Methylnaltrexone

Chronic Constipation: Gastroenterohepatologist's Approach

BACKGROUND

Constipation is a common problem in gastroenterological practice. The prevalence of constipation is about 16%. Constipation can be primary or secondary.

SUMMARY

The diagnostic and therapeutic approach to patients with constipation begins with a detailed history and physical examination. In selected cases, the use of additional diagnostic procedures is very important. This includes the use of laboratory, endoscopic, and radiological examinations, as well as advanced physiological testing (anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion test, colonic transit studies, and defecography). Constipation therapy can be both nonoperative and operative. Nonoperative therapy includes the application of a lifestyle measures, pharmacotherapy and biofeedback therapy. Key Messages: Two key things when taking a medical history and physical examination are to rule out the existence of alarm symptoms/signs and to rule out secondary constipation (primarily drug-induced). Therapy begins with lifestyle modification, and in case of failure, bulk or osmotic laxatives are used. In case of failure, the use of lubiprostone is indicated, as well as linaclotide. Surgical treatment of constipation is reserved for cases of refractory constipation, with delayed intestinal transit.

Diagnosis and management of chronic constipation in adults

Constipation is a heterogeneous, polysymptomatic, multifactorial disease. Acute or transient constipation can be due to changes in diet, travel or stress, and secondary constipation can result from drug treatment, neurological or metabolic conditions or, rarely, colon cancer. A diagnosis of primary chronic constipation is made after exclusion of secondary causes of constipation and encompasses several overlapping subtypes. Slow-transit constipation is characterized by prolonged colonic transit in the absence of pelvic floor dysfunction. This subtype of constipation can be identified using either the radio-opaque marker test or wireless motility capsule test, and is best treated with laxatives such as polyethylene glycol or newer agents such as linaclotide or lubiprostone. If unsuccessful, subspecialist referral should be considered. Dyssynergic defecation results from impaired coordination of rectoanal and pelvic floor muscles, and causes difficulty with defecation. The condition can be identified using anorectal manometry and balloon expulsion tests and is best managed with biofeedback therapy. Opioid-induced constipation is an emerging entity, and several drugs including naloxegol, methylnaltrexone and lubiprostone are approved for its treatment. In this Review, we provide an overview of the burden and pathophysiology of chronic constipation, as well as a detailed discussion of the available diagnostic tools and treatment options.

Methylnaltrexone: its pharmacological effects alone and effects on morphine in healthy volunteers

RATIONALE

Methylnaltrexone bromide (MTNX) is a peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist, prescribed for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in patients with advanced illness who are receiving palliative care. Studies have used this drug to determine if other opioid-induced effects besides constipation are altered by MTNX in humans and have suggested, based on their results, that these other effects are altered by peripheral opioid actions.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this report is to present results that provide indirect evidence that MTNX has centrally mediated effects, albeit slight, and secondarily to describe the effects of MTNX on psychopharmacological effects of morphine.

METHODS

In a crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 29 healthy volunteers received 0.45 mg/kg MTNX or saline subcutaneously, followed by saline intravenously. In three other conditions, 0.143 mg/kg of morphine sulfate administered intravenously was preceded by subcutaneous administration of 0, 0.225, or 0.45 mg/kg MTNX. Before and after drug administration, subjective and physiological measures, including pupil diameter, were assessed.

RESULTS

Two separate analyses confirmed that 0.45 mg/kg MTNX alone induced a slight degree of miosis, a centrally mediated opioid agonist effect. This dose had minimal subjective effects. MTNX at either or both the 0.225 and 0.45 mg/kg dose reduced some subjective effects of morphine without altering miosis.

CONCLUSIONS

We present indirect evidence that MTNX crosses the blood-brain barrier in humans. Therefore, whether the reductions in subjective effects of morphine by MTNX that were observed in past studies and in this study can be attributed to peripheral mechanisms is open to question.

The effect of methylnaltrexone on the side effects of intrathecal morphine after orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia

Methylnaltrexone is a peripheral opioid receptor antagonist that does not cross the blood-brain barrier; so without interference with pain relief, it could reverse the peripheral opioid side effects such as constipation, pruritus, postoperative ileus, and urinary retention. This study has been designed to evaluate the effect of methylnaltrexone on postoperative side effects of intrathecal morphine. In seventy-two 18- to 55-year-old patients scheduled for elective orthopedic operations under spinal anesthesia, neuraxial blockade was achieved using 10 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.1 mg preservative-free morphine sulfate. The first group (M) received 12 mg methylnaltrexone, while the second group (P) received normal saline, subcutaneously, immediately after spinal block in a randomized, double-blind fashion. There was a significant decrease in the rate of nausea and vomiting in group M, but there was no significant difference in the rate of pruritus or urinary retention between the two groups. Pain score was significantly lower in group M. Respiratory depression or decreased level of consciousness was not reported in any patient. Subcutaneous administration of methylnaltrexone was not effective in decreasing postoperative urinary retention and pruritus, but lowered the rate of nausea and vomiting and pain score after intrathecal bupivacaine and morphine.

Physiology, signaling, and pharmacology of opioid receptors and their ligands in the gastrointestinal tract: current concepts and future perspectives

Opioid receptors are widely distributed in the human body and are crucially involved in numerous physiological processes. These include pain signaling in the central and the peripheral nervous system, reproduction, growth, respiration, and immunological response. Opioid receptors additionally play a major role in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract in physiological and pathophysiological conditions. This review discusses the physiology and pharmacology of the opioid system in the GI tract. We additionally focus on GI disorders and malfunctions, where pathophysiology involves the endogenous opioid system, such as opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, opioid-induced constipation or abdominal pain. Based on recent reports in the field of pharmacology and medicinal chemistry, we will also discuss the opportunities of targeting the opioid system, suggesting future treatment options for functional disorders and inflammatory states of the GI tract.

Methylnaltrexone for opioid-induced constipation in pediatric oncology patients

BACKGROUND

Pediatric oncology patients can experience opioid-induced constipation, which may not respond to laxative treatment. Methylnaltrexone is an opioid receptor antagonist that can reverse opioid-induced constipation without affecting analgesia. Published literature on the use of methylnaltrexone in children is very limited. This retrospective review describes the effectiveness and safety of methylnaltrexone for opioid-induced constipation in pediatric oncology patients.

PROCEDURE

A retrospective review of health records was conducted for pediatric oncology in-patients who were prescribed methylnaltrexone between May 2008 and September 2012 at The Hospital for Sick Children. Demographic, clinical, efficacy, and safety data were collected, including; opioid, laxative, and methylnatrexone dosing and frequency.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (median age: 14 years, range: 4-17 years) received methylnaltrexone; 12 received a single dose while three received multiple doses. At the time of methylnaltrexone administration, patients were receiving a median oral morphine dose equivalent of 5.7 mg/kg/day (range: 1.5-29.2 mg/kg/day) and had not had any bowel movements for several days despite treatment with multiple laxatives. Methylnaltrexone was given at a mean dose of 0.15 ± 0.02 mg/kg/dose (range: 3-12 mg/dose) as a subcutaneous injection. After 14 of 19 doses administered, patients had a bowel movement within 4 hours. Three patients had documented mild gastrointestinal upset following methylnaltrexone administration. None reported a reduction of pain control or opioid withdrawal symptoms.

CONCLUSION

This case series suggests that methylnaltrexone is safe and may be effective when given subcutaneously as a 0.15 mg/kg single dose to pediatric oncology patients with opioid-induced constipation.

Effects of methylnaltrexone on guinea pig gastrointestinal motility

The purpose of the present study was to compare the effects of methylnaltrexone (MNTX), a peripherally acting μ opioid receptor (μOR) antagonist, on gastrointestinal (GI) motility in naïve vs. opiate chronically treated guinea pigs in vitro and in vivo. We have used the electrically stimulated muscle twitch contractions of longitudinal muscle-myenteric plexus (LMMP) preparations and total GI transit as measure of GI motility. In LMMP preparations of naïve guinea pigs, MNTX (1-30 μM) induced a significant, dose-response reduction of morphine-induced inhibition of electrically stimulated muscle twitch contractions, with an IC50 of 9.4 10(-8)M. By contrast, MNTX abolished the inhibitory effect of acute morphine at any concentrations tested (1-30 μM) in the guinea pigs chronically treated with opiates. In vivo, MNTX (10-50 mg s.c.) did not affect GI transit in naïve guinea pigs when administered acutely or for five consecutive days, but reversed the GI transit delay induced by chronic morphine treatment. These findings show that MNTX is effective in reversing opiate-induced inhibition of GI motility acting at peripheral μ opioid receptors, but does not exert a pharmacologic effect on GI transit in the absence of opiate stimulation.

Management of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients: focus on methylnaltrexone

Opioids are one of the most widely used therapies for the palliative treatment of cancer pain; however, despite their proven analgesic efficacy, they are associated with several adverse effects. Associated with psychological distress and multiple concomitant clinical concerns, constipation is the most commonly occurring adverse effect of chronic opioid therapy in cancer patients. Whilst prophylaxis remains the first-line management option, methylnaltrexone is a recommended treatment option for opioid-related constipation if administration of laxatives is ineffective. Due to its inability to cross the blood-brain barrier, methylnaltrexone exerts a peripheral inhibition of opioid-related effects without influencing the opioid-induced central effects; as a result, the analgesic effect of opioids is unaffected. Moreover, multiple clinical trials, albeit not always conducted specifically in cancer patients, have demonstrated that up to 4 months' treatment with either intravenous or subcutaneous methylnaltrexone provides effective relief from opioid-related constipation and is well tolerated. Preliminary evidence indicates that the addition of methylnaltrexone to standard care for opioid-related constipation may also be advantageous from a pharmacoeconomic perspective. In addition, preliminary data suggest that methylnaltrexone could be associated with some further clinical benefits other than the treatment of opioid-related constipation, such as the improvement of gastric emptying, the relief of nausea/vomiting, and the reduction of the risk of regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration. This narrative review examines the most recent evidence and evaluates the current role of methylnaltrexone in the management of opioid-related constipation, and its potential efficacy in cancer patients. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy and tolerability of methylnaltrexone are discussed.

(3R,4R,4aS,7aR,12bS)-3-Cyclopropylmethyl-4a,9-dihydroxy-3-methyl-7-oxo-2,3,4,4a,5,6,7,7a-octahydro-1H-4,12-methanobenzofuro[3,2-e]isoquinolin-3-ium bromide

The title compound, C₂₁H₂₆NO₄⁺·Br⁻, also known as R-methyl­naltrexone (MNTX) bromide, is a selective peripher­ally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist with a oroxymorphone skeleton, synthesized by hydroxyl protection, N-methyl­ation, deprotection and anion exchange of naltrexone. It comprises a five-ring system A/B/C/D/E. Rings C and E adopt distorted chair conformations, whereas ring D is in half-chair conformation. The C/E ring junctions are trans fused. The dihedral angle between rings D and E is 82.3 (1)°, while the dihedral angles between the planes of rings C and A, and rings D and E are respectively 81.7 (1), 75.9 (1) and 12.2 (1)°. In the crystal, mol­ecules are linked by O—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds.

Treating Constipation in Palliative Care

Opioids are major contributing factors to the problem of constipation in palliative care. Whilst this is without doubt, it remains unclear how much other factors also contribute to the problem. The aim of this audit is to review what other contributing factors are present when methylnaltrexone, the peripheral opioid antagonist is prescribed for constipation. The medical records of people prescribed methylnaltrexone over a four-month period were reviewed to examine certain characteristics of people including the whether the reason for constipation was charted, whether other factors that could contribute to constipation were considered and the effectiveness of methylnaltrexone. Over the study period, 10 people received methylnaltrexone, only 4 of whom had a bowel action less than 24 hours after administration with 3 not having any bowel actions reported 6 days after administration. Whilst all were receiving opioids, the opioids doses were in the moderate range (61-200 mg morphine equivalent). However, all had other factors that could contribute to constipation including impaired functional status and medications with anti-cholinergic effects (mean anti-cholinergic load 4.5). In conclusion, methylnaltrexone is targeted treatment for the management of opioid-induced constipation. However, there is a percentage of people who fail to respond. The impact of other factors on the problem of constipation requires greater clarification.

Endogenously released opioids mediate meal-induced gastric relaxation via peripheral mu-opioid receptors

BACKGROUND

The centrally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist naloxone inhibits meal-induced gastric accommodation.

AIM

To study the role of peripheral mu-opioid receptors in the regulation of gastric tone and food intake by comparing the effects of naloxone with the peripherally restricted mu-opioid receptor antagonist methylnaltrexone.

METHODS

Methylnaltrexone (12 mg s.c.), naloxone (20 μg/kg/h intravenous infusion after 0.4 mg bolus) and placebo were studied in 23 healthy volunteers. Gastric volume was recorded using an intragastric bag held at constant pressure connected to a barostat, with administration of a nutrient drink after 30 min. Pressure in the stomach was measured during intragastric nutrient drink infusion until the volunteers scored maximal satiation.

RESULTS

Methylnaltrexone inhibited significantly the volume increase after food intake as assessed with the barostat (P < 0.01). During nutrient drink infusion the intragastric pressure significantly decreased as compared with the preprandial pressure after placebo treatment. Both methylnaltrexone and naloxone significantly inhibited this intragastric pressure decrease (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively). Volunteers scored maximal satiation after 979 ± 96, 958 ± 84 and 1124 ± 107 mL nutrient drink infused (for naloxone, methylnaltrexone and placebo treatment, respectively; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that endogenous opioids mediate gastric accommodation and satiation via peripheral mu-opioid receptors. Effects were less pronounced after naloxone treatment, which indicates that centrally involved mu-opioid receptors mediate an opposing effect.