Serum D-dimer Levels Are Proportionally Associated with Left Atrial Enlargement in Patients with an Acute Ischemic Stroke due to Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Role of New Potential Biomarkers in the Risk of Thromboembolism in Atrial Fibrillation

Ischemic stroke risk in atrial fibrillation differs from patient to patient, depending on numerous variables. Many attempts have been made to translate this difference into simple numbers and to compare it to the hemorrhagic risk of anticoagulation. Different clinical scores have been studied to define a clear strategy. One score, the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, has been extensively and successfully applied worldwide. Nevertheless, it is not yet the “perfect instrument”. Many proposals have been made to integrate its clinical parameters with some biomarkers to improve its predictive power. This short review describes some of these biomarkers and their possible implications in potentiating the efficacy of clinical scores.

D-dimer levels in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and acute heart failure treated with edoxaban

BACKGROUND

D-dimer levels can predict ischemic stroke in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). However, the effects of direct oral anticoagulants on D-dimer levels have not been investigated during admission for AHF in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study examined D-dimer levels immediately after admission and following edoxaban initiation as a sub-analysis of a multi-center study that investigated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of edoxaban in patients with nonvalvular AF (NVAF) and AHF.

METHODS

Hospitalized patients with NVAF and AHF received edoxaban according to the label. The primary measure was the change in D-dimer levels on 7 consecutive days after admission for AHF. We also investigated differences according to prior edoxaban use (de novo at the time of admission or continuation).

RESULTS

In 10/13 (76.9%) de novo patients, D-dimer levels exceeded the reference value (1.0 µg/mL) at admission (mean, 2.12 µg/mL) and subsequently decreased in 9 patients (at final blood sampling: mean, 1.12 µg/mL); 1 patient did not fall below the reference value due to stasis dermatitis. In the continuation group, most patients had D-dimer levels below the reference value from Day 1 (mean, 0.93 µg/mL), and levels remained stable or decreased (at final blood sampling: mean, 0.49 µg/mL). No events of stroke were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

D-dimer levels may be elevated in patients with NVAF and AHF, particularly in those without prior anticoagulant treatment. Edoxaban may be effective for lowering and keeping D-dimer levels, a biomarker for predicting ischemic stroke, below the reference value in patients with NVAF and AHF.

A Review of Biomarkers for Ischemic Stroke Evaluation in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia worldwide and results in a significantly increased ischemic stroke (IS) risk. IS risk stratification tools are widely being applied to guide anticoagulation treatment decisions and duration in patients with non-valvular AF (NVAF). The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score is largely validated and currently recommended by renowned guidelines. However, this score is heavily dependent on age, sex, and comorbidities, and exhibits only moderate predictive power. Finding effective and validated clinical biomarkers to assist in personalized IS risk evaluation has become one of the promising directions in the prevention and treatment of NVAF. A number of studies in recent years have explored differentially expressed biomarkers in NVAF patients with and without IS, and the potential role of various biomarkers for prediction or early diagnosis of IS in patients with NVAF. In this review, we describe the clinical application and utility of AF characteristics, cardiac imaging and electrocardiogram markers, arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis-related markers, circulating biomarkers, and novel genetic markers in IS diagnosis and management of patients with NVAF. We conclude that at present, there is no consensus understanding of a desirable biomarker for IS risk stratification in NVAF, and enrolling these biomarkers into extant models also remains challenging. Further prospective cohorts and trials are needed to integrate various clinical risk factors and biomarkers to optimize IS prediction in patients with NVAF. However, we believe that the growing insight into molecular mechanisms and in-depth understanding of existing and emerging biomarkers may further improve the IS risk identification and guide anticoagulation therapy in patients with NVAF.

Biomarkers of Thrombo-Inflammatory Responses in Pulmonary Embolism Patients With Pre-Existing Versus New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation

Pulmonary embolism (PE) patients have an increased prevalence and incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Because comorbid AF increases risk of morbidity and mortality, we sought to investigate the role of thrombo-inflammatory biomarkers in risk stratifying patients who experience an acute PE episode. Study participants were enrolled from a Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) registry between March 2016 and March 2019 at Loyola University Medical Center and Gottlieb Memorial Hospital. This cohort was divided into 3 groups: PE patients with a prior diagnosis of AF (n = 8), PE patients with a subsequent diagnosis of AF (n = 11), and PE patients who do not develop AF (n = 71). D-dimer, CRP, PAI-1, TAFIa, FXIIIa, A2A, MP, and TFPI were profiled using the ELISA method. All biomarkers were significantly different between controls and PE patients (P < 0.05). Furthermore, TFPI was significantly elevated in PE patients who subsequently developed AF compared to PE patients who did not develop AF (157.7 ± 19.0 ng/mL vs. 129.0 ± 9.3 ng/mL, P = 0.0386). This study suggests that thrombo-inflammatory biomarkers may be helpful in indicating an acute PE episode. Also, elevated TFPI levels may be associated with an increased risk of developing AF after a PE.

The emerging value of serum D-dimer measurement in the work-up and management of ischemic stroke

Background

Elevated D-dimer levels are a marker of both thrombin formation and fibrinolysis. Currently D-dimer measurement is routinely used for ruling out venous thromboembolism and diagnosis/monitoring of disseminated intravascular coagulation. Recent emerging data suggest that D-dimer may become an important biomarker in ischemic stroke as well as in cardiovascular diseases.

Aims

To outline the clinical utility of D-dimer in work-up and management of ischemic stroke.

Summary

D-dimer measurement is most useful in stroke with active cancer as it can confirm etiologic diagnosis, predict recurrent stroke risk, and aid treatment decision in cancer-associated stroke. In cryptogenic stroke, high D-dimer levels can also provide clues for the cause of stroke as occult cancer and undetected cardiac embolic source as occult atrial fibrillation and may be helpful in treatment decision making of secondary stroke prevention. Serial D-dimer measurements should be further studied to monitor antithrombotic therapy effectiveness in both cardiogenic and cryptogenic etiologies.

Conclusion

Accumulating data suggests the utility of D-dimer test in the management of ischemic stroke, although the evidence is still limited. Future studies would clarify the role of D-dimer measurement in ischemic stroke.