Development of the Sulphidogenesis Cum Ammonia Removal Process for treatment of tannery effluent

Integrated biological system for remediation and valorization of tannery wastewater: Focus on microbial communities responsible for methanogenesis and sulfidogenesis

Microbial communities in hybrid linear flow channel reactors and anaerobic sequencing batch reactors operated in series for remediation and beneficiation of tannery wastewater were assessed. Despite concurrent sulfidogenesis, more intensive pre-treatment in hybrid linear flow channel reactors reduced methanogenic inhibition usually associated with anaerobic digestion of tannery effluent and promoted efficiency (max 321 mLCH4/gCODconsumed, 59% biogas CH4). Nitrification and biological sulfate reduction were key metabolic pathways involved in overall and sulfate reducing bacterial community selection, respectively, during pre-treatment. Taxonomic selection could be explained by the proteinaceous and saline character of tannery effluent, with dominant genera being protein and/or amino acid degrading, halotolerant and/or ammonia tolerant. Complete oxidizers dominated the sulfidogenic populations during pre-treatment, while aceticlastic genera dominated the methanogenic populations during anaerobic digestion. With more intensive pre-treatment, the system shows promise for remediation and recovery of biogas and sulfur from tannery wastewater in support of a bio-circular economy.

Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Tannery and Slaughterhouse Wastewater for Solids Reduction and Resource Recovery: Effect of Sulfate Concentration and Inoculum to Substrate Ratio

Anaerobic digestion is considered unsuitable for the bioremediation of tannery effluent due to process inhibition, mainly due to high concentrations of sulfur species, and the accumulation of H2S and/or NH3. This study using the standardized biochemical methane potential protocol showed that efficient processing is possible with slaughterhouse wastewater, provided sufficient functional biomass is present at the start of the process and the SO42− concentration is below inhibition threshold. Methanogenic activity (K = 13.4–17.5 and µm = 0.15–0.27) and CH4 yields were high when reactors were operated ISR ≥ 3 and/or lower SO42− ≤ 710 mg/L while high SO42− ≥ 1960 mg/L and ISR < 3.0 caused almost complete inhibition regardless of corresponding ISR and SO42−. The theoretical optimum operating conditions (922 mg/L SO42−, ISR = 3.72) are expected to generate 361 mL biogas/gVS, 235 mL CH4/gVS with reduction efficiencies of 27.5% VS, 27.4% TS, 75.1% TOC, 75.6% SO42−, and 41.1% COD. This implies that tannery sludge will be reduced by about 27% (dry mass) and SO42− by 76%, with a fraction of it recovered as S0. The models displayed a perfect fit to the cumulative CH4 yields with high precision in the order Logistic > Cone > modified Gompertz > first order.