Testosterone supplementation and the gender divide

Testosterone supplementation has proven benefits for women but unfortunately, to date, no Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved product is available; while 31 different preparations of testosterone are FDA approved for men.

Intensive Monitoring Studies for Assessing Medicines: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Intensive monitoring (IM) is one of the methods of post-marketing active surveillance based upon event monitoring, which has received interest in the current medicines regulatory landscape. For a specific period of time, IM involves primary data collection and is actively focused on gathering longitudinal information, mainly safety, since the first day of drug use. Objectives: To describe IM systems and studies' data published over 11-years period (2006-2016). Specifically, we reviewed study population/event surveillance, methodological approaches, limitations, and its applications in the real-world evidence generation data. Methods: We completed a systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify studies published from 2006 to 2016, that used IM methodology. We extracted data using a standardized form and results were analyzed descriptively. The methodological quality of selected studies was assessed using the modified Downs and Black checklist. Results: From 1,400 screened citations, we identified 86 papers, corresponding to 69 different studies. Seventy percent of reviewed studies corresponded to established IM systems, of which, more than half were prescription event monitoring (PEM) and modified-PEM. Among non-established IM systems, vaccines were the most common studied drugs (n = 14). The median cohort size ranged from 488 (hospitals) to 10,479 (PEM) patients. Patients and caregivers were the event data source in 39.1% of studies. The mean overall quality score was similar between established and non-established IM. Conclusions: Over the study period, IM studies were implemented in 26 countries with different maturity levels of post-marketing surveillance systems. We identified two major limitations: only 20% of studies were conducted at hospital-level, which is a matter of concern, insofar as healthcare systems are facing a lack of access to new medicines at ambulatory care level. Additionally, IM access to data of drug exposure cohorts, either at identification or at follow-up stages, could somehow constitute a barrier, given the complexity of managerial, linkable, and privacy data issues.

Implications of off-label use: An example from the final results of an observational cohort study on Intrinsa® (testosterone patch)

INTRODUCTION

Off-label use is where a medicinal product is used for a medical purpose not in accordance with the authorised product information. Intrinsa® is a transdermal testosterone patch, which is indicated for use in hypoactive sexual desire disorder in bilaterally oophorectomised and hysterectomised women receiving concomitant estrogen therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the utilization characteristics of patients prescribed testosterone patch (Intrinsa®) and to assess, where possible, if the product is being used according to the authorised product information.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients identified from dispensed prescriptions issued by general practitioners for Intrinsa® between March 2007 and August 2010. Postal questionnaires were sent to general practitioners six months following the date of the first prescription for Intrinsa® for each patient, requesting information including patient demographics and drug utilization.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Menopausal status and use of concomitant estrogen therapy.

RESULTS

The final cohort consisted of 3073 patients; the majority were females (3017, 98.2%). The most commonly reported indication was hypoactive sexual desire disorder in 2324 female patients (77.0%). Only 43.5% female patients (n = 1313) were reported to have been hysterectomised and bilaterally oophorectomised. For 1029 (34.1%) female patients there was no evidence that the patient was using concomitant estrogen therapy. Overall, only 643 patients (20.9%) in the cohort were being prescribed Intrinsa® according to the manufacturer's recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence obtained solely from clinical trials might not be generalisable where off-label prescribing occurs in real-life, so evidence from post-marketing observational studies is important to provide complimentary data on a product's safety and effectiveness.