1
|
Ly MT, Altaras C, Tripodis Y, Adler CH, Balcer LJ, Bernick C, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Peskind ER, Banks SJ, Barr WB, Wethe JV, Lenio S, Bondi MW, Delano-Wood LM, Cantu RC, Coleman MJ, Dodick DW, Mez J, Daneshvar DH, Palmisano JN, Martin B, Lin AP, Koerte IK, Bouix S, Cummings JL, Reiman EM, Shenton ME, Stern RA, Alosco ML. Single- versus two-test criteria for cognitive impairment: associations with CSF and imaging markers in former American football players. Clin Neuropsychol 2025:1-25. [PMID: 39834028 DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2025.2451828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2025] [Indexed: 01/22/2025]
Abstract
Objective: Cognitive impairment is a core feature of traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES), the putative clinical syndrome of chronic traumatic encephalopathy-a neuropathological disease associated with repetitive head impacts (RHI). Careful operationalization of cognitive impairment is essential to improving the diagnostic specificity and accuracy of TES criteria. We compared single- versus two-test criteria for cognitive impairment in their associations with CSF and imaging biomarkers in male former American football players. Method: 169 participants from the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project completed neuropsychological tests of memory and executive functioning. Cognitive impairment was identified by single-test criteria (z≤-1.5 on one test) and two-test criteria (z<-1 on two tests within a domain). ANCOVAs adjusting for age, race, education, body mass index, word-reading score, and APOE ε4 status assessed whether single- or two-test criteria predicted CSF markers (Aβ1-42, p-tau181, p-tau181/Aβ1-42, total tau, neurofilament light [NfL], glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP]) and MRI markers (hippocampal volume, cortical thickness, white matter hyperintensities). Results: Ninety-nine participants met single-test criteria for cognitive impairment. Sixty-six met two-test criteria. Participants who met two-test criteria had greater exposure to RHI than those who did not (p=.04). Two-test criteria were -associated with higher CSF p-tau181/Aβ1-42 (q=.02) and CSF NfL (q=.02). The association between two-test criteria and CSF NfL remained after excluding amyloid-positive participants (q=.04). Single-test criteria were not associated with any biomarkers (q's>.05). Conclusions: Two-test but not single-test criteria for cognitive impairment were associated with markers of neurodegeneration. Future clinical research in TES may benefit from applying two-test criteria to operationalize cognitive impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica T Ly
- Department of Neurology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center and Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Caroline Altaras
- Department of Neurology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center and Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yorghos Tripodis
- Department of Neurology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center and Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charles H Adler
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Laura J Balcer
- Departments of Neurology, Population Health and Ophthalmology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles Bernick
- Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
- UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Hong Kong Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Elaine R Peskind
- VA Northwest Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sarah J Banks
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - William B Barr
- Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer V Wethe
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Steve Lenio
- Department of Neurology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center and Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark W Bondi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Lisa M Delano-Wood
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Robert C Cantu
- Department of Neurology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center and Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Coleman
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David W Dodick
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
- Atria Academy of Science and Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jesse Mez
- Department of Neurology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center and Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA, USA
| | - Daniel H Daneshvar
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mass General Brigham-Spaulding Rehabilitation, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Joseph N Palmisano
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center (BEDAC), Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brett Martin
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center (BEDAC), Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander P Lin
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Clinical Spectroscopy, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Inga K Koerte
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- cBRAIN, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Ludwigs-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Sylvain Bouix
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Software Engineering and Information Technology, École de technologie supérieure, Université du Québec, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Jeffrey L Cummings
- Chambers-Grundy Center for Transformative Neuroscience, Department of Brain Health, School of Integrated Health Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| | - Eric M Reiman
- Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Martha E Shenton
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert A Stern
- Department of Neurology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center and Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology and Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael L Alosco
- Department of Neurology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center and Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Canu E, Castelnovo V, Aiello EN, De Luca G, Sibilla E, Freri F, Tripodi C, Spinelli EG, Cecchetti G, Magnani G, Caso F, Caroppo P, Prioni S, Villa C, Tremolizzo L, Appollonio I, Verde F, Ticozzi N, Silani V, Sturm VE, Rankin KP, Gorno‐Tempini ML, Poletti B, Filippi M, Agosta F. A common marker of affect recognition dysfunction in the FTD spectrum of disorders. Eur J Neurol 2025; 32:e16578. [PMID: 39632486 PMCID: PMC11617592 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2024] [Revised: 11/04/2024] [Accepted: 11/17/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor affect recognition is an early sign of frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Here, we applied the abbreviated version of the Comprehensive Affect Testing System (CATS-A) battery to Italian FTD cases and healthy controls (HC) to provide cut-offs of emotional dysfunction in the whole group and in different FTD clinical syndromes. METHODS One hundred thirty-nine FTD patients (60 behavioural variant [bvFTD],13 semantic behavioural variant of FTD [sbvFTD], 28 progressive supranuclear palsy [PSP], 21 semantic [svPPA] and 17 nonfluent [nfvPPA] variants of primary progressive aphasia) and 116 HC were administered the CATS-A, yielding an Affective Recognition Quotient (ARQ), which was used as outcome measure. Age- and education-adjusted, regression-based norms were derived in HC. In patients, the ARQ was assessed for its internal reliability, factorial validity and construct validity by testing its association with another social cognition paradigm, the Story-Based Empath Task (SET). The diagnostic accuracy of the ARQ in discriminating patients from HC, genetic cases from HC and patient groups among each other was tested via ROC analyses. RESULTS In the whole FTD cohort, CATS-A proved to be underpinned by a mono-component factor (51.1%) and was internally consistent (McDonald's ω = 0.76). Moreover, the ARQ converged with the SET (r(122) = 0.50; p < 0.001) and optimally discriminated HC from both the whole cohort (AUC = 0.89) and each clinical syndrome (AUC range: 0.83-0.92). Conversely, CATS-A subtests were able to distinguish patient groups. CONCLUSIONS The ARQ score from the CATS-A distinguishes FTD clinical syndromes from HC with high accuracy, making it an excellent tool for immediate use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Canu
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of NeuroscienceIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
- Neurology UnitIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
| | - Veronica Castelnovo
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of NeuroscienceIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
- Neurology UnitIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
| | - Edoardo Nicolò Aiello
- Department of Neurology and Laboratory of NeuroscienceIRCCS Istituto Auxologico ItalianoMilanItaly
| | - Giulia De Luca
- Department of Neurology and Laboratory of NeuroscienceIRCCS Istituto Auxologico ItalianoMilanItaly
| | - Elisa Sibilla
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of NeuroscienceIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
- Neurology UnitIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
| | - Fabiola Freri
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of NeuroscienceIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
| | - Chiara Tripodi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of NeuroscienceIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
| | - Edoardo Gioele Spinelli
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of NeuroscienceIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
- Neurology UnitIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
- Vita‐Salute San Raffaele UniversityMilanItaly
| | - Giordano Cecchetti
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of NeuroscienceIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
- Neurology UnitIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
| | | | - Francesca Caso
- Neurology UnitIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
| | - Paola Caroppo
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo BestaUnit of Neurology 5‐NeuropathologyMilanItaly
| | - Sara Prioni
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo BestaClinical Neuropsychology UnitMilanItaly
| | - Cristina Villa
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo BestaUnit of Neurology 5‐NeuropathologyMilanItaly
| | - Lucio Tremolizzo
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS “Fondazione San Gerardo” and School of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of Milano‐BicoccaMonzaItaly
| | - Ildebrando Appollonio
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS “Fondazione San Gerardo” and School of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of Milano‐BicoccaMonzaItaly
| | - Federico Verde
- Department of Neurology and Laboratory of NeuroscienceIRCCS Istituto Auxologico ItalianoMilanItaly
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, “Dino Ferrari” CenterUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly
| | - Nicola Ticozzi
- Department of Neurology and Laboratory of NeuroscienceIRCCS Istituto Auxologico ItalianoMilanItaly
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, “Dino Ferrari” CenterUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly
| | - Vincenzo Silani
- Department of Neurology and Laboratory of NeuroscienceIRCCS Istituto Auxologico ItalianoMilanItaly
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, “Dino Ferrari” CenterUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly
| | - Virginia E. Sturm
- Memory and Aging CenterUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Katherine P. Rankin
- Memory and Aging CenterUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Maria Luisa Gorno‐Tempini
- Memory and Aging CenterUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- Global Brain Health InstituteUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Barbara Poletti
- Department of Neurology and Laboratory of NeuroscienceIRCCS Istituto Auxologico ItalianoMilanItaly
- Department of Oncology and Hemato‐OncologyUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of NeuroscienceIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
- Neurology UnitIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
- Vita‐Salute San Raffaele UniversityMilanItaly
- Neurophysiology ServiceIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
- Neurorehabilitation UnitIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
| | - Federica Agosta
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of NeuroscienceIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
- Neurology UnitIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
- Vita‐Salute San Raffaele UniversityMilanItaly
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Levine TF, Dessenberger SJ, Allison SL, Head D. Alzheimer disease biomarkers are associated with decline in subjective memory, attention, and spatial navigation ability in clinically normal adults. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2024; 30:313-327. [PMID: 38014546 DOI: 10.1017/s135561772300070x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Subtle changes in memory, attention, and spatial navigation abilities have been associated with preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD). The current study examined whether baseline AD biomarkers are associated with self- and informant-reported decline in memory, attention, and spatial navigation. METHOD Clinically normal (Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR®) = 0) adults aged 56-93 (N = 320) and their informants completed the memory, divided attention, and visuospatial abilities (which assesses spatial navigation) subsections of the Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog) annually for an average of 4 years. Biomarker data was collected within (±) 2 years of baseline (i.e., cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) p-tau181/Aβ42 ratio and hippocampal volume). Clinical progression was defined as CDR > 0 at time of final available ECog. RESULTS Self- and informant-reported memory, attention, and spatial navigation significantly declined over time (ps < .001). Baseline AD biomarkers were significantly associated with self- and informant-reported decline in cognitive ability (ps < .030), with the exception of p-tau181/Aβ42 ratio and self-reported attention (p = .364). Clinical progression did not significantly moderate the relationship between AD biomarkers and decline in self- or informant-reported cognitive ability (ps > .062). Post-hoc analyses indicated that biomarker burden was also associated with self- and informant-reported decline in total ECog (ps < .002), and again clinical progression did not significantly moderate these relationships (ps > .299). CONCLUSIONS AD biomarkers at baseline may indicate risk of decline in self- and informant-reported change in memory, attention, and spatial navigation ability. As such, subjectively reported decline in these domains may have clinical utility in tracking the subtle cognitive changes associated with the earliest stages of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor F Levine
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Steven J Dessenberger
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Samantha L Allison
- Neurosciences Institute at Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT, USA
| | - Denise Head
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Charles F. and Joanna Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sex differences in risk factors that predict progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's dementia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2022; 29:360-368. [PMID: 35968841 DOI: 10.1017/s1355617722000297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate whether cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, apolipoprotein e4, neuroimaging abnormalities, and neuropsychological data differentially predict progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia for men and women. METHODS Participants who were diagnosed with MCI at baseline (n = 449) were classified as either progressing to Alzheimer's dementia at follow-up or as not progressing. Men and women were first compared using bivariate analyses. Sex-stratified Cox proportional hazard regressions were performed examining the relationship between baseline data and the likelihood of progressing to dementia. Sex interactions were subsequently examined. RESULTS Cox proportional hazard regression controlling for age and education indicated that all variables significantly predicted subsequent progression to dementia for men and women. Sex interactions indicated that only Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) delayed recall and Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) were significantly stronger risk factors for women. When all variables were entered into a fully adjusted model, significant risk factors for women were Aβ42, hippocampal volume, RAVLT delayed recall, Boston Naming Test, and FAQ. In contrast, for men, Aβ42, p-tau181, p-tau181/Aβ42, hippocampal volume, category fluency and FAQ were significant risk factors. Interactions with sex were only significant for p-tau181/Aβ42 and RAVLT delayed recall for the fully adjusted model. CONCLUSIONS Men and women with MCI may to differ for which factors predict subsequent dementia although future analyses with greater power are needed to evaluate sex differences. We hypothesize that brain and cognitive reserve theories may partially explain these findings.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bouwman FH, Frisoni GB, Johnson SC, Chen X, Engelborghs S, Ikeuchi T, Paquet C, Ritchie C, Bozeat S, Quevenco F, Teunissen C. Clinical application of CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: From rationale to ratios. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2022; 14:e12314. [PMID: 35496374 PMCID: PMC9044123 DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Biomarker testing is recommended for the accurate and timely diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Using illustrative case narratives we consider how cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker tests may be used in different presentations of cognitive impairment to facilitate timely and differential diagnosis, improving diagnostic accuracy, providing prognostic information, and guiding personalized management in diverse scenarios. Evidence shows that (1) CSF ratios are superior to amyloid beta (Aβ)1-42 alone; (2) concordance of CSF ratios to amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) is better than Aβ1-42 alone; and (3) phosphorylated tau (p-tau)/Aβ1-42 ratio is superior to p-tau alone. CSF biomarkers are recommended for the exclusion of AD as the underlying cause of cognitive impairment, diagnosis of AD at an early stage, differential diagnosis of AD in individuals presenting with other neuropsychiatric symptoms, accurate diagnosis of AD in an atypical presentation, and for clinical trial enrichment. Highlights Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker testing may be underused outside specialist centers.CSF biomarkers improve diagnostic accuracy, guiding personalized management of AD.CSF ratios (amyloid beta [Aβ]1-42/Aβ1-40 and phosphorylated tau/Aβ1-42) perform better than single markers.CSF ratios produce fewer false-negative and false-positive results than individual markers.CSF biomarkers should be included in diagnostic work-up of AD and mild cognitive impairment due to AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Femke H. Bouwman
- Alzheimer Center AmsterdamAmsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdam UMCVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | | | - Sterling C. Johnson
- University of Wisconsin‐Madison, and Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center of the William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans HospitalMadisonWisconsinUSA
| | | | - Sebastiaan Engelborghs
- Center for Neurosciences (C4N)Vrije Universiteit Brussel, and Department of Neurology/Brussels Integrated Center for Brain and Memory (Bru‐BRAIN)Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, and Department of Biomedical SciencesUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
| | | | - Claire Paquet
- Université de ParisCognitive Neurology Center Lariboisière Hospital GHU APHP NordINSERMU1144ParisFrance
| | - Craig Ritchie
- University of Edinburgh, and Brain Health ScotlandEdinburghUK
| | | | | | - Charlotte Teunissen
- Department of Clinical ChemistryNeurochemistry LaboratoryAmsterdam NeuroscienceAmsterdam UMCVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Resting state functional brain networks associated with emotion processing in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Mol Psychiatry 2022; 27:4809-4821. [PMID: 35595978 PMCID: PMC9734056 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-022-01612-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between emotion processing and resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) of the brain networks in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Eighty FTLD patients (including cases with behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia, primary progressive aphasia, progressive supranuclear palsy syndrome, motor neuron disease) and 65 healthy controls underwent rs-functional MRI. Emotion processing was tested using the Comprehensive Affect Testing System (CATS). In patients and controls, correlations were investigated between each emotion construct and rs-FC changes within critical networks. Mean rs-FC of the clusters significantly associated with CATS scoring were compared among FTLD groups. FTLD patients had pathological CATS scores compared with controls. In controls, increased rs-FC of the cerebellar and visuo-associative networks correlated with better scores in emotion-matching and discrimination tasks, respectively; while decreased rs-FC of the visuo-spatial network was related with better performance in the affect-matching and naming. In FTLD, the associations between rs-FC and CATS scores involved more brain regions, such as orbitofrontal and middle frontal gyri within anterior networks (i.e., salience and default-mode), parietal and somatosensory regions within visuo-spatial and sensorimotor networks, caudate and thalamus within basal-ganglia network. Rs-FC changes associated with CATS were similar among all FTLD groups. In FTLD compared to controls, the pattern of rs-FC associated with emotional processing involves a larger number of brain regions, likely due to functional specificity loss and compensatory attempts. These associations were similar across all FTLD groups, suggesting a common physiopathological mechanism of emotion processing breakdown, regardless the clinical presentation and pattern of atrophy.
Collapse
|
7
|
Spinelli EG, Ghirelli A, Basaia S, Cividini C, Riva N, Canu E, Castelnovo V, Domi T, Magnani G, Caso F, Caroppo P, Prioni S, Rossi G, Tremolizzo L, Appollonio I, Silani V, Carrera P, Filippi M, Agosta F. Structural MRI Signatures in Genetic Presentations of the Frontotemporal Dementia/Motor Neuron Disease Spectrum. Neurology 2021; 97:e1594-e1607. [PMID: 34544819 PMCID: PMC8548958 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000012702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES To assess cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar gray matter (GM) atrophy using MRI in patients with disorders of the frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) spectrum with known genetic mutations. METHODS Sixty-six patients carrying FTLD-related mutations were enrolled, including 44 with pure motor neuron disease (MND) and 22 with frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Sixty-one patients with sporadic FTLD (sFTLD) matched for age, sex, and disease severity with genetic FTLD (gFTLD) were also included, as well as 52 healthy controls. A whole-brain voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis was performed. GM volumes of subcortical and cerebellar structures were obtained. RESULTS Compared with controls, GM atrophy on VBM was greater and more diffuse in genetic FTD, followed by sporadic FTD and genetic MND cases, whereas patients with sporadic MND (sMND) showed focal motor cortical atrophy. Patients carrying C9orf72 and GRN mutations showed the most widespread cortical volume loss, in contrast with GM sparing in SOD1 and TARDBP. Globally, patients with gFTLD showed greater atrophy of parietal cortices and thalami compared with sFTLD. In volumetric analysis, patients with gFTLD showed volume loss compared with sFTLD in the caudate nuclei and thalami, in particular comparing C9-MND with sMND cases. In the cerebellum, patients with gFTLD showed greater atrophy of the right lobule VIIb than sFTLD. Thalamic volumes of patients with gFTLD with a C9orf72 mutation showed an inverse correlation with Frontal Behavioral Inventory scores. DISCUSSION Measures of deep GM and cerebellar structural involvement may be useful markers of gFTLD, particularly C9orf72-related disorders, regardless of the clinical presentation within the FTLD spectrum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Gioele Spinelli
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alma Ghirelli
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Basaia
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Camilla Cividini
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Nilo Riva
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Canu
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Veronica Castelnovo
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Teuta Domi
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Magnani
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Caso
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Caroppo
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Prioni
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomina Rossi
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucio Tremolizzo
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ildebrando Appollonio
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Silani
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Carrera
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Agosta
- From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (E.G.S., A.G., S.B., C.C., E.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.) and Experimental Neuropathology Unit (N.R., T.D.), Division of Neuroscience, Neurorehabilitation Unit (N.R., M.F.), Neurology Unit (E.G.S., G.M., F.C., M.F., F.A.), Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Biology (P. Carrera), and Neurophysiology Service (M.F.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (E.G.S., A.G., C.C., V.C., M.F., F.A.); Unit of Neurology 5-Neuropathology (P. Caroppo, S.P., G.R.), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan; Neurology Unit (L.T., I.A.), "San Gerardo" Hospital and University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza; Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience (V.S.), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano; and "Dino Ferrari" Center, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (V.S.), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Caso F, Agosta F, Scamarcia PG, Basaia S, Canu E, Magnani G, Volontè MA, Filippi M. A multiparametric MRI study of structural brain damage in dementia with lewy bodies: A comparison with Alzheimer's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2021; 91:154-161. [PMID: 34628194 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Differential diagnosis between dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial for an adequate patients' management but might be challenging. We investigated with advanced MRI techniques gray (GM) and white matter (WM) damage in DLB patients compared to those with AD. METHODS 24 DLB patients, 26 age- and disease severity-matched AD patients, and 20 age and sex-matched controls performed clinical and neuropsychological assessment, and brain structural and diffusion-tensor MRI. We measured GM atrophy using voxel-based morphometry, WM hyperintensities (WMH) using a local thresholding segmentation technique, and normal-appearing WM (NAWM) damage using tract-based spatial statistic. RESULTS DLB and AD patients exhibited mild-to-moderate-stage dementia. Compared to controls, GM damage was diffuse in AD, while limited to bilateral thalamus and temporal regions in DLB. Compared to DLB, AD patients exhibited GM atrophy in bilateral fronto-temporal and occipital regions. DLB and AD patients showed higher WMH load than controls, with no differences among each other. WMH in DLB were diffuse with relative prevalence in posterior parietal-occipital regions. Compared to controls, both DLB and AD patients showed reduced microstructural integrity of the main supratentorial and infratentorial NAWM tracts. AD patients exhibited greater posterior NAWM damage than DLB. CONCLUSIONS DLB showed prominent WM degeneration compared to the limited GM atrophy, while in AD both tissue compartments were severely involved. In DLB, NAWM microstructural degeneration was independent of WMH, thus revealing two possible underlying processes. Different pathophysiological mechanisms are likely to drive GM and WM damage distribution in DLB and AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Caso
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Agosta
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro G Scamarcia
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Basaia
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Canu
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Magnani
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Filippi
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Santangelo R, Huang SC, Bernasconi MP, Falautano M, Comi G, Magnani G, Leocani L. Neuro-Retina Might Reflect Alzheimer's Disease Stage. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 77:1455-1468. [PMID: 32925026 DOI: 10.3233/jad-200043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathological hallmarks were found in retinas of AD patients. Several studies showed a significant reduction of neuro-retina thickness measured through optical coherence tomography (OCT) in AD patients, but possible correlations between retina morphology, cognition, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD biomarkers (Aβ42, t-tau, and p-tau) have been poorly investigated so far. OBJECTIVE In the present cross-sectional study, we measured the thickness of neuro-retinal layers through OCT searching for possible correlations with patients' cognitive performances and CSF AD biomarkers. METHODS 137 consecutive subjects [43 with AD, 37 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 57 healthy controls (HC)], received an OCT scan acquisition to measure the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness. In a subsample of 21 AD, 18 MCI, and 18 HC, the macular volume of ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), and inner nuclear layer was computed. A comprehensive neuropsychological assessment and CSF AD biomarkers' concentrations were available in AD and MCI patients. RESULTS Peripapillary RNFL, global, and in superior quadrant was significantly thinner in AD and MCI patients when compared to HC, while macular GCL volume was significantly reduced only in AD. RNFL thickness in nasal and inferior quadrants was correlated with single CSF AD biomarker concentrations, but no differences were found in retina morphology depending on the presence of a CSF profile typical for AD. Memory performances were positively associated with GCL and IPL volume. CONCLUSION Our findings might propose OCT as a reliable and easy to handle tool able to detect neuro-retinal atrophy in AD in relation with cognitive performances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Santangelo
- Experimental Neurophysiology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology-INSPE, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Su-Chun Huang
- Experimental Neurophysiology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology-INSPE, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Giancarlo Comi
- Experimental Neurophysiology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology-INSPE, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Letizia Leocani
- Experimental Neurophysiology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology-INSPE, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.,Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Santangelo R, Agosta F, Masi F, Spinelli EG, Cecchetti G, Caso F, Mandelli A, Cardamone R, Barbieri A, Furlan R, Magnani G, Filippi M. Plasma neurofilament light chain levels and cognitive testing as predictors of fast progression in Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Neurol 2021; 28:2980-2988. [PMID: 34176186 DOI: 10.1111/ene.14999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by a heterogeneous course. Predicting a fast rather than a slow decline over time is crucial to both provide a reliable prognosis and elaborate stricter enrolment criteria in clinical trials. Here we searched for independent predictors of cognitive decline rate to assess the risk of fast disease progression already at baseline. METHODS Fifty-three subjects with an "in-vivo biomarker confirmed" diagnosis of AD were included. Neuropsychological assessment, plasma neurofilaments (NfL) concentrations and, in a subsample of 23 patients, brain magnetic resonance imaging were available. Patients were labelled FAST or SLOW depending on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) points lost per year (FAST if more than 3 points). We adopted single logistic regression models to search for independent predictors of FAST progression. RESULTS At baseline no differences were found between FAST and SLOW subgroups in demographics, MMSE scores, vascular burden and medial temporal lobe atrophy measurements. Higher plasma NfL concentrations and worse scores at semantic verbal fluency (SVF) and clock drawing test (CDT) were independent predictors of FAST decline, after controlling for age, education, sex and baseline disease severity stage. The regression model combining all the predictors correctly classified 80% of patients overall. The risk of FAST decline was 81.2% if all the three predictors were abnormal (i.e., SVF ≤21.5, CDT ≤5.5, NfL ≥22.19). CONCLUSIONS An easily applicable algorithm, including plasma NfL measurement and two neuropsychological tests worldwide adopted in clinical practice (SVF and CDT), may allow clinicians to reliably stratify AD patients in relation to the risk of fast cognitive decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Santangelo
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Agosta
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Masi
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Edoardo Gioele Spinelli
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giordano Cecchetti
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Caso
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Mandelli
- Clinical Neuroimmunology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Roberto Furlan
- Clinical Neuroimmunology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Magnani
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cecchetti G, Agosta F, Basaia S, Cividini C, Cursi M, Santangelo R, Caso F, Minicucci F, Magnani G, Filippi M. Resting-state electroencephalographic biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2021; 31:102711. [PMID: 34098525 PMCID: PMC8185302 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We evaluated the value of resting-state EEG source biomarkers to characterize mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subjects with an Alzheimer's disease (AD)-like cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) profile and to track neurodegeneration throughout the AD continuum. We further applied a resting-state functional MRI (fMRI)-driven model of source reconstruction and tested its advantage in terms of AD diagnostic accuracy. METHODS Thirty-nine consecutive patients with AD dementia (ADD), 86 amnestic MCI, and 33 healthy subjects enter the EEG study. All ADD subjects, 37 out of 86 MCI patients and a distinct group of 53 healthy controls further entered the fMRI study. MCI subjects were divided according to the CSF phosphorylated tau/β amyloid-42 ratio (MCIpos: ≥ 0.13, MCIneg: < 0.13). Using Exact low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (eLORETA), EEG lobar current densities were estimated at fixed frequencies and analyzed. To combine the two imaging techniques, networks mostly affected by AD pathology were identified using Independent Component Analysis applied to fMRI data of ADD subjects. Current density EEG analysis within ICA-based networks at selected frequency bands was performed. Afterwards, graph analysis was applied to EEG and fMRI data at ICA-based network level. RESULTS ADD patients showed a widespread slowing of spectral density. At a lobar level, MCIpos subjects showed a widespread higher theta density than MCIneg and healthy subjects; a lower beta2 density than healthy subjects was also found in parietal and occipital lobes. Evaluating EEG sources within the ICA-based networks, alpha2 band distinguished MCIpos from MCIneg, ADD and healthy subjects with good accuracy. Graph analysis on EEG data showed an alteration of connectome configuration at theta frequency in ADD and MCIpos patients and a progressive disruption of connectivity at alpha2 frequency throughout the AD continuum. CONCLUSIONS Theta frequency is the earliest and most sensitive EEG marker of AD pathology. Furthermore, EEG/fMRI integration highlighted the role of alpha2 band as potential neurodegeneration biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giordano Cecchetti
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Agosta
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Basaia
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Camilla Cividini
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Cursi
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Santangelo
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Caso
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Minicucci
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Magnani
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Phan LMT, Hoang TX, Vo TAT, Pham HL, Le HTN, Chinnadayyala SR, Kim JY, Lee SM, Cho WW, Kim YH, Choi SH, Cho S. Nanomaterial-based Optical and Electrochemical Biosensors for Amyloid beta and Tau: Potential for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2021; 21:175-193. [PMID: 33560154 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2021.1887732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Alzheimer's disease (AD), a heterogeneous pathological process representing the most common causes of dementia worldwide, has required early and accurate diagnostic tools. Neuropathological hallmarks of AD involve the aberrant accumulation of Amyloid beta (Aβ) into Amyloid plaques and hyperphosphorylated Tau into neurofibrillary tangles, occurring long before the onset of brain dysfunction.Areas covered:Considering the significance of Aβ and Tau in AD pathogenesis, these proteins have been adopted as core biomarkers of AD, and their quantification has provided precise diagnostic information to develop next-generation AD therapeutic approaches. However, conventional diagnostic methods may not suffice to achieve clinical criteria that are acceptable for proper diagnosis and treatment. The advantages of nanomaterial-based biosensors including facile miniaturization, mass fabrication, ultra-sensitivity, make them useful to be promising tools to measure Aβ and Tau simultaneously for accurate validation of low-abundance yet potentially informative biomarkers of AD.. EXPERT OPINION The study has identified the potential application of advanced biosensors as standardized clinical diagnostic tools for AD, evolving the way for new and efficient AD control with minimum economic and social burden. After clinical trial, nanobiosensors for measuring Aβ and Tau simultaneously possess innovative diagnosis of AD to provide significant contributions to primary Alzheimer's care intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Le Minh Tu Phan
- Department of Electronic Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.,School of Medicine and Pharmacy, The University of Danang, Danang, Vietnam
| | - Thi Xoan Hoang
- Department of Life Science, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Thuy Anh Thu Vo
- Department of Life Science, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Hoang Lan Pham
- Department of Life Science, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Hien T Ngoc Le
- Department of Electronic Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Jae Young Kim
- Department of Life Science, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Won Woo Cho
- Cantis Inc., Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Hyo Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Hye Choi
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sungbo Cho
- Department of Electronic Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.,Department of Health Sciences and Technology, GAIHST, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Peña-Bautista C, Álvarez L, Durand T, Vigor C, Cuevas A, Baquero M, Vento M, Hervás D, Cháfer-Pericás C. Clinical Utility of Plasma Lipid Peroxidation Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease Differential Diagnosis. Antioxidants (Basel) 2020; 9:antiox9080649. [PMID: 32707935 PMCID: PMC7464465 DOI: 10.3390/antiox9080649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a complex task due to the clinical similarity among neurodegenerative diseases. Previous studies showed the role of lipid peroxidation in early AD development. However, the clinical validation of potential specific biomarkers in minimally invasive samples constitutes a great challenge in early AD diagnosis. METHODS Plasma samples from participants classified into AD (n = 138), non-AD (including MCI and other dementias not due to AD) (n = 70) and healthy (n = 50) were analysed. Lipid peroxidation compounds (isoprostanes, isofurans, neuroprostanes, neurofurans) were determined by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Statistical analysis for biomarkers' clinical validation was based on Elastic Net. RESULTS A two-step diagnosis model was developed from plasma lipid peroxidation products to diagnose early AD specifically, and a bootstrap validated AUC of 0.74 was obtained. CONCLUSION A promising AD differential diagnosis model was developed. It was clinically validated as a screening test. However, further external validation is required before clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Peña-Bautista
- Neonatal Research Unit, Health Research Institute La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (C.P.-B.); (M.V.)
| | - Lourdes Álvarez
- Neurology Unit, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (L.A.); (A.C.); (M.B.)
| | - Thierry Durand
- Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron, IBMM, University of Montpellier, CNRS ENSCM, 34093 Montpellier, France; (T.D.); (C.V.)
| | - Claire Vigor
- Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron, IBMM, University of Montpellier, CNRS ENSCM, 34093 Montpellier, France; (T.D.); (C.V.)
| | - Ana Cuevas
- Neurology Unit, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (L.A.); (A.C.); (M.B.)
| | - Miguel Baquero
- Neurology Unit, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (L.A.); (A.C.); (M.B.)
| | - Máximo Vento
- Neonatal Research Unit, Health Research Institute La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (C.P.-B.); (M.V.)
| | - David Hervás
- Biostatistical Unit, Health Research Institute La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Consuelo Cháfer-Pericás
- Neonatal Research Unit, Health Research Institute La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (C.P.-B.); (M.V.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-961-246-721; Fax: +34-961-246-620
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Reiss AB, Glass AD, Wisniewski T, Wolozin B, Gomolin IH, Pinkhasov A, De Leon J, Stecker MM. Alzheimer's disease: many failed trials, so where do we go from here? J Investig Med 2020; 68:1135-1140. [PMID: 32699179 DOI: 10.1136/jim-2020-001297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative brain disorder associated with relentlessly progressive cognitive impairment and memory loss. AD pathology proceeds for decades before cognitive deficits become clinically apparent, opening a window for preventative therapy. Imbalance of clearance and buildup of amyloid β and phosphorylated tau proteins in the central nervous system is believed to contribute to AD pathogenesis. However, multiple clinical trials of treatments aimed at averting accumulation of these proteins have yielded little success, and there is still no disease-modifying intervention. Here, we discuss current knowledge of AD pathology and treatment with an emphasis on emerging biomarkers and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Bethanne Reiss
- Medicine, NYU Long Island School of Medicine and NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, New York, USA
| | - Amy D Glass
- Medicine, NYU Long Island School of Medicine and NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, New York, USA
| | - Thomas Wisniewski
- Departments of Neurology, Pathology and Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Benjamin Wolozin
- Departments of Pharmacology and Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Irving H Gomolin
- Medicine, NYU Long Island School of Medicine and NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, New York, USA
| | - Aaron Pinkhasov
- Department of Psychiatry, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, New York, USA
| | - Joshua De Leon
- Medicine, NYU Long Island School of Medicine and NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, New York, USA
| | - Mark M Stecker
- Neurology, UCSF San Francisco/Fresno, Fresno, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Using neuronal extracellular vesicles and machine learning to predict cognitive deficits in HIV. J Neurovirol 2020; 26:880-887. [PMID: 32681213 DOI: 10.1007/s13365-020-00877-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Our objective was to predict HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) in HIV-infected people using plasma neuronal extracellular vesicle (nEV) proteins, clinical data, and machine learning. We obtained 60 plasma samples from 38 women and 22 men, all with HIV infection and 40 with HAND. All underwent neuropsychological testing. nEVs were isolated by immunoadsorption with neuron-specific L1CAM antibody. High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), neurofilament light (NFL), and phosphorylated tau-181 (p-T181-tau) proteins were quantified by ELISA. Three different computational algorithms were performed to predict cognitive impairment using clinical data and nEV proteins. Of the 3 different algorithms, support vector machines performed the best. Applying 4 different models of clinical data with 3 nEV proteins, we showed that selected clinical data and HMGB1 plus NFL best predicted cognitive impairment with an area under the curve value of 0.82. The most important features included CD4 count, HMGB1, and NFL. Previous published data showed nEV p-T181-tau was elevated in Alzheimer's disease (AD), and in this study, p-T181-tau had no importance in assessing HAND but may actually differentiate it from AD. Machine learning can access data without programming bias. Identifying a few nEV proteins plus key clinical variables can better predict neuronal damage. This approach may differentiate other neurodegenerative diseases and determine recovery after therapies are identified.
Collapse
|
16
|
Santangelo R, Masserini F, Agosta F, Sala A, Caminiti SP, Cecchetti G, Caso F, Martinelli V, Pinto P, Passerini G, Perani D, Magnani G, Filippi M. CSF p-tau/Aβ42 ratio and brain FDG-PET may reliably detect MCI “imminent” converters to AD. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 47:3152-3164. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04853-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
17
|
Sun X, Nie B, Zhao S, Chen Q, Li P, Zhang T, Pan T, Feng T, Wang L, Yin X, Zhang W, Zhao S, Shan B, Liu H, Liang S, Ai L, Wang G. Tau PET Distributional Pattern in AD Patients with Visuospatial Dysfunction. Curr Alzheimer Res 2019; 16:1055-1062. [PMID: 31724513 DOI: 10.2174/1567205016666191113152434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Revised: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Visuospatial dysfunction is one predominant symptom in many atypical Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, however, until now its neural correlates still remain unclear. For the accumulation of intracellular hyperphosphorylated tau proteins is a major pathogenic factor in neurodegeneration of AD, the distributional pattern of tau could highlight the affected brain regions associated with specific cognitive deficits. OBJECTIVE We investigated the brain regions particularly affected by tau accumulation in patients with visuospatial dysfunction to explore its neural correlates. METHODS Using 18F-AV-1451 tau positron emission tomography (PET), voxel-wise two-sample t-tests were performed between AD patients with obvious visuospatial dysfunction (VS-AD) and cognitively normal subjects, AD patients with little-to-no visuospatial dysfunction (non VS-AD) and cognitively normal subjects, respectively. RESULTS Results showed increased tau accumulations mainly located in occipitoparietal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, inferior and medial temporal cortex in VS-AD patients, while increased tau accumulations mainly occurred in the inferior and medial temporal cortex in non VS-AD patients. CONCLUSION These findings suggested that occipitoparietal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus, which were particularly affected by increased tau accumulation in VS-AD patients, may associate with visuospatial dysfunction of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Sun
- College of Physical Science and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.,Beijing Engineering Research Center of Radiographic Techniques and Equipment, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Binbin Nie
- Beijing Engineering Research Center of Radiographic Techniques and Equipment, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.,School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.,CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
| | - Shujun Zhao
- College of Physical Science and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
| | - Qian Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100071, China
| | - Panlong Li
- College of Physical Science and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.,Beijing Engineering Research Center of Radiographic Techniques and Equipment, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Tianhao Zhang
- Beijing Engineering Research Center of Radiographic Techniques and Equipment, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.,School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Tingting Pan
- College of Physical Science and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.,Beijing Engineering Research Center of Radiographic Techniques and Equipment, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Ting Feng
- College of Physical Science and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.,Beijing Engineering Research Center of Radiographic Techniques and Equipment, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Luying Wang
- College of Physical Science and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.,Beijing Engineering Research Center of Radiographic Techniques and Equipment, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Xiaolong Yin
- College of Physical Science and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.,Beijing Engineering Research Center of Radiographic Techniques and Equipment, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Beijing Engineering Research Center of Radiographic Techniques and Equipment, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.,School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Shilun Zhao
- Beijing Engineering Research Center of Radiographic Techniques and Equipment, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.,School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Baoci Shan
- Beijing Engineering Research Center of Radiographic Techniques and Equipment, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.,School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.,CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
| | - Hua Liu
- Beijing Engineering Research Center of Radiographic Techniques and Equipment, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.,School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Shengxiang Liang
- National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Rehabilitation Medicine Technology, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian 350122, China.,Traditional Chinese Medicine Rehabilitation Research Center of State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou 350122, China
| | - Lin Ai
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100071, China
| | - Guihong Wang
- Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100071, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Carandini T, Arighi A, Sacchi L, Fumagalli GG, Pietroboni AM, Ghezzi L, Colombi A, Scarioni M, Fenoglio C, De Riz MA, Marotta G, Scarpini E, Galimberti D. Testing the 2018 NIA-AA research framework in a retrospective large cohort of patients with cognitive impairment: from biological biomarkers to clinical syndromes. ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY 2019; 11:84. [PMID: 31615545 PMCID: PMC6794758 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-019-0543-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background According to the 2018 NIA-AA research framework, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is not defined by the clinical consequences of the disease, but by its underlying pathology, measured by biomarkers. Evidence of both amyloid-β (Aβ) and phosphorylated tau protein (p-tau) deposition—assessed interchangeably with amyloid-positron emission tomography (PET) and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis—is needed to diagnose AD in a living person. Our aim was to test the new NIA-AA research framework in a large cohort of cognitively impaired patients to evaluate correspondence between the clinical syndromes and the underlying pathologic process testified by biomarkers. Methods We retrospectively analysed 628 subjects referred to our centre in suspicion of dementia, who underwent CSF analysis, together with neuropsychological assessment and neuroimaging, and were diagnosed with different neurodegenerative dementias according to current criteria, or as cognitively unimpaired. Subjects were classified considering CSF biomarkers, and the prevalence of normal, AD-continuum and non-AD profiles in each clinical syndrome was calculated. The positivity threshold of each CSF biomarker was first assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis, using Aβ-positive/negative status as determined by amyloid-PET visual reads. The agreement between CSF and amyloid-PET data was also evaluated. Results Among patients with a clinical diagnosis of AD, 94.1% were in the AD-continuum, whereas 5.5% were classified as non-AD and 0.4% were normal. The AD-continuum profile was found also in 26.2% of frontotemporal dementia, 48.6% of Lewy body dementia, 25% of atypical parkinsonism and 44.7% of vascular dementia. Biomarkers’ profile did not differ in amnestic and not amnestic mild cognitive impairment. CSF Aβ levels and amyloid-PET tracer binding negatively correlated, and the concordance between the two Aβ biomarkers was 89%. Conclusions The examination of the 2018 NIA-AA research framework in our clinical setting revealed a good, but incomplete, correspondence between the clinical syndromes and the underlying pathologic process measured by CSF biomarkers. The AD-continuum profile resulted to be a sensitive, but non-specific biomarker with regard to the clinical AD diagnosis. CSF and PET Aβ biomarkers were found to be not perfectly interchangeable to quantify the Aβ burden, possibly because they measure different aspects of AD pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiziana Carandini
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy. .,Dino Ferrari Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Andrea Arighi
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Dino Ferrari Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Sacchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Dino Ferrari Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio G Fumagalli
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Dino Ferrari Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Anna M Pietroboni
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Dino Ferrari Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Ghezzi
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Dino Ferrari Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Annalisa Colombi
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Dino Ferrari Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Scarioni
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Dino Ferrari Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Milena A De Riz
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Dino Ferrari Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Marotta
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Scarpini
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Dino Ferrari Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Galimberti
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Dino Ferrari Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|