Acute gastroenteritis in children: role of anti-emetic medication for gastroenteritis-related vomiting

Lipidomics reveals the significance and mechanism of the cellular ceramide metabolism for rotavirus replication

As one of the most important causative agents of severe gastroenteritis in children, piglets, and other young animals, species A rotaviruses have adversely impacted both human health and the global swine industry. Vaccines against rotaviruses (RVs) are insufficiently effective, and no specific treatment is available. To understand the relationships between porcine RV (PoRV) infection and enterocytes in terms of the cellular lipid metabolism, we performed an untargeted liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) lipidomics analysis of PoRV-infected IPEC-J2 cells. Herein, a total of 451 lipids (263 upregulated lipids and 188 downregulated lipids), spanning sphingolipid, glycerolipid, and glycerophospholipids, were significantly altered compared with the mock-infected group. Interestingly, almost all the ceramides among these lipids were upregulated during PoRV infection. LC-MS analysis was used to validated the lipidomics data and demonstrated that PoRV replication increased the levels of long-chain ceramides (C16-ceramide, C18-ceramide, and C24-ceramide) in cells. Furthermore, we found that these long-chain ceramides markedly inhibited PoRV infection and that their antiviral actions were exerted in the replication stage of PoRV infection. Moreover, downregulation of endogenous ceramides with the ceramide metabolic inhibitors enhanced PoRV propagation. Increasing the levels of ceramides by the addition of C6-ceramide strikingly suppressed the replication of diverse RV strains. We further found that the treatment with an apoptotic inhibitor could reverse the antiviral activity of ceramide against PoRV replication, demonstrating that ceramide restricted RV infection by inducing apoptosis. Altogether, this study revealed that ceramides played an antiviral role against RV infection, providing potential approaches for the development of antiviral therapies.IMPORTANCERotaviruses (RVs) are among the most important zoonosis viruses, which mainly infected enterocytes of the intestinal epithelium causing diarrhea in children and the young of many mammalian and avian species. Lipids play an essential role in viral infection. A comprehensive understanding of the interaction between RV and lipid metabolism in the enterocytes will be helpful to control RV infection. Here, we mapped changes in enterocyte lipids following porcine RV (PoRV) infection using an untargeted lipidomics approach. We found that PoRV infection altered the metabolism of various lipid species, especially ceramides (derivatives of the sphingosine). We further demonstrated that PoRV infection increased the accumulation of ceramides and that ceramides exerted antiviral effects on RV replication by inducing apoptosis. Our findings fill a gap in understanding the alterations of lipid metabolism in RV-infected enterocytes and highlight the antiviral effects of ceramides on RV infection, suggesting potential approaches to control RV infection.

Pilot Study of Ondansetron in Improvement of Pediatric Colonoscopy Preparation Outcomes at an Urban Academic Center

Objectives

To gather initial data on the effectiveness and tolerability of the addition of Ondansetron to bowel preparation regimens to justify a funded, larger, placebo-controlled study.

Methods

Design, Setting, and Participants:: A total of 41 pediatric and young adult (age 2-22) patients participated in a single center, open label, parallel randomized trial, with simple randomization. All patients were recruited as outpatients, and all procedures occurred as outpatient procedures, with both recruitment and procedures occurring at a low-resource urban academic medical center in Brooklyn.Interventions and Outcome Measures:: The intervention studied was a single dose of oral-dissolving tablet Ondansetron provided before initiation of bowel preparation using a standardized prep of Polyethylene Glycol 3350 and Bisacodyl. There were 2 arms, a study arm using typical preparation (Polyethylene Glycol 3350 and Bisacodyl) and Ondansetron, and a control arm (Polyethylene Glycol 3350 and Bisacodyl). Patients received standard weight-based dosing. The primary outcome measure assessed was the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) to assess efficacy of preparation. Secondary objectives included evaluation of patient satisfaction via a survey answered by each patient. The questionnaire assessed the presence of the following symptoms during bowel prep: abdominal pain, nausea, bloating, vomiting, scale of ease/difficulty, and if the entire bowel prep was completed.

Results

No benefit to BBPS from the addition of Ondansetron to bowel preparation was observed. Statistically significant improvement in reports of abdominal pain (35% decrease in Ondansetron arm) was noted with a P = 0.019. No statistically significant improvement was noted in other symptoms although all domains showed nonsignificant improvement in the Ondansetron arm.

Conclusion

No benefit to efficacy of preparation as measured by the BBPS was observed. A single dose of Ondansetron before bowel preparation reduced reports of abdominal pain by 35%, with other symptomatic improvements suggesting possible improvements to be confirmed by a higher-powered study. Trial registration: NCT05439772.

Antiemetic effects of sclareol, possibly through 5-HT3 and D2 receptor interaction pathways: In-vivo and in-silico studies

BACKGROUND

Emesis is a complex physiological phenomenon that serves as a defense against numerous toxins, stressful situations, adverse medication responses, chemotherapy, and movement. Nevertheless, preventing emesis during chemotherapy or other situations is a significant issue for researchers. Hence, the majority view contends that successfully combining therapy is the best course of action. In-vivo analysis offers a more comprehensive grasp of how compounds behave within a complex biological environment, whereas in-silico evaluation refers to the use of computational models to forecast biological interactions.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the effects of Sclareol (SCL) on copper sulphate-induced emetic chicks and to investigate the combined effects of these compounds using a conventional co-treatment approach and in-silico study.

METHODS

SCL (5, 10, and 15 mg/kg) administered orally with or without pre-treatment with anti-emetic drugs (Ondansetron (ODN): 24 mg/kg, Domperidone (DOM): 80 mg/kg, Hyoscine butylbromide (HYS): 100 mg/kg, and Promethazine hydrochloride (PRO): 100 mg/kg) to illustrate the effects and the potential involvement with 5HT3, D2, M3/AChM, H1, or NK1 receptors by SCL. Furthermore, an in-silico analysis was conducted to forecast the role of these receptors in the emetic process.

RESULTS

The results suggest that SCL exerted a dose-dependent anti-emetic effect on the chicks. Pretreatment with SCL-10 significantly minimized the number of retches and lengthened the emesis tendency of the experimental animals. SCL-10 significantly increased the anti-emetic effects of ODN and DOM. However, compared to the ODN-treated group, (SCL-10 + ODN) group considerably (p < 0.0001) extended the latency duration (109.40 ± 1.03 s) and significantly (p < 0.01) decreased the number of retches (20.00 ± 0.70), indicating an anti-emetic effect on the test animals. In in-silico analysis, SCL exhibited promising binding affinities with suggesting receptors.

CONCLUSION

SCL-10 exerted an inhibitory-like effect on emetic chicks, probably through the interaction of the 5HT3 and D2 receptors. Further studies are highly appreciated to validate this study and determine the precise mechanism(s) behind the anti-emetic effects of SCL. We expect that SCL-10 may be utilized as an antiemetic treatment in a single dosage form or that it may function as a synergist with other traditional medicines.

Vaccination of pregnant rhesus monkeys with inactivated rotavirus as a model for achieving protection from rotavirus SA11 infection in the offspring

Live-attenuated rotavirus vaccine has shown low protection in underdeveloped or developing countries. However, the inactivated rotavirus vaccine may have the potential to overcome some of these challenges. In the present study, the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a bivalent inactivated rotavirus vaccine by parenteral administration were elevated in a neonatal rhesus monkey model. A bivalent inactivated rotavirus vaccine containing G1P[8] (ZTR-68 strain) and G9P[8] (ZTR-18 strain) was administered to pregnant rhesus monkeys twice at an interval of 14 days. Neutralizing antibodies against RV strains ZTR-68, ZTR-18, SA11, WA, UK, and Gottfried emerged in pregnant rhesus monkeys and were transplacentally transmitted to the offspring. In the vaccine group, clinical symptoms of diarrhea, viral load in the gut tissue and histopathological changes were significantly reduced in the neonatal rhesus monkeys following oral challenge with the SA11 strain.

Phytochemicals from Plant Foods as Potential Source of Antiviral Agents: An Overview

To date, the leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide include viral infections, such as Ebola, influenza virus, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and recently COVID-19 disease, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Currently, we can count on a narrow range of antiviral drugs, especially older generation ones like ribavirin and interferon which are effective against viruses in vitro but can often be ineffective in patients. In addition to these, we have antiviral agents for the treatment of herpes virus, influenza virus, HIV and hepatitis virus. Recently, drugs used in the past especially against ebolavirus, such as remdesivir and favipiravir, have been considered for the treatment of COVID-19 disease. However, even if these drugs represent important tools against viral diseases, they are certainly not sufficient to defend us from the multitude of viruses present in the environment. This represents a huge problem, especially considering the unprecedented global threat due to the advancement of COVID-19, which represents a potential risk to the health and life of millions of people. The demand, therefore, for new and effective antiviral drugs is very high. This review focuses on three fundamental points: (1) presents the main threats to human health, reviewing the most widespread viral diseases in the world, thus describing the scenario caused by the disease in question each time and evaluating the specific therapeutic remedies currently available. (2) It comprehensively describes main phytochemical classes, in particular from plant foods, with proven antiviral activities, the viruses potentially treated with the described phytochemicals. (3) Consideration of the various applications of drug delivery systems in order to improve the bioavailability of these compounds or extracts. A PRISMA flow diagram was used for the inclusion of the works. Taking into consideration the recent dramatic events caused by COVID-19 pandemic, the cry of alarm that denounces critical need for new antiviral drugs is extremely strong. For these reasons, a continuous systematic exploration of plant foods and their phytochemicals is necessary for the development of new antiviral agents capable of saving lives and improving their well-being.

Paediatrics: how to manage viral gastroenteritis

Background

Viral gastroenteritis is the most common diarrhoeal disorder seen in general practice and emergency departments. This article aims to provide a narrative updated review on the evaluation and management of viral gastroenteritis in children.

Methods

A PubMed search was performed with Clinical Queries using the key term 'viral gastroenteritis'. The search strategy included clinical trials, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, observational studies and reviews. The search was restricted to the English literature and the paediatric population.

Results

Acute viral gastroenteritis is usually self-limiting. However, it can lead to dehydration and electrolyte imbalance if not properly treated. Adequate fluids containing physiological concentrations of glucose and electrolytes should be provided to compensate for gastrointestinal losses and cover maintenance needs. Oral rehydration therapy is as effective as intravenous (IV) fluid therapy for rehydration for children with mild-to-moderate dehydration. Measurements of serum electrolytes, creatinine and glucose are usually not necessary and should only be considered in a subset of children with severe dehydration who require hospitalization and IV therapy. Judicious use of ondansetron can increase the success rate of oral rehydration therapy and minimize the need for IV therapy and hospitalization.

Conclusion

Acute viral gastroenteritis is associated with substantial morbidity in developed countries and significant mortality in developing countries. Physicians should educate caregivers on proper personal hygiene and handwashing to prevent faecal to oral transmission of the pathogen as well as the importance of rotavirus vaccine in the prevention of rotavirus gastroenteritis. Several norovirus vaccines are currently undergoing clinical trials with promising results. It is hoped that development of an effective norovirus vaccine will further reduce the incidence of viral gastroenteritis.

Single-dose of ondansetron for vomiting in children and adolescents with acute gastroenteritis-an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

This review aimed to meta-analyze evidence of efficacy and safety of one single dose of ondansetron for vomiting in children and adolescents with acute gastroenteritis. Database searches of MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus (Elsevier), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov up to November 2019 were performed. Only randomized clinical trials versus placebo were considered. Fixed and random effect models were used for the analyses of pooled data. Thirteen randomized clinical trials (2146 patients) were finally included. One single dose of ondansetron showed to produce (1) higher chance of vomiting cessation within 8 h (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.19-1.68; low-quality evidence); (2) lower chances of oral rehydration therapy failure (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.34-0.55; high-quality evidence), intravenous hydration needs (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.34-0.57; high-quality evidence), and hospitalization rates within 8 h (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.75; high-quality evidence); and (3) no statistically significant differences in return visits to emergency department (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.74-1.76; high-quality evidence) compared with placebo. Further studies are necessary to better assess long term efficacy and safety of ondansetron in this context.Conclusions: Mixed evidence was found via few studies about the efficacy and safety of a single dose of ondansetron in the pediatric population.What is known:• Ondansetron use for vomiting in pediatric acute gastroenteritis is increasing worldwide.• Actual convictions come from studies evaluating one and more than one dose of the drug.What is new:• This is the first review to collect data about the effects of one single dose of ondansetron on strong and temporally homogeneous clinical outcomes.• This study supports the use of one dose of ondansetron in pediatric acute gastroenteritis.• Further studies are necessary to assess its long-term efficacy and safety.

Travelers' Diarrhea: A Clinical Review

Background:

Travelers’ diarrhea is the most common travel-related malady. It affects millions of international travelers to developing countries annually and can significantly disrupt travel plans.

Objective:

To provide an update on the evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of traveler’s diar-rhea.

Methods:

A PubMed search was completed in Clinical Queries using the key term “traveler’s diarrhea”. The search strategy included meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, observational studies, and reviews. The search was restricted to English literature. Patents were searched using the key term “traveler’s diarrhea” from www.freepatentsonline.com.

Results:

Between 10% and 40% of travelers develop diarrhea. The attack rate is highest for travelers from a developed country who visit a developing country. Children are at particular risk. Travelers’ diarrhea is usually acquired through ingestion of food and water contaminated by feces. Most cases are due to a bac-terial pathogen, commonly, Escherichia coli, and occur within the first few days after arrival in a foreign country. Dehydration is the most common complication. Pretravel education on hygiene and on the safe selection of food items is important in minimizing episodes. For mild travelers’ diarrhea, the use of antibi-otic is not recommended. The use of bismuth subsalicylate or loperamide may be considered. For moder-ate travelers’ diarrhea, antibiotics such as fluoroquinolones, azithromycin, and rifaximin may be used. Loperamide may be considered as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy. For severe travelers’ diarrhea, antibiotics such as azithromycin, fluoroquinolones, and rifaximin should be used. Azithromycin can be used even for the treatment of dysentery whereas fluoroquinolones and rifaximin cannot be used for such purpose. Recent patents related to the management of travelers’ diarrhea are discussed.

Conclusion:

Although travelers’ diarrhea is usually self-limited, many travelers prefer expedient relief of diarrhea, especially when they are traveling for extended periods by air or ground. Judicious use of an antimotility agent and antimicrobial therapy reduces the duration and severity of diarrhea.

Concussion: A Global Perspective

Concussion, also referred to as mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI), is a common pediatric condition. This article reviews global perspectives on the epidemiology, treatment, and prognosis of concussion in children. A Pubmed search was conducted using Clinical Queries with the key terms "concussion" and "mild traumatic brain injury," and the search was limited to "children." The search strategy included meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and reviews. The majority of publications were from Canada and the United States. Prevalence estimates vary widely according to case definition and studied population. Due to under-reporting and to the widely varying definitions of concussion, it is difficult to estimate how common the condition is. Common causes of concussions include sports injuries, motor vehicle collisions, bicycle accidents, falls, and assaults. Diagnosis is mainly clinical. Because concussion results from a disturbance in brain function rather than structural injury, neuroimaging studies, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, are not routinely recommended. Treatment generally involves physical and cognitive rest, with a gradual return to activities, whereas prolonged rest may actually worsen outcomes. Helmets when bicycling, skiing, snowboarding, motor biking, placing age limits on certain types of contact sports, and encouragement of fair play are recommended to decrease the impact of head injuries but they do not prevent concussions. Overall outcomes are generally favorable. The symptoms and signs of concussion usually resolve within 10 days; most patients recover in 48-72 hours. Global perspectives on management and prognosis are lacking. Concussions or MTBIs are common childhood injuries and the prognosis is good but information is predominantly from Canada and the USA. Research in other countries in particular low and middle income countries is vital to have a global perspective on MTBI.

Rotavirus infection

Rotavirus infections are a leading cause of severe, dehydrating gastroenteritis in children <5 years of age. Despite the global introduction of vaccinations for rotavirus over a decade ago, rotavirus infections still result in >200,000 deaths annually, mostly in low-income countries. Rotavirus primarily infects enterocytes and induces diarrhoea through the destruction of absorptive enterocytes (leading to malabsorption), intestinal secretion stimulated by rotavirus non-structural protein 4 and activation of the enteric nervous system. In addition, rotavirus infections can lead to antigenaemia (which is associated with more severe manifestations of acute gastroenteritis) and viraemia, and rotavirus can replicate in systemic sites, although this is limited. Reinfections with rotavirus are common throughout life, although the disease severity is reduced with repeat infections. The immune correlates of protection against rotavirus reinfection and recovery from infection are poorly understood, although rotavirus-specific immunoglobulin A has a role in both aspects. The management of rotavirus infection focuses on the prevention and treatment of dehydration, although the use of antiviral and anti-emetic drugs can be indicated in some cases.

Estimating the excess of inappropriate prescriptions of anti-dopaminergic anti-emetics during acute gastroenteritis epidemics in France

PURPOSE

Anti-dopaminergic anti-emetics (ADA) use for the treatment of nausea associated with gastroenteritis (GE) can be considered inappropriate, as their effects are not supported by evidence of clinical efficacy and can potentially induce serious adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

This study quantifies the suboptimal consumption of ADA attributable to seasonal GE epidemics in France and its cost.

METHODS

GE epidemiological data were collected and transmitted by the general practitioners (GPs) of Sentinelles network. Epidemic periods were identified by periodic regression. Drug sales data were obtained from pharmacies, and costs data were obtained from the French National Social Security. The ADA use and costs incurred by seasonal GE epidemics were calculated.

RESULTS

During the epidemic periods considered in this study, the median age of patients seen by GPs for GE was 24 years old. During each epidemic, a sale increase by 14% for domperidone, by 15% for metoclopramide and 30% for metopimazine was observed. The average cost attributable to seasonal GE epidemic was 5,030,000 Euros, of which 2,160,000 Euros were incurred by the French National Social Security.

CONCLUSION

Linking epidemiological databases helped to identify and quantify inappropriate ADA prescriptions. GE treatment guidelines should be disseminated more widely.

Clinical and economic impact of oral ondansetron for vomiting in a pediatric emergency department

In this study, we determine the clinical impact of 1 dose of oral ondansetron for children with vomiting and evaluate the economic consequences of its use. The strategies compared were administering oral ondansetron in addition to oral rehydration therapy (group A) versus oral rehydration solution alone (group B) in children attended to for vomiting in a pediatric emergency department. The study population was 1871 children between 0 and 14 years of age treated for vomiting during a 2-year period (2009-2010). Outcome measures were need for intravenous rehydration, length of stay in the emergency department, return visits, and hospitalization. Estimates of the costs in the emergency department and hospitalization were derived from administrative databases. During the study period, 580 (31%) of 1871 patients received oral rehydration therapy. Oral ondansetron before oral rehydration solution was used in 109 (18.8%) of 580 patients. An equal number of patients not receiving ondansetron were randomized and analyzed for comparison (group B). Patients of group A had a significantly decreased risk of hospitalization (relative risk, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.63) and intravenous rehydration (relative risk, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.63), but there were no differences in the length of stay or return visits to the emergency department. There were no differences in the medical costs between both groups in the emergency department (US $22,078 vs US $21,987, respectively). The hospitalization cost was US $9600 for group A and US $25,079 for group B, providing a 73.7% saving. In conclusion, the administration of oral ondansetron to children with vomiting in the emergency department is clinically effective and results in significant economic savings.

The use of ondansetron for nausea and vomiting after head injury and its effect on return rates from the pediatric ED

BACKGROUND

The use of ondansetron in children with vomiting after a head injury has not been well studied. Concern about masking serious injury is a potential barrier to its use.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of ondansetron in children with head injury and symptoms of vomiting in the pediatric emergency department (PED) and its effect on return rates and masking of more serious injuries.

DESIGN/METHODS

Visits to 2 PEDs from 2003 to 2010 with a diagnosis of head injury were evaluated retrospectively. Patients discharged home after a head computed tomography (CT) are the primary cohort for the study. A logistic regression model was used to analyze ondansetron's effects on the likelihood of return to the PED within 72 hours for persistent symptoms. A secondary analysis was performed on patients with a diagnoses of head injury who did not receive a head CT and were discharged.

RESULTS

A total of 6311 patients had a diagnosis of head injury, had a head CT performed, and were discharged from the PED. The use of ondansetron increased significantly from 3.7% in 2003 to 22% in 2010 (P < .001). After controlling for demographic/acuity differences, receiving ondansetron in the PED was associated with a lower likelihood of returning within 72 hours (0.49, 95% confidence interval [0.26-0.92]). In patients with head injury who did not have a head CT performed and were sent home, the use of ondansetron in the PED was not associated with an increased risk of missed diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

Ondansetron use in children with a CT scan who are dispositioned home is relatively safe, does not appear to mask any significant conditions, and significantly reduces return visits to the PED.

Emergency department use of oral ondansetron for acute gastroenteritis-related vomiting in infants and children

Acute gastroenteritis is one of the most common causes of emergency room visits. Although it is usually a self-limited infection, vomiting related to this illness can cause various degrees of dehydration, leading to intravenous insertion, electrolyte abnormalities and/or hospital admission. Ondansetron is a highly potent antiemetic drug that is effective in preventing chemotherapy-and radiation-induced nausea and vomiting with a very low risk of adverse effects. Recently, ondansetron has been used to control vomiting related to acute gastroenteritis. The present article examines evidence for the use of oral ondansetron for acute gastroenteritis-related vomiting in infants and children, and provides a recommendation for treatment based on the evidence-based review.

Towards a human rotavirus disease model

While the clinical importance of human rotavirus (RV) disease is well recognized and potent vaccines have been developed, our understanding of how human RV causes diarrhoea, vomiting and death remains unresolved. The fact that oral rehydration corrects electrolyte and water loss, indicates that enterocytes in the small intestine have a functional sodium-glucose co-transporter. Moreover, RV infection delays gastric emptying and loperamide appears to attenuate RV diarrhoea, thereby suggesting activation of the enteric nervous system. Serotonin (5-HT) receptor antagonists attenuate vomiting in young children with gastroenteritis while zinc and enkephalinase inhibitors attenuate RV-induced diarrhoea. In this review we discuss clinical symptoms, pathology, histology and treatment practices for human RV infections and compile the data into a simplified disease model.

Ondansetron use in the pediatric emergency room for diagnoses other than acute gastroenteritis

BACKGROUND

Ondansetron is widely used in the pediatric emergency department (PED) for vomiting and acute gastroenteritis (GE). Little is known about the spectrum of its use in diagnoses other than acute GE.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the spectrum of diagnoses for which ondansetron is used in the PED.

METHODS

Medical records from 2 tertiary care PEDs from January 2006 to December 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients 3 months to 18 years of age given ondansetron in the PED were identified. Patients without a primary discharge diagnosis (based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code) of vomiting or GE were defined as non-GE. Patient age, initial triage level (1 = lowest acuity, 5 = highest), route of administration (enteral vs parenteral), primary diagnosis, disposition, and prescription for ondansetron at discharge were recorded; GE and non-GE patients were compared based on age and triage acuity.

RESULTS

There were 32,971 patients who received ondansetron in the PED; 12,620 (38%) were non-GE patients. Non-GE patients were older (8.3 vs 4.3 years, P < 0.001) and of higher average initial triage level (2.95 vs 2.33, P < 0.001) compared with GE patients. Within non-GE patients, 79% received ondansetron enterally, 71% were discharged, and 37% of those discharged received an ondansetron prescription. The most common primary diagnoses for non-GE discharged patients were fever (15%), abdominal pain/tenderness (13%), head injury/concussion (7%), pharyngitis (6%), viral infection (6%), migraine variants (5%), and otitis media (5%). The most common diagnoses of patients admitted were appendicitis (11%), asthma (6%), pneumonia (4%), and diabetes (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although ondansetron is a widely accepted treatment for GE in children, this study identifies a broader spectrum of primary diagnoses for which ondansetron is being used.

Ondansetron dosing in pediatric gastroenteritis: a prospective cohort, dose-response study

BACKGROUND

Ondansetron is increasingly used to prevent emesis in children with acute gastroenteritis; however, the optimal dose is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if higher doses of oral ondansetron are associated with greater efficacy or side effects.

METHODS

We analyzed data from a prospective clinical trial performed between January 2004 and April 2005. Data were collected on 105 children with dehydration due to gastroenteritis who received an ondansetron oral disintegrating formulation. The following outcomes of efficacy were analyzed: number of vomiting episodes, volume of oral rehydration fluids consumed, percent weight gain, and the proportions of children who had ongoing vomiting, received intravenous rehydration, and were hospitalized. In addition, the number of episodes of diarrhea was evaluated to measure whether there were dose-dependent side effects.

RESULTS

Participants were aged 0.5-8.2 years and the dose ranged between 0.13 and 0.26 mg/kg. There was no significant association between the dose of ondansetron and the outcomes of number of vomiting episodes, volume of fluids consumed, increase in bodyweight, or number of diarrhea episodes/hour. The mean dose of ondansetron (mg/kg) administered was not different amongst those who did and did not have ongoing vomiting, undergo hospitalization, and receive intravenous rehydration.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the dose range of 0.13-0.26 mg/kg, higher doses of ondansetron were not superior to lower doses, nor were they associated with increased side effects. Thus, ondansetron in this dose range was shown to result in a similar reduction in emesis in children with acute gastroenteritis.

Acute gastroenteritis: from guidelines to real life

Acute gastroenteritis is a very common disease. It causes significant mortality in developing countries and significant economic burden to developed countries. Viruses are responsible for approximately 70% of episodes of acute gastroenteritis in children and rotavirus is one of the best studied of these viruses. Oral rehydration therapy is as effective as intravenous therapy in treating mild to moderate dehydration in acute gastroenteritis and is strongly recommended as the first line therapy. However, the oral rehydration solution is described as an underused simple solution. Vomiting is one of the main reasons to explain the underuse of oral rehydration therapy. Antiemetics are not routinely recommended in treating acute gastroenteritis, though they are still commonly prescribed. Ondansetron is one of the best studied antiemetics and its role in enhancing the compliance of oral rehydration therapy and decreasing the rate of hospitalization has been proved recently. The guidelines regarding the recommendation on antiemetics have been changed according to the evidence of these recent studies.

Antiemetics for acute gastroenteritis in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The alleviation of vomiting due to gastroenteritis in children can help promote oral rehydration and prevent medical visits for dehydration.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent randomized, placebo-controlled trials of newer antiemetics, such as serotonin antagonists like ondansetron, have demonstrated efficacy in relief of vomiting, decreased need for intravenous fluid therapy and hospitalizations, without serious adverse effects.

SUMMARY

The ability to arrest further vomiting and prevent intravenous fluid therapy and hospitalization aids children with vomiting so they may tolerate oral fluids and be discharged from medical care. This can reduce the medical care burdens and enhance patient satisfaction. This new pharmaceutical therapy may change how gastroenteritis is managed as it is studied further.

Antiemetic medications in children with presumed infectious gastroenteritis--pharmacoepidemiology in Europe and Northern America

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prescription pattern of antiemetic medications in 0- to 9-year-old children with infectious gastroenteritis in several industrialized countries during 2005.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively retrieved data from 4 national and international databases (IMS MIDAS, IMS disease analyzer, WIdO databases).

RESULTS

Between 2% and 23% of children with gastroenteritis (International Classification of Diseases code A08.X or A09) received prescriptions for antiemetic medications (United States, 23%; 95% CI, 15-31; Germany, 17%; 95% CI, 15-20; France, 17%; 95% CI, 14-19; Spain, 15%; 95% CI, 10-19; Italy, 11%; 95% CI, 7-16; Canada, 3%; 95% CI, 0-16; United Kingdom, 2%; 95% CI, 1-2). The antihistamines dimenhydrinate and diphenhydramine were most frequently used in Germany and Canada, whereas promethazine was prescribed preferentially in the United States. In France, Spain, and Italy, the dopamine receptor antagonist domperidone was preferred as antiemetic treatment. Ondansetron was used in a minor proportion of antiemetic prescriptions (Germany, Canada, Spain, and Italy, 0%; United States, 3%; United Kingdom, 6%).

CONCLUSION

Antiemetic drugs are frequently used in children with gastroenteritis. In different industrialized countries, prescription of antiemetic medication varies considerably. Ondansetron, the only drug with evidence-based antiemetic efficacy, plays a minor role among antiemetic prescriptions.