Endoscopic endoprosthesis for large stones in the common bile duct

Outcome of forgotten biliary stents for more than five years-A two-decade experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Prolonged biliary stenting may lead to complications such as cholangitis, stentolith and stent migration. There is limited data on forgotten biliary stents for more than five years in literature. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the complications and outcomes in patients who forgot to get their biliary stents removed or exchanged for more than five years.

METHODS

The study population included patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and plastic biliary stent placements in a tertiary care center from 1990 to 2022 for benign biliary diseases. Loss to follow-up and subsequent forgotten stent for more than five years were observed in 40 patients who underwent ERCP during this study period. We retrospectively analyzed the indications of stenting, present status of stent, complications and outcomes in the study patients.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study patients was 51.5 ± 11.5 years with 27 females. Indications of biliary stent placement were choledocholithiasis (33, 82.5%), bile leak (3, 7.5%), benign biliary stricture (2, 5%) and choledochal cyst (2, 5%). The mean duration of forgotten stent was 5.9 ± 3.6 years. Presenting symptoms were abdominal pain (37, 92.5%), fever (26, 65%) and jaundice (32, 80%). Most commonly placed stent was 7 French double pigtail of 10 cm length. Complications in the study patients were cholangitis (35, 87.5%), internal migration (2, 5%), pancreatitis (1, 2.5%) and portal hypertension (1, 2.5%). The outcomes were stone removal (30, 90.9%), stent removal (31, 77.5%), stent reinsertion (19, 47.5%), broken stent (3, 7.5%) and surgery (2, 5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged duration (> 5 years) of forgotten stent is uncommon and is observed most commonly in patients with choledocholithiasis. The most common complication of long duration of forgotten stents was cholangitis followed by internal migration, pancreatitis and portal hypertension. Stone and stent removal was successful in a majority of patents, while surgery was required in less number of patients.

Endoscopic biliary stenting in irretrievable common bile duct stones: stent exchange or expectant management-tertiary-centre experience and systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Conventional endoscopic duct clearance may not be possible in up to 10%-15% of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Sphincterotomy and biliary drainage by endoprosthesis have for many years been the mainstay of management in irretrievable stones. Recent years have seen the advent of sphincteroplasty or cholangioscopically-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) permitting duct clearance in majority of cases. However, when bile duct clearance is not possible, options include long-term stenting followed by elective stent exchange (ESE) 6-12 monthly or permanent stent insertion (PSI) in selected cases, but it is not clear which management strategy among ESE and PSI is preferable.

METHODS AND AIMS

A retrospective review of all patients in Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust who underwent plastic stent insertion for biliary access for difficult CBDS from January 2006 to December 2011 was undertaken. Adult patients with irretrievable CBDS who had plastic stent insertions throughout the follow-up period were included. Patients who underwent PSI and ESE annually were retrospectively reviewed to determine the long-term outcomes. A detailed systematic review was also performed, examining the outcomes of CBDS managed with stents.

RESULTS

During the study period, 674 patients underwent 1769 biliary-stent-related procedures; of which, 246 patients met our inclusion criteria. 201 patients had subsequent duct clearance. 45 patients were, therefore, included in the final analysis, 28 of whom underwent annual ESEs and 17 PSIs. Patients in the PSI group had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores compared with the ESE group. In the PSI group, 9/17 patients presented acutely with blocked stents, 5 of whom presented within 12 months. 2/9 patients were severely ill and died within a fortnight following the repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In the ESE group, 4/28 patients had duct clearance in subsequent ERCPs, 1/28 patient presented with a blocked stent, and no biliary-related deaths were observed. The mean numbers of ERCPs performed were 0.52 and 1.95 in the PSI and ESE groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 50% of patients treated with long-term stenting re-presented acutely with stent blockage, though many of these were before 12 months, meaning planned stent exchange would not have affected the outcome. Duct clearance using all possible modalities is the preferred option, but where not possible, management with biliary stenting either with elective exchange or permanent stenting remains a possibility for carefully selected patients, though maybe best suited to those with limited life expectancy.

The effect of biliary stenting on difficult common bile duct stones

Introduction

If common bile duct (CBD) stones (choledocholithiasis) are left untreated, they may cause increases in morbidity and mortality due to several conditions.

Aim

In this study, using transient biliary stenting following the failure of an initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) session, we aimed to show the effects of making the CBD stones smaller and easier to remove in the following session.

Material and methods

In 156 of 1300 (12%) patients with CBD stones, who underwent balloon screening and/or basket lithotripsy following ERCP and CBD cannulation, it was not possible to remove the stones in the first session. Of these 156 patients, 64 (4.9%) were further followed and tested following transient biliary stenting.

Results

In the last ERCP following biliary stenting, the maximum stone sizes and stone indices were decreased in 54 (83%) patients and stone fragmentation was observed in 46 (72%) patients. Complete and incomplete removal was obtained in 40 (62.5%) and 24 (37.5%) patients, respectively.

Conclusions

Biliary stenting, fragmentation and the reduction in the size of difficult common bile duct stones caused by the first session of ERCP may increase the chance of success in the next session of ERCP.

Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid and endoscopic sphincterotomy in long-term stenting for common bile duct stones

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We investigated the patency rate of a biliary stent and the effects of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for difficult-to-remove common bile duct stones.

METHOD

A total of 63 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs) were performed in 36 patients (mean age, 86.0 years; male-female, 17:19) for stenting. Among the 63 subjects, 28 were further treated with EST; 20, with UDCA therapy; and 43, without UDCA therapy.

RESULTS

The mean patency time was significantly longer in the UDCA treatment group (1,012 days) than in the "stent without UDCA" group (354 days; P = 0.0002; hazard ratio, 0.253). The mean patency time was significantly longer in the patients who had stent placement with EST (1074 days) than in those who had stent placement without EST (279 days; P = 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.439). The mean patency time was significantly longer in the patients who had stent placement with UDCA therapy and EST (1211 days) than in the patients who had stent placement with either UDCA therapy or EST (425 days; P = 0.031; hazard ratio, 0.3292). The mean patency time was significantly longer in the patients who had stent placement with either UDCA therapy or EST than in those who had stent placement without UDCA therapy or EST (263 days; P = 0.0465; hazard ratio, 0.5124).

CONCLUSION

Biliary stenting combined with UDCA therapy and EST may be considered as an effective treatment method for cases of common bile duct stones in elderly patients that are difficult to remove.

Endoscopic biliary stenting for irretrievable common bile duct stones: Indications, advantages, disadvantages, and follow-up results

BACKGROUND

The advantages of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) over open surgery have made it the predominant method of treating patients with choledocholithiasis. After sphincterotomy, however, 10%-15% of common bile duct (CBD) stones cannot be removed with a basket or balloon. Methods for managing "irretrievable stones" include surgery; mechanical, intraductal shock wave, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; chemical dissolution; and biliary stenting. Endoscopic biliary stent insertion, which is frequently used in specific situations, has both advantages and disadvantages. To maximize the advantages and minimize the complications of biliary endoprosthesis, it is important to recognize its proper indications and to apply the technique in proper situations.

DATA SOURCES

We reviewed all publications cited in Pubmed and published through July 2011 on biliary endoprosthesis in patients with irretrievable CBD stones. We analyzed the indications, advantages, disadvantages, and long-term follow-up results of this technique.

RESULTS

Despite the occurrence of related complications, such as cholangitis, endoscopic placement of an endoprosthesis may reduce stone size, allowing later clearance of unextractable stones. Permanent biliary stenting may be a definitive treatment in selected elderly patients who are poor candidates for surgery.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic biliary stenting remains a simple and safe method for patients with stones difficult to manage by conventional endoscopic methods and those patients unfit for surgery or at high surgical risks.

Complex biliary stones: treatment with removable self-expandable metal stents: a new approach (with videos)

BACKGROUND

Complex biliary stones often require temporary stent placement before a repeat attempt at extraction. To date, covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) have not been formally investigated for this indication.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of CSEMSs in patients with retained complex biliary stones.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Large quaternary-care center.

PATIENTS

Thirty-six patients (24 women) with complex biliary stones with incomplete stone clearance after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) with biliary sphincterotomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients with incomplete stone clearance after ERC with biliary sphincterotomy underwent temporary placement of CSEMSs, with subsequent removal before repeat stone extraction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Success achieving immediate biliary drainage and eventual complete duct clearance. Procedure-related complications were also assessed.

RESULTS

CSEMS placement was successful in establishing immediate biliary drainage in all 36 patients. Complete duct clearance at repeat ERC was achieved in 29 of 35 patients after a mean duration of 6.4 weeks. Four of the remaining 6 patients underwent sequential CSEMS placement, with eventual duct clearance after multiple ERCPs. There were no complications related to biliary obstruction. One patient died of a nonbiliary cause. Of the total 42 CSEMSs placed, there were 4 cases (9.5%) of clinically insignificant stent migration.

LIMITATIONS

Single-center experience, retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

CSEMSs permit management of complex biliary stones, but require multiple sessions. The cost-effectiveness of this technique needs further investigation.

Success rate and complications of endoscopic extraction of common bile duct stones over 2 cm in diameter

BACKGROUND

Clinically, common bile duct (CBD) stones >2 cm are difficult to remove by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). To evaluate this observation, the rates of successful clearance of CBD stones and complications were compared between ERCP extraction of CBD stones of >2 cm and <2 cm in diameter.

METHODS

All patients who had undergone endoscopic extraction of CBD stones at the Endoscopy Center of Shanghai First People's Hospital from May 2004 to May 2008 were reviewed. Patients with CBD stones of >2 cm in diameter were enrolled in the >2 cm group. Two matched controls with CBD stones of <2 cm in diameter were selected for each enrolled patient (<2 cm group). Patient characteristics, success rates, and complications during and after ERCP were compared.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients constituted the >2 cm group and 144 patients were in the <2 cm group. No significant differences were found in the patient characteristics, except for stone size and CBD diameter. Both the overall success rate and the success rate in the first ERCP session were lower in the >2 cm group (77.8% and 58.3%, respectively) than in the <2 cm group (91.7% and 83.3%, P<0.01). During ERCP, the incidence of hypoxemia (30.6%) and hemorrhaging papillae (18.1%) in the >2 cm group was higher than in the <2 cm group (13.2% and 6.3%, P<0.05). After ERCP, the rates of delayed papillae hemorrhage (13.9%), hyperamylasemia (23.6%), acute pancreatitis (8.3%) and biliary infection (18.1%) were higher in the >2 cm group than in the <2 cm group (3.5%, 11.1%, 2.1%, and 2.8%, respectively, P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The success rate of endoscopic extraction of CBD stones of >2 cm in diameter was lower but the complication rate was higher than that of stones of <2 cm in diameter.

A prospective study of the efficacy of endoscopic biliary stenting on common bile duct stones

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of endoscopic biliary stenting on common bile duct stones.

METHODS

Fifty patients with choledocholithiasis were treated with endoscopic biliary stenting and followed. The early and late outcome was assessed.

RESULTS

The procedure was successful in all patients and there was only one patient with mild pancreatitis. The patency rates of stent at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after biliary stenting were 94%, 79% and 58%, respectively. The rate of reduction in size of stone was 60%.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic biliary stenting was not a definitive treatment of choledocholithiasis. It may be an option for patients clinically unfit for definitive treatment.

Effect of biliary stenting combined with ursodeoxycholic acid and terpene treatment on retained common bile duct stones in elderly patients: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

For frail, elderly patients with large impacted common bile duct (CBD) stones, long-term treatment with biliary stenting provides palliation. Biliary stenting with choleretic agents such as ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and terpene preparations may promote CBD stone size reduction. We studied the effectiveness of biliary stenting combined with UDCA and a terpene preparation as a medical treatment for difficult-to-remove CBD stones in patients older than 65 years in this multicenter, prospective study.

METHODS

A total of 28 elderly patients with CBD stones refractory to conventional endoscopic removal, including mechanical lithotripsy, underwent endoscopic placement of a straight 10-F plastic biliary stent. Each patient was administered 600 mg of UDCA and 300 mg of a terpene preparation daily for a mean of 6 months. After 6 months of medication following the initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), a second ERCP was performed and endoscopic stone removal was again attempted. Differences in stone size and CBD diameter before and after biliary stenting and medication were compared. The complete stone removal rate after treatment was obtained.

RESULTS

The mean size (transverse x longitudinal diameter) of the CBD stones was initially 21.6 x 29.5 mm, and it decreased significantly to 12.2 x 20.1 mm at the second ERCP (P<0.01). The mean CBD diameter measured initially at the cystic duct insertion level was 23.2 mm, and it decreased significantly to 19.5 mm at the second ERCP (P<0.01). After biliary stenting with medication, endoscopic stone removal was successful in 26 of 28 patients (92.8%), with a mean of 1.7 subsequent ERCP sessions.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic biliary stenting with a period of combined UDCA and terpene preparation administration seems to be a safe and effective method for retained CBD stones in elderly patients. A prospective study with randomization and a control group is required to confirm these results.

An audit of the outcome of long-term biliary stenting in the treatment of common bile duct stones in a general hospital

BACKGROUND

This study audited the clinical outcome of a cohort of patients with choledocholithiasis treated with long-term biliary stenting in order to determine the feasibility of this practice.

METHODS

Over 2 years, 83 patients with symptomatic choledocholithiasis were treated with long-term stenting because they either refused further treatments or were medically unfit for further procedures after the initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Recurrence of clinical events, need for stent change, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. As a secondary analysis, published data on long-term biliary stenting were reviewed.

RESULTS

ERCP and biliary stenting were successful in all cases with no complications. The mean follow-up was 19 months (1-103 months). The median number of ERCPs performed was 1 (1-4). The mean duration of stent patency was 12.4 months (1-54.8 months). A total of 28 clinical events (cholangitis, 71%) occurred in 24 patients during follow-up, for a late complication rate of 33.7%. ERCP was repeated and the stents changed on 15 occasions in 11 asymptomatic patients with abnormal liver function tests detected on routine follow-up. No biliary-related mortality occurred. Review of published data revealed a mean late complication rate of 22.4% (0%-64%), a biliary-related mortality rate of 3.5% (0%-21.1%), and a nonbiliary-related mortality rate of 20.8% (0%-60.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term biliary stenting is a feasible option for patients who decline or are medically unfit for further elective endoscopic or surgical procedures. Close follow-up is mandatory to detect and treat late complications.

Prospective randomized study of T-tube versus biliary stent for common bile duct decompression after open choledocotomy

The T-tube has been the alternative of choice for decompression following common bile duct (CBD) exploration. The development of laparoscopic surgery has suggested using a biliary stent as an alternative to the T-tube following choledochotomy. The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare clinical results obtained from patients who underwent open CBD exploration using a biliary stent versus those from patients with a T-tube for decompression. Between September 2000 and June 2002 a total of 81 patients were randomly assigned to a biliary stent or a T-tube as the decompression method following choledochotomy. An open CBD exploration was performed when CBD stones were suspected, in both elective and emergency settings. The length of the postoperative hospital stay was 6.8 +/- 4.7 days for patients with the T-tube and of 5.2 +/- 3.3 days for, patients with the biliary stent (p = 0.19). Postoperative complications were observed in 13 patients (30%) with the T-tube and in 4 patients (11%) with the biliary stent (p = 0.03). One patient with a biliary stent was reoperated because of an intraabdominal abscess, and another patient was reoperated because of biliary peritonitis following T-tube removal. Three patients (7%) with a biliary stent and one patient (3%) with a T-tube were rehospitalized. There were no deaths. The T-tube and biliary stent were removed 27.1 +/- 10.8 days and 34.9 +/- 12.9 days after surgery, respectively (p = 0.24). The biliary stent is a safe alternative to the T-tube as a biliary decompression method following an open CBD exploration.

The effect of indwelling endoprosthesis on stone size or fragmentation after long-term treatment with biliary stenting for large stones

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic biliary stenting is often used for large or difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones, but the effect of indwelling endoprosthesis on size or fragmentation of stones after long-term treatment with biliary stenting has not been formally established. We compared the stone size or fragmentation of common bile duct stones after a long period of biliary stenting.

METHODS

Endoscopic biliary endoprosthesis was performed for 49 high-risk patients with CBD stones too large or difficult to be extracted by conventional endoscopic means. Bile duct drainage was established in all the patients without complications. Of the patients, 24 died with endoprosthesis in situ all from causes unrelated to biliar disease; 22 underwent a second and three patients a third attempt at stone extraction. The largest stone diameter was >12 mm in all patients.

RESULTS

In 11 of 25 patients (44%) the endoprosthesis allowed resolution of the problem of unextractable common bile duct stones. Four patients showed no existence of stent, and ERCP complete stone clearance from the CBD on programmized appointment after endoprosthesis insertion. Reduced size or fragmentation of stones was obtained in seven patients, and the stones could be removed endoscopically. The remaining 14 patients demonstrated no significant change in the size or fragmentation of their stones, and endoprostheses were replaced.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that endoscopic endoprosthesis for large or difficult CBD stones is an effective method to clear the duct in selected cases, as well as an important definitive treatment in high-risk patients.

Common bile duct stenting for choledocholithiasis: a district general hospital experience

The favoured treatment of common bile duct stones is endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction. The management of those cases where duct clearance is not possible is controversial. At our institution it has been policy to insert an endoluminal stent. We report a retrospective review of the outcome of patients stented for common bile duct stones. The study population was 14 men and 22 women, with a median age of 73 years (range 23-89 years). Treatment-related morbidity was seen in nine patients (25%), comprising cholangitis (5), pancreatitis (3), and cholecystitis (1). Three of these patients died; all were over the age of 75 years and had been stented on a long-term basis. These data suggest that endobiliary stents can be employed with an acceptable complication rate. We suggest that patients under the age of 75 years be stented only as a temporising measure, but that patients over 75 years or those unfit on physiological grounds can be stented on a long-term basis as definitive treatment.