Allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome associated with systemic cytomegalovirus infection and systemic bacteremia

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Part I. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinicopathological features, and prognosis

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. Anticonvulsants, antibiotics, and allopurinol are the most common triggers. The pathogenesis involves a complex interplay between drugs, viruses, and the immune system primarily mediated by T-cells. DiHS/DRESS typically presents with a morbilliform eruption 2-6 weeks after drug exposure, and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and risk of relapse. Long-term sequelae primarily relate to organ dysfunction and autoimmune diseases. Part I of this continuing medical education activity on DiHS/DRESS provides an update on epidemiology, novel insights into pathogenesis, and a description of clinicopathological features and prognosis.

Drug allergy and non-HIV immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome

Non-HIV immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (non-HIV IRIS) is associated with the recovery from an immunocompromised condition. It is defined as inflammatory disorders caused by antigens, including drugs or pathogenic microorganisms present prior to immune recovery, or by the exacerbation of an inflammatory disorder that was already present. Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome is a prototype of IRIS, and the pathophysiology of non-HIV IRIS can be recognized in several disorders treated with corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, molecular-targeted drugs, TNF-α antibody drugs, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. This review focuses on the relationship between the immune mechanism of non-HIV IRIS and drug allergies, especially severe drug eruption. The antigen recognition mechanism in drug allergy varies depending on the clinical type and the causative drug. The p-i concept is the main mechanism in severe drug eruption such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, and drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Lymphocytes activated by an antigen other than a drug, such as a virus, can also develop drug allergy by the loose binding of drugs with immune receptors of T cells or human leukocyte antigen. Therefore, fluctuations in the immune environment affect the onset of severe drug eruption. Novel agents that cause major changes in immunity have been marketed mainly for autoimmune diseases and malignant tumors; therefore, it is necessary to consider their effects when treating severe drug eruptions. Moreover, although a list of diagnostic criteria for this syndrome has been drafted, predictive and diagnostic biomarkers for this syndrome needs to be urgently developed.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS)/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): An update in 2019

The aim of this review was to provide an updated overview of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS)/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). Several new insights have been made, particularly with regards to the diagnosis, pathogenesis and care of some important complications and sequelae. The indication of herpesvirus reactivations in diagnosis in the assessment of disease severity is now better specified. Nevertheless, because fatal complications and autoimmune sequelae have been under-recognized, there is a clear need to identify effective parameters for assessing disease severity and predicting prognosis of the disease in the early phase. In this regard, we have established a scoring system that can be used to monitor severity, predict prognosis and stratify the risk of developing severe complications including fatal cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. Regulatory T cells are likely to be central to the mechanism and would represent potential targets for therapeutic approaches that can ameliorate inflammatory responses occurring at the acute phase while preventing the subsequent development of harmful outcomes, such as CMV disease and autoimmune diseases.

Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms: An Update and Review of Recent Literature

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome, is also known as drug induced hypersensitivity syndrome and by various other names. It is now recognised as one of the severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) and can be potentially life-threatening. Historically, it was most frequently linked with phenytoin and was initially described as phenytoin hypersensitivity syndrome. However, it was later found to be caused by various other medications. Anticonvulsants and sulfonamides are the most common offender. Characteristically DRESS has a latent period of 2 to 6 weeks. The pathophysiology remains incompletely understood but involves reactivation of viruses and activation of lymphocyte. It is manifested most commonly with a morbilliform cutaneous eruption with fever and lymphadenopathy. The severity of this syndrome is related to the systemic involvement, which can result in multi-organ failure. Most important step in the management of DRESS is early diagnosis and immediate cessation of the suspected offending drug. Patients of DRESS syndrome should be managed in an intensive care set up for appropriate supportive care and infection control. Topical corticosteroids can give symptomatic relief, but systemic therapy with steroid and other immunosuppressant is usually required.

Drug-Induced Hypersensitivity Syndrome due to Mexiletine Associated with Human Herpes Virus 6 and Cytomegalovirus Reactivation

A 66-year-old man developed a fever of 38 degrees C and generalized pruritic rash about one month after mexiletine hydrochloride administration for ventricular tachycardia. The rash appeared as edematous erythema and papules with purpura on the lower extremities. Liver dysfunction, leukocytosis, and atypical lymphocytes were also present. Elevated antibody titer against human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6) was detected during the course of the disease (1:20 -> 1:640). The patient was diagnosed as having drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) due to mexiletine. Discontinuation of the mexiletine administration and systemic corticosteroid treatment led to a temporary improvement, but tapering the corticosteroid dose twice led to recrudescence. Simultaneous with the recrudescence, elevated antibody titers against HHV-6 and cytomegalovirus were detected, as well as viral DNA in the blood, suggesting that these two viruses may have been involved in the recrudescence. The patient died of myocarditis, most likely related to cytomegalovirus. Our case indicates that, in addition to HHV-6, other herpes viruses such as cytomegalovirus can be reactivated in DIHS and may modify the clinical disease activity.

Drug-Induced Hypersensitivity Syndrome Associated with Human Herpesvirus 6 and Cytomegalovirus Reactivation

We describe a patient with drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) associated with human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection induced by sulfasalazine. Two weeks after starting sulfasalazine to treat a rectal ulcer, the patient developed disseminated macular erythema accompanied by fever, liver injury, and lymphadenopathy. Seroconversion of antibodies to HHV-6 was observed. Systemic steroid treatment was not effective against the eruptions. Five months after the onset, he presented with an acute febrile disease. The detection of CMV antigen on peripheral blood leukocytes and positive staining for CMV on cutaneous endothelium indicated active CMV infection. Furthermore, he developed a bacteremia of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. An association the CMV reactivation with DIHS was suggested, although there remains the possibility that the systemic steroid treatment precipitated CMV reactivation. Recently, HHV-6 has been documented to have immunomodulating effects and to be associated with CMV reactivation. Therefore, we should pay attention to the possibility of CMV reactivation in patients with DIHS in whom the immunomodulating virus of HHV-6 has been reactivated.

Isolated ileal perforation due to cytomegalovirus reactivation during management of terbinafine hypersensitivity

We report a case of 71-year-old man who developed a hypersensitivity syndrome associated with terbinafine. He was placed on terbinafine (250 mg/d) for the treatment of tinea pedis due to diabetes mellitus. Following the treatment with terbinafine, he developed drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS). Systemic corticosteroid led to transient improvement of his clinical manifestations. Three months after disease onset, he presented with panperitonitis due to ileal perforation, and underwent an emergency operation. The affected ileum was resected and ileostomy was performed in the terminal ileum. Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific IgG antibodies were significantly increased, high-titer CMV antigenemia was detected, and pathological examination of the resected ileum confirmed CMV infection. Based on these observations, we strongly recommend that physicians monitor reactivation of the family of herpesvirus other than herpesvirus 6, to manage DIHS properly.

Visceral involvements and long-term sequelae in drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) is a severe systemic reaction with several herpesvirus reactivations. Multiple organ failures appear during the course of the disease. The severity of DIHS is determined by the degree of visceral involvement. Autoimmune diseases also develop several months to years after the apparent clinical resolution of DIHS.

The variable clinical picture of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms in relation to the eliciting drug

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS)/drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a life-threatening adverse reaction characterized by skin rashes, fever, leukocytosis with eosinophilia or atypical lymphocytosis, lymph node enlargement, and liver or renal dysfunction. The syndrome develops 2 to 6 weeks after initiation of administration of a specific drug. It has been demonstrated that various herpesvirus reactivations, in addition to human herpesvirus 6, contribute to internal organ involvement and the relapse of symptoms observed long after discontinuation of the causative drugs. A better understanding of the interplay in the development of DIHS/DRESS has implications for safer and more efficient treatment of this syndrome.

Reactivation of human herpesvirus (HHV) family members other than HHV-6 in drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) is characterized by a severe multiorgan hypersensitivity reaction that usually appears after a 3-6-week exposure to certain drugs, including anticonvulsants. There are some reports showing that serum IgG levels often decrease at the early stage of DIHS. Reactivation of human herpesvirus (HHV)-6 has been reported in patients with DIHS, and some other DIHS patients showed reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV).

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether reactivation of HHV-6, HHV-7, CMV and/or EBV occurs in patients with DIHS.

METHODS

Titres of IgG and IgM antibodies to HHV-6 and HHV-7 were determined using an indirect immunofluorescence antibody assay on admission and at various times after admission. Anti-CMV IgG and IgM antibody titres and anti-EBV capsid antigen IgG, IgA, IgM, and EBV nuclear antigen and EBV early antigen IgG titres were determined by enzyme immunoassay. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedures for HHV-6, HHV-7, CMV and EBV DNAs were performed using serum samples. IgG antibody titres to HHV-6, HHV-7, CMV and EBV were increased after the onset in seven, six, seven and two of seven patients, respectively. IgG antibody titres to HHV-6 and HHV-7 were elevated simultaneously 21-38 days after the onset.

RESULTS

IgG antibody titres to CMV and EBV were elevated 10-21 days after the elevation of HHV-6 and HHV-7 antibody titres. PCR showed that HHV-6, HHV-7, CMV and EBV DNAs became positive in six, five, seven and two of seven patients, respectively. HHV-6 and HHV-7 DNAs were detected 21-35 days after the onset, and CMV DNA was detected 10-21 days after detection of HHV-6 and HHV-7 DNAs.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that in addition to HHV-6 reactivation, reactivation of HHV-7, CMV and/or EBV may also occur following drug eruption in some patients with DIHS.

DRESS (Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) après traitement par imatinib (Glivec)

BACKGROUND

Imatinib (Gleevec) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat chronic myeloid leukemia. We describe a case of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) after institution of treatment with imatinib.

PATIENT AND METHODS

A 78-year-old woman was treated with low-dose imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia since November 2003. A macular and pruritic eruption appeared on the patient's trunk after 7 weeks of treatment and gradually worsened. After 1 month, she was admitted for generalized skin eruption with fever and diffuse lymphadenopathy. Laboratory data showed hypereosinophilia and blood cultures positive for Staphylococcus aureus. Imatinib was stopped and replaced with hydroxyurea (Hydrea). Improved clinical and laboratory results were seen with antibiotics and topical steroids.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first case of DRESS following treatment with imatinib. Cutaneous reactions to imatinib are frequent and are usually mild, comprising maculopapular eruption, pruritus and facial edema. Few cases of serious skin reactions have been reported until now. Several authors suggest that the prevalence and severity of cutaneous manifestations are related to a pharmacologic effect of imatinib. Our observation cannot rule out an underlying immunologic mechanism. Septicemia may also play a part in the development of DRESS.

Immune mechanism of drug hypersensitivity

Drug hypersensitivity reactions can lead to a great variety of different diseases. The main cause is a specific interaction of antibodies or T cells with a drug. In addition to the hapten concept, some drugs can bind directly to T-cell receptors and stimulate them. Based on recent investigation on different exanthemas, an extended classification of the Gell and Coombs type IV reaction is proposed.

Cellular and molecular pathophysiology of cutaneous drug reactions

Hypersensitivity reactions to drugs can cause a variety of skin diseases like maculopapular, bullous and pustular eruptions. In recent years increasing evidence indicates the important role of T cells in these drug-induced skin diseases. Analysis of such drug-specific T cell clones has revealed that drugs can be recognized by alpha beta-T cell receptors, not only if bound covalently to peptides, but also if the drug binds in a rather labile way to the presenting major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-peptide. This presentation is sufficient to stimulate T cells. In maculopapular exanthema (MPE), histopathological analysis typically shows a dominant T cell infiltration together with a vacuolar interface dermatitis. Immunohistochemical studies demonstrate the presence of cytotoxic CD4+ and to a lesser degree of CD8+ T cells, which contain perforin and granzyme B. They are close to keratinocytes that show signs of cell destruction. Expression of Fas ligand is barely detectable, suggesting that cytotoxic granule exocytosis may be the dominant pathway leading to keratinocyte cell damage. While in MPE, the killing of cells seems to be predominantly mediated by CD4+ T cells, patients with bullous skin disease show a strong CD8+ T cell migration to the epidermis. This is probably due to a preferential presentation of the drug by MHC class I molecules, and a more extensive killing of cells that present drugs on MHC class I molecules. This might lead to bullous skin diseases. In addition to the presence of cytotoxic T cells, drug-specific T cells also orchestrate the inflammatory skin reaction through the release and induction of various cytokines [i.e. interleukin (IL)-5, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interferon-gamma] and chemokines (RANTES, eotaxin or IL-8). The increased expression of these mediators seems to contribute to the generation of tissue and blood eosinophilia, a hallmark of many drug-induced allergic reactions. However, in acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (a peculiar form of drug allergy), neutrophils represent the predominant cell type within pustules, probably due to their recruitment by IL-8 secreting drug specific T cells and keratinocytes.