Acalculous Ischemic Cholecystitis Caused by Spontaneous Celiac Artery Dissection

Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Stenting of the Celiac Artery for Hepatic Hypoperfusion After Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Case Report

Type A aortic dissection is a life-threatening emergency requiring prompt surgical treatment. The dissection itself and use of cardiopulmonary bypass can lead to further postoperative complications, including aortic branch occlusion, thrombosis, ischemia, and fatal end-organ damage. Celiac artery occlusion with consequent hepatic malperfusion is one feared complication of aortic dissection, which requires urgent surgical intervention. Optimal management of celiac artery dissection in the setting of type A aortic dissection has not yet been described in the literature. In this report, we describe a 39-year-old female patient with hypertension who was found to have celiac artery dissection and impending hepatic failure less than 48 hours after emergent ascending aortic replacement for type A aortic dissection. Placement of an ultrasound-guided endovascular celiac artery stent enabled reperfusion of the liver, ultimately saving the patient's life.

The characteristics and comparison between young and old patients with spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection: Analysis based on 60 reports

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Though increasing studies reported the management of spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (ICAD), the characteristics and etiology of ICAD in different age-stage patients have not been well-studied. Our study was designed to describe and further to compare the clinical features of spontaneous ICAD between young and old patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to March 1, 2023 for spontaneous ICAD case reports. Two reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of searched records for qualified reports according to the including and excluding criteria and extracted the data independently. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 19.0; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) and Stata 12.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX). Descriptive results were presented as the mean ± standard deviation or percent. The comparison results between young and old patients were displayed as risk ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with its 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

We totally identified 60 reports in the present analysis. The mean age of patients was 52.4 years, with the majority of patients being male (84.4%). The majority of patients were symptomatic and commonest presentation was abdominal pain (76.7%). Most patients (63.2%) had comorbidities or history and hypertension and smoking were the top 2 conditions with proportion of 63.3% and 40.5% respectively. When comparing young to old patients with ICAD, no significant difference was found in demographic and clinical features including sex, comorbidities/history, and symptoms. However, we found that young patients with ICAD experienced significantly longer dissection length (SMD 1.01, 95% CI 0.16-1.86; P = .015) and distance from ostium (SMD 0.96, 95% CI 0.07-1.85; P = .013), but no significant difference was observed in true lumen compression (SMD -0.39, 95% CI -1.22-0.44; P = .364). In addition, our results showed that ICAD in young patients extending more to distal arteries, including common hepatic artery/hepatic artery (RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.13-3.68; P = .01), splenic artery (RR 2.36, 95% CI 1.24-4.49; P = .017) and left gastric artery (RR 25.42; 95% CI 1.55-417.74; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Though spontaneous ICAD had multitudinous clinic-pathologic features, it was apt to middle-aged males and symptomatic and abdominal pain was always the commonest presentation. Hypertension and smoking were the top 2 conditions of ICAD patients. There was significant difference between young and old patients in radiographic characteristics of ICAD which may lead to different treatment and outcomes.

General features, management strategies, and outcomes of symptomatic spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection

Objectives

Spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (SICAD) is a rare condition that has not been fully investigated and reported, and very little is known regarding its prognosis and management. Here, we aimed to provide more evidence on the management strategy and outcome for symptomatic SICAD based on the experience of a single center.

Methods

From January 2018 to December 2021, a total of consecutive 51 patients with symptomatic SICAD were retrospectively included in this study. These patients had been selectively treated with conservative treatment (n = 31) or endovascular treatment (n = 20). Baseline data, imaging findings, treatment strategy, outcomes, and follow-up data have been described and analyzed.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 53.2 ± 9.6 years, 44 (86.3%) were male, and 36 (70.6%) had hypertension. The median length of stay was 10.0 days. The complete remission rate was 92.2% on discharge. The median follow-up time was 21.0 months. A secondary intervention was required for two patients during follow-up in the conservative group, wherein one underwent a stent placement three months after discharge because of progression of symptoms and extension of dissection, and the other required intervention one month after discharge because of symptomatic progression. No secondary intervention was required in the endovascular group. Occasional and mild relapse of symptoms occurred in two patients in both the conservative and endovascular groups, with no secondary intervention. The length of dissection (25.5 ± 11.8 mm vs. 19.1 ± 7.4 mm, P = 0.022) and complete remodeling rate (85.7% vs. 15.4%, P < 0.001) in the endovascular group were greater than that in the conservative group.

Conclusion

Patients with symptomatic SICAD who were selectively treated with conservative treatment or endovascular treatment had satisfactory early and medium-term outcomes. Endovascular treatment showed significant advantages in the complete remodeling of the celiac artery and presented with a lower rate of secondary intervention. Moreover, it was found to be a safe and effective remedy for failed conservative treatment.