Putting the cardiovascular safety of aromatase inhibitors in patients with early breast cancer into perspective: a systematic review of the literature

The Cardiovascular Risks Associated with Aromatase Inhibitors, Tamoxifen, and GnRH Agonists in Women with Breast Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiovascular disease accounts for up to 10% of all-cause mortality in women with a diagnosis of breast cancer, and the causes for this are multifaceted. Many women at risk of or with a diagnosis of breast cancer are on endocrine-modulating therapies. It is therefore important to understand the effect of hormone therapies on cardiovascular outcomes in breast cancer patients to mitigate against any adverse effects and to identify those most at risk so that they can be proactively managed. Here we discuss the pathophysiology of these agents, their effect on the cardiovascular system, and the latest evidence on their cardiovascular risks association.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tamoxifen appears to be cardioprotective during treatment but not over the longer term, while the effect of AIs on cardiovascular outcomes remains controversial. Heart failure outcomes remain understudied, and the cardiovascular effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GNRHa) in women need further research, especially since data from men with prostate cancer have indicated an increased risk of cardiac events in GNRHa users. There remains a need for a greater understanding of the effects of hormone therapies on cardiovascular outcomes in breast cancer patients. Further areas of research in this area include developing evidence to better define the optimal preventive and screening methods for cardiovascular effects and the risk factors for patients on hormonal therapies.

Adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy and early markers for cardiovascular disease in breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are an important component of the adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor positive breast cancer (BC) but concerns regarding their cardiovascular safety remain. In this cross-sectional study nested in a breast cancer cohort, we investigated the association between AI exposure and early markers for cardiovascular disease in BC survivors.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 569 women, who were 5-7 years (n = 277) or 10-12 years (n = 292) after BC diagnosis. All participants underwent carotid ultrasound, skin autofluorescence measurement and laboratory evaluation. To quantify AI exposure, we obtained the AI ratio by dividing the duration of AI use by the total duration of endocrine therapy (ET). Patients were classified according to their AI ratio into low (no ET or AI ratio < 0.40), intermediate (0.40 ≤ AI ratio ≤ 0.60) or high AI exposure (AI ratio > 0.60). The association between AI ratio and carotid intima media thickness (cIMT), advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and the presence of dyslipidemia was assessed using linear and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Median age at study visit was 55.5 years (range 45.2-63.8). Forty percent (n = 231) of the study population had used AIs, of whom the majority sequentially with tamoxifen; median duration of AI use was 3.0 years. Mean cIMT and mean AGEs did not differ across AI exposure groups in univariable and multivariable analysis. The occurrence of dyslipidemia did not vary across AI exposure groups. Intermediate AI exposure was associated with more frequent occurrence of the combined endpoint (elevated cIMT, elevated AGEs and/or dyslipidemia). This association, however, was not present in the group with highest AI exposure.

CONCLUSION

AI exposure was not associated with cIMT, AGEs or the presence of dyslipidemia. These results do not prompt a change in current clinical practice, although further research is warranted to validate our findings over time and in different BC populations. Trial registration number (clinicaltrials.gov): NCT02485626, June 30, 2015.

Association Between Aromatase Inhibitors and Myocardial Infarction Morbidity in Women With Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

BACKGROUND

The cardiovascular toxicity of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer is controversial. We aimed to evaluate the association between AIs and the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on real-world studies.

METHOD

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify studies that estimated the association between MI risk and AIs. A random-effects model was used to evaluate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the predefined outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 134 476 patients from eight cohort studies were enrolled in our analysis. For MI incidence, no significant difference was found between the users of AIs and non-users (HR: .98, 95% CI: .83-1.17). The subgroup analysis of patients without a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) suggested a reduced risk of MI (HR: .86, 95% CI: .77-.96). No significant difference was found for ischemic stroke (HR: .93, 95% CI: .82-1.07) and heart failure (HR: 1.24, 95% CI: .92-1.66) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Based on real-world data, AIs may be a safe treatment route for patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and those with a history of CVD. AIs caused a major decrease in MI in patients without CVD history. However, more in-depth investigations are needed to explore the association between AI use and the incidence of MI in the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Cardiotoxicity of Use of Sequential Aromatase Inhibitors in Women With Breast Cancer

The association between use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and cardiovascular outcomes is controversial. While some observational studies have assessed the cardiovascular safety of AIs as upfront treatments, their cardiotoxicity as sequential treatments with tamoxifen remains unknown. Thus, we conducted a population-based cohort study using data from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics databases. We employed a prevalent new-user design to propensity-score match, in a 1:2 ratio, patients switching from tamoxifen to AIs with patients continuing tamoxifen between 1998 and 2016. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the study outcomes (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality). Overall, 1,962 patients switching to AIs were matched to 3,874 patients continuing tamoxifen. Compared with tamoxifen, AIs were associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02, 4.27). The hazard ratios were elevated for ischemic stroke (HR = 1.58, 95% CI: 0.85, 2.93) and heart failure (HR = 1.69, 95% CI: 0.79, 3.62) but not cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.49, 1.54), with confidence intervals including the null value. The elevated hazard ratios observed for the cardiovascular outcomes should be corroborated in future large observational studies.

Aromatase Inhibitors and the Risk of Cardiovascular Outcomes in Women With Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The association between aromatase inhibitors and cardiovascular outcomes among women with breast cancer is controversial. Given the discrepant findings from randomized controlled trials and observational studies, additional studies are needed to address this safety concern.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics databases. The study population consisted of women newly diagnosed with breast cancer initiating hormonal therapy with aromatase inhibitors or tamoxifen between April 1, 1998, and February 29, 2016. We usedCox proportional hazards models with inverse probability of treatment and censoring weighting to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs comparing new users of aromatase inhibitors with new users of tamoxifen for each of the study outcomes (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality).

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 23 525 patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer, of whom 17 922 initiated treatment with either an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen (8139 and 9783, respectively). The use of aromatase inhibitors was associated with a significantly increased risk of heart failure (incidence rate, 5.4 versus 1.8 per 1000 person-years; HR, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.14-3.03]) and cardiovascular mortality (incidence rate, 9.5 versus 4.7 per 1000 person-years; HR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.11-2.04]) compared with the use of tamoxifen. Aromatase inhibitors were associated with elevated HRs, but with CIs including the null value, for myocardial infarction (incidence rate, 3.9 versus 1.8 per 1000 person-years; HR, 1.37 [95% CI, 0.88-2.13]) and ischemic stroke (incidence rate, 5.6 versus 3.2 per 1000 person-years; HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.82-1.72]).

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based study, aromatase inhibitors were associated with increased risks of heart failure and cardiovascular mortality compared with tamoxifen. There were also trends toward increased risks, although nonsignificant, of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke. The increased risk of cardiovascular events associated with aromatase inhibitors should be balanced with their favorable clinical benefits compared with tamoxifen.

Genetic Variations of CYP19A1 Gene and Stroke Susceptibility: A Case-Control Study in the Chinese Han Population

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the association between genetic variations of CYP19A1 and stroke susceptibility in the Chinese Han population.

METHODS

A total of 477 stroke patients and 480 healthy controls were recruited in this study. The genotyping of CYP19A1 polymorphisms (rs4646, rs6493487, rs1062033, rs17601876, and rs3751599) was performed by the Agena MassARRAY platform. Under logistic regression models, we evaluated the associations of CYP19A1 polymorphisms and stroke susceptibility by odds ratio and 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Our study showed that rs4646 (codominant: P = 0.020; recessive: P = 0.016) and rs17601876 (allele: P = 0.044; codominant: P = 0.011; dominant: P = 0.009; recessive: P = 0.046) significantly decreased the risk of stroke. In the stratification analysis, rs4646 is associated with decreased stroke risk among the individuals older than 64 years (codominant: P = 0.028; recessive: P = 0.010) and women (codominant: P = 0.029; recessive: P = 0.029), whereas rs1062033 increased stroke risk in the subgroup of age 64 years and younger (recessive: P = 0.042). The rs17601876 polymorphism has a strong relationship with stroke susceptibility, which is age and gender dependent. In haplotype analysis, we found a block (rs17601876 and rs3751599), and Ars17601876Grs3751599 haplotype is related to an increased stroke risk (P < 0.05). In addition, CYP19A1 variations had effects on clinical characteristics.

CONCLUSION

CYP19A1 polymorphisms were significantly associated with stroke susceptibility in the Chinese Han population.

Cardiotoxicity of aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been associated with cardiovascular disease in adjuvant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing these drugs to tamoxifen. However, it is unclear whether this risk is real or due to cardioprotective effects of tamoxifen. To address this question, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all RCTs of AIs and tamoxifen in adjuvant and extended adjuvant setting.

Patients and methods

We searched PubMed, Embase (OVID), Cochrane CENTRAL, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to June 2016 for all RCTs comparing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular safety of AIs to tamoxifen, AIs to placebo or no-treatment, or tamoxifen to placebo or no-treatment in the adjuvant or extended adjuvant setting. Relative risks (RRs) were pooled using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models with analyses stratified by RCT design.

Results

A total of 19 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis (n  =  62 345). In the adjuvant setting, AIs were associated with a 19% (RR: 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.34) increased risk of cardiovascular events compared with tamoxifen. AIs were not associated with an increased risk compared with placebo in the extended-adjuvant setting (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.85-1.20). In the adjuvant setting, tamoxifen was associated with a 33% (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.45-0.98) decreased risk compared with placebo or no-treatment. The results from extended adjuvant RCTs comparing tamoxifen to placebo were inconclusive but suggestive of a small protective effect (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.77-1.07).

Conclusions

The increased risk of cardiovascular events with AIs relative to tamoxifen is likely the result of cardioprotective effects of the latter. This new evidence should be considered when assessing the benefits and risks of AIs in the treatment of breast cancer.

Exemestane Use in Postmenopausal Women at High Risk for Invasive Breast Cancer: Evaluating Biomarkers of Efficacy and Safety

This phase II trial evaluated clinical markers of efficacy and safety of exemestane in postmenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer. Postmenopausal women (n = 42) at risk for invasive breast cancer received 25 mg exemestane daily for 2 years along with calcium and vitamin D. The primary outcome was change in mammographic density (MD) after one year. Secondary outcomes included change in serum steroid hormones as well as change in trefoil protein 1 (TFF1) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in breast tissue. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. MD decreased at 1 year and was significant at 2 years [mean change = -4.1%; 95% confidence intervals (CI), -7.2 to -1.1; P = 0.009]. Serum estradiol and testosterone levels significantly decreased at 3 months and remained suppressed at 12 months. After 1 year of treatment, TFF1 intensity decreased (mean change -1.32; 95% CI, -1.87 to -0.76; P < 0.001). Exemestane was safe and well tolerated. Exemestane decreased MD and expression of breast tissue TFF1. It was well tolerated with few clinically relevant side effects. MD and breast tissue TFF1 are potential biomarkers of breast cancer-preventive effects of exemestane in high-risk postmenopausal women.

Comparative study on individual aromatase inhibitors on cardiovascular safety profile: a network meta-analysis

The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs: anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane) have now become standard adjuvant endocrine treatment for postmenopausal estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer complementing chemotherapy and surgery. Because of the absence of direct head-to-head comparisons of these AIs, an indirect comparison is needed for individual treatment choice. In this network systemic assessment, the cardiovascular (CV) side effects in using anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane based on original studies on AIs vs placebo or tamoxifen were compared. We integrated all available direct and indirect evidences. The odds ratio (OR) of severe CV events for indirect comparisons between exemestane and anastrozole was 1.41 (95% confidence interval [CI] =0.49–2.78), letrozole and anastrozole was 1.80 (95% CI =0.40–3.92), and letrozole and exemestane was 1.46 (95% CI =0.34–3.4). OR of subgroup risk for AIs and tamoxifen were all >1 except for thrombolism risk subgroup. The results showed that the total and severe CV risk ranking is letrozole, exemestane, and anastrozole in descending order. None of the AIs showed advantages in CV events than tamoxifen except for thromboembolism event incidence.

Role of aromatase in sex-specific cerebrovascular endothelial function in mice

Stroke risk and outcome are strongly modified by estrogen. In addition to ovaries, estrogen is produced locally in peripheral tissue by the enzyme aromatase, and extragonadal synthesis becomes the major source of estrogen after menopause. Aromatase gene deletion in female mice exacerbates ischemic brain damage after stroke. However, it is not clear which cell type is responsible for this effect, since aromatase is expressed in multiple cell types, including cerebrovascular endothelium. We tested the hypothesis that cerebrovascular aromatase contributes to sex differences in cerebrovascular endothelial function. Cerebrocortical microvascular responses to the endothelium-dependent vasodilator ACh were compared between male and female wild-type (WT) and aromatase knockout (ArKO) mice by measuring laser-Doppler perfusion in vivo through a closed cranial window. Additional studies were performed in WT mice treated with the aromatase inhibitor fadrozole or vehicle. WT female mice had significantly greater responses to ACh compared with WT males (P < 0.001), which was associated with higher aromatase expression in female compared with male cerebral vessels (P < 0.05). ACh responses were significantly lower in ArKO compared with WT females (P < 0.05) and in WT females treated with fadrozole versus vehicle (P < 0.001). Conversely, ACh responses were significantly higher in ArKO versus WT males (P < 0.05). Levels of phosphorylated endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) were lower in ArKO versus WT female brains, but were not altered by aromatase deletion in males. We conclude that cerebrovascular endothelial aromatase plays an important and sexually dimorphic role in cerebrovascular function and that aromatase inhibitors in clinical use may have cardiovascular consequences in both males and females.

[Vitamin D and breast cancer: physiopathology, biological and clinical implications]

There is a recent increase in interest of vitamin D and breast cancer, facing the number of publications on the subject. This increase have several reasons, on the one hand, vitamin D deficiency is more and more prevalent and, on the other hand, there are new data that highlights the extra-bone effects of vitamin D, especially in breast cancer, the vitamin D is involved in the breast cancer risk factor, the prognosis, and the interaction with breast cancer treatments. This combination between vitamin D deficiency and breast cancer is extremely usual, and combined with all cancer clinical parameters: the incidence, the tumour biology, the clinical presentation, the prognosis, and the antineoplastic treatment tolerance. This vitamin D deficiency is increased after adjuvant cancer treatments. And yet, this problem increases bone metabolism disruptions in breast cancer patients, inducing osteoporotic risk at long time, even though this population is curable. This problem is therefore serious in the adjuvant breast cancer treatment. Unfortunately, in this population, the current recommendations are clearly insufficient, and the current randomized clinical trial results would contribute to define the best way to correct the vitamin D deficiency, quickly and secure.

A randomized, double-blind, controlled study of exemestane versus anastrozole for the first-line treatment of postmenopausal Japanese women with hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer

The aromatase inhibitors exemestane and anastrozole are approved in Japan for first-line treatment of postmenopausal patients with advanced, hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. This phase 3, randomized, double-blind study directly compared time to progression (TTP) for exemestane and anastrozole therapy in this patient population. Eligible patients were randomized to receive exemestane 25 mg or anastrozole 1 mg, each once daily. The primary endpoint was TTP based on assessment by an expert radiologic images review committee (ERIRC). Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed TTP, time to treatment failure, overall survival, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, and safety. A total 298 patients were randomized to receive exemestane (n = 149; mean age 63.4 years) or anastrozole (n = 149; mean age 64.0 years). Median ERIRC-assessed TTP was 13.8 and 11.1 months (hazard ratio = 1.007; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.771, 1.317) and median investigator-assessed TTP was 13.8 and 13.7 months (hazard ratio = 1.059; 95 % CI: 0.816, 1.374) in the exemestane and anastrozole arms, respectively. Median overall survival was 60.1 months in the anastrozole arm and was not reached in the exemestane arm at data cutoff. The objective response rate was 43.9 % (95 % CI: 35.3, 52.8) and 39.1 % (95 % CI: 30.6, 48.1) in the exemestane and anastrozole arms, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events grade ≥3 occurred in 9.4 and 6.0 % of patients, and treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 4.0 and 3.4 % of patients in the exemestane and anastrozole arms, respectively. In this study, the efficacy and safety profiles of exemestane were similar to those of anastrozole in Japanese patients with advanced, hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer; however, TTP non-inferiority of exemestane versus anastrozole was not confirmed.