Influence of cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) genetic polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of the prolonged-release, once-daily formulation of tacrolimus in stable renal transplant recipients

Tacrolimus dose adjustment is not necessary in dose to dose conversion from a twice daily to a prolonged release once daily dose form

Twice daily TAC (BID TAC) and prolonged released once daily dose tacrolimus (OD TAC) have different pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Precise dose adjustment recommendations when converting from BID TAC to OD TAC remain inconclusive. A single center, PK study was conducted in stable KT recipients taking constant doses of TAC, mycophenolic acid, and prednisolone. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) 0-24 and C_trough were measured before and 4 weeks after 1:1 conversion from BID TAC to OD TAC without subsequent dose adjustment. A 90% confidence interval (CI) of geometric mean ratio (GMR) of OD TAC/BID TAC within the range of 0.9-1.11 was utilized to indicate equivalence of the narrow therapeutic index drugs. The roles of CYP3A5 genotypic polymorphism on PK parameters were also assessed. There were 20 patients with median time since transplantation of 18 months. The mean of CKD-EPI eGFR was 60.7 ± 16.43 mL/min/1.73 m². The median total daily TAC dose of 0.058 mg/kg/day. The geometric means (%CV) of AUC_0-24 of OD and BID TAC were 205.16 (36.4%) and 210.3 (32.5%) ng/mL × h, respectively, with a GMR of 0.98 (90%CI 0.91-1.04). The geometric means (%CV) of C_trough of OD TAC and BID TAC were 5.43 (33.1%) and 6.09 (34.6%) ng/mL, respectively. The GMR of C_trough was 0.89 (90%CI 0.82-0.98), which was below 0.9. The newly calculated target C_trough level of OD TAC was 4.8-6.2 ng/mL. The best abbreviated AUC_0-24 was AUC = 0.97(C0) + 5.79(C6) + 18.97(C12) - 4.26. The GMR AUC_0-24 was within the range of 0.9-1.11 irrespective of CYP3A5 genotypic polymorphism while the GMR of C_trough was below 0.9 only in the CYP3A5 expressor patients. The 1:1 conversion from BID TAC to OD TAC without subsequent dose adjustment provided similar AUC_0-24 regardless of CYP3A5 genotypic polymorphism. However, the C_trough was lower in the CYP3A5 expressor group. Therefore, it is not necessary to routinely increase the OD TAC dose after conversion.Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR20210715002).

Polymorphism and cocrystal salt formation of 2-((2,6-dichlorophenyl)amino)benzoic acid, harvest of a second form of 2-((2,6-dimethylphenyl)amino)benzoic acid, and isomorphism between the two systems

Isomorphism and isostructurality were observed between form I of 2-((2,6-dimethylphenyl)amino)benzoic acid and its analog 2-((2,6-dichlorophenyl)amino)benzoic acid, which suggests double Cl–CH3 exchange also leads to structural similarity.

Effects of Late Conversion from Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Slow Release Tacrolimus on the Insulin Resistance Indexes in Kidney Transplant Patients

The use of tacrolimus (Tac) may be involved in the development of new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) in a dose-related manner. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a standard twice-daily formulation of Tac (TacBID) vs. the once-daily slow-release formulation (TacOD) on the basal insulin resistance indexes (Homa and McAuley), and related metabolic parameters, in a cohort of kidney transplant patients. We retrospectively evaluated 20 stable renal transplant recipients who were switched from TacBID to TacOD. Blood levels of Tac were analyzed at one-month intervals from 6 months before to 8 months after conversion. Moreover, Homa and McAuley indexes, C-peptide, insulin, HbA1c, uric acid, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol serum levels and their associations with Tac levels were evaluated. We observed a significant decrease in Tac exposure (8.5 ± 2 ng/mL, CV 0.23 vs. 6.1 ± 1.9 ng/mL, CV 0.31, TacBID vs. TacOD periods, p < 0.001) and no significant changes in Homa (1.42 ± 0.4 vs. 1.8 ± 0.7, p > 0.05) and McAuley indexes (7.12 ± 1 vs. 7.58 ± 1.4, p > 0.05). Similarly, blood levels of glucose, insulin, HbA1c, lipids, and uric acid were unchanged between the two periods, while C-peptide resulted significantly lower after conversion to TacOD. These data suggest that in kidney transplant recipients, reduced Tac exposure has no significant effects on basal insulin sensitivity indexes and metabolic parameters.

Comparison of the Impact of Pharmacogenetic Variability on the PK of Slow Release and Immediate Release Tacrolimus Formulations

Tacrolimus-modified release formulations allow for once-daily dosing, and adherence is better compared to the twice-daily immediate release formulation. When patients are switched from one formulation to another, variable changes in drug concentrations are observed. Current data suggest that the changes in drug exposure are larger in patients who express the CYP3A5 enzyme (CYP3A5 *1/*3 or *1/*1) compared to nonexpressers (CYP3A5*3/*3). Possibly, these differences are due to the fact that in the upper region of the small intestine CYP3A activity is higher, and that this expression of CYP3A decreases towards the more distal parts of the gut. Modified release formulations may therefore be subject to a less presystemic metabolism. However, the full implications of pharmacogenetic variants affecting the expression and function of drug transporters in the gut wall and of enzymes involved in phase I and phase II metabolism on the different formulations are incompletely understood, and additional studies are required. Conclusions: In all patients in whom the formulation of tacrolimus is changed, drug levels need to be checked to avoid clinically relevant under- or overexposure. In patients with the CYP3A5 expresser genotype, this recommendation is even more important, as changes in drug exposure can be expected.

Once-Daily versus Twice-Daily Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus is the most commonly prescribed medication in initial immunosuppressive regimens to prevent acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Tacrolimus was originally available as an immediate-release formulation (IR-Tac) given twice daily. Extended-release tacrolimus (ER-Tac) given once daily was later developed with the expectation of improved medication adherence. Data from observational studies, which compared outcomes between ER-Tac and IR-Tac in different populations of KTRs including those who are unlikely to be enrolled in randomized clinical trials, have been reported.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 12 months together with other outcomes reported in observational studies among adult KTRs who received ER-Tac compared to IR-Tac.

METHODS

In accordance with the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology, we systematically reviewed all observational studies that compared clinical outcomes between ER-Tac and IR-Tac in KTRs. The systematic searches were conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science without language restriction. Reference lists were also searched and reviewed. Data were extracted for BPAR, graft survival, patient survival, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum creatinine (Scr), creatinine clearance (CrCl), at different times after kidney transplantation (KT). A meta-analysis was performed to integrate the results from the eligible studies. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42019135705.

RESULTS

From the 1401 articles screened, 10 observational studies in KTRs who received tacrolimus were included. The pooled results showed significantly lower BPAR with ER-Tac than with IR-Tac at 12 months post-KT (5 studies, n = 659; RR, 0.69; 95% CI 0.51-0.95; p = 0.02; I² = 0%). No significant differences in BPAR at other time points after KT were found. Graft survival, patient survival, Scr, and eGFR were comparable between groups at different times over approximately 1 year after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Based upon currently available evidence in observational studies, 30% lower risk of BPAR was observed in ER-Tac group compared with IR-Tac group at 12 months post-KT, while there was no significant difference in BPAR risk at any other studied time points. No differences in graft- and patient-survival rates and kidney function were found. Given the limitations of observational studies to make causal inference, as well as quality limitations among the included studies, caution should be exercised in interpreting these findings.

Trough Level and Tacrolimus Variability of Early Converted Once-Daily Tacrolimus: 1-Year Follow-up Study

INTRODUCTION

Long-term transplant outcomes are considered a crucial point for kidney transplantation. Follow-up studies in patients receiving early conversion to once-daily tacrolimus (TAC-OD) are still limited. We aimed to investigate tacrolimus trough level (C_min), intrapatient variability of tacrolimus dose-normalized C_min (TAC-C_min/D), along with other outcomes between twice-daily tacrolimus (TAC-BID) and early converted TAC-OD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was a single center, retrospective, cohort study. All new kidney transplant patients who received tacrolimus and presented an estimated glomerular filtration rate of more than 45 mL/min/1.73 m² on the day of hospital discharge were included. Studied patients were divided into the standard TAC-BID and patients who were converted from TAC-BID to TAC-OD on the day of hospital discharge. We followed patients for 1 year after transplantation.

RESULTS

At the first follow-up visit, C_min of TAC-OD was significantly lower than that of TAC-BID. However, C_min and estimated glomerular filtration rate were comparable between TAC-BID and TAC-OD throughout 1-year follow-up. TAC-OD also provided a lower intrapatient variability of TAC-C_min/D compared with TAC-BID when observed after 6 months post transplantation (17.40% and 23.27% for TAC-OD and TAC-BID, respectively; P = .13). The renal function, as well as other adverse outcomes, was similar between 2 formulations.

DISCUSSION

TAC-OD provided a similar C_min with comparable renal function compared with TAC-BID during 1-year follow-up. In addition, TAC-OD is likely to have a benefit of a lower intrapatient variability of tacrolimus.

CONCLUSION

Early conversion from TAC-BID to TAC-OD with 1:1 ratio can be used with close long-term monitoring.

The association between trough blood concentration and systemic exposure of tacrolimus: Comparison between once-daily (Advagraf®) and twice-daily (Prograf®) formulation in de novo kidney transplant recipients

Available data of early conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (TAC-BID) to once-daily tacrolimus (TAC-OD) in de novo kidney transplant (KT) recipients are limited. We conducted a prospective study of early conversion to TAC-OD in de novo KT recipients. Eligible patients were enrolled to receive TAC-BID (Prograf®) and then converted to TAC-OD (Advagraf®) by 1:1 ratio, approximately 14 days after KT (range 9-22). Blood samples were investigated for pharmacokinetic parameters before and 7-14 days after the conversion. Fifteen patients were included and provided AUC_0-24 of 202.9 ± 44.4 ng h/mL for TAC-BID (pre-conversion) and 193.0 ± 63.4 ng h/mL for TAC-OD (post-conversion) (p = 0.41). Mean trough blood concentration (C_min) of TAC-BID and TAC-OD was 6.4 ± 1.4 ng/mL and 4.9 ± 1.6 ng/mL (p = 0.01). Correlation coefficient (r) between C_min and AUC_0-24 of TAC-BID and TAC-OD were 0.620 and 0.875. Additional analysis found that patients with a drop of C_min > 30% had a significant lower AUC_0-24 after conversion. Renal function remains stable. We conclude that early conversion to TAC-OD is safe and well tolerated with an indifferent systemic exposure. However, patients with a drop of C_min > 30% after conversion to TAC-OD will require additional dose adjustment.

Caveolin-1 rs4730751 single-nucleotide polymorphism may not influence kidney transplant allograft survival

Caveolin-1 is a protein (encoded by the CAV1 gene) supposedly harboring a protective effect against fibrosis. CAV1 rs4730751 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) AA genotype was initially associated with lower graft survival compared to non-AA. However, subsequent studies could not find the same effect. CAV1 rs4730751 SNP was investigated on 918 kidney donors. Multivariate Cox-model analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors for graft loss. Longitudinal changes on long-term estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRs) were evaluated with a linear mixed model. Histopathological findings from protocolled biopsies after 3 months post transplantation were also analyzed. Donor CAV1 rs4730751 genotyping proportions were 7.1% for AA, 41.6% for AC and 51.3% for CC. The AA genotype, compared to non-AA, was not associated with lower graft survival censored or not for death (multivariate analysis: HR = 1.23 [0.74–2.05] and HR = 1.27 [0.84–1.92]). Linear mixed model on long-term eGFRs revealed also no significant difference according to the genotype, yet we observed a trend. AA genotype was also not associated with a higher degree of fibrosis index on protocolled kidney biopsies at 3 months. To conclude, donor CAV1 rs4730751 SNP may impact on kidney transplantation outcomes, but this study could not confirm this hypothesis.

Conversion from Twice-Daily Prograf® to Once-Daily Advagraf® in Multi-ethnic Asian Adult Renal Transplant Recipients With or Without Concomitant Use of Diltiazem: Impact of CYP3A5 and MDR1 Genetic Polymorphisms on Tacrolimus Exposure

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Tacrolimus is the mainstay of immunosuppression in renal transplantation. Given that once-daily administration improves patient compliance, 1:1 dose conversion from twice-daily Prograf^® to once-daily Advagraf^® is recommended. Although cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 and multi-drug resistance 1 (MDR1) polymorphisms influence tacrolimus concentrations, it is unknown if these impact on conversion. This study investigated the change in the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus after conversion from Prograf^® to Advagraf^® and examined the impact of CYP3A5 and MDR1 C3435T polymorphisms on those pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

A prospective open-label pharmacokinetic study of 1:1 conversion from Prograf^® to Advagraf^® with or without diltiazem was conducted on 26 stable renal transplant recipients. Blood samples were collected over 24 h during each phase, tacrolimus concentrations were assayed, and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed. All participants were genotyped for CYP3A5*3 and MDR1 C3435T.

RESULTS

After conversion, without diltiazem, the area under the concentration-time curve at steady state from 0 to 24 h after dose administration (AUC_{ss, 0-24}) was significantly reduced [median 224 (range 172-366) vs. 184 (104-347) ng·h/mL, p = 0.006, n = 26]. A decrease in tacrolimus exposure (median 21%) was only evident among CYP3A5 expressors [227 (172-366) vs. 180 (104-347) ng·h/mL, p = 0.014, n = 18], not among non-expressors [215 (197-290) vs. 217 (129-281) ng·h/mL, p = 0.263, n = 8]. In contrast, among CYP3A5 expressors receiving diltiazem, AUC_{ss, 0-24} did not change significantly upon conversion [229 (170-296) vs. 221 (123-342) ng·h/mL, p = 0.575, n = 10]. An independent effect was not evident for MDR1 C3435T polymorphism.

CONCLUSION

The high prevalence of CYP3A5 polymorphism among Asians may lead to a significant reduction in tacrolimus exposure with 1:1 dose conversion of Prograf^® to Advagraf^®. These results advocate for CYP3A5 determination prior to conversion, and suggest that 1:1.25 conversion should be used for CYP3A5 expressors and 1:1 conversion for other patients.

Extended release versus immediate release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 12 months together with other outcomes among adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who received extended release, once daily tacrolimus (ER-Tac) compared to those who received the immediate release, twice daily tacrolimus (IR-Tac) administration.

METHODS

In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, we systematically reviewed all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared clinical outcomes between ER-Tac versus IR-Tac in KTRs. The systematic searches were conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL without language restriction. The trials registered and reference lists were also searched and reviewed. Data were extracted for eGFR, serum creatinine (Scr), creatinine clearance (CrCl), biopsy-proven acute rejection rate (BPAR), graft survival, and overall patient survival at different times over 24 months after kidney transplant (KT). A meta-analysis was performed to integrate the results from eligible studies.

RESULTS

From 1145 articles screened, 11 RCTs were included. The pooled results of included RCTs showed no significant difference of eGFR at 12 months between ER-Tac and IR-Tac groups (four trials, n = 1738; mean difference - 0.77 mL/min/1.73 m2, 95% CI: - 2.41 to 0.87; p = 0.56; I2 = 0%). Comparing between the two tacrolimus formulations, there were no significant differences of eGFR, CrCl, Scr, BPAR, graft survival, and patient survival at different times over 4 years after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Based upon currently available evidences in KTRs, the impact on kidney allograft function appears to be comparable between ER-Tac and IR-Tac.

CYP3A5 and ABCB1 polymorphisms in living donors do not impact clinical outcome after kidney transplantation

Aim: To investigate the association between donor CYP3A5 and ABCB1 polymorphisms and tacrolimus (Tac)-induced nephrotoxicity and renal function in kidney transplant recipients. Methods: The CYP3A5 6986A>G and ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphisms were determined in 237 recipients and donors. Results: There was no significant association between Tac-related nephrotoxicity and donor CYP3A5 and ABCB1 genotype. The donor ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphism was associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate on day 7 and month 1. The combined donor–recipient ABCB1 genotype (3435C>T polymorphism) was significantly related with estimated glomerular filtration rate on day 3 and 7 in univariate analysis. However, these differences were no longer statistically significant in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: A genetic analysis of ABCB1 and CYP3A5 of kidney transplant donors is not helpful to improve renal transplant outcomes.

Risk factors for calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity after renal transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) is the major concern for long-term allograft survival despite its predominant role in current immunosuppressive regime after renal transplantation. CNI nephrotoxicity is multifactorial with demographic, environmental, and pharmacogenetic flexibility, whereas studies indicating risk factors for CNI nephrotoxicity obtained incomplete or conflicting results.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for CNI nephrotoxicity was performed on all retrieved studies through a comprehensive research of network database. Data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.2 with heterogeneity assessed using the Cochrane Q and I² tests. CNI nephrotoxicity was primarily indicated with protocol biopsy or index-based clinical diagnosis, and the secondary outcome was defined as delayed graft function.

Results

Twelve observational studies containing a total of 2,849 cases were identified. Donor age (odds ratio [OR], 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; p=0.02), recipient zero-time arteriosclerosis (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.04-1.99; p=0.03), and CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype (OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 2.63-2.98; p=0.00) were confirmed as risk factors for CNI nephrotoxicity. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis claimed donor age as a significant contributor in Asian and Caucasian areas.

Conclusion

Older donor age, recipient zero-time arteriosclerosis, and CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype might add up the risk for CNI nephrotoxicity, which could be interpreted into a robust biomarker system.

Trough level from twice daily to once daily tacrolimus in early conversion kidney transplant recipients: a prospective study

Background Early conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (TAC-BID) to once-daily tacrolimus (TAC-OD) provides a greater benefit of reducing under-exposure of TAC-OD during the first period after transplantation. Information regarding the conversion dose among Asian kidney transplant recipients is still limited. Objective This study aimed to compare the trough levels (C_min) of TAC-BID (Prograf^®) and TAC-OD (Advagraf^®). The values were obtained from early conversion intervention by 1:1 milligram per-milligram. Setting A university-based hospital. Method This study employed a single-center, open-label, prospective and single-armed design. Fifteen de novo standard risk kidney transplant recipients were enrolled. Fourteen days after transplantation, the C_min of TAC-BID (pre-conversion C_min) was determined. Subsequently, TAC-BID was converted to TAC-OD with a similar dose. The C_min of TAC-OD was first measured at a steady state (immediate post-conversion C_min) and compared. All enrolled patients received therapeutic monitoring at the first and second months. Main outcome measure Pre-conversion C_min of TAC-BID and immediate post-conversion C_min of TAC-OD. Results The immediate post-conversion C_min was found to be 23% lowered than the pre-conversion C_min. However, the C_min of TAC-OD was found to be similar to the pre-conversion C_min compared during the follow-up period. Renal function was found to be stable in all patients over 2 months. Conclusion Early conversion therapy was associated with a significantly lower immediate post-conversion C_min but comparable C_min throughout the follow-up period. The "one to one conversion ratio" from TAC-BID to TAC-OD could be performed among Asian de novo kidney transplant recipients at an early period after transplantation.

Clinical Evaluation of Modified Release and Immediate Release Tacrolimus Formulations

The science of drug delivery has evolved considerably and has led to the development of multiple sustained release formulations. Each of these formulations can present particular challenges in terms of clinical evaluation and necessitate careful study to identify their optimal use in practice. Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent that is widely used in organ transplant recipients. However, it is poorly soluble, has an unpredictable pharmacokinetic profile subject to important genetic polymorphisms and drug-drug interactions, and has a narrow therapeutic index. For these reasons, it represents an agent that could benefit from modified release formulations to overcome these limitations. The objective of this review is to discuss the clinical evaluation of immediate and modified release tacrolimus formulations in renal transplant recipients. Clinical trials from early development of immediate release tacrolimus to formulation-specific post-marketing trials of modified release tacrolimus formulations are reviewed with an emphasis on key elements relating to trial design end endpoint assessment. Particular elements that can be addressed with formulation alterations, such as pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenomics, and toxicity and corresponding clinical evaluations are discussed. In addition, current knowledge gaps in the clinical evaluation of immediate and modified release tacrolimus formulations are discussed to highlight potential avenues for the future development of different tacrolimus formulations with outcomes relevant to the regulators, the transplant community, and to transplant recipients. This review shows that new formulations may alter tacrolimus bioavailability, alleviate certain adverse events while potentially enhancing patient convenience.

Effects of CYP3A5 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of a once-daily modified-release tacrolimus formulation and acute kidney injury in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Background

Tacrolimus is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and 3A5. We investigated the influence of CYP3A5 polymorphism and concurrent use of azole antifungal agents (AZ) on the pharmacokinetics of a once-daily modified-release tacrolimus formulation (Tac-QD) in patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Design and methods

Twenty-four patients receiving allogeneic HSCT were enrolled. Genotyping for CYP3A5*3 was done by a PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. Trough blood concentrations (C₀) of tacrolimus were measured by chemiluminescence magnetic microparticle immunoassay. Continuous infusion of tacrolimus was administered from the day before transplantation and was switched to Tac-QD after adequate oral intake.

Results

Thirteen patients had a CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype, and 11 patients had a CYP3A5*1/*1 or *1/*3 genotype. No significant difference was observed in daily dosages and the C₀ of tacrolimus between the two genotype groups without AZ. However, in patients who were co-administered AZ, the C₀ values of tacrolimus were higher in patients with the CYP3A5*3/*3 allele than with the CYP3A5*1 allele (P = 0.034), although daily doses of Tac-QD in patients with CYP3A5*3/*3 were significantly lower than those with the CYP3A5*1 allele (P = 0.041). The cumulative incidence of acute kidney injury was higher in patients with the CYP3A5*3/*3 than with the CYP3A5*1 allele when AZ was co-administered. The decrement for daily dosage of Tac-QD was significantly greater in patients expressing the CYP3A5*3/*3 than the CYP3A5*1 allele.

Conclusions

CYP3A5 genotyping may be useful for safe and effective immunosuppressive therapy with Tac-QD in HSCT patients in whom the use of AZ is anticipated.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00280-016-3060-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The role of CYP3A5 polymorphism and dose adjustments following conversion of twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients

Background

Tacrolimus is available as twice-daily Prograf® (Tac-BID) and the once-daily formulation, Advagraf® (Tac-OD). Although therapeutically equivalent, some transplant recipients require dose adjustments to achieve similar tacrolimus trough concentrations [Tac C₀] after conversion between formulations. Tacrolimus is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5). We sought to determine whether genetic polymorphisms in the CYP3A5 enzyme; CYP3A5 *1/*1 and CYP3A5 *1/*3 (expressers) compared to CYP3A5 *3/*3 (non-expressers) could account for discrepancies in dose requirements following conversion from Tac-BID to Tac-OD.

Methods

A cohort of 60 renal transplant recipients (RTR) from our larger conversion study of 496 patients underwent additional testing for CY3A5 genetic polymorphisms. Analysis included demographics, tac dosing and [Tac C₀] pre- and post-conversion and dosing changes relative to CYP3A5 genotypes. CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms were identified through analysis of genomic DNA.

Results

Conversion from tac bid to tac OD in this cohort required a mean (SD) dose increase from 3.1 (1.0) mg/day to 3.8 (1.3) mg/day (p = 0.007), to achieve similar [Tac C₀]. The *1/*3 expresser group required a greater percentage dose adjustment (56.7 %) in converting from Tac-BID to Tac-OD as compared to the *3/*3 non-expresser group (26.6 %). Similar findings were observed with the both expresser groups combined (*1/*1 &*1/*3). The expressers were significantly more highly represented in the East Asian cohort.

Conclusions

The CYP3A5 expresser polymorphism necessitates an increase in dosing upon conversion from Tac-BID to Tac-OD, with the expresser genotypes contributing significantly to this finding. Given the variability in frequency of CYP3A5 genotypes in various ethnic groups, future studies should account for both isoenzyme polymorphism and ethnicity in optimizing dosing requirements.

Trial registration

Clinical trials.gov identifier: NCT01884480

Donor ABCB1 3435 C>T genetic polymorphisms influence early renal function in kidney transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus

AIM

Determine the effect of genetic variants of donors and recipients on early renal function and tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients.

PATIENTS & METHODS

We measured CYP3A5 (6986A>G), ABCB1 (3435C>T, 2677G>T/A, 1236C>T) genetic polymorphisms in 120 renal transplant recipients and donors by high-resolution melting curve analysis. The renal function and tacrolimus trough concentrations were analyzed.

RESULTS

The genotype of CYP3A5 (6986A>G) in recipients showed strong influence on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. The ABCB1 3435 CC genotype in donor was significantly associated with lower estimated glomerular filtration in recipients within 1 month (p < 0.05) and correlated with delayed creatinine recovery (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

ABCB1 3435 CC genotype in donor influences early renal function and creatinine recovery in tacrolimus-treated kidney transplant recipients.

Performance of modified-release tacrolimus after conversion in liver transplant patients indicates potentially favorable outcomes in selected cohorts

Clinical outcomes, dose changes, and dose-equalized tacrolimus concentrations were examined sequentially in 129 liver transplantation (LT) recipients after successful conversion to once daily modified-release tacrolimus either early (within 1 month) or late (>1 month) after LT. The data were compared with data for a group of 60 patients maintained on twice daily conventional-release tacrolimus. Formulation- and time-dependent changes in dose requirements for once and twice daily tacrolimus differed after transplantation. A 1.7-fold initial increase in the median daily dose was required to achieve target tacrolimus concentrations in the early-conversion cohort (P = 0.006), whereas a 1.25-fold increase was required for those converted later (P = 0.013 and P < 0.001 for the difference). In the subsequent 2 months, the median daily dose fell by 20% in the early-conversion cohort, remained stable for the late-conversion cohort, but rose by 33% with conventional therapy. Lower median dose-equalized concentrations persisted for up to 3 months after the conversion to modified-release therapy. Sex, ethnicity, and the underlying liver disease did not significantly affect these variables. The frequency of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes fell approximately 4-fold after the conversion to modified-release tacrolimus, most notably in the late-conversion cohort, which experienced a high incidence of rejection before conversion. Posttransplant increases in serum creatinine concentrations were smaller after the introduction of modified-release tacrolimus in the late-conversion group (0.7 versus 4 mg/mL for twice daily tacrolimus over 6 months). Reduced interpatient variability in tacrolimus concentrations was evident in the early-conversion cohort versus the twice daily cohort. A decline in intrapatient variability accompanied the reduction in acute rejection in the late-conversion cohort. Our data highlight potential benefits for the rejection rate and renal function on conversion to once daily modified-release tacrolimus late after LT.

Donor ABCB1 genetic polymorphisms influence epithelial-to-mesenchyme transition in tacrolimus-treated kidney recipients

Aim: The contribution of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been suggested in renal transplant recipients receiving calcineurin inhibitors and developing nephrotoxicity. Materials & methods: We assessed whether interindividual variability in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics is associated with the occurrence in tubular cells of two EMT markers (vimentin, β-catenin) detected at 3‐month in 140 allograft biopsies. We investigated whether genetic polymorphisms affecting CYP3A5 and ABCB1 influence EMT and kidney fibrosis. Results: In univariate analysis, the donor CYP3A5*1 allele was significantly associated with a lower vimentin expression. In multivariate analysis, grafts carrying ABCB1 3435T allele(s) developed significantly less EMT and less interstitial fibrosis. Conclusion: Donor SNPs significantly influence the epithelial program in the context of kidney transplantation, and the epithelial metabolism of tacrolimus is one key to understand graft fibrogenesis.

[Drug-drug interaction with telaprevir or boceprevir in liver transplant patients: about four cases]

Boceprevir and telaprevir are both direct-acting antivirals indicated, as part of combination therapy for the management of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection. Transplanted patients treated with anticalcineurines (tacrolimus and cyclosporine) are confronted with major risks of interactions. Indeed, these antiviral are strong inhibitors of the enzyme cytochrome 3A4/A5, responsible for the metabolisme of ciclosprine and tacrolimus. The literature gives evidence of the dangerousness of this drug-drug interaction. We report four clinical cases illustrating the dosage adaptations at liver transplant patients and treated by telaprevir or boceprevir. To protect the immunosuppressive efficiency, a multidisciplinary care and narrow monitoring of the interaction between immunosuppressing agents and protease inhibitors were necessary.

Pharmacokinetic and CYP3A5 pharmacogenetic differences between once- and twice-daily tacrolimus from the first dosing day to 1 year after renal transplantation

Aim & patients & methods: This study investigated 24-h pharmacokinetic and CYP3A5 pharmacogenetic differences between once-daily tacrolimus (Tac-q.d.) versus twice-daily tacrolimus (Tac-b.i.d.) pretransplantation and at 1 month and 1 year post-transplantaion. Results: The dose-adjusted trough level (Cmin) and area under the blood concentration–time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0–24) increased twofold within 1 year post-transplantation with both formulations and the two genotypes. Good correlations were observed between the AUC0–24 and Cmin for both formulations. However, the dose-adjusted Cmin, but not dose-adjusted AUC0–24, was approximately 30% lower for Tac-q.d. than for Tac-b.i.d. Although the dose-adjusted Cmin was lower for Tac-q.d. than for Tac-b.i.d. in both genotypes, the dose-adjusted AUC0–24 was approximately 25% lower for Tac-q.d. than for Tac-b.i.d. in CYP3A5 expressers, but not in nonexpressers during the study period. Conclusion: These results suggested that the approximately 30% lower Cmin for Tac-q.d. than for Tac-b.i.d. may have achieved the same AUC0–24 with both formulations and may be associated with CYP3A5 pharmacogenomic differences, especially in CYP3A5 expressers, between Tac-b.i.d. and Tac-q.d.

Original submitted 3 May 2013; Revision submitted 11 June 2014

A prospective cohort conversion study of twice-daily to once-daily extended-release tacrolimus: role of ethnicity

Background

Tacrolimus is a widely used calcineurin inhibitor in kidney transplantation. It is available as twice-daily Prograf® (Tac-BID) and once-daily Advagraf® (Tac-OD). Although therapeutically equivalent, some patients require dose adjustments to achieve similar trough concentrations [C₀] after conversion. Tacrolimus exposure is affected by ethnicity in the de novo setting but the role of ethnicity in determining dose requirements and adjustments after conversion is unknown.

Methods

In this study, 496 renal transplant recipients (RTRs) were prospectively converted from Tac-BID to Tac-OD, with dose adjustments targeted to achieve similar [C₀] at 12 months post-conversion. Renal function, acute rejection and Tac dose adjustments by ethnicity were analyzed.

Results

There were similar numbers of recipients from living and deceased donors. The mean transplant duration was 7 years. Of the RTRs, 60% were Caucasian and 40% were identified as belonging to an ethnic minority. There was no change in estimated renal function (eGFR) post-conversion to Tac-OD. At 12 months, 35/488 (7%) RTRs were receiving a reduced dose, 101/488 (21%) required a dose increase of which 77 (16%) were receiving at least a 30% increase in dose over baseline. The percentage of those in ethnic groups requiring a dose increase of >30% varied from 8.0% for South Asians to 27.5% for East Asians (P = 0.03), despite East Asians having a similar baseline dose of Tac-BID (3.59 mg/day) compared to the entire cohort (3.53 mg/day).

Conclusions

Ethnicity may play an important role in dosing requirements when converting from Tac-BID to Tac-OD, unrelated to baseline dose. Further investigation is required to determine the reasons for ethnic variability when patients are converted between tacrolimus preparations.

Pharmacogenetics in solid organ transplantation: genes involved in mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs

Allogenic solid organ transplantation has become the routine procedure in patients with end stage organ disease. Although the transplanted organ compensates deficient body functions, its allogenic nature requires institution of immune tolerance, nowadays provided by immunosuppressive drug administration. Both the safety and efficacy of immunosuppressive treatment depend on many factors, and maintaining levels of immunosuppressants within therapeutic range is the essential target for success in graft function preservation. It is obvious that drug and metabolite concentrations depend on efficiency of individual patient metabolism. Recently, many studies were undertaken to investigate the relationship between genetic factors, drug pharmacokinetics and therapy outcome, and interindividual variability apparently can be explained, at least in part, by genetically determined polymorphisms of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes, transport proteins and also in some cases, drug targets. This review presents the recent state of knowledge in the field of pharmacogenetics related to solid organ transplantation.

A limited sampling strategy to estimate the area under the concentration-time curve of tacrolimus modified-release once-daily preparation in renal transplant recipients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to develop a limited sampling strategy to estimate the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of a modified-release, once-daily formulation of tacrolimus (Advagraf, Japanese trade name Graceptor) with Japanese renal transplant patients.

METHODS

Among the 43 enrolled patients, 23 patients continued to take Graceptor for 1 year. A total of 66 profiles on day 28 and day 365 from the 43 patients were randomly divided into a training group (N = 33) and a validation group (N = 33) without any overlap.

RESULTS

The prediction formula for the AUC 0-24 using the single C 12h time point gave the highest correlation with the observed AUC 0-24 (r2 = 0.9057). When 2 sampling times were used, C 0h-C 12h were the best time points for the estimation of the AUC 0-24 (AUC 0-24 = 26.8 + 8.0C 0h + 17.8C 12h, r2 = 0.9221, P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the prediction error for the prediction formulas with the C 0h-C 12h combination between CYP3A5 genotypes. The % mean prediction error, % mean absolute error, and % root mean squared prediction error of the prediction formula using C 0h-C 12h were 0.1%, 7.6%, and 8.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In a hospital setting, a limited sampling strategy using C 0h-C 12h would be applicable to estimating the AUC 0-24 of tacrolimus once daily.

Conversion of twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily tacrolimus formulation in stable pediatric kidney transplant recipients: pharmacokinetics and efficacy

The pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of once-daily tacrolimus formulation (Tac-OD) were assessed in 34 stable pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Enrolled patients received their dose of twice-daily tacrolimus formulation (Tac-BID) on study Days 0 through 7. On the morning of study Day 8, the total daily doses for patients were converted to Tac-OD on a 1:1 basis and maintained on a once-daily morning dosing regimen. Tacrolimus pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained on study Days 7, 14 and 28 (after dose adjustment). Although the mean C0 concentrations (4.10 ± 1.16-3.53 ± 1.10 ng/mL, p = 0.004), and AUC0-24 (151.8 ± 41.6-129.8 ± 39.3 ng h/mL, p < 0.001) were decreased significantly after a 1:1 based conversion, there was high interindividual variability. The dose of Tac-OD was decreased in 26.5% and increased in 44.1% of patients. The resultant tacrolimus dose and pharmacokinetic profiles on study Day 28 were comparable to those on Day 7. There were no serious adverse events. In conclusion, Tac-BID can be safely converted to Tac-OD in stable pediatric kidney transplant patients with the heightened therapeutic drug monitoring. Effects of drug conversion on the cardiovascular risk factors, neurological side effects and adherence should be further evaluated.

Pharmaceutical and genetic determinants for interindividual differences of tacrolimus bioavailability in renal transplant recipients

PURPOSE

The pharmacokinetics of orally administered immediate-release, twice-daily (BID) and modified-release, once-daily (QD) formulations of tacrolimus have high interindividual variability. We investigated factors affecting interindividual variability of tacrolimus bioavailability in renal transplant patients.

METHODS

Ninety-seven Japanese renal transplant patients (47 patients on tacrolimus BID and 50 patients on tacrolimus QD) were enrolled in this study. The tacrolimus absolute bioavailability was calculated using the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) after continuous intravenous infusion and oral formulations of tacrolimus in the same recipient.

RESULTS

The median (quartile 1-quartile 3) tacrolimus relative bioavailability for recipients with the CYP3A5*1 or CYP3A5*3/*3 alleles was significantly lower for the tacrolimus QD group [9.1 % (6.3-10.7 %) and 15.4 % (11.5-18.7 %), respectively] than for the tacrolimus BID group [12.6 % (9.9-14.2 %) and 19.3 % (16.5-24.8 %), respectively] (P = 0.004 and 0.028, respectively). Consequently, tacrolimus absolute bioavailability was lowest for recipients with the CYP3A5*1 allele taking tacrolimus QD. The CYP3A5 polymorphism had no impact on the dose-adjusted AUC0-24 of tacrolimus in patients on continuous intravenous infusion (P = 0.906).

CONCLUSION

The larger interindividual variability of tacrolimus bioavailability for oral formulations appears to be due to the effects of the CYP3A5 polymorphism and the tacrolimus oral formulation. These factors should therefore be taken into account when determining individualized tacrolimus dosing.

Comparison of pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of once- and twice-daily tacrolimus in the early stage after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

This study investigated pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic differences between a modified-release once-daily formulation of tacrolimus (Tac-QD) and the original formulation requiring twice-daily intake (Tac-BID) in de novo renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

Forty-seven and 25 patients who received Tac-BID and Tac-QD, respectively, were enrolled. The pharmacokinetics and CYP3A5 6986A>G and ABCB1 3435C>T pharmacogenetics of each formulation were analyzed on day 28 posttransplantation.

RESULTS

The dose-adjusted trough level (C0) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) of tacrolimus were approximately 25% lower for Tac-QD than Tac-BID. However, there was a good correlation between the AUC0-24 and C0 in the Tac-BID and Tac-QD groups (r=0.575, P<0.001; and r=0.638, P<0.001, respectively) and a similar coefficient in each regression equation. The dose-adjusted AUC0-24 was approximately 25% lower in carriers of the CYP3A*1 allele (CYP3A5 expressers), but not individuals with the CYP3A*3/*3 genotype (nonexpressers), for TAC-QD than Tac-BID. In the Tac-QD group, the interpatient variability for dose-adjusted parameters was small, and the interquatile ranges of dose-adjusted parameters differed between CYP3A5 expressers and nonexpressers and did not overlap. The ABCB1 polymorphism was not associated with any pharmacokinetic parameters of Tac-QD.

CONCLUSIONS

C0-guided monitoring may lead to similar AUC0-24 values for both formulations. However, to maintain the same AUC0-24 value, a higher dose of Tac-QD than Tac-BID may be needed, especially for CYP3A5 expressers, in the early stage posttransplantation. The narrow interindividual variability of Tac-QD pharmacokinetics and its difference between CYP3A5 expressers and nonexpressers might contribute to a dosing strategy based on CYP3A5 genotype.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of once daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Tacrolimus(PR) is a new prolonged-release once-daily formulation of the calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus, currently used in adult transplant patients. As there are no pharmacokinetic data available in pediatric kidney transplant recipients, the aims of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus(PR) in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant recipients and to identify covariates that have a significant impacts on tacrolimus(PR) pharmacokinetics, including CYP3A5 polymorphism.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic samples were collected from 22 pediatric kidney transplant patients. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM. Pharmacogenetic analysis was performed on the CYP3A5 gene.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic data were best described by a one-compartment model with first order absorption and lag-time. The weight normalized oral clearance CL/F [CL/F/ (weight/70)(0.75)] was lower in patients with CYP3A5 3/3 as compared to patients with the CYP3A5 1/3 (32.2 ± 10.1 vs. 53.5 ± 20.2 L/h, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The population pharmacokinetic model of tacrolimus(PR) was developed and validated in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant patients. Body weight and CYP3A5 polymorphism were identified as significant factors influencing pharmacokinetics. The developed model could be useful to optimize individual pediatric tacrolimus (PR) dosing regimen in routine clinical practice.