Malignant pleural mesothelioma presenting as achalasia

Is it necessary to perform a morphological assessment for an esophageal motility disorder? A retrospective descriptive study

BACKGROUND

Esophageal motility disorders are most often of primary origin but may be secondary to an occult malignancy or another etiology. High-resolution esophageal manometry cannot differentiate between secondary or primary origin. This study aimed at discussing the usefulness of a morphological assessment in the diagnosis of specific esophageal motility disorders, and to establish the predictive factors of a potential secondary origin.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients with suspected esophageal motility disorders who underwent an esophageal manometry were included. High-resolution manometry results were interpreted according to the Chicago Classification, 3rd version. The results of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography, assessed by a panel of experts, allowed to diagnose a secondary origin.

KEY RESULTS

Out of 2138 patients undergoing manometry, 502 patients had a esophageal motility disorder suspect to be from secondary origin; among them 182 patients underwent tomography or endoscopic ultrasound. According to experts, 16 patients (8.8%) had a secondary esophageal motility disorder: esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (n = 7), jackhammer disorder (n = 4), achalasia (n = 3) and localized pressurization (n = 2). The etiology was malignant in 8 patients. Predictive factors suggesting potential secondary esophageal motility disorders were smoking, age ≥ 58 years and an Integrated Relaxation Pressure higher than 10 mmHg for water swallows.

CONCLUSION AND INFERENCES

Esophageal motility disorders with organic origin are not uncommon. A morphological assessment using endoscopic ultrasonography and/or computed tomography may be of use to diagnose a secondary origin, especially in the elderly and smokers.

Pseudoachalasia: a systematic review of the literature

Pseudoachalasia, also known as secondary achalasia, is a clinical condition mimicking idiopathic achalasia but most commonly caused by malignant tumors of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Our aim was to systematically review and present all available data on demographics, clinical features, and diagnostic modalities involved in patients with pseudoachalasia. A systematic search of literature published during the period 1978-2019 was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (end-of-search date: June 25th, 2019). Two independent reviewers extracted data with regards of study design, interventions, participants, and outcomes. Thirty-five studies met our inclusion criteria and were selected in the present review. Overall, 140 patients with pseudoachalasia were identified, of whom 83 were males. Mean patient age was 60.13 years and the mean weight loss was 13.91 kg. A total of 33 (23.6%) patients were wrongly 'treated' at first for achalasia. The most common presenting symptoms were dysphagia, food regurgitation, and weight loss. The median time from symptoms' onset to hospital admission was 5 months. Most common etiology was gastric cancer (19%). Diagnostic modalities included manometry, barium esophagram, endoscopy, and computed tomography (CT). Pseudoachalasia is a serious medical condition that is difficult to be distinguished from primary achalasia. Clinical feature assessment along with the correct interpretation of diagnostic tests is nowadays essential steps to differentiate pseudoachalasia from idiopathic achalasia.

Pseudoachalasia: a case series and analysis of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Pseudoachalasia frequently cannot be distinguished from idiopathic achalasia by manometry, radiologic examination or endoscopy. Mechanisms proposed to explain the clinical features of pseudoachalasia include a circumferential mechanical obstruction of the distal esophagus or a malignant infiltration of inhibitory neurons within the myenteric plexus.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between January 1980 and December 2002, the clinical features of 5 patients with pseudoachalasia and 174 patients with primary achalasia, diagnosed in a single center, were compared. A literature analysis of the etiology of pseudoachalasia for the time period 1968 to December 2002 was performed. The search concentrated on the databases and online catalogues PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Current Contents Connect.

RESULTS

In our case series, patients with pseudoachalasia reported a shorter duration of symptoms and tended to be older than patients with primary achalasia. Conventional manometry, endoscopy and radiologic examination of the esophagus proved to be of little value in distinguishing between the diseases. In the majority of cases only surgical exploration revealed the underlying cause. A coincidence of primary achalasia and disorders of the gastroesophageal junction was excluded by showing return of peristalsis following treatment. The analysis of the literature showed a total of 264 cases of pseudoachalasia in 122 publications. Most cases of were due to malignant disease (53.9% primary and 14.9% secondary malignancy), followed by benign lesions (12.6%) and sequelae of surgical procedures at the distal esophagus or proximal stomach (11.9%). In rare instances, the disease was an expression of a paraneoplastic process due to distant neuronal involvement rather than to local invasion with destruction of the myenteric plexus (2.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of pseudoachalasia is difficult to establish by conventional diagnostic measures. The main distinguishing feature of secondary versus primary achalasia is the complete reversal of pathologic motor phenomena following successful therapy of the underlying disorder.

Recurrent gastric carcinoma causing pseudoachalasia: case report

We report the case of a patient with a gastric remnant relapse of an antral carcinoma resected 5 years before and presenting with the clinical feature of a secondary achalasia (pseudoachalasia). In spite of the patient's 4-month history of dysphagia and weight loss that suggested a malignant lesion, barium swallow, repeated endoscopic biopsies and computed tomography (CT) scan of the upper abdomen did not reveal any abnormalities to indicate a recurrence. However, in the following months, because of worsening symptoms, a further CT scan was performed and revealed thickening of the cardia and gastric wall. The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy that showed an unresectable lesion involving the gastric fundus, the diaphragm and penetrating into the mediastinum, and therefore a palliative jejunostomy was performed.

Clinical presentation and evaluation of malignant pseudoachalasia

Malignant pseudoachalasia can be indistinguishable from primary achalasia on routine clinical evaluation, often resulting in a delay in diagnosis. To better define the clinical features and appropriate management of this disease, the course of five patients discovered to have pseudoachalasia after being referred for a minimally invasive Heller myotomy was reviewed, as were 67 cases of pseudoachalasia previously reported in the literature. Patients with an occult malignancy tended to present with shorter durations of symptoms, greater weight loss, and at a more advanced age than patients with primary achalasia. Since contrast radiography and endoscopy frequently failed to differentiate these two diseases, persons with presumed achalasia meeting these criteria who are referred for minimally invasive surgery should undergo additional imaging to rule out an occult malignancy, since this condition cannot be reliably detected during the course of a thoracoscopic or laparoscopic esophagomyotomy.