Predictors of treatment response in chronic hepatitis B

Factors affecting HBV DNA suppression in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

Background: This study aims to determine the factors affecting HBV DNA suppression in chronic hepatitis B patients with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). Methods: A case-control was carried out from October 2021 to August 2022 on 182 chronic hepatitis B patients who had TDF therapy regularly for 24 weeks at H. Adam Malik and USU Hospitals in Medan, Indonesia. The history of the samples was obtained, followed by physical examination, and blood collection. CTLA-4 polymorphism examination was carried out using real-time PCR, while the serum CTLA-4 levels were assessed with ELISA. Results: The CTLA-4 -1661G>A polymorphism, genotype GG+AG, increased 1.52 times risk of not achieving HBV DNA suppression to TDF compared to genotype AA (p=0.041). High CTLA-4 levels increased 2.28 times risk, high HBV DNA levels increased 2.09 times risk, low ALT levels increased 1.95 times risk of not achieving HBV DNA suppression (p= 0.009, 0.026, 0.036, respectively). There was no relationship between gender, age, ethnicity, obesity, baseline AST, HBeAg, genotype, liver fibrosis and HBV DNA suppression after 24 weeks of treatment (p>0.05). Conclusions: The levels of CTLA-4, HBV DNA, ALT, and CTLA-4 -1661G>A polymorphism have a potential relationship with the suppression of HBV DNA in chronic hepatitis B patients with TDF.

An Automated, Quantitative, and Multiplexed Assay Suitable for Point-of-Care Hepatitis B Virus Diagnostics

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has a global reach with high prevalence in resource-limited areas like China and Africa. HBV patients in these areas have limited access to the currently used, costly HBV assays, which are performed in centralized clinical laboratories using single-plexed assays with bulky and expensive instruments. We aim to overcome these limitations by developing a simple and affordable HBV diagnostic platform to allow for timelier diagnosis and intervention of HBV infection. Using giant magnetoresistive (GMR) biosensor chips, we developed an automated and multiplexed quantitative platform for the measurement of a panel of HBV serology markers, including HBV “e” antigen (HBeAg), HBV surface antigen (HBsAg), and the antibody against HBsAg (anti-HBs). Our assay platform was able to detect each HBV marker with high specificity and sensitivity (with three orders of magnitude in dynamic range for each marker). Blinded analysis of HBV patient sera showed excellent correlation between our multiplexed quantitative HBsAg results and the qualitative results obtained using FDA-approved immunoassays, as well as those obtained using quantitative, single-plexed, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). The portable, automated, multiplexed, quantitative HBV serology assay platform we designed shows great promise as a more accessible alternative for HBV screening, diagnosis, and treatment monitoring.

Analysis of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) using high-sensitivity HBsAg assays in hepatitis B virus carriers in whom HBsAg seroclearance was confirmed by conventional assays

AIM

We investigated the utility of high-sensitivity hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) assays compared with conventional HBsAg assays.

METHODS

Using serum samples from 114 hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers in whom HBsAg seroclearance was confirmed by conventional HBsAg assays (cut-off value, 0.05 IU/mL), the amount of HBsAg was re-examined by high-sensitivity HBsAg assays (cut-off value, 0.005 IU/mL). Cases negative for HBsAg in both assays were defined as consistent cases, and cases positive for HBsAg in the high-sensitivity HBsAg assay only were defined as discrepant cases.

RESULTS

There were 55 (48.2%) discrepant cases, and the range of HBsAg titers determined by high-sensitivity HBsAg assays was 0.005-0.056 IU/mL. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of nucleos(t)ide analog therapy, liver cirrhosis, and negative anti-HBs contributed to the discrepancies between the two assays. Cumulative anti-HBs positivity rates among discrepant cases were 12.7%, 17.2%, 38.8%, and 43.9% at baseline, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years, respectively, whereas the corresponding rates among consistent cases were 50.8%, 56.0%, 61.7%, and 68.0%, respectively. Hepatitis B virus DNA negativity rates were 56.4% and 81.4% at baseline, 51.3% and 83.3% at 1 year, and 36.8% and 95.7% at 3 years, among discrepant and consistent cases, respectively. Hepatitis B surface antigen reversion was observed only in discrepant cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-examination by high-sensitivity HBsAg assays revealed that HBsAg was positive in approximately 50% of cases. Cumulative anti-HBs seroconversion rates and HBV-DNA seroclearance rates were lower in these cases, suggesting a population at risk for HBsAg reversion.

Entecavir plasma concentrations are inversely related to HBV-DNA decrease in a cohort of treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B

The role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of entecavir (ETV) in the treatment of patients affected by chronic hepatitis B (CHB) has not yet been defined. Here we present an interim analysis regarding the role of ETV TDM in a prospective cohort of treatment-naïve patients with CHB who received this treatment. The results from 40 patients consecutively enrolled at our centre from 2010 to 2013 are described. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of the role of ETV plasma concentrations in the kinetics of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA decrease. Minimum ETV concentrations (Ctrough) were measured every month after the start of therapy for the first 3 months and then every 6 months. The main result of the pharmacokinetic analysis was the significant inverse correlation of ETV concentration after 1 month of treatment and HBV-DNA decrease after 3 months of treatment (r = -0.624; P <0.001). This correlation was also confirmed when stratifying patients on the basis of viral genotypes: A (r = -0.719; P = 0.003); C (r = -0.917; P = 0.007); and D (r = -0.760; P = 0.007). Possible explanations for this phenomenon could involve interpatient differences in liver conditions (tissue damage or inflammation) and/or genetic variability in specific drug transporters. Further investigations are needed to confirm these results quantifying ETV concentration in peripheral blood mononuclear cells as well as in a larger cohort.

Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen combined with hepatitis B e antigen as sustained virological response predictors during extended therapy with Peginterferon alfa-2a for hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

The best strategy for chronic hepatitis B patients with poor response to 48 weeks of Peginterferon-based therapy has been controversial and the predictive value of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels for determining the sustained virological response (SVR) of these patients is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To optimize management of these patients and evaluate the use of these serobiomarkers to predict SVR.

STUDY DESIGN

Eighty-one patients with an unsatisfactory response after 48 weeks of Peginterferon-based therapy were treated with extended Peginterferon therapy with or without nucleo(s) tide analogues (NAs), for a total of 96 weeks of Peginterferon treatment. HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA levels were measured serially during the treatment and follow-up.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-six of 81 patients (32.1%) attained SVR during the 72-week follow-up. The SVR rate was not statistically different between groups receiving 1-year prolongation of Peginterferon with or without NAs. The serum HBsAg cut-off of 1800IU/mL at week 48 had area under curve (AUC) of 0.727, and the serum HBsAg cut-off of 1500IU/mL, combined with HBeAg loss at week 72, had AUC of 0.753 to predict SVR during the follow-up. In conclusion, extended treatment with Peginterferon with or without NAs for patients with unsatisfactory response after 48 weeks of Peginterferon-based therapy is a promising strategy to achieve SVR, and quantitative serum HBsAg at week 48 and HBsAg level combined with HBeAg loss at week 72 of therapy can predict SVR to prolongation therapy with Peginterferon.

The predictive value of early indicators for HBeAg seroconversion in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with Telbivudine treatment for 104 weeks

PURPOSE

Through an observation on HBeAg-positive chronic hepatits B (CHB) patients in Telbivudine (LDT) treatment for 104 weeks, we tried to explore valuable early predictors for HBeAg seroconversion during the treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study lasting for 104 weeks was conducted, and the patients enrolled were administered with LDT 600 mg daily. The medical evaluation went every 12 weeks, then the age distribution, baseline ALT level, early HBVDNA, HBsAg and HBeAg levels at baseline, week 12 and 24 as well as the decrease of the three indicators at week 12 and 24 were analyzed for their predictive values for HBeAg seroconversion at week 104.

RESULT

Thirty-three patients finished the observation. All patients got ALT normalisation and 28 patients (84.84%) got complete virological response (HBV DNA<291 copies/ml) at week 104. Poor virological response and virologic breakthrough was observed in two (6.06%) and three patients (9.09%), respectively. Nine patients (27.27%) got HBeAg seroconversion. HBeAg levels and its decrease levels at week 12 and 24 showed significant differences between patients with and without HBeAg seroconversion. And the HBsAg levels at week 12 and 24 showed tendencies of significant differences in two groups. HBeAg level at week 24 was confirmed related to its longer term seroconversion in regression analysis. The patients with HBeAg level<2.1 S/CO at week 24 would be more possible to get HBeAg seroconversion at week 104, with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 95.83%, 88.89%, 95.8% and 88.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Good efficacy of long-term LDT treatment in biological and virological response and its advantage in serological response was confirmed again in our study. The HBeAg level at week 24 showed significant value in prediction for HBeAg seroconversion at week 104 compared to other serological markers in the early period.

Comparative effectiveness of antiviral treatment for hepatitis B: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

A wide variety of competing drugs are available to patients for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. We update a recent meta-analysis to include additional trial evidence with the aim of determining which treatment is the most effective.

METHODS

Twelve monotherapy or combination therapy were evaluated in treatment-naive individuals with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive or negative patients. Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials in the first year of therapy. Bayesian random effects network meta-analysis was used to calculate the pairwise odds ratios, 95% credible intervals and ranking of six surrogate outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 22 studies were identified (7508 patients): 12 studies analysed HBeAg-positive patients, six analysed HBeAg-negative patients, and four evaluated both. Tenofovir was most effective at increasing efficacy in HBeAg-positive patients, ranking first for three outcomes and increased odds of undetectable levels of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA compared with seven other therapies (such as lamivudine: odds ratio 33.0; 95% credible interval 7.0-292.7). For HBeAg-negative patients, the large network (seven therapies) ranked entecavir alone or in combination with tenofovir highly for reduction in HBV DNA and histologic improvement. In the smaller network (three therapies), tenofovir ranked first for undetectable HBV DNA and histologic improvement. No data existed to directly or indirectly compare these treatments.

CONCLUSION

For HBeAg-positive patients tenofovir is the most effective at increasing efficacy, whereas for HBeAg-negative patients, either tenofovir or entecavir is most effective. Further research should focus on strengthening the network connections, in particular comparing tenofovir and entecavir in HBeAg-negative patients.

Combination therapy of interferon and nucleotide/nucleoside analogues for chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B is one of the leading causes of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma globally. At present, seven drugs, including two interferons and five oral nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs), have been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Interferon works by immunomodulation, but is successful in less than a third of treated patients and is a relatively weak antiviral. NAs directly suppress the hepatitis B virus but have limited durability. Based on current data, combination of NA and interferon results in greater viral suppression but does not translate to off-treatment sustained response. Concomitant or sequential treatment also does not make a difference. Combining telbivudine and interferon also runs the risk of severe peripheral neuropathy. On the other hand, interferon switch or additional therapy in patients well controlled with NAs appears to improve the durability of off-treatment response. This article reviews current data on interferon and NA combination and discusses potential future developments.

Comparison of three luminescent immunoassays for hepatitis B virus surface antigen quantification during the natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) quantification has garnered attention because of its high predictive value in determining treatment responses. The HBsAg quantification assays, such as Architect and Elecsys, are commercially available, and more assays are in development. We aimed to compare the results of the Architect and Elecsys assays with those of a new assay, WTultra. The WTultra HBsAg assay is a sandwich chemiluminescent microplate enzyme immunoassay and provides an alternative choice which is more cost-effective and potentially applicable in developing or resource-constrained countries and areas. A total of 411 serum samples were collected from patients during various phases of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection. The samples were assessed using the three assays, and the results were compared and analyzed. The results for the Architect, Elecsys, and WTultra assays were well correlated according to the overall results for the samples (correlation coefficients, rArchitect versus WTultra = 0.936, rArchitect versus Elecsys = 0.952, and rWTultra versus Elecsys = 0.981) and the various infection phases (rArchitect versus WTultra ranging from 0.67 to 0.975, rArchitect versus Elecsys ranging from 0.695 to 0.982, and rWTultra versus Elecsys ranging from 0.877 to 0.99). Additionally, consistent results were observed according to genotype (genotype B: rArchitect versus WTultra = 0.976, rArchitect versus Elecsys = 0.978, and rWTultra versus Elecsys = 0.979; genotype C: rArchitect versus WTultra = 0.950, rArchitect versus Elecsys = 0.963, and rWTultra versus Elecsys = 0.981) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels (rArchitect = 0.540, rWTultra = 0.553, and rElecsys = 0.580). In conclusion, the Elecsys and WTultra assays were well correlated with the Architect assay, irrespective of the CHB infection phase or genotype. All of these assays are reliable for HBsAg quantification.

Current developments in nucleoside/nucleotide analogues for hepatitis B

There had been remarkable development in nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) and evolution in treatment strategies in last 15 years. Currently, there are five NAs available for chronic hepatitis B treatment, namely lamivudine, telbivudine and entecavir (nucleoside analogues), adefovir dipivoxil and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (nucleotide analogues). The advantages of relatively infrequent side effects and easy administration per oral make NAs popular treatment options. The major drawback of earlier generation NAs is the risk of emergence of drug resistance. Current international guidelines recommend the use of more potent agents with high genetic barriers to resistance including entecavir and tenofovir as first line chronic hepatitis B treatment. However, there is no consensus regarding the subsequent treatment regimens in patients with suboptimal responses to NAs. De novo combination therapy of two NAs, response-guided therapy and roadmap concept in NAs with subsequent switch or add-on therapy can also potentially improve treatment efficacy and avoid resistance.

Incidence and risk factors for incomplete HBV DNA suppression in HIV/HBV-co-infected patients initiating tenofovir-based therapy

Suppression of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA to undetectable levels is an important goal for HIV/HBV-co-infected patients receiving anti-HBV-active antiretroviral therapy (ART), and current guidelines recommend that this outcome should be reached by 1 year of treatment. However, the proportion of patients that fail to achieve an undetectable HBV DNA at this time point and its determinants remain unknown in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors for incomplete HBV suppression following 1 year of tenofovir-based ART. We performed a cohort study among tenofovir-treated HIV/HBV-co-infected patients. Patients had HBV viraemia, initiated tenofovir-based ART and had HBV DNA measured at 1 year of therapy. The primary outcome was incomplete HBV suppression (HBV DNA ≥2.6 log IU/mL) at 1 year. Logistic regression determined odds ratio (ORs) of incomplete HBV suppression for risk factors of interest. Among 133 patients, 54% (95% CI, 46-63%) had incomplete HBV suppression at 1 year. Incomplete suppression was associated with higher baseline HBV DNA (OR, 1.46 per log IU/mL increase; 95% CI, 1.1-1.94) and detectable HIV viraemia at 1 year (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.19-5.32). Among 66 patients with suppressed HIV RNA at 1 year, 28 (42%) failed to achieve an undetectable HBV DNA. Failure to suppress HBV DNA by 1 year occurred in a sizeable proportion of tenofovir-treated HIV/HBV-co-infected patients. Higher HBV DNA and detectable HIV viraemia were risk factors for incomplete HBV suppression.

Serum proteins in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2b

AIM: To study the differential protein profile in serum of hepatitis B patients.

METHODS: Serum samples were obtained from patients with chronic hepatitis B who were receiving peginterferon alfa-2b. The serum samples were subjected to albumin depletion and analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE). Differentially expressed protein spots were identified by electrospray ionization-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein, complement component C3c and CD5 antigen were further analyzed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunonephelometry.

RESULTS: Nineteen patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) were studied. These patients were followed for at least 1 year after treatment and were classified according to their treatment response: responders (n = 9) and non-responders (n = 10). 2-DE and MS/MS analysis were performed to compare the serum proteins before initiating peginterferon alfa-2b. From the quantitative analysis of the 2-D gel, 7 proteins were detected between the two groups at different levels before treatment. Among these potential candidates, serum levels of alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein, complement component C3c and CD5 antigen-like precursor were further analyzed. In the validation phase, 23 subjects, 9 sustained responders and 14 non-responders, were recruited. Interestingly, the levels of alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein and complement component C3c were elevated in the serum of the non-responders compared to the responders.

CONCLUSION: Serum alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein and complement component C3c may be potential serum biomarkers in predicting the treatment response of peginterferon alfa-2b in patients with CHB prior to treatment.

Kinetics and prediction of HBsAg loss during therapy with analogues in patients affected by chronic hepatitis B HBeAg negative and genotype D

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In patients affected by chronic hepatitis because of HBV infection, long-term suppressive therapy with nucleos(t)ides analogues in the HBeAg- patients has shown low effects on HBsAg titre (qHBsAg) decrease, and HBsAg loss is difficult to achieve. Thus, in this type of patients the main goals of antiviral therapy is the suppression of HBV-DNA and ALT normalization.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated different qHBsAg kinetics in 134 treatment-naïve patients having the same characteristics: HBeAg-, infection sustained by HBV genotype D and persistently undetectable HBV-DNA. Patients were treated with NAs therapy (lamivudine, adefovir, telbivudine, entecavir and tenofovir) for at least 2 years. qHBsAg was performed every 6 months.

RESULTS

Our results showed a significantly greater qHBsAg decline after 2 years in patients treated with tenofovir (0.45 logIU/ml) than in patients treated with telbivudine (0.12 logIU/ml; P < 0.001). The calculated expected time to HBsAg loss was shorter in the tenofovir group than in the telbivudine group (nearly 17 vs 63 years, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

HBeAg negative patients infected by HBV genotype D should be treated with more potent NAs such as entecavir or tenofovir to obtain a significant qHBsAg decrease, but the achievement of HBsAg loss seems to require almost two decades of therapy.

Analysis of mutations in the S gene of hepatitis B virus strains in patients with chronic infection by online bioinformatics tools

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) genomes show a high rate of mutations. This can lead to a variety of amino acid changes in the surface and polymerase genes, causing changes in viral protein conformation that can result in diminished antibody binding or decreased secretion of surface antigen (HBsAg). HBV monitoring increasingly relies on HBsAg detection and quantification, and therefore epidemiological data on HBsAg mutations are needed. We therefore analyzed the frequency of HBsAg mutations possibly influencing the quantification of HBsAg (MUPIQHs) in an unselected patient collective. To this end, we determined the HBV surface and polymerase gene sequences of an unselected patient collective of 237 individuals chronically infected with HBV and analyzed the MUPIQHs in these sequences using three different online HBV sequence analysis tools. We found that 17 or 34% of the patients, depending on the online interpretation algorithm used, harbored MUPIQHs and that MUPIQHs were not significantly associated with the duration of disease, treatment, or HBV genotype. Thus, this study shows that a substantial amount of HBV sequences derived from unselected patients chronically infected with HBV carry MUPIQHs, and therefore the reliability of routine quantitative and qualitative HBsAg tests needs to be reevaluated.

Molecular mechanisms of ursodeoxycholic acid toxicity & side effects: ursodeoxycholic acid freezes regeneration & induces hibernation mode

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a steroid bile acid approved for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). UDCA is reported to have “hepato-protective properties”. Yet, UDCA has “unanticipated” toxicity, pronounced by more than double number of deaths, and eligibility for liver transplantation compared to the control group in 28 mg/kg/day in primary sclerosing cholangitis, necessitating trial halt in North America. UDCA is associated with increase in hepatocellular carcinoma in PBC especially when it fails to achieve biochemical response (10 and 15 years incidence of 9% and 20% respectively). “Unanticipated” UDCA toxicity includes hepatitis, pruritus, cholangitis, ascites, vanishing bile duct syndrome, liver cell failure, death, severe watery diarrhea, pneumonia, dysuria, immune-suppression, mutagenic effects and withdrawal syndrome upon sudden halt. UDCA inhibits DNA repair, co-enzyme A, cyclic AMP, p53, phagocytosis, and inhibits induction of nitric oxide synthatase. It is genotoxic, exerts aneugenic activity, and arrests apoptosis even after cellular phosphatidylserine externalization. UDCA toxicity is related to its interference with drug detoxification, being hydrophilic and anti-apoptotic, has a long half-life, has transcriptional mutational abilities, down-regulates cellular functions, has a very narrow difference between the recommended (13 mg/kg/day) and toxic dose (28 mg/kg/day), and it typically transforms into lithocholic acid that induces DNA strand breakage, it is uniquely co-mutagenic, and promotes cell transformation. UDCA beyond PBC is unjustified.

Undetectable HBV DNA at month 12 of entecavir treatment predicts maintained viral suppression and HBeAg-seroconversion in chronic hepatitis B patients at 3 years

BACKGROUND

On-treatment monitoring of serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA to guide treatment strategy for patients on entecavir has received little attention.

AIM

To investigate the predictive value of on-treatment HBV DNA levels for responses to entecavir.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study among nucleos(t)ide analogue-naïve HBV-infected patients on entecavir with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Maintained virological suppression was defined as undetectable HBV DNA (<20 IU/mL) until the last visit. Genotypic drug resistance was screened by using the INNO-LiPA DR assay.

RESULTS

A total of 440 chronic hepatitis B patients (160 HBeAg-positive) followed for 34 ± 9 months were included. The cumulative probability of maintained virological suppression at year 1, 2 and 3 were 76.5%, 83.0% and 88.3% respectively. On multivariate analysis, lower baseline HBV DNA, undetectable HBV DNA at month 12 and negative HBeAg were the independent predictors of maintained virological suppression. M12 responders (who had undetectable HBV DNA at month 12) had higher probability of maintained virological suppression at 3 years (99.1%) as compared to non responders (57.5%; P < 0.001). The cumulative probability of HBeAg-seroconversion at year 1, 2 and 3 were 19.0%, 27.2% and 33.5% respectively. M12 responders had higher probability of HBeAg-seroconversion at 3 years (43.2%) than the non responders (19.0%; P = 0.003). M12 responders had lower probability of drug resistance at 3 years (0%) than the non responders (2.6%; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Month 12 HBV DNA responses could predict the probability of maintained virological suppression, HBeAg-seroconversion and risk of drug resistance among patients on entecavir treatment at 3 years.

Prediction of off-treatment response to lamivudine by serum hepatitis B surface antigen quantification in hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients

BACKGROUND

The timing of antiviral therapy cessation in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients is controversial. Here, we aimed to investigate the role of HBV DNA and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) monitoring to predict off-treatment sustained response.

METHODS

A total of 53 HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients who received lamivudine for 34 ±23 (range 12-76) months and had lamivudine stopped for 47 ±35 months were studied. Primary outcome was sustained response, defined as HBV DNA≤200 IU/ml, at 12 months post-treatment (SR-12).

RESULTS

A total of 9 (17%) patients achieved SR-12. HBV DNA at baseline, month 6 and end of treatment had no association with SR-12. HBsAg levels tended to decrease more significantly during treatment among SR-12 responders. At the end of treatment, both HBsAg ≤2 log IU/ml and reduction by >1 log from baseline had sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for SR-12 of 78%, 96%, 78% and 96%, respectively. All 5 patients with HBsAg≤2 log IU/ml and reduction >1 log at the end of treatment achieved SR-12 and all 40 patients with HBsAg>2 log IU/ml and reduction ≤1 log did not have SR-12. The cumulative probability of sustained response and HBsAg clearance at 5 years among patients with HBsAg≤2 log IU/ml were 88% and 72%, respectively, that among patients with HBsAg reduction >1 log were 74% and 61%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring of HBsAg level can guide the timing of stopping lamivudine in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.

Comparison between Elecsys HBsAg II and architect HBsAg QT assays for quantification of hepatitis B surface antigen among patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis B virus

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) quantification has been steadily gaining interest as a clinical marker of therapeutic efficacy, for which two commercial assays are currently available: Architect HBsAg QT (Architect) and Elecsys HBsAg II (Elecsys). HBsAg quantification was evaluated using both assays in 126 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV)-coinfected patients initiating treatment with tenofovir dipivoxil fumarate. Linear regression and correlation were used to establish the relationship between the two methods. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to determine mean between-assay difference and limits of agreement (LOA) (±2 standard deviations [SD]) both overall and stratified on HBV (hepatitis B envelope antigen [HBeAg] status, replication, genotype, HBV mutants) or HIV (CD4(+) cell count) cofactors. There was a significant correlation between Elecsys and Architect assays (correlation coefficient, r = 0.959; P < 0.001). HBsAg quantification using the Elecsys assay was on average 0.200 log(10) IU/ml (LOA, -0.500, 0.800) higher than that using Architect, which was consistent across levels of CD4(+) cell count, presence of precore and YMDD mutations, and HBeAg status. A slightly larger mean between-assay difference was observed with genotypes A and G (0.196 and 0.201, respectively) versus HBV genotypes D and E (0.036 and 0.030, respectively). Mutations on the S region at position s120/s145 were the only determinant in which the mean between-assay difference in HBsAg quantification was lower than the null value (-0.078). In conclusion, the Elecsys assay, with automatic on-board dilution, is capable of quantifying serum HBsAg levels in HIV-HBV-coinfected patients, with very high correlation with the Architect assay.

Efficacy of peginterferon α-2a and predictors of response in HBeAg-negative, genotype D-naive patients

BACKGROUND

Peginterferon (PEG-IFN) α-2a has been shown to induce a sustained virologic response (SVR) in 20-30% of "hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)"-negative patients.

AIM

To determine the safety and efficacy of PEG-IFN α-2a in HBeAg-negative, genotype D-naive patients and to analyze the predictors of response.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized trial was conducted at four hospitals. A total of 35 consecutive HBeAg-negative naive genotype D patients received PEG-IFN α-2a for 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Based on a cutoff of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <400 copies ml(-1), an early virologic response (EVR) at week 12, end of treatment virologic response (ETVR) at week 48, and SVR at week 72 were achieved by 3 (9%), 9 (26%), and 8 patients (23%), respectively. The EVR rate improved to 43%, ETVR to 49%, and SVR to 57%, when a HBV DNA cutoff level of <20,000 copies ml(-1) was used. Pretreatment HBsAg level was not a predictor for SVR on univariate analysis, but correlated with decline in HBV DNA levels at weeks 48 and 72. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, low body weight, high alanine aminotransferase (ALT), low HBV DNA, and low triglyceride levels were identified as baseline predictors of SVR.

CONCLUSION

HBeAg-negative genotype D-naive patients treated with PEG-IFN α-2a achieved SVR in 23 (HBV <400 copies ml(-1)) and 57% (HBV <20,000 copies ml(-1)) of patients, a better response than previously reported that might be related to the absence of drug resistance in these naive patients. Pretreatment predictors of SVR were low body weight, high ALT, low HBV DNA, and low triglycerides.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients receiving tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-targeted therapy: analysis of 257 cases

The emergence of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)-targeted therapies as a key therapeutic option for patients with rheumatic, digestive, and dermatologic autoimmune diseases has been associated with increasing reports of liver damage in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. We studied the current evidence on the use of anti-TNF agents in patients with HBV through a systematic analysis of cases reported in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases using the MeSH term "hepatitis B virus" combined with the terms "infliximab," "etanercept," "adalimumab," "certolizumab," "golimumab," and "anti-TNF agents," and summarize the results here. We analyzed 257 patients with positive HBV markers who received anti-TNF therapy (255 identified in the search strategy and 2 new cases), 89 HBsAg+ carriers, and 168 anti-HBc+ persons. HBV reactivation was reported in 35 (39%) HBsAg+ carriers. The percentage of reactivation was higher in patients previously treated with immunosuppressive agents (96% vs. 70%, p=0.033) and lower in those who received antiviral prophylaxis (23% vs. 62%, p=0.003). Acute liver failure was reported in 5 patients, 4 of whom died. Infliximab was associated with a higher rate of induced liver disease (raised transaminase levels, clinical signs, viral reactivation, and acute liver failure) compared with etanercept. In anti-HBc+ persons, reactivation was reported in 9 (5%) cases, including 1 patient who died due to fulminant liver failure.In summary, our search of the current evidence identified 257 reported HBV+ patients treated with anti-TNF agents, with a significant percentage of liver damage in HBsAg+ carriers, including raised transaminase levels (42%), signs and symptoms of liver disease (16%), reappearance of serum HBV-DNA (39%), and death related to liver failure (5%). The rate of reactivation in anti-HBc+ persons was 7-fold lower than in HBsAg+ carriers. The increasing number of reported cases of HBV reactivation following TNF-targeted therapies and the associated morbidity and mortality demand specific preventive strategies.

Implications of the changes in the levels of HBV DNA and HBsAg during the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

With the development of new drugs, there has been a significant progression in the treatment of viral hepatitis B over the past five years. Based on their effect mechanisms, the currently available seven different drugs can be classified either as those of the interferon group or those of the nucleoside analogue group. Despite the pharmacological advances, it is still rare to achieve sustained response. The chances of a long-term inactive hepatitis stage, however, have greatly increased with the growing opportunities for personalized pharmacological treatment based on the selection of the correct type of drug, the timely modification of therapy in case of ineffectiveness and the determination of the optimal time and length of the therapy. For this, it is necessary to monitor several predictive, non-invasive biomarkers. For the initiation of the therapy, the most important markers are HBeAg, alanine-aminotranferase and HBV DNA serum levels and the viral genotype. During therapy, quantitative monitoring of the HBV DNA and HbsAg levels helps most to differentiate between those who will respond fast, those who will need longer treatment and those who are unlikely to respond and therefore need alternative drug therapy. A rapid decrease in or disappearance of HBsAg is predictive of successful response during interferon therapy, while changes in the HBV DNA level are more informative during treatment with nucleoside analogues. It is expected that information on the effects of combination therapy will become available soon and this may alter both the currently recommended treatment and monitoring strategy. Orv. Hetil., 2011, 152, 866–868.

Serum HBsAg quantification to predict response to peginterferon therapy of e antigen positive chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

On-treatment predictors of response to peginterferon can guide individualization of therapy in chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

AIM

To investigate the use of serum hepatitis B surface antigen quantification to predict sustained response.

METHODS

Hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B patients who received peginterferon for 32-48 weeks with or without lamivudine combination were studied. Sustained response was defined as hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion and chronic hepatitis B virus DNA <10 000 copies/mL until 12 months post-treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-one of 92 (23%) patients achieved sustained response. At month 6, the area under receiver operating characteristics curve for hepatitis B surface antigen to predict sustained response was 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.65-0.89, P < 0.001). An hepatitis B surface antigen cutoff at 300 IU/mL at month 6 could give the maximum combination of sensitivity (62%) and specificity (89%) to predict sustained response. Nine of 21 (43%) sustained responders vs. 9 of 71 (13%) nonsustained responders had >1 log hepatitis B surface antigen reduction at month 6 (P < 0.001). Combined hepatitis B surface antigen ≤ 300 IU/mL and >1 log reduction at month 6 had sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 43%, 96%, 75% and 85% to predict sustained response, respectively.

CONCLUSION

On-treatment serum hepatitis B surface antigen can predict response to peginterferon therapy in chronic hepatitis B.

Meta-analysis: reduction in hepatic events following interferon-alfa therapy of chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

The long-term benefit of interferon-alfa (IFN-α) treatment in preventing various hepatic complications is not certain.

AIM

To study the effects of IFN-α on reducing the risk of developing overall hepatic events (hepatocellular carcinoma, cirrhotic complications and liver-related mortality) in chronic hepatitis B patients.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials, case-control studies and cohort studies were retrieved from electronic databases and conference abstracts. Relative risks (RRs) of different hepatic complications among patients treated by IFN-α vs. no treatment or placebo were studied.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were identified totalling 975 patients treated by IFN-α vs. 1147 untreated controls for analysis. Patients were treated by IFN-α for 1-24 months with a post-treatment follow-up of 1-13 years. Treatment by IFN-α reduced the risk of overall hepatic events (RR 0.55, 95% confident interval or CI 0.43-0.70, P < 0.001) and cirrhotic complications (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.32-0.67, P < 0.001) by 45% and 54% respectively. Patients who responded to IFN-α had more profound reduction in overall hepatic events (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.87, P = 0.03) and cirrhotic complications (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.09-0.38, P < 0.001) vs. the untreated controls.

CONCLUSION

Interferon-alfa treatment reduces the risk of hepatic events particularly among responders to treatment.

A longitudinal study on the natural history of serum hepatitis B surface antigen changes in chronic hepatitis B

Serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) quantification has been suggested to reflect the concentration of covalently closed circular DNA in the liver. We aimed to investigate the HBsAg levels at different stages of chronic hepatitis B and the changes in HBsAg level during the natural progression of disease. One hundred seventeen untreated patients with chronic hepatitis B were studied with longitudinal follow-up for 99 ± 16 months. HBsAg quantification was performed at the first visit, the last visit, and three visits at each quartile during the follow-up. At the first visit, HBsAg level was higher among patients who were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive (N = 49) than those who were HBeAg-negative (N = 68) (4.01 ± 0.91 log IU/mL versus 2.73 ± 1.25 log IU/mL, P < 0.001). HBsAg level was persistently high at approximately 5 log IU/mL among patients in the immune tolerance phase (N = 7). The HBsAg levels among patients with HBeAg-positive active disease (N = 25) or sustained HBeAg seroconversion (N = 17) were comparable at approximately 3-4 log IU/mL. The HBsAg levels among patients who were HBeAg-negative tended to be higher among patients with active (N = 46) than those with inactive disease (N = 22). The median HBsAg levels decreased in HBeAg-negative patients with active and inactive disease by 0.041 log IU/mL/year and 0.043 log IU/mL/year, respectively. Twenty-two (17%) patients had HBsAg reduction >1 log IU/mL at the last visit; most of them showed reduced hepatitis B virus DNA, and eight had HBsAg loss.

CONCLUSION

HBsAg remained stable in HBeAg-positive patients and tended to reduce slowly in HBeAg-negative patients. Reduction of HBsAg for >1 log IU/mL could reflect improved immune control.

Hepatitis B virus: from diagnosis to treatment

During the next few decades, vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) will dramatically change the epidemiological profile of this worldwide infection especially when Heath Policies encourage including HBV vaccination program for the newborns. However, it is still estimated that more than 2000millions living people have met HBV. Symptomatic hepatitis with jaundice is less frequent than asymptomatic infection; however, as much as 350millions of individuals remain chronically infected by HBV. In these cases, the need for efficient antiviral therapy remains clear when a viral replication is observed to control the risk of progression and the need for liver transplantation, which represents the only end-stage treatment. Indeed, patients having chronic hepatitis B (CHB) can now be successfully treated using nucleos(t)ide analogs (NA) or pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN). Therefore, beside vaccination, prevention of the progression of the disease to cirrhosis and liver decompensation, leading to end-stage liver disease and/or to hepatocellular carcinoma, by inhibiting viral replication seems to represent the best approach to improve survival. At last but not least, co-morbidities and other viral infections, leading also to chronic liver cirrhosis or liver inflammation such as the specific satellite delta virus (HDV), human immunodeficency virus (HIV) and/or hepatitis C (HCV) virus, are able to accelerate the progression and have to be taken in account. Interestingly, in treated infection, the dogma of the irreversibility of the liver fibrosis, when the cirrhosis is constituted, is tumbling down. In this review, we will focus on the clinical, virological and therapeutic aspects of hepatitis B infection in order to expose the proposals to follow-up and treat HBV-infected patients and the prevention of drug-resistant HBV mutants that frequently arise, leading to treatment failure and progression to liver disease.

Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD): A review of its use in chronic hepatitis B

Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) [Pegasys] comprises an inert, branched, 40 kD polyethylene glycol (PEG) moiety attached to interferon-alpha-2a. Subcutaneous peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) is indicated for the treatment of adults with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive or -negative chronic hepatitis B who have compensated liver disease with evidence of viral replication and hepatic inflammation. Subcutaneous peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) has antiviral and immunomodulatory properties and a convenient once-weekly administration schedule. Forty-eight weeks of therapy with peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) with or without lamivudine was more effective than lamivudine alone in achieving a sustained response in patients with HBeAg-positive or -negative chronic hepatitis B. A long-term follow-up study in patients with HBeAg-positive disease who received peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) monotherapy revealed an HBeAg seroconversion rate of 42%, 1 year after the end of treatment. A long-term follow-up study in patients with HBeAg-negative disease who received peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) with or without lamivudine revealed hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance in 12% of patients and inactive chronic hepatitis B in 17% of patients, 5 years after the end of treatment. Various predictors of response may be useful in terms of identifying patients who may be candidates for shorter or longer peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) treatment durations. For example, quantifying serum HBeAg (in HBeAg-positive disease) and HBsAg levels during therapy may be useful. Adverse events typical of the influenza-like symptoms seen with alpha-interferons occurred more frequently in patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) with or without lamivudine than in those receiving lamivudine alone. In conclusion, peginterferon-alpha-2a (40 kD) is a valuable option for the first-line treatment of HBeAg-negative or -positive chronic hepatitis B.