Incidence of anti-mouse IgG in normal subjects and patients with autoimmune thyroid disease

False-positive semiquantitative immunochromatography assays for procalcitonin in three patients with rheumatoid arthritis-A case series

We report three rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with false-positive procalcitonin (PCT) based on semiquantitative immunochromatography assays without infection, but who had negative PCT assay results based on quantitative methods. Immunochromatography was useful for screening; however, other heterophilic antibodies rather than rheumatoid factor were possible to affect, especially in RA flare.

Reactivity of human IgM binding murine monoclonal 6B6C1 (IgG2a) with other murine monoclonal IgG antibodies

BACKGROUND

Approximately 6% of sera positive in a dengue virus IgM-capture enzyme immunoassay (EIA) represent false-positives due to interaction between IgM and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled monoclonal antibody (MAb) 6B6C1 (IgG2a). To better understand this interaction, we assessed the reactivity of captured IgM from these sera with other HRP-labeled MAbs.

METHODS

Fifty dengue IgM false-positive sera (recognizing 6B6C1) were evaluated for IgM reactivity with the HRP-labeled MAbs H3A4 (IgG2a), 53.8 (IgG2b), and IL-A2 (IgG1). The sera were also tested in an EIA for human anti-mouse antibody (HAMA).

RESULTS

Forty-three sera (86%) reacted with IgG2a MAb (H3A4). Most (31/43 = 72%) of these sera recognizing 6B6C1 and H3A4 also recognized the IgG2 MAb and/or the IgG1 MAb. In contrast, HAMA was increased in only 9 of 50 (18%) sera reacting with 6B6C1.

CONCLUSIONS

IgM from most sera-binding IgG2a MAb 6B6C1 also binds another IgG2a MAb, suggesting that IgM-6B6C1 reactivity is not idiotype specific. In many cases, IgM recognizing 6B6C1 also binds MAbs of other IgG subclasses, but is negative in a HAMA assay. These findings indicate that samples positive in IgM-capture EIAs utilizing conjugated MAbs should always be retested in the absence of antigen to identify false-positive reactivity caused by direct IgM-MAb interaction.

Antibody interference in thyroid assays: a potential for clinical misinformation

Measurements of thyrotropin and of total and free thyroxine and triiodothyronine are widely used diagnostic methods for thyroid function evaluation. However, some serum samples will demonstrate a nonspecific binding with assay reagents that can interfere with the measurement of these hormones. Several recent case reports have described the presence of such interferences resulting in reported abnormal concentrations of thyroid hormones inconsistent with the patient’s thyroid state. Circulating thyroid hormone autoantibodies, described in thyroid and nonthyroid disorders, are an important class of interference factor and can bind to hormone tracers used in various immunoassays. Two additional categories of interfering antibodies may particularly interfere within two-site immunoassays for thyrotropin. These include heterophile antibodies, especially human anti-mouse antibodies, and rheumatoid factors, which can cause interferences by immunoglobulin aggregation and (or) cross-linking of both capture and signal antibodies. Here we review the nature of these disturbances; their occurrence, prevalence, and detection; and the clinical consequences of the failure to recognize such interference.