Three Cases of Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy with Rapid Increase in Visual Acuity After Gene Therapy

Gene therapy for Leber hereditary optic neuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is among the most frequent inherited mitochondrial disease, causing a severe visual impairment, mostly in young-adult males. The causative mtDNA variants (the three common are m.11778 G>A/MT-ND4, m.3460 G>A/MT-ND1, and m.14484T>C/MT-ND6) by affecting complex I impair oxidative phosphorylation in retinal ganglion cells, ultimately leading to irreversible cell death and consequent functional loss. The gene therapy based on allotopic expression of a wild-type transgene carried by adeno-associated viral vectors (AVV-based) appears a promising approach in mitochondrial disease and its efficacy has been explored in several large clinical trials.

AREAS COVERED

The review work employed basic concepts in mitochondrial diseases, LHON, and gene therapy procedures. Reports from completed trials in LHON (i.e. RESCUE) were reviewed and critically compared.

EXPERT OPINION

New challenges, as the improvement of the contralateral untreated eye or the apparently better outcome in patients treated in later stages (6-12 months), were highlighted by the latest gene therapy trials. A better understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms of the disease together with combined therapy (medical and gene therapy) and optimization in genetic correction approaches could improve the visual outcome of treated eyes.

Safety and Efficacy of Adeno-Associated Viral Gene Therapy in Patients With Retinal Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of ocular gene therapy using adeno-associated virus (AAV).

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched systematically for controlled or non-controlled interventional gene therapy studies using key words related to retinal diseases, gene therapy, and AAV vectors. The primary outcome measure was safety, based on ocular severe adverse events (SAEs). Secondary outcome measures evaluated efficacy of the therapy based on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and improvements in visual sensitivity and systemic involvement following ocular delivery. Pooling was done using a DerSimonian Laird random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, version 1.

Results

Our search identified 3548 records. Of these, 80 publications met eligibility criteria, representing 28 registered clinical trials and 5 postmarket surveillance studies involving AAV gene therapy for Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), choroideremia, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), retinitis pigmentosa (RP), X-linked retinoschisis, and achromatopsia. Overall, AAV therapy vectors were associated with a cumulative incidence of at least one SAE of 8% (95% confidence intervals [CIs] of 5% to 12%). SAEs were often associated with the surgical procedure rather than the therapeutic vector itself. Poor or inconsistent reporting of adverse events (AEs) were a limitation for the meta-analysis. The proportion of patients with any improvement in BCVA and visual sensitivity was 41% (95% CIs of 31% to 51%) and 51% (95% CIs of 31% to 70%), respectively. Systemic immune involvement was associated with a cumulative incidence of 31% (95% CI = 21% to 42%).

Conclusions

AAV gene therapy vectors appear to be safe but the surgical procedure required to deliver them is associated with some risk. The large variability in efficacy can be attributed to the small number of patients treated, the heterogeneity of the population and the variability in dosage, volume, and follow-up.

Translational Relevance

This systematic review will help to inform and guide future clinical trials.

The safety and efficacy of gene therapy treatment for monogenic retinal and optic nerve diseases: A systematic review

PURPOSE

This study aimed to systematically review and summarize gene therapy treatment for monogenic retinal and optic nerve diseases.

METHODS

This review was prospectively registered (CRD42021229812). A comprehensive literature search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Central, and clinical trial registries (February 2021). Clinical studies describing DNA-based gene therapy treatments for monogenic posterior ocular diseases were eligible for inclusion. Risk of bias evaluation was performed. Data synthesis was undertaken applying Synthesis Without Meta-analysis guidelines.

RESULTS

This study identified 47 full-text publications, 50 conference abstracts, and 54 clinical trial registry entries describing DNA-based ocular gene therapy treatments for 16 different genetic variants. Study summaries and visual representations of safety and efficacy outcomes are presented for 20 unique full-text publications in RPE65-mediated retinal dystrophies, choroideremia, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, rod-cone dystrophy, achromatopsia, and X-linked retinoschisis. The most common adverse events were related to lid/ocular surface/cornea abnormalities in subretinal gene therapy trials and anterior uveitis in intravitreal gene therapy trials.

CONCLUSION

There is a high degree of variability in ocular monogenic gene therapy trials with respect to study design, statistical methodology, and reporting of safety and efficacy outcomes. This review improves the accessibility and transparency in interpreting gene therapy trials to date.

Focused Update on AAV-Based Gene Therapy Clinical Trials for Inherited Retinal Degeneration

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) comprise a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of disorders that can ultimately result in photoreceptor dysfunction/death and vision loss. With over 270 genes known to be involved in IRDs, translation of treatment strategies into clinical applications has been historically difficult. However, in recent years there have been significant advances in basic research findings as well as translational studies, culminating in an increasing number of clinical trials with the ultimate goal of reducing vision loss and associated morbidities. The recent approval of Luxturna^® (voretigene neparvovec-rzyl) for Leber congenital amaurosis type 2 (LCA2) prompts a review of the current clinical trials for IRDs, with a particular focus on the importance of adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based gene therapies. The present article reviews the current state of AAV use in gene therapy clinical trials for IRDs, with a brief background on AAV and the reasons behind its dominance in ocular gene therapy. It will also discuss pre-clinical progress in AAV-based therapies aimed at treating other ocular conditions that can have hereditable links, and what alternative technologies are progressing in the same therapeutic space.

Therapeutic Options in Hereditary Optic Neuropathies

Options for the effective treatment of hereditary optic neuropathies have been a long time coming. The successful launch of the antioxidant idebenone for Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON), followed by its introduction into clinical practice across Europe, was an important step forward. Nevertheless, other options, especially for a variety of mitochondrial optic neuropathies such as dominant optic atrophy (DOA), are needed, and a number of pharmaceutical agents, acting on different molecular pathways, are currently under development. These include gene therapy, which has reached Phase III development for LHON, but is expected to be  developed also for DOA, whilst most of the other agents (other antioxidants, anti-apoptotic drugs, activators of mitobiogenesis, etc.) are almost all at Phase II or at preclinical stage of research. Here, we review proposed target mechanisms, preclinical evidence, available clinical trials with primary endpoints and results, of a wide range of tested molecules, to give an overview of the field, also providing the landscape of future scenarios, including gene therapy, gene editing, and reproductive options to prevent transmission of mitochondrial DNA mutations.