Fentanyl sublingual: in breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant adults with cancer

Sublingual and buccal drug administration in medical emergencies

Drug administration is crucial to achieve effective therapeutic drug outcomes. In medical emergencies, it is particularly convenient to use drugs that could be administered as an alternative to traditional routes (as oral or intravenous routes), that are not always suitable in these situations. Thus, sublingual and buccal routes offer an alternative to traditional routes, when a rapid onset of action is required. The main objective of this narrative review is to summarize the evidence for the use of sublingual and buccal drug administration in medical emergencies. The evidence obtained has been divided into four common scenarios found in the emergency department and intensive care units: cardiovascular emergencies, acute pain, agitation, and epileptic status. Moreover, the main advantages and disadvantages of sublingual and buccal routes are presented, as the future perspectives in the drug delivery field to overcome the limitations of these routes.

Breakthrough pain and rapid-onset opioids in patients with cancer pain: a narrative review

Breakthrough pain is transitory pain that occurs despite the use of opioids for background pain control. Breakthrough pain occurs in 40% to 80% of patients with cancer pain. Despite effective analgesic therapy, patients and their caregivers often feel that their pain is not sufficiently controlled. Therefore, an improved understanding of breakthrough pain and its management is essential for all physicians caring for patients with cancer. This article reviews the definition, clinical manifestations, accurate diagnostic strategies, and optimal treatment options for breakthrough pain in patients with cancer. This review focuses on the efficacy and safety of rapid-onset opioids, which are the primary rescue drugs for breakthrough pain.

Improving the Emergency Department Management of Sickle Cell Vaso-Occlusive Pain Crisis: The Role and Options of Sublingual and Intranasally Administered Analgesia

Vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC), characterized by periods of excruciating pain is the most common clinical manifestation of sickle cell disease (SCD), often resulting in emergency room presentation. These patients often experience long wait times in the emergency department before receiving their first dose of analgesia. This delay results from the complexities of the emergency care system. Using the intranasal or sublingual approach to administering analgesia to SCD patients with VOC offers a fast, safe, noninvasive, atraumatic, and easily accessible route of administration which could reduce the time to first dose of analgesia. With the evolving advances in the development and delivery of analgesic medications, providers should be conversant with the nuances of intranasal and sublingual analgesia in the management of acute vaso-occlusive pain crisis. This review explores the pharmacokinetic profiles, dosages, and administration of intranasal and sublingual analgesics with relevance to the SCD population.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sublingual fentanyl orally disintegrating tablet in the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Breakthrough pain (BTP) is an important challenge in treatment and requires a rapid onset of action for pain control. BTP should be adequately controlled with a stable dose of a short-acting oral opioid. So far, no drug is available for the treatment of BTP in cancer patients in Iran, so we designed the first study in Iran to investigate the effect of sublingual fentanyl in relief of pain episodes in these patients.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sublingual fentanyl in the treatment of breakthrough pain in cancer patients.

METHOD

This study was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial in cancer patients with breakthrough pain (at least 1-4 episodes of acute pain with moderate to severe pain daily) referred to the pain clinic of Akhtar and Masih Daneshvari hospitals in 2019. The study consisted of two stages: 100 patients were selected by simple, non-random sampling and entered the open-label titration phase. The primary efficacy endpoint was the sum of pain intensity difference over 30 min post-administration. Secondary efficacy endpoints included pain intensity difference (PID) and pain relief (PR) throughout the 60-min post-dose assessment period. In the double-blind study, patients were randomly divided into two groups of placebo (n=50) and intervention (sublingual fentanyl tablet) (n=50). For evaluation of efficacy, 10 episodes were treated in each group and the results were recorded by the patient. (Clinical trial registration: IRCT20131124015515N8).

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients entered the titration phase, primary efficacy of sublingual fentanyl was 3.5±0.6 and secondary efficacy of sublingual fentanyl (60 min, after treatment) was 0.3±0.6 which was statistically significant. In the titration phase, the treatment success rate was 100%. In the double-blind phase of the study, the pain intensity in multiple episodes showed a significant improvement at 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after drug administration (P=0.0001). The intensity of pain in each episode was significantly decreased compared to the next episode (P=0.0001). The mean frequency of pain episodes in the sublingual fentanyl group showed a significant decrease (P=0.0001). The most common adverse drug events in the titration phase were drowsiness (20%), dizziness (7%), and nausea 4%, and in the double-blind phase only drowsiness (12%). (Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Survey).

CONCLUSION

Sublingual fentanyl appears to be effective for patients with rapid-onset analgesia, has short-acting duration, is effective medication, safe, and well tolerated. It is a suitable choice in Iranian patients with chronic cancer-related pain controlled suffering from acute pain episodes related to cancer.

Effects of Age Among Elderly Cancer Patients on Breakthrough Pain Management with Sublingual Fentanyl Tablets

Introduction

Sublingual fentanyl tablets (SFTs) have been shown to be a safe and effective option in controlling breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP). However, further examination is required to investigate the use of SFTs among the elderly. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of age in BTcP management with SFTs in the elderly population.

Methods

We performed subgroup analyses of a recently completed trial in two subsets of individuals: patients aged 65–74 years (low age group) and patients ≥ 75 years (high age group). Pain intensity (PI), onset of pain relief, frequency and duration of BTcP episodes, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at 3, 7, 15, and 30 days. Health status instruments used were the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A and HADS-D) and the Short Form 12, version 2 (SF-12v2) questionnaire.

Results

Levels of PI at the end of the study improved significantly as compared with baseline in both the low and the high age groups (30.0% and 27.7% reduction, respectively). The onset of analgesia at the end of the study began in < 10 min in 85.0% of young–old subjects and in 62.5% of patients ≥ 75 years, but no significant differences were found. BTcP episodes lasted < 15 min in 75.0% of patients in the low age group and 58.3% in the high age group (p = 0.24). Most of patients in both groups experienced one to five BTcP daily episodes, at all assessment points. HADS-D decreased from 10.78 (± 4.33) to 8.21 (± 3.57) in the low age group, and from 10.96 (± 4.26) to 9.36 (± 3.35) in the high age group (p = 0.02). Significant differences in HADS-A scores from baseline to the end of the study were also observed in both subgroups (p < 0.05). Patients in the low age group had less favorable mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) scores than patients in the high age group. At the end of the study, 10.0% of young–old patients and 29.2% of patients aged ≥ 75 years reported AEs related to their treatment. The most commonly reported AEs included nausea, vomiting, constipation, somnolence, and skin disorders and they were generally mild to moderate in severity.

Conclusions

The results of this study showed that SFTs provided safe and clinically meaningful pain relief in both elderly subgroups. Clinical implications of these findings await validation in large, confirmatory studies to identify age subgroup divergences among elderly cancer patients treated with SFTs.

The efficacy of oral piroxicam fast-dissolving tablets versus sublingual fentanyl in incident breakthrough pain due to bone metastases: a double-blinded randomized study

PURPOSE

Breakthrough pain (BTP) is a transient exacerbation of pain occurring in a patient with chronic, persistent pain. The most common type is incident pain that is mostly related to bone metastases. The oral mucosa is an attractive route for drug delivery. Sublingual fentanyl preparations are a very attractive agent in controlling attacks of BTP due to its rapid absorption through the oral mucosa. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) play a key role as a first step in treatment of cancer pain; piroxicam sublingual formulations could be a useful alternative in controlling incident pain. Our study hypothesis is to evaluate the efficacy of sublingual fentanyl versus oral piroxicam fast-dissolving tablets in patients with incident pain and its impact on functional status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cohort of 100 adults of both genders suffering from bone metastases. Patients were assigned to receive either sublingual fentanyl tablet (group 1) or oral piroxicam fast-dissolving tablets (group 2). The pain intensity reduction on a 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS), frequency of BTP attacks, and onset of pain relief. Secondary end points included the functional interference items of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI).

RESULTS

There is no significant difference between the two groups regarding the patients' demographics. Significant decline of the VAS in each group in comparison to the pretreatment values (p = 0.001). Non-significant changes of the VAS, duration of pain attacks, and number of rescue doses in comparing both groups were measured. There was significant reduction in group 2 BPI regarding the relation with others, sleep pattern and enjoyment of life parameters at 2 and 4 weeks (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that oral piroxicam fast-dissolving tablet is an analgesic alternative to sublingual fentanyl in patients with bone metastasis to control incidental BTP attacks with more favorable cost-benefit values.

Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Fentanyl Tablets in Breakthrough Cancer Pain Management According to Cancer Stage and Background Opioid Medication

Objective

Our objective was to assess the effect of sublingual fentanyl tablets (SFTs) on pain relief, quality of life, and adverse effects in patients with cancer pain, according to cancer stage and background opioid regimen.

Methods

Subgroup analyses from a recently completed study were performed according to cancer stage (locally advanced cancer [LAC] vs. metastatic cancer) and most frequent background opioid medication (fentanyl vs. oxycodone/naloxone). The efficacy and safety of SFTs were evaluated, recording pain intensity (PI), onset of pain relief, and adverse events (AEs). Health status was assessed with the Short Form 12, version 2 (SF-12v2) questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (anxiety subscale [HADS-A] and depression subscale [HADS-D]).

Results

In total, 54 (67.5%) patients had LAC and 26 (32.5%) had metastatic cancer. The oxycodone/naloxone group included 39 patients (48.1%) and the fentanyl group 29 (35.8%). In all subgroups, pain relief was achieved within 5 min in an increasing number of individuals over time; at the end of the study, PI values decreased (PI-end: 44.4% for LAC vs. 57.9% for metastatic cancer; 44.4% for fentanyl vs. 38.6% for oxycodone/naloxone). HADS and mental component summary (MCS) SF-12v2 scores significantly improved in the LAC group (HADS-A 9.44–8.04; HADS-D 10.46–8.15; MCS 44.69–45.94) and in the fentanyl group (HADS-A 10.05–8.33; HADS-D 11.95–8.76; MCS 44.38–47.19). AEs were reported in few patients and were mostly mild.

Conclusions

Exploratory subgroup analyses show the efficacy and safety of SFTs for the treatment of breakthrough pain in patients with cancer, regardless of their cancer stage and background opioid medication.

Breakthrough Pain Management with Sublingual Fentanyl Tablets in Patients with Cancer: Age Subgroup Analysis of a Multicenter Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Breakthrough pain (BTP) management in patients with cancer is challenging, especially in the elderly. However, no studies examining the influence of age on BTP medication have been conducted. The aim of this work was to investigate the effect of sublingual fentanyl tablets (SFTs) in terms of efficacy, safety, and quality of life in two age categories.

METHODS

We performed age subgroup analyses (<65 and ≥65 years) from a recently completed study conducted in Spain. Pain intensity (PI), onset of pain relief, frequency and duration of BTP episodes, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at 3, 7, 15, and 30 days. Health-status instruments used were the Short Form 12, version 2 (SF-12v2) questionnaire, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A and HADS-D).

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were aged <65 years and 54 were aged ≥65 years. SF-12v2 scores did not enhance significantly from baseline. HADS scores and PI decreased significantly at the end of the study, particularly in younger patients (HADS-A: 19.05 vs. 14.41%; HADS-D: 21.35 vs. 18.57%; PI: 67.23 vs. 56.30%). Onset of analgesia began in 2-5 min in 63.3% of subjects aged <65 years and in 36.4% of subjects aged >65 years. Most patients experienced one to five daily episodes after 30 days, and <5% needed a treatment change. AEs were less frequently reported in older individuals (20.5 vs. 36.4%).

CONCLUSION

Age subgroup analyses suggest that SFTs are an effective and safe treatment for the management of BTP in cancer patients of all ages. SFTs may offer a well-tolerated and efficient option to control cancer BTP in the elderly.

Characteristics and Treatment of Breakthrought Pain (BTcP) in Palliative Care

INTRODUCTION

This research was to follow characteristics of breakthrough pain caused by cancer (BTcP) and other most common sympthoms (ESAS) at patients in advanced stage of cancer disease in palliative care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective study included 433 patients which were treated in Palliative Care Centre in UKC Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Group 1 was consisted of 353 patients whose basal cancer pain of intensity 4-7 NRS was treated weak opiates (basal analgetic- fixed combination of tramadol/paracetamol (37.5 mg/325 mg) in initial dose 3x1tbl for pain intensity 4, to 4x2tbl (for pain intensity 7). In Group 2 (80 patients) basal pain of intensity 8-10 was treated strong opiates as basal analgetic (oral morphine and transdermal fentanil). If the previous day were 2 or more breakthrough pain that required ''rescue dose'' of analgetics (tramadol 50-100 mg orally in group 1 ie. Oral morphine 8-12 mg in the group 2), the dose of basal analgetic was increased.

RESULTS

The total number of reported breakthrough pain in all 433 patients for 10 days of treatment was 3 369 (0.78 BTcP /per patient/day), where at Group 1 patients showed significantly lower BTcP (0.56 BTcP/patient/day). The average intensity of BTcP was 5.91 where in the Group1 was 4.51 while in the Group 2 8.04. 582 (17.28%) was rated grade 7, of which 539 were successfully coupled by strong and 43 (7.39%) successfully coupled by weak opiates. From 556 BTcP who were rated with 8, 540 of them were coupled strong and only 16 successfully coupled by weak opiates. 1967 (58.39 %) of breakthrough pain has occured in the evening hours (18-06 h), while 1402 (41.62%) BTCP occured during day hours (06-18h). Most (1290 or 38.29%) of breakthrough pain lasted less than 10 minutes, 882 (26.18%) between 16 and 20 minutes, 752 (22.32%) between 11 and 15 minutes, 407 (12.8%) between 21 and 30 minutes and 38 (1.13%) lasted longer than 20 minutes.

CONCLUSION

Duriong our study, we noted a relatively large number of breakthrough pain with lower intensity (3-6) in patients treated with weak opiates, which are also adversely affected patients satisfaction with pain treatment and required additional doses of analgetics. In the small percentage is possible the breakthrough pain of stronger intensity (7-8) treat by maximum doses of weak opiates.

New opioids

Despite the skilled use of opioid analgesics, which is crucial to the relief of cancer pain, there is a lack of evidence to support many aspects of current clinical practice. Therefore, there is a significant need for more effective treatment options. New opioids have been marketed in the past years, including hydrocodone and oxymorphone. Moreover, mixed opioids with combined mechanisms of action have been developed; one such agent, tapentadol, is a centrally acting oral analgesic that possesses a combined mechanism of action: μ-opioid receptor activation with norepinephrine reuptake inhibition. Drug development strategies involving naloxone have been initiated to reduce peripheral opioid-related adverse effects. The rationale is based on the local antagonist activity of naloxone in intestinal opioid receptors and the negligible oral bioavailability of naloxone, particularly in a prolonged-release formulation. New delivery systems have been developed to provide rapid analgesia with potent opioid drugs such as fentanyl. Despite the upcoming availability of these new drugs and technologies that will add to existing types of opioid medication, their benefits and liabilities will ultimately need to be determined by the individual physician and individual patient experiencing pain.

Efficacy of sublingual fentanyl vs. oral morphine for cancer-related breakthrough pain

INTRODUCTION

Breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) is recognized as a clinically significant complication of chronic cancer pain with most BTcP episodes peaking in intensity within a few minutes and lasting for approximately 30 min. Although a number of rapid-onset fentanyl preparations have been developed in the last decade, BTcP is still typically managed through the use of rescue doses of oral morphine but a comparative study of sublingual fentanyl and oral morphine is still lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy, tolerability, and patient satisfaction of sublingual fentanyl citrate (SLF) and oral morphine solution (OM) in the treatment of BTcP.

METHODS

In this prospective, longitudinal, controlled-study, 40 patients with BTcP were allocated to receive oral morphine (OM) or sublingual fentanyl (SLF). Pain intensity level on a 0-10 numerical rating visual analog scale (VAS), frequency of BTcP throughout the day, onset of relief (0-5, 6-10, 11-15, or over 16 min), time required for dose titration, patient satisfaction and adverse effects were assessed at 3, 7, 15, and 30 days after starting the treatment.

RESULTS

Mean doses of opioids for BTcP were 235 ± 23.4 μg (SLF) and 38 ± 5.2 mg (OM). The mean pain intensity levels were significantly lower with SLF than OM at 3 days (6.0 vs. 6.95; p = 0,001), 7 days (4.15 vs. 6.25, p < 0.001), 15 days (3.45 vs. 5.35, p < 0.001), and 30 days (3.05 vs. 4.45, p < 0.001). SLF provided significantly faster relief for BTcP than OM (p < 0.001) with a shorter dose titration period (mean 6.6 ± 3.3 vs. 13.3 ± 4.9 days; p < 0.001) and better satisfaction scores and with a very good safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of SLF might provide a more effective treatment option than oral morphine for BTcP.

The use of sublingual fentanyl for breakthrough pain by using doses proportional to opioid basal regimen

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the efficacy and safety of sublingual fentanyl (SLF) in doses proportional to opioid doses used for background analgesia for the treatment of BTP of cancer patients.

METHODS

A sample of patients admitted to an acute palliative care unit, presenting breakthrough pain (BTP) episodes and receiving stable doses of opioids for background pain was selected to assess the efficacy and safety of SLF used in doses proportional to the basal opioid regimen used for the management of BTP. For each patient, data from four consecutive episodes were collected. For each episode, nurses collected changes in pain intensity and adverse effects when pain got severe (T0), and 5, 10, and 15 minutes after SLF was given (T15).

RESULTS

Seventy patients were recruited for the study. The mean age was 61.7 (±11.5). Forty-one patients were males. A total of 173 episodes of BTP were recorded (mean 2.5 episodes/patient). In 19 events, documentation regarding changes in pain intensity was incomplete. Of the 154 evaluable episodes, 143 were successfully treated (92%). Mean doses of SLF were 637 µg (SD 786), and 51 patients (72.8%) received SLF doses ≥800 µg. When compared to younger adult patients, older patients received significantly lower doses of SLF (p < 0.0005) [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED], similarly to their lower basal opioid regimen. Pain intensity significantly decreased at T5, 10 and T15 (p < 0.0005). The number of patients with a pain reduction of more than 33% at T5, T10, and T15 were 11, 79, and 137, respectively, and the number of patients with a reduction in pain intensity of more than 50% were 1, 21, 114 at the same intervals, respectively. No differences in changes in pain intensity for gender (p < 0.9) or age (p < 0.85) were observed. No significant changes in the number of patients reporting adverse effects of mild-moderate intensity were reported after SLF administration in comparison with baseline, and no adverse effects severe enough in intensity to require medical intervention were observed. Limitations of this study are represented by the uncontrolled design.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that SLF given in doses proportional to the basal opioid regimen for the management of BTP is safe and effective in clinical practice.

Pharmacokinetics of non-intravenous formulations of fentanyl

Fentanyl was structurally designed by Paul Janssen in the early 1960s as a potent opioid analgesic (100-fold more potent than morphine). It is a full agonist at μ-opioid receptors and possesses physicochemical properties, in particular a high lipophilicity (octanol:water partition coefficient >700), which allow it to cross quickly between plasma and central nervous target sites (transfer half-life of 4.7-6.6 min). It undergoes first-pass metabolism via cytochrome P450 3A (bioavailability ~30 % after rapid swallowing), which can be circumvented by non-intravenous formulations (bioavailability 50-90 % for oral transmucosal or intranasal formulations). Non-intravenous preparations deliver fentanyl orally-transmucosally, intranasally or transdermally. Passive transdermal patches release fentanyl at a constant zero-order rate for 2-3 days, making them suitable for chronic pain management, as are iontophoretic transdermal systems. Oral transmucosal and intranasal routes provide fast delivery (time to reach maximum fentanyl plasma concentrations 20 min [range 20-180 min] and 12 min [range 12-21 min], respectively) suitable for rapid onset of analgesia in acute pain conditions with time to onset of analgesia of 5 or 2 min, respectively. Intranasal formulations partly bypass the blood-brain barrier and deliver a fraction of the dose directly to relevant brain target sites, providing ultra-fast analgesia for breakthrough pain. Thanks to the development of non-intravenous pharmaceutical formulations, fentanyl has become one of the most successful opioid analgesics, and can be regarded as an example of a successful reformulation strategy of an existing drug based on pharmacokinetic research and pharmaceutical technology. This development broadened the indications for fentanyl beyond the initial restriction to intra- or perioperative clinical uses. The clinical utility of fentanyl could be expanded further by more comprehensive mathematical characterizations of its parametric pharmacokinetic input functions as a basis for the rational selection of fentanyl formulations for individualized pain therapy.