Immunological analysis of a patient with hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation after bone marrow transplantation

Hepatitis B reactivation in hematopoietic stem cell transplanted patients: 20 years of experience of a single center from a middle endemic country

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a risk factor for viral hepatitis reactivations because it affects lymphocyte number and functions. Latent hepatitis B virus (HBV) may stay in dormant form in hepatocytes and may be reactivated in prolonged immunosuppression. This study analyzes the incidence of reactivation of HBV infections in HSCT patients in a middle endemic country like Turkey. Five hundred and sixty-one HSCT patients from 1994 to 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. Sixty-six patients had a serologic feature of HBV infection. Fifteen patients were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients (3 allogeneic and 12 autologous) while 51 of them were anti-hepatitis B core IgG (anti-HBc IgG)-positive patients (22 allogeneic and 29 autologous). Although under lamivudine prophylaxis, reactivation was seen in three of 12 (25%) chronic HBV (HBsAg positive) patients who received autologous HSCT and in two of the three HBsAg-positive patients who received allogeneic HSCT. Rate of reactivation in the whole HBsAg-positive group was 33%. Reactivation occurred on median 270th day (range: 60-730). Reverse seroconversion incidence was 10% on 133th day for HBsAg negative, but anti-HBc IgG-positive patients, which increased to 17% on 360th and to 23% on 1500th day. Cumulative incidence increased to 41% on 2280th day for isolated anti-HBc IgG-positive patients. Hepatitis B surface antibodies (anti-HBs) were found to be protective as reactivation did not exceed 11% on 5050th day when anti-HBs was positive. When anti-HBc IgG-positive cases were analyzed according to their transplantation types, allogeneic HSCT was found to have higher cumulative incidence (45% on 3258th day) for HBV reactivation than autologous HSCT (7% on 5050th day). Besides, HBV reactivation in anti-HBc IgG-positive patients who received allogeneic transplantation was related to mortality. Findings of this study suggest that HBV prophylaxis extending over 1 year should be prescribed for HBsAg-positive patients independent of the transplantation type. Prophylaxis should also be given to anti-HBc IgG-positive patients if an allogeneic HSCT is to be performed.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in a Patient with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis 41 Months after Rituximab-containing Chemotherapy

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation occasionally occurs long after immunosuppressive therapy. The characteristics of late HBV reactivation remain unclear. We herein present a case of HBV reactivation in a patient with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) more than 3 years after rituximab-containing chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Increased transaminase levels, which were induced by NASH, were observed after chemotherapy and were alleviated with statin treatment. HBV reactivation was identified incidentally. The patient developed hepatitis that improved with entecavir therapy. Our case might indicate that the presence of NASH is associated with HBV reactivation long after treatment and that statins, as immune-modulatory agents, affect HBV reactivation.

Acute hepatitis B virus infection or acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B infection: the differential serological diagnosis

Acute exacerbations of chronic hepatitis B are common, and may even be the first presentation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Sometimes, patients involved in these scenarios may have mistaken diagnosis of acute hepatitis B. The reason for the confusion is that the two forms of infection manifestation resemble remarkably in clinical, biochemical, and serological features, such as apparent rapid onset of severe disease, advanced grades of encephalopathy, high aminotransferases and prolonged international normalized ratios (INRs), as well as positivity for HBsAg and for IgM anti-HBc antibodies and DNA detection. Therefore, these two entities cannot be distinguished easily without historical information of HBV-associated chronic infection or recent HBV exposure, information that is often inaccurate. Considering the different prognoses, treatment strategies, and the epidemiological impact in the public health context, the correct diagnosis is extremely important. Despite the lack of effective and reliable tests to differentiate between acute infection and acute exacerbation of chronic HBV infection, the expression and kinetic evaluation of viral markers present in the circulation of individuals infected, the observation of physical-chemical properties of specific antibodies, and the combination of these findings represent some strategies in serology that could assist in differentiating between the two entities, or at least in the guidance for the correct diagnosis.