EGFR-mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Accompanied by Transient Asymptomatic Pulmonary Opacities Successfully Treated with "Stop-And-Go" Osimertinib

Real-World Data on Subsequent Therapy for First-Line Osimertinib-Induced Pneumonitis: Safety of EGFR-TKI Rechallenge (Osi-risk Study TORG-TG2101)

BACKGROUND

Although osimertinib is a promising therapeutic agent for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung cancer, the incidence of pneumonitis is particularly high among Japanese patients receiving the drug. Furthermore, the safety and efficacy of subsequent anticancer treatments, including EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) rechallenge, which are to be administered after pneumonitis recovery, remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the safety of EGFR-TKI rechallenge in patients who experienced first-line osimertinib-induced pneumonitis, with a primary focus on recurrent pneumonitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer who developed initial pneumonitis following first-line osimertinib treatment across 34 institutions in Japan between August 2018 and September 2020.

RESULTS

Among the 124 patients included, 68 (54.8%) patients underwent EGFR-TKI rechallenge. The recurrence rate of pneumonitis following EGFR-TKI rechallenge was 27% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17-39) at 12 months. The cumulative incidence of recurrent pneumonitis was significantly higher in the osimertinib group than in the first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI (conventional EGFR-TKI) groups (hazard ratio [HR] 3.1; 95% CI 1.3-7.5; p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between EGFR-TKI type (osimertinib or conventional EGFR-TKI) and pneumonitis recurrence, regardless of severity or status of initial pneumonitis (HR 3.29; 95% CI 1.12-9.68; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Osimertinib rechallenge after initial pneumonitis was associated with significantly higher recurrence rates than conventional EGFR-TKI rechallenge.

TAPO in first-line osimertinib therapy and continuation of osimertinib

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib is associated with a relatively high frequency of drug-induced interstitial lung disease (D-ILD), and transient asymptomatic pulmonary opacities (TAPO) have been reported to occur during osimertinib administration. The frequency of TAPO during first-line treatment and the pros and cons of osimertinib continuation is unknown.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective study. The purpose of this study was to research the frequency of TAPO and to evaluate osimertinib continuation in first-line therapy. We also evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) including subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

From August 2018 to December 2020, 133 patients were enrolled into the study. The median observation period was 23.2 months (0.3-48.3 months). Thirty patients (22.6%) experienced D-ILD events, including 16 patients (12.1%) with CTCAE grade 1, five patients (3.8%) with grade 2, and nine patients (6.7%) with grade 3 and above D-ILD. Among the patients with grade 1 D-ILD, 11 cases (8.3%) of TAPO were observed, and all patients succeeded in osimertinib continuation. The TAPO images were characterized by localized patchy opacities (73%). The median PFS was 22.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.8-28.7 months). Patients with TAPO had a significantly longer PFS than patients with non-TAPO D-ILD in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that grade 1 D-ILD might include TAPO and that patients with TAPO might have good PFS. We need to consider the possibility of osimertinib continuation when lung opacities appear.

Successful Rechallenge with Osimertinib after Very Acute Onset of Drug-Induced Pneumonitis

Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DI-ILD) is a rare, yet life-threatening complication associated with tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-TKI, osimertinib use can be associated with a benign radiological finding called transient asymptomatic pulmonary opacities that can be confused with an infectious pulmonary process resulting in overtreatment with antibiotics or premature treatment withdrawal or severe DI-ILD. In this case, our patient with newly diagnosed metastatic non-small cell lung cancer on treatment with osimertinib developed very early onset severe DI-ILD (grade-IV) with a unique pattern of pulmonary involvement and was treated with high-dose corticosteroids with a response. She was later successfully rechallenged with osimertinib and responded well to the treatment. Our case highlights the importance of being cognizant of the possibility that DI-ILD can rarely occur within a week of treatment initiation with osimertinib and safe reintroduction of the drug is possible in select patients following complete resolution of pulmonary radiographic findings and clinical symptoms even with high-grade adverse events.

Osimertinib versus afatinib in patients with T790M-positive, non-small-cell lung cancer and multiple central nervous system metastases after failure of initial EGFR-TKI treatment

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of osimertinib (OSI) versus afatinib (AFA) in patients with T790M-positive, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and multiple central nervous system (CNS) metastases after failure of initial epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment.

Methods

Consecutive patients with T790M-positive NSCLC and multiple CNS metastases after failure of initial EGFR-TKI treatment were retrospectively identified from our medical institution during 2016–2018 and underwent either oral 80 daily OSI or oral 40 daily AFA every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles, until disease progression, intolerable adverse events (AEs), or death. The co-primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

The cohort consisted of 124 patients (OSI: n = 60, mean age = 64.24 years [SD: 12.33]; AFA: n = 64, mean age = 64.13 years [SD: 13.72]). After a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 3 to 28), a significant improvement in OS was detected (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39–0.91; p = 0.0160; median, 13.7 months [95% CI, 11.1–14.8] for OSI vs 9.6 months [95% CI, 8.4–10.2] for AFA). The median duration of PFS was significantly longer with OSI than with AFA (HR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41–0.91; p = 0.014; median, 4.5 months [95% CI, 3.5–5.7] vs 3.9 months [95% CI, 3.1–4.8]). The proportion of grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) was lower with OSI (22.4%) than with AFA (39.4%).

Conclusions

In patients with T790M-positive NSCLC and multiple CNS metastases after failure of initial EGFR-TKI treatment, OSI may be associated with significantly improved survival benefit compared with AFA, with a controllable tolerability profile.

Retrospective analysis of osimertinib re-challenge after osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung carcinoma

Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that has exhibited efficacy in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a fatal adverse event of osimertinib treatment, and it requires treatment discontinuation. There are few reports regarding the safety and efficacy of osimertinib re-challenge in patients who experienced osimertinib-induced ILD. This retrospective study assessed this treatment option. We retrospectively collected data for patients treated with osimertinib who developed ILD at Shizuoka Cancer Center from April 2016 to March 2020. ILD was diagnosed by two doctors based on imaging tests and blood tests to exclude other causes. Among 215 patients treated with osimertinib, 28 developed ILD. The median age of patients with ILD was 69.5 years (range, 39.0-80.0). In addition, 29% of patients were men, and 46% had a history of smoking. Eleven patients were re-administered EGFR TKIs, including eight patients treated with osimertinib and three patients treated with alternative EGFR TKIs. Among patients re-challenged with osimertinib, none who previously experienced grade 1 ILD exhibited ILD relapse, even with the same osimertinib dose and without the concurrent administration of systemic steroids. Meanwhile, one of the four patients who previously exhibited grade 2 ILD experienced despite a dose reduction for osimertinib and systemic steroid administration. For patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who experience grade 1 ILD during osimertinib therapy, osimertinib re-challenge may be suitable when no other treatments are available.