Population pharmacokinetic analysis of transdermal granisetron in healthy Chinese and Caucasian volunteers

Granisetron patches are a prolonged delivery transdermal system that is used to prevent Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). To date, no pharmacokinetics comparison between Chinese and Caucasian populations has been conducted for granisetron patches. This study focused on the ethnic differences in pharmacokinetics (PK) of granisetron transdermal delivery system (GTDS) between Chinese and Caucasians and the influence of demographic covariates on pharmacokinetics (age, weight, height, body mass index, sex). To achieve this, blood concentration data were collected from 112 Caucasian healthy subjects participating in four clinical trials and 24 Chinese healthy subjects from one clinical trial, after a single application of the granisetron transdermal delivery system. A nonlinear mixed-effects model method of Phoenix NLME software was used to establish a population pharmacokinetic (Pop PK) model for Caucasian subjects. Bootstrap and visual predictive check (VPC) were used to validate the model. Based on the analysis a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and a first-order elimination well described the PK characteristics of GTDS. The apparent systemic clearance was determined to be 31316.3 mL/h and the central compartment volume of distribution was 6299.03 L. None of the five covariates (age, weight, height, body mass index, and sex) included in the Pop PK were significant covariates affecting PK. The final Pop PK model was used to simulate the Caucasian blood concentration by applying the dosing regimen used for the Chinese population. Comparison of the simulated Caucasian PK data with observed clinical PK data from Chinese healthy subjects revealed no significant differences in the main parameters, AUC_last and C_avg, between the two groups. These findings suggested that no dose adjustment was required when applied to the Chinese population. In conclusion, this Pop PK study comparing the transdermal patch in Chinese and Caucasian healthy subjects provided valuable insights for optimizing dosage across ethnicities.

Indazole as a Privileged Scaffold: The Derivatives and their Therapeutic Applications

BACKGROUND

Heterocyclic compounds, also called heterocycles, are a major class of organic chemical compound that plays a vital role in the metabolism of all living cells. The heterocyclic compound, indazole, has attracted more attention in recent years and is widely present in numerous commercially available drugs. Indazole-containing derivatives, representing one of the most important heterocycles in drug molecules, are endowed with a broad range of biological properties.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar and Web of Science regarding articles related to indazole and its therapeutic application.

RESULTS

The mechanism and structure-activity relationship of indazole and its derivatives were described. Based on their versatile biological activities, the compounds were divided into six groups: anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, anti-HIV, antiarrhythmic, antifungal and antitumour. At least 43 indazole-based therapeutic agents were found to be used in clinical application or clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

This review is a guide for pharmacologists who are in search of valid preclinical/clinical drug compounds where the progress of approved marketed drugs containing indazole scaffold is examined from 1966 to the present day. Future direction involves more diverse bioactive moieties with indazole scaffold and greater insights into its mechanism.

Transdermal versus oral granisetron in controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of transdermal granisetron versus oral granisetron in controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients with cancer METHODS: Data sources were CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Clinicaltrials.gov , and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials comparing transdermal versus oral granisetron in patients with CINV. For data extraction, two authors independently analyzed the methodological quality and extracted data. A random effects model was used to estimate the risk ratio (RR) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Three studies (1086 patients) were included. Oral granisetron is superior (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.99) to its transdermal form in achieving complete control of CINV in patients receiving chemotherapy. As for the risk of constipation (RR 1.32; 95% CI 0.73 to 2.40) and QTc prolongation (RR 0.17; 95% CI 0.02 to 1.40) as adverse effects, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two routes.

CONCLUSION

Oral granisetron is better in achieving complete control of CINV in patients receiving chemotherapy. As for the risk of constipation and QTc prolongation as adverse effects, there was no statistically significant difference between the two routes.

Granisetron Extended-Release Injection: A Review in Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting

An extended-release (ER) subcutaneously injectable formulation of the first-generation 5-HT₃ receptor antagonist granisetron is now available in the USA (Sustol^®), where it is indicated for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) or anthracycline and cyclophosphamide combination chemotherapy regimens in adults. Granisetron ER is administered as a single subcutaneous injection and uses an erosion-controlled drug-delivery system to allow prolonged granisetron release. Primary endpoint data from phase III studies after an initial cycle of chemotherapy indicate that, when used as part of an antiemetic regimen, granisetron ER injection is more effective than intravenous ondansetron in preventing delayed CINV following highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC); is noninferior to intravenous palonosetron in preventing both acute CINV following MEC or HEC and delayed CINV following MEC; and is similar, but not superior, to palonosetron in preventing delayed CINV following HEC. The benefits of granisetron ER were seen in various patient subgroups, including those receiving anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide-based HEC, and (in an extension of one of the studies) over multiple MEC or HEC cycles. Granisetron ER injection is generally well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of ondansetron or palonosetron. Thus, granisetron ER injection expands the options for preventing both acute and delayed CINV in adults with cancer receiving MEC or anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide-based HEC.

Newest Drugs for Chronic Unexplained Nausea and Vomiting

OPINION STATEMENT

Chronic unexplained nausea and vomiting (CUNV) refers to a symptom complex defined by nausea and/or vomiting with normal diagnostic testing, including anatomic assessments (including upper endoscopy) and measures of upper gut function (e.g., gastric emptying testing). Nausea and vomiting in this condition are postulated to result from aberrant peripheral or central neurohumoral activity. A substantial subset of patients satisfies this diagnosis as more than half of individuals referred for scintigraphic testing exhibit normal gastric emptying rates. No randomized, placebo-controlled trials of any medication treatment have been performed in CUNV. However, agents with potential therapeutic benefits in CUNV include antiemetic drugs, neuromodulatory treatments which are proposed to act by reducing gastric sensitivity, and medications with prokinetic action to stimulate upper gut propulsion. Recently approved drugs with antiemetic capability include serotonin antagonists with novel modes of delivery and neurokinin antagonists with or without additional serotonergic blocking capabilities. Existing neuroleptics and pain-modifying neuromodulatory therapies with fortuitous antiemetic benefits are being considered for their benefits in this disorder. Furthermore, current investigations will define potential therapeutic actions of agents that stimulate gastric emptying via action on gastroduodenal serotonin, motilin, and ghrelin receptors. This current research may broaden the treatment options for refractory cases of unexplained nausea and vomiting.

Management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple-day highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: role of transdermal granisetron

Granisetron transdermal delivery system (GTDS) is the first 5-HT3 drug to be transdermally delivered and represents a convenient alternative to oral and intravenous antiemetics for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. GTDS is effective and well tolerated in patients receiving multiple-day moderate-to-highly emetogenic chemotherapy. In this setting noninferiority studies showed similar efficacy when GTDS was compared with intravenous and oral granisetron and intravenous palonosetron. GTDS has shown good cardiovascular safety; however, special caution is needed in patients at risk for developing excessive QTc interval prolongation and arrhythmias. So far, GTDS has been investigated for intravenous prevention in comparison with granisetron and palonosetron; however, further prospects open the route to future clinical investigations.

Transdermal granisetron: a guide to its use in preventing nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy

Transdermal granisetron (Sancuso®) is effective in the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer who are receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy for 3-5 days. Transdermal granisetron is noninferior to oral granisetron in this indication, and is generally well tolerated in this indication. Thus, transdermal granisetron provides a convenient option for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, with the potential to improve patient compliance.

Evolving treatment paradigms for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is one of the most debilitating toxicities associated with cancer treatment. Although effective antiemetic agents are available, their use in practice often is suboptimal.

METHODS

The author reviews the pathophysiology of CINV as well as the drug classes and cost considerations that should be incorporated into treatment planning.

RESULTS

Several drug classes, including 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists, neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists, and corticosteroids, are effective, especially when used in combination. Older antiemetic agents, such as prochlorperazine and metoclopramide, as well as olanzapine may provide reasonable alternatives in certain settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions for CINV should include standard-of-care antiemetics combined with corticosteroids. The cost of using older, less expensive antiemetics may be outweighed by the expenditures to rescue patients after suboptimal prophylaxis, as well as the indirect costs of missed work and lost productivity.