Electrochemical oxidation of quinoline aqueous solution on β-PbO2 anode and the evolution of phytotoxicity on duckweed

Enhancing photocatalytic degradation of quinoline by ZnO:TiO2 mixed oxide: Optimization of operating parameters and mechanistic study

This study focuses on the photocatalytic degradation of quinoline, a recalcitrant heterocyclic nitrogenous aromatic organic compound, using the mixed oxide ZnO-TiO₂ photo-catalyst. Photo-catalysts were synthesized by the solid-state reaction method at different calcination temperatures of 400 °C, 600 °C, and 800 °C. Different analytical methods, including Field emission scanning electron microscope, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area, X-ray diffraction, UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis were used for the catalyst characterization. The highest pore surface area of 57.9 m²g^-1 was obtained for the photo-catalyst calcined at 400 °C. The effects of calcination temperature, solution pH, initial concentration, catalyst dose as well as irradiation time were studied. At the optimum condition, i.e., calcination temperature of 400 °C, pH ≈8 and catalyst dose of 2.5 gL^-1, maximum quinoline degradation and total organic carbon (TOC) removal efficiency of ≈92% and ≈78% were obtained after 240 min for initial quinoline amount of 50 mgL^-1. The 1^st, 2^nd, and n^th-order kinetic models were applied to analyze the quinoline degradation rate. The photocatalytic mechanism was studied by drawing energy level diagram with the help of the band-gap structures of the ZnO and TiO₂, potential of the free radicals like OH and O₂ and HOMO-LUMO energy gap of the quinoline molecule. The proposed pathways of quinoline mineralization were suggested on the basis of the identified intermediates by the gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer analysis and scavenger study.

Duckweed biomarkers for identifying toxic water contaminants?

Surface or ground waters can be contaminated with numerous toxic substances. The duckweeds Lemna minor and Lemna gibba are widely used for assaying waterborne toxicity to higher plants in terms of growth inhibition and photosynthetic pigment reduction. These tests cannot, however, in themselves determine the nature of the agents responsible for toxicity. Morphological, developmental, physiological, biochemical, and genetic responses of duckweeds to exposure to toxic water contaminants constitute biomarkers of toxic effect. In principle, the very detection of these biomarkers should enable the contaminants having elicited them (and being responsible for the toxicity) to be identified. However, in practice, this is severely compromised by insufficient specificity of biomarkers for their corresponding toxicants and by the lack of documentation of biomarker/toxin relationships. The present contribution illustrates the difficulties of using known water contaminant-related duckweed biomarkers to identify toxins, and discusses possibilities for achieving this goal.