Posttransplant complications: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions

Posttransplantation complications pose a major challenge to the long-term survival and quality of life of organ transplant recipients. These complications encompass immune-mediated complications, infectious complications, metabolic complications, and malignancies, with each type influenced by various risk factors and pathological mechanisms. The molecular mechanisms underlying posttransplantation complications involve a complex interplay of immunological, metabolic, and oncogenic processes, including innate and adaptive immune activation, immunosuppressant side effects, and viral reactivation. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical features, risk factors, and molecular mechanisms of major posttransplantation complications. We systematically summarize the current understanding of the immunological basis of allograft rejection and graft-versus-host disease, the metabolic dysregulation associated with immunosuppressive agents, and the role of oncogenic viruses in posttransplantation malignancies. Furthermore, we discuss potential prevention and intervention strategies based on these mechanistic insights, highlighting the importance of optimizing immunosuppressive regimens, enhancing infection prophylaxis, and implementing targeted therapies. We also emphasize the need for future research to develop individualized complication control strategies under the guidance of precision medicine, ultimately improving the prognosis and quality of life of transplant recipients.

Immunosuppressive Therapy and Nutritional Status of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: A Protocol for a Systematic Review

(1) Background: Kidney transplantation is widely recognized as the most effective method of treating end-stage renal disease. Immunosuppressive therapy plays a pivotal role in the treatment of kidney transplant patients, encompassing all patients (except identical twins), and is administered from organ transplantation until the end of its function. The aim of this systematic review is to identify the evidence of the association between immunosuppressive therapy and nutritional status of patients following kidney transplantation. (2) Methods: This protocol has been designed in line with Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA-P). Our search encompasses several databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE (Elsevier), Scopus and Web of Science. We intend to include observational studies (cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort designs), randomized controlled trials (RCTs), as well as completed and ongoing non-randomized study designs. We will confine our search to studies published in English within the past decade (from inception to 17 February 2023). Qualitative studies, case studies, and conference reports will be excluded. The selection process will be done in Covidence by two independent reviewers. Data extraction will be conducted using a standardized MS Excel template version 16.0. Quality assessment of included studies will be performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2), or the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Risk-of-bias plots will be generated using the web application Robvis. Relevant data that have been extracted from eligible studies will be presented in a narrative synthesis. We expect the studies to be too heterogeneous to perform subgroup analyses. (3) Conclusion: This systematic review will offer insights into the evidence regarding association between immunosuppressive therapy and nutritional status of adult patients (18 years of age or older) within the initial year following kidney transplantation. To our knowledge, there is no systematic review addressing that question.

Current Status Regarding Immunosuppressive Treatment in Patients after Renal Transplantation

Renal transplantation is now the best treatment for end-stage renal failure. To avoid rejection and prolong graft function, organ recipients need immunosuppressive therapy. The immunosuppressive drugs used depends on many factors, including time since transplantation (induction or maintenance), aetiology of the disease, and/or condition of the graft. Immunosuppressive treatment needs to be personalised, and hospitals and clinics have differing protocols and preparations depending on experience. Renal transplant recipient maintenance treatment is mostly based on triple-drug therapy containing calcineurin inhibitors, corticosteroids, and antiproliferative drugs. In addition to the desired effect, the use of immunosuppressive drugs carries risks of certain side effects. Therefore, new immunosuppressive drugs and immunosuppressive protocols are being sought that exert fewer side effects, which could maximise efficacy and reduce toxicity and, in this way, reduce both morbidity and mortality, as well as increase opportunities to modify individual immunosuppression for renal recipients of all ages. The aim of the current review is to describe the classes of immunosuppressive drugs and their mode of action, which are divided by induction and maintenance treatment. An additional aspect of the current review is a description of immune system activity modulation by the drugs used in renal transplant recipients. Complications associated with the use of immunosuppressive drugs and other immunosuppressive treatment options used in kidney transplant recipients have also been described.

The impact of induction therapy in low-immunological risk kidney transplant recipients regardless of HLA matching

BACKGROUND

Induction agents have proved to reduce the rate of acute rejection (AR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) without improving long-term graft and patient survival (PS).

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the utility of induction therapy in low immunological risk KTRs regardless of donor-to-recipient HLA matching.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 218 patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT). These patients were divided into two groups according to the usage of induction therapy: 82 did not receive any induction therapy (Group I), and 136 patients received either Anti-IL2 receptor antibodies or anti-thymocyte globulin (Group II). All patients had panel reactive antibody (PRA) < 20% and absence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). The difference in outcomes were assessed at different intervals following KT.

RESULTS

The rate of bacterial infections at one year (p-value = 0.032) and the frequency of CMV disease (p-value = 0.044) were significantly higher in Group II (with induction therapy). The duration of hospital stay, the rate and severity of acute rejection, the occurrence of delayed graft function, the rate and type of surgical complications at one year, and the graft function and survival at one and three years were similar between the two groups (p-value = NS). In addition, the financial burden is much less in Group I (without induction therapy), reducing the total cost of the transplant procedure.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that induction therapy in low-immunological risk kidney transplant patients is not a must regardless of donor-to-recipient HLA matching. Therefore, induction therapy did not yield significant health results, but had negative financial consequences.

Risks and ways of preventing kidney dysfunction in drug-induced immunosuppression in solid organ recipients

Immunosuppressive therapy (IMT) is the cornerstone of treatment after transplantation. The goal of immunosuppression is to prevent acute and chronic rejection while maximizing patient survival and long-term graft function. However, the expected effects of IMT must be balanced against the major adverse effects of these drugs and their toxicity. The purpose of this review is to summarize world experience on current immunosuppressive strategies and to assess their effects on renal function.

Effect of donor-to-recipient HLA matching in low-immunological risk kidney transplant recipients without induction therapy on acute rejection, graft survival, infections, and surgical complications at 3 years: The road towards new recommendations

BACKGROUND

Donor-to-recipient human leukocyte antigen mismatching is considered one of the strongest determinants for graft and patient survival in kidney transplant recipients (KTR).

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study discusses the impact of HLA matching as low immunological risk KTR without induction therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Records of 80 adult kidney transplant patients were reviewed with three years of the follow-up. All patients had panel reactive antibodies (PRA) < 20%, absence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and did not receive the induction therapy. These patients were divided into two groups according to their HLA matching between donor and recipient: 55 patients with ≥ 3 HLA matches (Group I; low immunogenicity) were compared to 25 patients with <3 HLA matches (Group II; high immunogenicity). The primary endpoints included the rate and severity of acute rejection (AR) episodes, graft function (creatinine level), and survival at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 36 months. Secondary endpoints include the rate and type of infections at one-year, surgical complications at one-year, and patient survival at 1, 6, 12, and 36 months after kidney transplantation. Baseline demographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups except for recipient age, donor gender, and pre-transplant dialysis time.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference observed between two groups at one-year in infection rate, the length of hospital stay, AR severity, the rate of cytomegalovirus infection, and the occurrence of delayed graft function. However, the rate of AR, the graft function upon discharge, and the rate and type of surgical complications at one-year were significantly higher in Group II (high immunogenicity). The patient and graft survival at three years, the death-censored graft survival, and the serum creatinine levels at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 36 months were similar between two groups. Two deaths occurred in each group (NS).

CONCLUSION

In our center, the donor-to-recipient HLA mismatch is not considered an immunological risk factor in low-risk kidney transplant recipients (PRA < 20% and absence of DSA).

Induction therapy with mesenchymal stromal cells in kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis

Objective

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) versus traditional regimens for induction therapy in kidney transplantation (KT), especially the safety of MSC infusion, practicability of MSCs as induction therapy agents, and posttransplant complications.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library were searched for prospective clinical trials that compared MSCs with traditional regimens for induction therapy in KT.

Results

Four trials were included, including a total of 197 patients. The pooled results revealed that MSC therapy had a lower 1-year infection rate than did the traditional therapies (RR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46–0.9, P = 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two protocols regarding the 1-year acute rejection (AR) rate (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.41–1.45, P = 0.42), 1-year graft survival rate (RR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.95–1.03, P = 0.74), delayed graft function (DGF) rate (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.21–1.38, P = 0.2) and renal graft function at 1 month (MD = −1.56, 95% CI: − 14.2–11.08, p = 0.81), 3 months (MD = 0.15, 95% CI: − 5.63–5.93, p = 0.96), 6 months (MD = − 1.95, 95% CI: − 9.87–5.97, p = 0.63), and 12 months (MD = − 1.13, 95% CI: − 7.16–4.89, p = 0.71) postsurgery. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the 1-year AR rate, 1-year graft survival rate, DGF rate, and renal graft function at 12 months postsurgery did not significantly differ between the low-dose calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) group and the standard-dose CNI group, indicating the potential benefits of successful CNI sparing in combination with MSC treatment. Moreover, when MSCs were applied as an alternative therapy rather than an additional therapy or allogeneic MSCs were utilized instead of autologous MSCs, all of the outcomes mentioned above were comparable.

Conclusion

Induction therapy with MSCs is safe and has similar immune response modulation effects to those of traditional regimens in the short term in KT recipients. However, regarding the long-term effects, as suggested by the 1-year infection rate and the potential of CNI sparing, MSC therapy has significant advantages. However, these advantages should be further verified in more well-designed, multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with large sample sizes and long follow-up periods.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13287-021-02219-7.

Low Hydrophobic Mismatch Scores Calculated for HLA-A/B/DR/DQ Loci Improve Kidney Allograft Survival

We evaluated the impact of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) disparity (immunogenicity; IM) on long-term kidney allograft survival. The IM was quantified based on physicochemical properties of the polymorphic linear donor/recipient HLA amino acids (the Cambridge algorithm) as a hydrophobic, electrostatic, amino acid mismatch scores (HMS\AMS\EMS) or eplet mismatch (EpMM) load. High-resolution HLA-A/B/DRB1/DQB1 types were imputed to calculate HMS for primary/re-transplant recipients of deceased donor transplants. The multiple Cox regression showed the association of HMS with graft survival and other confounders. The HMS integer 0–10 scale showed the most survival benefit between HMS 0 and 3. The Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that: the HMS=0 group had 18.1-year median graft survival, a 5-year benefit over HMS>0 group; HMS ≤ 3.0 had 16.7-year graft survival, a 3.8-year better than HMS>3.0 group; and, HMS ≤ 7.8 had 14.3-year grafts survival, a 1.8-year improvement over HMS>7.8 group. Stratification based on EMS, AMS or EpMM produced similar results. Additionally, the importance of HLA-DR with/without -DQ IM for graft survival was shown. In our simulation of 1,000 random donor/recipient pairs, 75% with HMS>3.0 were re-matched into HMS ≤ 3.0 and the remaining 25% into HMS≥7.8: after re-matching, the 13.5 years graft survival would increase to 16.3 years. This approach matches donors to recipients with low/medium IM donors thus preventing transplants with high IM donors.

Acyclovir in the Treatment of Herpes Viruses – A Review

Background:

Herpes Simplex (HSV) viruses are widely spread, highly contagious human pathogens. The statistics indicate that 50-90% of adults worldwide are seropositive for these viruses, mainly HSV-1 and HSV-2. The primary infection results in the appearance of watery blisters (cold sores) on the skin, lips, tongue, buccal mucosa or genitals. The ocular infection is the major cause of corneal blindness in the Western World. Once the HSV virus enters human body, it cannot be completely eradicated because HSV viruses are able to change into their latent form which can survive the treatment. The viron resides in trigeminal ganglia of the host, who becomes vulnerable to the reoccurrence of the disease during the whole lifespan. The neurotropic and neuro-invasive properties of HSV are responsible for neurodegenerative illnesses, such as Alzheimer's disease. Acyclovir and its analogues, being the inhibitors of the viral DNA replication, are the only approved medicines for HSV infection therapies.

Objective:

The current paper presents the up-to-date overview of the important pharmacological features of acyclovir, its analogues and their delivery systems including the mechanism of action, routes of administration, absorption and metabolism, as well as side effects of the therapy.

Conclusion:

Acyclovir remains the gold standard in the treatment of herpes virus infections, mainly due to the emerging of the new delivery systems improving considerably its bioavailability. The analogues of acyclovir, especially their esters, characterized by significantly higher bioavailability and safety, may gradually replace acyclovir in selected applications.

Outcomes of induction antibody therapies in the nonbroadly sensitized adult deceased donor kidney transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort registry analysis

The outcomes of lymphocyte-depleting antibody induction therapy (LDAIT), [thymoglobulin (ATG) or alemtuzumab (ALM)] versus interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA) in the nonbroadly-sensitized [pretransplant calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA), <80%] adult deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (adult-DDKTRs) are understudied. In this registry, study of 55 593 adult-DD-KTRs, outcomes of LDAIT [(ATG, N = 32 985) and (ALM, N = 9429)], and IL-2RA (N = 13 179) in <10% and 10-79% cPRA groups was analyzed. Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of one-year biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was lower; while, aOR of 1-year composite of re-hospitalization, graft loss, or death was higher with LDAIT than IL2-RA in both cPRA groups. Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of delayed graft function was higher with LDAIT than IL-2RA in the <10% cPRA group. Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 5-year death-censored graft loss (DCGL) in both <80% cPRA groups seemed higher with ALM than other inductions [(<10% cPRA: ALM versus IL2RA, aHR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.00-1.23 and ATG versus ALM: aHR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.77-0.91; 10-79% cPRA: ALM versus IL2RA, aHR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.02-1.64; and ATG versus ALM, aHR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.70-0.98)]. Five-year aHR of death did not differ among induction therapies in both cPRA groups. In nonbroadly sensitized adult-DDKTRs, LDAIT is more protective against 1-year BPAR (not 5-year mortality) than IL-2RA; the trend of a higher 5-year DCGL risk with ALM than ATG or IL-2RA needs further investigation.

Induction Therapy With ATG Compared With Anti-IL2 Basiliximab in Low-Immunologic Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients

Practically all kidney allograft recipients require immunosuppressive therapy to prevent rejection and loss of the allograft. The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of biopsy-proven acute rejection in low-immunologic risk kidney transplant recipients according to the type of induction (basiliximab vs low-dose of rabbit antithymocyte globulin [rATG], 3.5 mg/kg).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 125 patients after primary kidney transplant were included in the retrospective analysis with 6-month follow-up. The immunosuppression regimen included tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, and corticoids.

RESULTS

We did not find any significant difference in the occurrence of acute rejection or difference in the occurrence of infection complications. Patients in the rATG group had a significantly longer period of cold ischemia, more frequently received kidney transplants from expanded criteria donors, and had significantly more mismatches in HLA-DR. Delayed graft function (DGF) was identified as an independent risk factor for biopsy-proven acute rejection (hazard ratio, 3.4859; P = .003). There was comparable incidence of DGF between the 2 groups despite that there were several factors that are more commonly associated with DGF in the rATG group.

CONCLUSION

Patients with low immunologic risk and high risk of DGF benefit from the rATG induction in dose of 3.5 mg/kg without the increased risk of infection complications with the assumption of good graft function in long-term post-transplant period.

Anti-thymocyte globulins in kidney transplantation: focus on current indications and long-term immunological side effects

Antithymocyte globulins (ATGs) are part of the immunosuppression arsenal currently used by clinicians to prevent or treat acute rejection in solid organ transplantation. ATG is a mixture of non-specific anti-lymphocyte immunoglobulins targeting not only T cell subsets but also several other immune and non-immune cells, rendering its precise immunoglobulin composition difficult to appreciate or to compare from one preparation to another. Furthermore, several mechanisms of action have been described. Taken together, this probably explains the efficacy and the side effects associated with this drug. Recent data suggest a long-term negative impact on allograft and patient outcomes, pointing out the need to better characterize the potential toxicity and the benefit-risk balance associated to this immunosuppressive therapy within large clinical trials.

Tailored Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction Dosing for Kidney Transplantation

Background

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) is the most widely used kidney transplant induction immunotherapy in the United States. It was recently Food and Drug Administration approved for this indication with typical dose recommendations of 1.5 mg/kg for up to 7 days given via a central line.

Methods

We theorized that reduced rATG dosing when compared with conventional dosing (6-10.5 mg/kg) is safe and effective, leading to development of a risk-stratified treatment protocol. Five-year data from a retrospective cohort of 224 adult kidney transplants (2008-2013) with follow-up through 2015 is presented. Cumulative rATG doses of 3 mg/kg were administered peripherally to nonsensitized living donor recipients, 4.5 mg/kg to nonsensitized deceased donor recipients. A subset of higher immunologic risk recipients (defined as history of prior transplant, panel reactive antibody greater than 20%, or flow cytometry crossmatch positivity) received 6 mg/kg.

Results

There were no differences in patient or graft survival between the 3 groups. One-year rejection rates in the first 2 groups were 8.3% and 8.8%, respectively, comparable to contemporaneous rates reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Dose tailoring permitted substantial cost savings estimated at US $1 091 502. Mean length of stay fell by almost 3 days as the protocol was refined. There were no episodes of phlebitis. Infection rates were comparable with those reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.

Conclusions

The novel findings of the current study include peripheral administration, reduced dosing, favorable safety, excellent allograft outcomes, and clear associative data regarding reduced costs and length of stay.

Antithymocyte globulins in renal transplantation-from lymphocyte depletion to lymphocyte activation: The doubled-edged sword

Compelling data suggest that lymphocyte depletion following T cell depleting therapy may induce prolonged CD4 T cell lymphopenia and trigger lymphocyte activation in some patients. These profound and non-reversible immune changes in T cell pool subsets are the consequence of both impaired thymic renewal and peripheral homeostatic proliferation. Chronic viral challenges by CMV play a major role in these immune alterations. Even when the consequences of CD4 T cell lymphopenia have been now well described, recent studies shed new light on the clinical consequences of immune activation. In this review, we will first focus on the mechanisms involved in T cell pool reconstitution after T cell depletion and further consider the clinical consequences of ATG-induced T cell activation and senescence in renal transplant recipients.

Immunosuppression in Solid-Organ Transplantation: Essentials and Practical Tips

A multidisciplinary team approach is essential for successful management of patients with solid-organ transplant. Transplant nursing encompasses care and support of transplant recipients as well as caregivers and organ donors through all phases of transplantation, from pretransplant evaluation to posttransplant recovery and maintenance. The field of solid-organ transplantation has advanced rapidly, and new treatments continue to emerge. Nurses who are responsible for the care of transplant recipients should have a knowledge base in transplant immunology and pharmacology. This review discusses mechanism of action, indication, side effects, and drug interactions of commonly used immunosuppressive medications in solid-organ transplantation. Nonoral routes of drug administration, therapeutic drug monitoring, and patient monitoring strategies are also included as practical tips for bedside nurses who are responsible for delivery of direct patient care and education of patients and their caregivers. This review focuses on the following medications: antithymocyte globulins, basiliximab, alemtuzumab, corticosteroids, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolate sodium, sirolimus, everolimus, belatacept, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab.

Efficacy and safety of antibody induction therapy in the current era of kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Antibody induction with polyclonal rabbit-antithymocyte globulin (rATG) or an interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA) is widely used in kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Collaborative Transplant Study data from 38 311 first deceased-donor kidney transplants (2004-13) were analysed. Transplants were classified as 'normal risk' or 'increased risk' according to current guidelines. Cox regression analysis was applied to subpopulations of propensity score-matched recipients.

RESULTS

rATG or IL-2RA induction was given to 64% of increased-risk and 53% of normal-risk patients, respectively. rATG and IL-2RA induction were each associated with reduced risk for graft loss versus no induction in increased-risk patients [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, P = 0.046 and HR 0.89, P = 0.011, respectively]. The HR values for incidence of treated rejection in increased-risk patients for rATG and IL-2RA versus no induction were 0.75 (P = 0.037) and 0.77 (P < 0.001), respectively. In the normal risk subpopulation, neither induction therapy significantly affected the risk of graft loss or treated rejection. Hospitalization for infection was increased by rATG (P < 0.001) and IL-2RA (P < 0.001) induction. In contrast to patients transplanted during 1994-2003, among patients transplanted during 2004-13, rATG did not significantly affect the risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma versus no induction (P = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

Induction therapy following kidney transplantation should be targeted to increased-risk transplants. In this analysis, a beneficial effect of antibody induction in normal-risk transplants could not be demonstrated.

Basiliximab induction in kidney transplantation with donation after cardiac death donors

Basiliximab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the α-chain of the interleukin (IL)-2 receptor. It is used as induction therapy in kidney transplantation. The objective of the present study was to evaluate induction therapy with single-dose basiliximab (Simulect^®) in kidney transplantation with donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors. A total of 33 DCD kidney transplants were performed between December 2010 and July 2013 in patients who received single-dose basiliximab (20 mg) as induction therapy. The maintenance immunosuppression included calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine A or tacrolimus), mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. The follow-up time was 1 year. The mean ages of the DCD donors and recipients were 29.3 and 41.1 years, respectively. Within the 1-year follow-up, the overall incidence of acute rejection was 9.1%. There were 10 cases of delayed graft function among the recipients. Mean serum creatinine values at 1 week and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-transplantation were 257.6, 238.2, 194.5, 159.3, 137.9 and 110.8 µmol/l, respectively, with a favorable trend to allograft function recovery over time. The 1-year patient and graft survival rates were 96.9 and 90.9%, respectively, with an infection rate of 24.2%. Increased alanine aminotransferase/aspartate transaminase levels in only 2 patients were considered to be associated with basiliximab. This experience with single-dose basiliximab for induction therapy in DCD kidney transplantation showed that favorable clinical outcomes were achieved in terms of graft survival and function within 1 year.

Recollective homeostasis and the immune consequences of peritransplant depletional induction therapy

One's cellular immune repertoire is composed of lymphocytes in multiple stages of maturation - the dynamic product of their responses to antigenic challenges and the homeostatic contractions necessary to accommodate immune expansions within physiologic norms. Given that alloreactivity is predominantly a cross-reactive phenomenon that is stochastically distributed throughout the overall T-cell repertoire, one's allospecific repertoire is similarly made up of cells in a variety of differentiation states. As such, the continuous expansion and elimination of activated memory populations, producing a 'recollective homeostasis' of sorts, has the potential over time to alter the maturation state and effector composition of both ones protective and alloreactive T-cell repertoire. Importantly, a T cell's maturation state significantly influences its response to numerous immunomodulatory therapies used in organ transplantation, including depletional antibody induction. In this review, we discuss clinically utilized depletional induction strategies, how their use alters a transplant recipient's cellular immune repertoire, and how a recipient's repertoire influences the clinical effects of induction therapy.

First-in-human study of the safety and efficacy of TOL101 induction to prevent kidney transplant rejection

TOL101 is a murine IgM mAb targeting the αβ TCR. Unlike other T cell targets, the αβ TCR has no known intracellular signaling domains and may provide a nonmitogenic target for T cell inactivation. We report the 6-month Phase 2 trial data testing TOL101 in kidney transplantation. The study was designed to identify a dose that resulted in significant CD3 T cell modulation (<25 T cell/mm(3) ), to examine the safety and tolerability of TOL101 and to obtain preliminary efficacy information. Thirty-six patients were enrolled and given 5-10 daily doses of TOL101; 33 patients completed dosing, while three discontinued after two doses due to a self-limiting urticarial rash. Infusion adjustments, antihistamines, steroids and dose escalation of TOL101 reduced the incidence of the rash. Doses of TOL101 above 28 mg resulted in prolonged CD3 modulation, with rapid recovery observed 7 days after therapy cessation. There were no cases of patient or graft loss. Few significant adverse events were reported, with one nosocomial pneumonia. There were five biopsy-confirmed acute cellular rejections (13.9%); however, no donor-specific antibodies were detected. Overall TOL101 was well-tolerated, supporting continued clinical development using the dose escalating 21-28-42-42-42 mg regimen.

Antithymocyte antibody-induced coagulopathy in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Antithymocyte antibody (ATA) remains the most commonly used induction immunosuppressive agent in renal transplantation (RT). To date, few case reports of ATA-induced coagulopathy exist.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of renal transplant recipients (RTRs) who underwent RT followed by ATA therapy between 2007 and 2011. The protocol used for deceased donor and unrelated living donor recipient immunosuppression was Thymoglobulin (TMG), methylprednisolone, Cellcept, Prograf, and Rapamune. In related living donor recipients, Simulect (SIM) was substituted for TMG. The international normalized ratio (INR) was routinely checked on days 0 and 2, and thereafter at the discretion of the surgeon. RTRs were transfused packed red blood cells (PRBCs) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) at the discretion of the surgeon.

RESULTS

During the study period, 257 RTs were performed at our institution. The following 18 RTR were excluded: simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant recipients (4), RTRs on warfarin at the time of admission (2), RTRs who received OKT3 (2), and RTRs with INR ≥ 1.2 at the time of admission (10). Of the remaining 239 RTR, 208 (87%) underwent TMG induction therapy; 31 RTR (13%) underwent SIM induction therapy. The mean INR peaked in both groups on day 4 but was higher in TMG recipients (TMG 1.35, SIM 1.20). FFP was transfused in 65 TMG (31%) and 3 SIM (10%) recipients (P = .01); PRBCs were transfused in 88 TMG (44%) and 6 SIM (19%) recipients (P = .02). No patients returned to the operating room for bleeding complications within 7 days of RT. Patient age, gender, ethnicity, and diabetes status were not statistically significant factors in the development of coagulopathy.

CONCLUSION

TMG administration is associated with coagulopathy. Using an INR screening protocol and an aggressive transfusion protocol, bleeding complications associated with coagulopathy can be avoided in this higher-risk group.

Improving the safety of tolerance induction: chimerism and cellular co-treatment strategies applied to vascularized composite allografts

Although vascularized composite allografts (VCAs) have been performed clinically for a variety of indications, potential complications from long-term immunosuppression and graft-versus-host disease remain important barriers to widespread applications. Recently it has been demonstrated that VCAs incorporating a vascularized long bone in a rat model provide concurrent vascularized bone marrow transplantation that, itself, functions to establish hematopoietic chimerism and donor-specific tolerance following non-myeloablative conditioning of recipients. Advances such as this, which aim to improve the safety profile of tolerance induction, will help usher in an era of wider clinical VCA application for nonlife-saving reconstructions.

Alemtuzumab induction in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis and systemic review

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab versus traditional antibodies for induction therapy in renal transplantation.

METHODS

Literature searches for all randomized controlled trials comparing alemtuzumab with traditional antibodies for post renal transplant induction therapy were performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Quality assessment was performed in each trial. Meta-analyses were performed to demonstrate the pooled effects of relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 808 participants from six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Alemtuzumab was associated with lower incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection over traditional antibodies (RR 0.63, CI 0.45-0.87, p=0.005). This difference remained when only studies comparing alemtuzumab with rabbit antithymocyte globulin were included (RR 0.32, CI 0.11-0.91, p=0.03), but lost significance when only patients at high-risk were included (RR 0.86, CI 0.48-1.55, p=0.62). No significant differences were detected between alemtuzumab and traditional antibodies in terms of delayed graft function, patient death, graft loss, and safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Alemtuzumab induction is superior to traditional antibodies in preventing AR in renal transplantation, but this benefit may not extend to recipients at high immunologic risk. The lower rejection rates do not translate into a uniform increase in graft or patient survival.