Treatment of inflammatory immunologic disease 3. Anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis

Use of unapproved or off-label drugs in Japan for the treatment of graft-versus-host disease and post-transplant viral infection

Many drugs are used for unapproved indications in Japan for post hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) complications. To investigate unapproved or off-label drug usage for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and virus infections after allogeneic HCT, we analyzed the data of Japanese HCT registry. Between 2006 and 2017, 39,941 adults and children received HCT for a variety of disease and their transplant data were captured in the registry. Among them, 14,687 and 8914 patients receiving treatment for acute and/or chronic GVHD, 24,828 patients with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection or receiving therapies for CMV, and 4943 who received treatment for other viral infections were included in the analyses of off-label or unapproved drugs. For GVHD, mycophenolate mofetil was the most frequently used off-label drug, followed by beclomethasone, infliximab, and etanercept. For viral infections other than CMV, foscarnet was the most frequently used off-label drug. Cidofovir, which is not approved for use in Japan, was mainly used for adenovirus infection. This study demonstrated that numerous off-label and unapproved drugs have been used as key drugs for GVHD and post-transplant viral infection, and the real world date in the transplant registry may serve as an important asset to regulatory purposes.

Single center prospective study of tacrolimus efficacy and safety in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in clinical practice. Fifty-five active RA patients who had been resistant or intolerant to other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were enrolled in this open-label trial. Patients were administered tacrolimus at a dosage of 1, 2 or 3 mg once daily, and followed up for 24 weeks. They were divided into three groups according to their dosage. Efficacy and safety were evaluated utilizing clinical and laboratory findings. Eighty percent of the patients had moderate or high disease activity; 55% were elderly and 53% had complications; 65% of the patients were started on tacrolimus as a monotherapy. Moderate or good response rates were achieved as follows: 38.2% (4 weeks); 41.8% (12 weeks); and 45.6% (24 weeks). Adverse events were observed in seven cases (12.7%). Only one case required hospitalization due to severe hyperglycemia caused by a high tacrolimus concentration (24.2 ng/ml); we suspected a drug interaction in this subject. Mean concentrations were dose-dependent in the 1, 2, and 3 mg/day groups (2.96, 4.29, and 8.32 ng/ml, respectively). Four cases of high concentration (over 10 ng/ml), without any signs or symptoms, were observed in the 3 mg/day group; in these cases, doses were decreased and no severe adverse events occurred. Tacrolimus was found to be both effective and safe in treating active RA patients with complicated backgrounds in clinical practice. Blood concentration measurements and dose adjustments should be performed to prevent severe adverse events in a 3 mg/day group.