1
|
Sternberg CN, Loriot Y, Choy E, Castellano D, Lopez-Rios F, Banna GL, Zengerling F, De Giorgi U, Gedye C, Masini C, Bamias A, Garcia Del Muro X, Duran I, Powles T, Retz M, Gamulin M, Geczi L, Huddart RA, Calabrò F, Kandula G, Skamnioti P, Merseburger AS. Final Results from SAUL, a Single-arm International Study of Atezolizumab in Unselected Patients with Pretreated Locally Advanced/Metastatic Urinary Tract Carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus 2024:S2405-4569(24)00071-3. [PMID: 38839505 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE We assessed the safety of atezolizumab in unselected patients (including understudied populations typically excluded from clinical trials) with pretreated urinary tract carcinoma (UTC). The prespecified final analysis updates previously reported safety and efficacy data. METHODS The single-arm prospective SAUL study (NCT02928406) enrolled 1004 patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial/non-urothelial UTC that had progressed during/after one to three prior treatment lines for advanced UTC (or <12 mo after [neo]adjuvant therapy). Broad eligibility criteria allowed enrollment of patients with complex comorbidities approximating the real-world setting. Patients received atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 wk until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included duration of response and overall survival (OS). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS The treated cohort included 10% of patients with poor performance status, 5% with creatinine clearance <30 ml/min, and 4% with autoimmune disease. At median follow-up of 55 mo, median atezolizumab duration was 2.8 mo (range 0-62); 68 patients (7%) continued atezolizumab for >4 yr. Treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 16% of patients (death in 1%); 8% discontinued atezolizumab for adverse events. Median OS was 8.6 mo (95% confidence interval 7.8-9.7) and 136 patients (14%) had OS longer than 4 yr. Limitations include the small sample size for some subgroups of special interest. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Long-term safety and efficacy data continue to show a benefit of atezolizumab in unselected patients with UTC. Remarkably, 14% of patients lived for >4 yr after starting atezolizumab. These results can inform multidisciplinary team discussions and treatment decision-making for patients with UTC with complex comorbidities. PATIENT SUMMARY The SAUL study looked at how well tolerated a drug called atezolizumab was in patients with urinary tract cancer who had already received up to three previous treatments for their cancer, including people who are usually not included in clinical trials because of other medical conditions. The length of survival after starting treatment was also assessed. Overall, the results show that atezolizumab was well tolerated. People for whom other therapies had failed lived for about 8.6 months on average after starting treatment, and 14% of the patients were still alive after 4 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; San Camillo and Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy.
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Department of Cancer Medicine and INSERM U981, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Ernest Choy
- CREATE Centre, Section of Rheumatology, Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Lopez-Rios
- Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Research Institute 12 de Octubre University Hospital (i+12), CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Ugo De Giorgi
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy
| | | | - Cristina Masini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Xavier Garcia Del Muro
- Institut Catala d'Oncologia, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Margitta Retz
- Department of Urology, Technical University of Munich, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Marija Gamulin
- University Hospital Centre Zagreb and School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Lajos Geczi
- Medical Oncology Center and the National Tumor Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Robert A Huddart
- Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | | | - Geetha Kandula
- Biostatistics, Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Mississauga, Canada
| | - Pari Skamnioti
- Global Product Development Medical Affairs Oncology, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Axel S Merseburger
- Department of Urology, Campus Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|