shielding and shadowing effects of metallic stents may change the dose distribution relative to that produced by the bare source. The development of new generations of stents inspired us to a new experimental study in this field. The effect was studied for 14 stents which we have recently encountered in clinical practice.

METHODS

The model source was a continuous 20-mm column of (90)Sr/(90)Y solution sealed in a 1-mm-I.D. Plexiglas capillary. The dose distribution in the Plexiglas phantom was mapped using GafChromic MD-55-2 film. The stent masses varied from 2.5 to 25 mg; the strut thicknesses, from 0.075 to 0.15 mm; and the atomic numbers of stent materials, from 24 (Cr) to 79 (Au).

RESULTS

Dose perturbations depend on a variety of stent features. Local reduction of the mean dose rates near the reference distance (r(0) = 2 mm) varied from 11% to 47%. No simple correlation was found between these data and stent characteristics, but it seems that the atomic number of the stent material is less important than the strut thickness and mesh density.

CONCLUSION

The results provide a warning that clinical indications for in-stent radiation therapy must always be confronted with another aspect of the patient's history: the kind of implanted stent. Intravascular brachytherapy using pure beta sources may be recommended only for patients "wearing" light, thin-strut stents. The presence of thick-strut stents is a contraindication for this modality, due to excessive dose perturbation.

La radiothérapie des affections bénignes : quelles indications huit ans plus tard ?

The authors present an update version of the indications for radiotherapy in the management of benign diseases. This is based on available randomized trials and recent international meetings. Validated indications remain the prevention of resected heterotopic bone ossifications, keloïds scars and pterygium and also treatment of arteriovenous malformations; the place of radiotherapy for malignant exophtalmia is more and more restricted. Randomized trials have demonstrated the efficacy of endobrachytherapy in the prevention of restenosis after angioplasty but the use of embedded stent has replaced this indication. Macular degeneration is no more an indication of radiotherapy. Quality requirements for radiotherapy are identical for benign or malignant indications.