Pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of Bencycloquidium bromide, a novel selective muscarinic M1/M3 receptor antagonist, after single and multiple intranasal doses in healthy chinese subjects: an open-label, single-center, first-in-human study

Structure, function and drug discovery of GPCR signaling

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are versatile and vital proteins involved in a wide array of physiological processes and responses, such as sensory perception (e.g., vision, taste, and smell), immune response, hormone regulation, and neurotransmission. Their diverse and essential roles in the body make them a significant focus for pharmaceutical research and drug development. Currently, approximately 35% of marketed drugs directly target GPCRs, underscoring their prominence as therapeutic targets. Recent advances in structural biology have substantially deepened our understanding of GPCR activation mechanisms and interactions with G-protein and arrestin signaling pathways. This review offers an in-depth exploration of both traditional and recent methods in GPCR structure analysis. It presents structure-based insights into ligand recognition and receptor activation mechanisms and delves deeper into the mechanisms of canonical and noncanonical signaling pathways downstream of GPCRs. Furthermore, it highlights recent advancements in GPCR-related drug discovery and development. Particular emphasis is placed on GPCR selective drugs, allosteric and biased signaling, polyphamarcology, and antibody drugs. Our goal is to provide researchers with a thorough and updated understanding of GPCR structure determination, signaling pathway investigation, and drug development. This foundation aims to propel forward-thinking therapeutic approaches that target GPCRs, drawing upon the latest insights into GPCR ligand selectivity, activation, and biased signaling mechanisms.

[A multi-center observation of the therapeutic efficacy of Bencycloquidium bromide in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis with predominant symptoms of rhinorrhea]

Objective:To observe the efficacy and safety of the M receptor antagonist Bencycloquidium bromide nasal spray in treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis with runny nose as the main symptom. Methods:From August 2021 to September 2021, 134 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis were enrolled in the otolaryngology Outpatient Department of Peking University Third Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University and China-Japanese Friendship Hospital of Jilin University, including 71 males and 63 females, with a median age of 38 years. TNSS score and visual analogue scale（VAS） of total nasal symptoms were observed during 2 weeks of treatment with Bencycloquidium bromide nasal spray. Results:TNSS score decreased from （8.89±3.31） on day 0 to （3.71±2.51） on day 14（P<0.001）, VAS score of nasal symptoms decreased from （24.86±7.40） on day 0 to （6.84±5.94） on day 14（P<0.001）, VAS score of rhinorrhoea decreased from （6.88±2.06） on day 0 to （1.91±1.81） on day 14（P<0.001）. Rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire（RQLQ） score decreased from （94.63±33.35） on day 0 to （44.95±32.28） on day 14（P<0.001）. The incidence of adverse reaction was low and no serious adverse events occurred during the whole experiment. Conclusion:Bencycloquidium bromide nasal spray has significant efficacy and good safety in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Development and validation of LC-MS/MS methods for the quantification of 101BHG-D01, a novel, long-acting and selective muscarinic receptor antagonist, and its main metabolite M6 in human plasma, urine and feces: Application to a clinical study in healthy Chinese subjects

101BHG-D01 is a novel, long-acting and selective muscarinic receptor antagonist for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and rhinorrhea in rhinitis. To support its clinical study, several liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods for the quantification of 101BHG-D01 and its main metabolite M6 in human plasma, urine and feces were developed. The plasma samples were prepared by protein precipitation, and the urine and fecal homogenate samples were pretreated by direct dilution, respectively. The chromatographic separation was performed on an Agilent InfinityLab Poroshell 120 C18 column with 0.1% formic acid and 10.0 mM ammonium acetate buffer solution in water and methanol as the mobile phase. The MS/MS analysis was performed by using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) under a positive ion electrospray ionization mode. The methods were validated with regards to selectivity, linearity, lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ), accuracy and precision, matrix effect, extraction recovery, dilution integrity, batch size, carryover and stability. The calibration ranges were as follows: 1.00-800 pg/mL for 101BHG-D01 and 1.00-20.0 pg/mL for M6 in plasma; 0.0500-20.0 ng/mL for 101BHG-D01 and M6 in urine; 0.400-400 ng/mL for 101BHG-D01 and 0.100-100 ng/mL for M6 in feces. There was no endogenous or cross interference observed at the retention time of the analytes and internal standard in various biological matrices. Across these matrices, for the lower limit of quantitation quality control (LLOQ QC) samples, the intra- and inter-batch coefficients of variation were within 15.7%. For other QC samples, the intra- and inter-batch coefficients of variation were within 8.9%. The intra- and inter-batch accuracy deviations for all QC samples were within the range of - 6.2-12.0%. No significant matrix effect was observed from the matrices. The extraction recoveries of these methods at different concentrations were consistent and reproducible. The analytes were stable in different matrices under various storage conditions. The other bioanalytical parameters were also fully validated and met the criteria given in the FDA guidance. These methods were successfully applied to a clinical study in healthy Chinese subjects after a single dose administration of 101BHG-D01 inhalation aerosol. After inhalation, 101BHG-D01 was absorbed into plasma rapidly with the time to reach the maximum drug concentration (T_max) of 5 min and eliminated slowly with a half-life time about 30 h. The cumulative urinary and fecal excretion rates revealed 101BHG-D01 was mainly excreted in feces, rather than urine. The pharmacokinetic results of the study drug laid a foundation for its further clinical development.

Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Bencycloquidium Bromide, a Novel Inhaled Anticholinergic Bronchodilator, in Healthy Subjects: Results from Phase I Studies

BACKGROUND

Bencycloquidium bromide (BCQB) is a novel inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator with high selectivity for muscarinic M3 receptor. BCQB's potential utility of for therapy in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been indicated in pre-clinical studies.

PURPOSE

To investigate the initial safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of BCQB delivered via pressurised Metered Dose Inhaler (pMDI) in healthy subjects.

METHODS

This study consisted of single-ascending-dose (SAD), multiple-ascending-dose (MAD) tolerability study periods, and single- plus multiple-dose pharmacokinetic study periods. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating tolerability and pharmacokinetic studies were conducted. Seventy-two healthy subjects were assigned 3:1 (BCQB: placebo) to 7 single-dose cohorts (125, 250, 500, 750, 1125, 1500 and 2000 μg) and 2 multiple-dose cohorts (1500 μg/d and 2000 μg/d). In the pharmacokinetic periods, 12 subjects were allocated three-way crossover to receive single dose of 250, 750 or 2000 μg BCQB, respectively. Subsequently, the same 12 subjects received multiple dose of 750 μg/d and 1000 μg/d for 7 days. Pharmacokinetic, safety and tolerability assessments were performed.

RESULTS

BCQB administered by inhalation was well tolerated, especially with favorable cardiovascular safety profile. BCQB was rapidly absorbed into plasma after inhalation through pMDI, with peak concentrations achieved within 5 to 10 minutes. Repeated inhalation caused certain degree of accumulation with the accumulation ratio R_Cmax 2.50, R_AUC 3.49 for 3 times-a-day and R_Cmax 2.23, R_AUC 3.44 for 4 times-a-day, respectively. Twice-a-day or even once-a-day dosage could be suggested in phase II study. Sex didn't affect the pharmacokinetics of BCQB and dose adjustments based on sex is not anticipated in clinical use. Approximately 4% of the BCQB dose excreted unchanged in urine and liver metabolism is the main biotransformation route of BCQB in human.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study provided the initial safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic profiles of BCQB inhalation, and could enable further clinical development in COPD patients.

Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists Under Investigational to Treat Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Introduction

Bronchodilators are the cornerstone of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) therapy and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) as a mono or combination treatment play a pivotal role. Several LAMAs are already available on the market in different formulations, but developing a new compound with a higher M3 receptor selectivity and a lower affinity to M2 receptors to increase the therapeutic effect and minimize the adverse effects is still a goal. Moreover, new formulations could improve adherence to therapy.

Areas Covered

This systematic review assesses investigational long-acting muscarinic antagonist in Phase I and II clinical trials over the last decade. It offers insights on whether LAMAs and/or their new formulations in clinical development can become effective treatments for COPD in the future.

Expert Opinion

Research on LAMA seems to have come to a standstill, the few new molecules under study do not show distinctive characteristics compared to the previous ones. Muscarinic antagonist/β2-agonist (MABAs) appear to be the major innovation currently under investigation, and they could theoretically open new research frontiers on the effect between adrenergic and muscarinic interaction in the same cell.

Effects of ABCB1, UGT1A1, and UGT1A9 Genetic Polymorphisms on the Pharmacokinetics of Sitafloxacin Granules in Healthy Subjects

Sitafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone, has strong antibacterial activity. We evaluated the effects of sitafloxacin granules in single‐dose and multidose cohorts and the effects of ABCB1, UGT1A1, and UGT1A9 genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of sitafloxacin in healthy subjects. The single‐dose study included 3 fasted cohorts receiving 50, 100, and 200 mg of sitafloxacin granules and 1 cohort receiving 50 mg of sitafloxacin granules with a high‐fat meal. The multidose study included 1 cohort receiving 100 mg of sitafloxacin granules once daily for 5 days. PK parameters were calculated using noncompartmental parameters based on concentration‐time data. The genotypes for ABCB1, UGT1A1, and UGT1A9 single‐nucleotide polymorphisms were determined using Sanger sequencing. Subsequently, the association between sitafloxacin PK parameters and target single‐nucleotide polymorphisms was analyzed. Sitafloxacin granules were well tolerated up to 200 and 100 mg in the single‐dose and multidose studies, respectively. Sitafloxacin AUC and C_max increased linearly within the detection range, and a steady state was reached within 3 days after the administration of multiple oral doses. Our findings showed that C_max was lower in the ABCB1 (rs1045642) mutation group, whereas t_1/2 was longer in the UGT1A1 (rs2741049) and UGT1A9 (rs3832043) mutation groups. In conclusion, sitafloxacin granules were safe at single doses and multiple doses up to 200 and 100 mg/day, respectively, with a linear plasma PK profile. However, ABCB1 (rs1045642), UGT1A1 (rs2741049), and UGT1A9 (rs3832043) genetic polymorphisms are likely to influence the C_max or t_1/2 and thereby merit further clinical evaluation.

Bencycloquidium bromide nasal spray is effective and safe for persistent allergic rhinitis: a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of bencycloquidium bromide nasal spray (BCQB) in patients with persistent allergic rhinitis (PAR).

METHODS

We enrolled 720 patients from 15 hospitals across China and randomly assigned them into BCQB group or placebo group (90 μg per nostril qid) to receive a 4-week treatment. Visual analog scale (VAS) for rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, itching and overall symptoms were recorded by patients every day. Anterior rhinoscopy scoring was completed by doctors on every visit. Adverse events were recorded in detail.

RESULTS

A total of 354 and 351 patients were included in BCQB group and in placebo group. Baseline information was comparable. At the end of the trial, the decrease of VAS for rhinorrhea from baseline was 4.83 ± 2.35 and 2.46 ± 2.34 in BCQB group and placebo group, respectively (P < 0.001). The change ratio from baseline of VAS for rhinorrhea in BCQB group was 72.32%, higher than 31.03% in placebo group (P < 0.001). VAS for other symptoms and overall symptoms also improved significantly in the BCQB group, while no inter-group difference was found in anterior rhinoscopy scoring. The incidence of adverse reaction was similar between the two groups. Most reactions were mild and no severe reactions happened.

CONCLUSION

90 μg BCQB per nostril four times daily is effective and safe in the treatment of rhinorrhea as well as sneezing, nasal congestion and itching for patients with PAR.

RETROSPECTIVELY REGISTERED

ChiCTR2000030924, 2020/3/17.

Emerging muscarinic receptor antagonists for the treatment of asthma

INTRODUCTION

The increased acetylcholine signaling in asthma pathophysiology offers the rationale for the use of LAMAs in the treatment of asthmatic patients. Tiotropium is still the only LAMA approved for use in asthma but there is a real interest in developing novel LAMAs for the treatment of asthma, or at least to extend this indication to other LAMAs already on the market.

AREAS COVERED

We examined and discussed trials and research that have studied or are evaluating the role of LAMAs already on the market in asthma and possible novel muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists.

EXPERT OPINION

Glycopyrronium and umeclidinium will soon be included in the GINA strategy with the same current indications of tiotropium. It is likely that the choice of the LAMA will be influenced not so much by its pharmacological profile as by the type of triple therapy chosen. It is extremely difficult to identify a new LAMA that is more effective than tiotropium, but is it plausible that new technologies that will allow delivering the drug in a more targeted way and with a lower risk of adverse effects may represent the real progress in the use of LAMAs in asthma in the coming years.

Study of pharmacokinetic interaction of paroxetine and roxithromycin on bencycloquidium bromide in healthy subjects

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential drug-drug interaction between Bencycloquidium bromide (BCQB) and paroxetine, and between BCQB and roxithromycin.

METHODS

Two studies were conducted on healthy male Chinese volunteers. Study A was an open-label, two-period, one-sequence crossover study (n=21). Each participant received a single nasal spray dose of BCQB 180μg on day 1. After a 7-day wash-out period, subjects received 20mg of paroxetine from day 8 to 17, and were co-administered 20mg of paroxetine and BCQB 180μg on day 18. In study B, participants (n=12) were randomly assigned to two groups. In period I, group A received BCQB 180μg on day 1, followed by the same dose four times daily from day 4 to 10, then, on day 11 a single dose of 150mg roxithromycin with BCQB 180μg were co-administered. In parallel, group B received a single dose of roxithromycin 150mg on day 1, followed by 300mg of roxithromycin from day 4 to 10, then, on day 11 a single dose of BCQB 180μg with roxithromycin 300mg were co-administered. After a wash-out time of 7days the respective treatments of each group (A and B) were swapped in period II. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis. Statistical comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters was performed to identify a possible drug interaction between treatments. Tolerability was evaluated by recording adverse events.

RESULTS

Study A: Geometric mean AUC0-36 for BCQB alone and co-administered with paroxetine were 474.3 and 631.3pgh/ml, respectively. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) of AUC0-36 was 1.33 (1.13-1.46), 90% C.Is, and was out the predefined bioequivalence interval (90% C.Is, 0.80-1.25). Geometric mean Cmax were 187.0 and 181.2pg/ml. Study B: The GMR of AUC0-36 was 0.98 (0.90-1.07), 90% C.Is for BCQB, and the GMR of AUC0-72 was 0.98 (0.87-1.11), 90% C.Is for roxithromycin. Both GMRs were within the predefined bioequivalence interval (90% C.Is, 0.80-1.25). Other pharmacokinetic parameters were within the predefined interval. No serious adverse events were reported and no significant clinical changes were observed in laboratory test results, vital signs and ECGs in any of the studies. All treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The co-administration of BCQB with paroxetine showed a moderate increase in BCQB exposure, but was not clinically relevant. Also, no drug interaction was found between BCQB and roxithromycin.