Bevacizumab combination therapy: for the first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Controlled Phase I Study Comparing the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Immunogenicity of SCT510 to Bevacizumab (Avastin®) in Healthy Chinese Males

BACKGROUND

SCT510 is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which is intended as a candidate biosimilar of bevacizumab that is approved for various metastatic cancers.Please confirm change in wording to match definition for VEGF belowYes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics profiles, safety, and immunogenicity of SCT510 to bevacizumab (Avastin^®) in healthy Chinese males.

METHODS

This was a single-center, double-blind, parallel-group phase I study. A total of 84 participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a single 3 mg/kg infusion of either SCT510 or bevacizumab and followed up for 99 days. Primary endpoints were area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC_0-∞), area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration (AUC_0-t), and the maximum observed concentration (C_max). Secondary endpoints included safety and immunogenicity.Kindly check and confirm the edit made in the article title.Yes.

RESULTS

A total of 82 subjects completed the study. Geometric means ratios (GMR) for AUC_0-∞, AUC_0-t, and C_max were 0.88, 0.89, and 0.97, respectively, for SCT510 versus bevacizumab (USA). The 90% confidence intervals for GMRs of AUC_0-∞, AUC_0-t, and C_max were all within the prespecified criteria (80-125%). No adverse events (AEs) led to study termination, and no serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported. None of the anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) identified were found to be neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), and only one subject from the SCT510 group tested positive for the ADA at the day 99 visit.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of SCT510 were equivalent to bevacizumab (Avastin^®). As a proposed biosimilar drug to bevacizumab, SCT510 was well tolerated in healthy Chinese males.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT05113511.

PG545 enhances anti-cancer activity of chemotherapy in ovarian models and increases surrogate biomarkers such as VEGF in preclinical and clinical plasma samples

BACKGROUND

Despite the utility of antiangiogenic drugs in ovarian cancer, efficacy remains limited due to resistance linked to alternate angiogenic pathways and metastasis. Therefore, we investigated PG545, an anti-angiogenic and anti-metastatic agent which is currently in Phase I clinical trials, using preclinical models of ovarian cancer.

METHODS

PG545's anti-cancer activity was investigated in vitro and in vivo as a single agent, and in combination with paclitaxel, cisplatin or carboplatin using various ovarian cancer cell lines and tumour models.

RESULTS

PG545, alone, or in combination with chemotherapeutics, inhibited proliferation of ovarian cancer cells, demonstrating synergy with paclitaxel in A2780 cells. PG545 inhibited growth factor-mediated cell migration and reduced HB-EGF-induced phosphorylation of ERK, AKT and EGFR in vitro and significantly reduced tumour burden which was enhanced when combined with paclitaxel in an A2780 model or carboplatin in a SKOV-3 model. Moreover, in the immunocompetent ID8 model, PG545 also significantly reduced ascites in vivo. In the A2780 maintenance model, PG545 initiated with, and following paclitaxel and cisplatin treatment, significantly improved overall survival. PG545 increased plasma VEGF levels (and other targets) in preclinical models and in a small cohort of advanced cancer patients which might represent a potential biomarker of response.

CONCLUSION

Our results support clinical testing of PG545, particularly in combination with paclitaxel, as a novel therapeutic strategy for ovarian cancer.

VEGF pathway polymorphisms as prognostic and pharmacogenetic factors in cancer: a 2013 update

With the recent advances in genomic medicine and the development of targeted antiangiogenic therapy for cancer patients, there has been an increased interest in the role of predictive and prognostic markers for antiangiogenic therapy. Here, we provide a summary of the angiogenesis pathway, the role of predictive and prognostic markers in cancer and a summary of the current literature and studies on predictive and prognostic markers for antiangiogenic therapy. Our aim is to summarize those studies that are currently in the literature with an emphasis on the future directions of the field from 2013 and beyond. We conclude by providing our perspective on the future directions of this growing field, as well as possible challenges and pitfalls along the way.

Nadir CA-125 level as prognosis indicator of high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Purpose

The capacity of nadir CA-125 levels to predict the prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to explore whether the nadir CA-125 serum levels could predict the durations of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HG-SOC) from the USA and PRC.

Materials and methods

A total of 616 HG-SOC patients from the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC, USA) between 1990 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The results of 262 cases from the Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research (JICR, PRC) between 1992 and 2011 were used to validate the MDACC data. The CA-125 immunohistochemistry assay was performed on 280 tissue specimens. The Cox proportional hazards model and the log-rank test were used to assess the associations between the clinicopathological characteristics and duration of survival.

Results

The nadir CA-125 level was an independent predictor of OS and PFS (p < 0.01 for both) in the MDACC patients. Lower nadir CA-125 levels (≤10 U/mL) were associated with longer OS and PFS (median: 61.2 and 16.8 months with 95% CI: 52.0–72.4 and 14.0–19.6 months, respectively) than their counterparts with shorter OS and PFS (median: 49.2 and 10.5 months with 95% CI: 41.7–56.7 and 6.9–14.1 months, respectively). The nadir CA-125 levels in JICR patients were similarly independent when predicting the OS and PFS (p < 0.01 for both). Nadir CA-125 levels less than or equal to 10 U/mL were associated with longer OS and PFS (median: 59.9 and 15.5 months with 95% CI: 49.7–70.1 and 10.6–20.4 months, respectively), as compared with those more than 10 U/mL (median: 42.0 and 9.0 months with 95% CI: 34.4–49.7 and 6.6–11.2 months, respectively). Baseline serum CA-125 levels, but not the CA-125 expression in tissues, were associated with the OS and PFS of HG-SOC patients in the MDACC and JICR groups. However, these values were not independent. Nadir CA-125 levels were not associated with the tumor burden based on second-look surgery (p = 0.09). Patients who achieved a pathologic complete response had longer OS and PFS (median: 73.7 and 20.7 months with 95% CI: 63.7–83.7 and 9.5–31.9 months, respectively) than those with residual tumors (median: 34.6 and 10.6 months with 95% CI: 6.9–62.3 and 4.9–16.3 months, respectively).

Conclusions

The nadir CA-125 level was an independent predictor of OS and PFS in HG-SOC patients. Further prospective studies are required to clinically optimize the chances for a complete clinical response of HG-SOC cases with higher CA-125 levels (>10 U/mL) at the end of primary treatment.