Can EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) Alone Without Talc Pleurodesis Prevent Recurrence of Malignant Pleural Effusion (MPE) in Lung Adenocarcinoma

Theranostic applications of selenium nanomedicines against lung cancer

The incidence and mortality rates of lung cancer are among the highest in the world. Traditional treatment methods include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Although rapid progress has been achieved in the past decade, treatment limitations remain. It is therefore imperative to identify safer and more effective therapeutic methods, and research is currently being conducted to identify more efficient and less harmful drugs. In recent years, the discovery of antitumor drugs based on the essential trace element selenium (Se) has provided good prospects for lung cancer treatments. In particular, compared to inorganic Se (Inorg-Se) and organic Se (Org-Se), Se nanomedicine (Se nanoparticles; SeNPs) shows much higher bioavailability and antioxidant activity and lower toxicity. SeNPs can also be used as a drug delivery carrier to better regulate protein and DNA biosynthesis and protein kinase C activity, thus playing a role in inhibiting cancer cell proliferation. SeNPs can also effectively activate antigen-presenting cells to stimulate cell immunity, exert regulatory effects on innate and regulatory immunity, and enhance lung cancer immunotherapy. This review summarizes the application of Se-based species and materials in lung cancer diagnosis, including fluorescence, MR, CT, photoacoustic imaging and other diagnostic methods, as well as treatments, including direct killing, radiosensitization, chemotherapeutic sensitization, photothermodynamics, and enhanced immunotherapy. In addition, the application prospects and challenges of Se-based drugs in lung cancer are examined, as well as their forecasted future clinical applications and sustainable development.

[Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of 76 Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Harboring EGFR Mutations with Pleural Effusion at Initial Diagnosis: A Single-center Retrospective Study]

BACKGROUND

Malignant pleural effusion is one of the common clinical manifestations of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Patients with pleural effusion at the initial diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma usually indicate poor prognosis. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations mainly occur in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Patients with different mutant subtypes have different prognosis. The clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with EGFR mutated lung adenocarcinoma of different molecular subtypes combined with pleural effusion at initial diagnosis are still unclear. This study was designed to explore the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of these patients in order to provide management recommendations for them.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the clinical characteristics, treatment, outcomes and progression-free survival (PFS) of first-line treatment in patients with EGFR mutated lung adenocarcinoma combined with pleural effusion at initial diagnosis admitted to Department of Medical Oncology and Radiation Sickness, Peking University Third Hospital from January 2012 to June 2021 was performed. Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test were performed for comparison between groups. Kaplan-Meier method was performed for survival analysis and Cox proportional risk regression model was performed for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

76 patients met the inclusion criteria in this study. The incidences of EGFR classical mutations 19del, 21L858R and non-classical mutations were 46.0%, 38.2% and 15.8%, respectively among these patients. There was no significant difference between the three mutations in terms of gender, age, presence of dyspnea at presentation, whether other distant metastases were combined, site of pleural effusion, volume of pleural effusion, presence of other combined effusions, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, presence of other gene mutations, and treatment of pleural effusion (P>0.05). In patients with EGFR classical mutations 19del or 21L858R or non-classical mutations subtype, the proportion of chemotherapy in first-line regimens were 17.1%, 20.7% and 58.3%, respectively (P=0.001); and first-line disease control rates were 94.3%, 75.9% and 50%, respectively (P=0.003); pleural effusion control rates were 94.3%, 79.3% and 66.7%, respectively (P=0.04); PFS were 287 d, 327 d and 55 d, respectively (P=0.001). Univariate analysis showed that EGFR mutation subtype, control of pleural effusion, first-line treatment agents, and first-line treatment efficacy were significantly associated with PFS (P<0.05). Cox multifactorial analysis showed that only EGFR mutation subtype and first-line treatment efficacy were independent prognostic factors for PFS (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PFS was significantly better for classical mutations than for non-classical mutations in patients with EGFR mutated lung adenocarcinoma combined with pleural effusion at initial diagnosis. Improving the efficacy of first-line therapy is the key to improve the prognosis of these patients.

Risk Factors for and Time to Recurrence of Symptomatic Malignant Pleural Effusion in Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR or ALK Mutations

BACKGROUND

The main goal of management in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is palliation. Patients with MPE and actionable mutations, because their disease is expected to respond quickly and markedly to targeted therapy, are less likely than those without actionable mutations to receive definitive MPE management. Whether such management is indicated in these patients is unclear.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

What is the time to ipsilateral MPE recurrence requiring intervention in patients with metastatic NSCLC by mutation status? What are the risk factors for MPE recurrence?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent initial thoracentesis for MPE. We used a Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model to calculate the time to ipsilateral MPE recurrence requiring intervention within 100 days of initial thoracentesis and to identify variables associated with time to pleural fluid recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 396 patients, comprising 295 (74.5%) without and 101 (25.5%) with actionable mutations, were included. Most patients with actionable mutations (90%) were receiving targeted treatment within 30 days of initial thoracentesis. On univariate analysis, patients with actionable mutations showed a significantly higher hazard of MPE recurrence. On multivariate analysis, this difference was not significant. Larger pleural effusion size on chest radiography (P < .001), higher pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase (P < .001), and positive cytologic examination results (P = .008) were associated with an increased hazard of recurrence.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings indicate that patients with actionable mutations have a similar risk of MPE recurrence when compared with patients without mutations and would benefit from a similar definitive management approach to MPE.

Role of early definitive management for newly diagnosed malignant pleural effusion related to lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The advent of effective anti-cancer therapy has brought about uncertainty on the benefit of early definitive measures for newly diagnosed MPE from lung cancer. This study aims to investigate the outcomes of MPE in this setting.

METHODS

Lung cancer patients with MPE at first presentation to a tertiary care hospital were followed up till death or censored from 2011 to 2018. Early MPE control measures included chemical pleurodesis or IPC before or shortly after oncological treatment. Predictors of time to MPE re-intervention were identified with Cox proportional hazard analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 509 records screened, 233 subjects were eligible. One hundred and twenty-seven subjects received oral targeted therapy as first-line treatment and 34 (26.8%) underwent early definitive MPE control measures. Early MPE control measures in addition to targeted therapy, as compared to targeted therapy alone, significantly reduced the subsequent need of MPE re-intervention (23.5% vs 53.8%, P = 0.002). Similar benefits from MPE control measures were found in groups receiving systemic anti-cancer therapy or best supportive care (0% vs 52%, P = 0.003; 18% vs 56.7%, P = 0.024, respectively). In the group with targetable mutations, both early MPE control measures (HR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.12-0.53, P < 0.001) and the use of targeted therapy (HR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.10-0.46, P < 0.001) were independently associated with longer time to MPE re-interventions.

CONCLUSION

Early MPE control measures in lung cancer has additional benefits on reducing the need and prolonging the time to MPE re-intervention, independent of anti-cancer therapies.

Prognostic factors of recurrence of malignant pleural effusion: what is the role of neoplasia progression?

Background

It is known that malignant pleural effusion (MPE) recurs rapidly, in a considerable number of patients. However, some patients do not have MPE recurrence. Since MPE is associated with an average survival of 4–7 months, accurate prediction of prognosis may help recognize patients at higher risk of pleural recurrence, aiming to individualize more intensive treatment strategies.

Methods

A prospectively assembled database of cases with pleural effusion treated at a single institution analyzed a subset of patients with symptomatic MPE. Prognostic factors for pleural recurrence were identified by univariable analysis using Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used for the comparison between the curves. Univariate and multiple Cox regression models were used to evaluate the risk (HR) of recurrence. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis determined the cutoff points for continuous variables.

Results

A total of 288 patients were included in the analysis. Recurrence-free survival was of 76.6% at 6 months and 73.3% at 12 months. Univariable analysis regarding factors affecting postoperative recurrence was: lymphocytes, platelets, pleural procedure, chemotherapy lines and number of metastases. The independent factors for recurrence-free survival were pleural procedure and chemotherapy lines. Patients who were submitted to pleurodesis had a protective factor for recurrence, with an HR =0.34 (95% CI, 0.15–0.74, P=0.007). On the other hand, patients submitted to the 1st and 2nd line of palliative CT had, respectively, an HR risk = 2.81 (95% CI, 1.10–7.28, P=0.034) and HR =3.23 (95% CI, 1.33–7.84, P=0.010).

Conclusions

patients receiving the first or second line of systemic treatment have a higher risk of MPE recurrence when compared to patients who underwent MPE treatment before starting the systemic treatment. The definitive treatment of MPE, such as pleurodesis, was associated with a lower risk of MPE recurrence.

Intracavitary chemotherapy with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) is not superior to TKI monotherapy in controlling malignant pleural effusion recurrence in EGFR-mutated lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients benefit from EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) therapy. There are few studies comparing the efficacy between intrapleural chemotherapy combination with TKIs and TKIs alone in controlling re-accumulation of malignant pleural effusions (MPEs). The purpose of the study was to determine if patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and MPEs would benefit from intrapleural chemotherapeutics with an oral EGFR-TKI than EGFR-TKI alone.

METHODS

We evaluated EGFR-mutated lung cancer patients with MPEs in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. We evaluated the efficacy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

One hundred one NSCLC patients with MPEs at the time of diagnosis were included. We divided the patients into two groups. The overall response rate (ORR) with respect to MPE recurrence between the TKI alone and combination therapy groups was 65.5% (38/58) and 58.1% (25/43) (P=0.449). The disease control rate was 89.7% (52/58) and 86.0% (37/43) (P=0.579), respectively. The PFS in the TKI alone and TKI plus intrapleural drugs was 10.3 and 9.9 months, respectively (P=0.746). The intrapleural PFS was 11.4 and 11.0 months for the TKI alone and combination groups, respectively (P=0.188). The OS was 24.9 and 22.6 months (P=0.543), respectively. Hematologic toxicity and chest pain were more frequent in the combination therapy than TKI alone groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrapleural chemotherapy with TKI did not improve the efficacy of controlling MPEs in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC, but may increase adverse events, which are typical side effects of chemotherapy. We could treat these patients with TKI drugs alone combined with pleural effusion drainage.

Wet M1a non-small cell lung cancer: is it possible to predict recurrence of pleural effusion?

Background

The propose was to recognize risk factors of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) recurrence in patients with symptomatic M1a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

All patients with NSCLC and MPE submitted to pleural palliative procedures were enrolled in a prospective study. Group I contained patients who had pleural recurrence, and Group II with no pleural recurrence. Prognostic factors for pleural recurrence were identified by univariable analysis, using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Student's t test for quantitative variables. Afterwards the significant variables were entered into a multivariable logistic regression analysis (with P<0.05 considered significant). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis determined the cutoff points for continuous variables.

Results

A total of 82 patients were included in the analysis. There were 15 patients (18.3%) in Group I and 67 patients (81.7%) in Group II. Univariable analysis regarding factors affecting postoperative recurrence was: adenosine deaminase concentration in pleural fluid <16 mg/dL (P=0.04), albumin concentration in pleural fluid <2.4 mg/dL (P=0.03), administration of second-line palliative chemotherapy (P=0.018) and type of procedure [therapeutic pleural aspiration (TPA)] (P=0.023). At the multivariable analysis, only the type of procedure (TPA) (P=0.031) was identified as independent predictor of recurrence.

Conclusions

The identification of this factor may assist the choice of the optimal palliative technique; at the first episode of MPE in NSCLC patients and definitive procedure as pleurodesis or indwelling pleural catheter are recommended.

Comparing approaches to the management of malignant pleural effusions

INTRODUCTION

Management of symptomatic malignant pleural effusions is becoming more complex due to the range of treatment options, which include therapeutic thoracenteses, thoracoscopic talc pleurodesis, bedside pleurodesis with talc or other sclerosing agents via small-bore chest catheters, indwelling pleural catheters, surgery, or a combination of some of these procedures. Areas covered: Recent advances for the expanding range of treatment options in malignant pleural effusions are summarized, according to the best available evidence. Expert commentary: Selection of a treatment approach in malignant pleural effusions should take into account patient preferences and performance status, tumor type, predicted prognosis, presence of a non-expandable lung, and local experience or availability. The role of pleurodesis has decreased with the advent of indwelling pleural catheters, which provide a high degree of symptomatic relief on an outpatient basis and, therefore, are being positioned as a first choice therapy in many centers. Talc poudrage pleurodesis should probably be reserved for those situations in which pleural tumor invasion is discovered during diagnostic thoracoscopy. Ongoing randomized controlled trials will offer solid evidence on which of the available palliative approaches should be selected for each particular patient.

Interstitial Lung Disease after Pleurodesis for Malignant Pleural Effusion

Objective Pleurodesis is an effective therapy for malignant pleural effusion (MPE). While interstitial lung disease (ILD) has been regarded as a serious complication of pleurodesis, its clinicopathological characteristics have not been fully understood. This study was conducted to elucidate the incidence of ILD and the risk factors for ILD in patients who underwent pleurodesis to control MPE. Methods The medical records of patients who underwent pleurodesis in Aichi Medical University between March 2008 and February 2013, the period before the approval of talc in Japan, were retrospectively analyzed. Results A total of 84 patients underwent pleurodesis, all using OK-432. ILD occurred in 13 patients (15.5%). The development of ILD after pleurodesis was significantly associated with old age (odds ratio [OR]: 4.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-19.08) and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment (OR: 5.97, CI: 1.7-20.9). A multivariate analysis revealed that >67 years of age (p=0.01) and EGFR-TKI treatment (p=0.02) were significantly associated with the development of pleurodesis-related ILD. Among the patients who received both pleurodesis and EGFR-TKIs (n=23), 8 patients developed ILD. All of these patients were receiving EGFR-TKI therapy at the time of pleurodesis or within 30 days after pleurodesis. In contrast, no cases of ILD were observed among the patients who stopped EGFR-TKIs before pleurodesis or started EGFR-TKIs at more than 30 days after pleurodesis. Conclusion ILD seemed to be a frequent complication of pleurodesis in patients using OK-432, especially elderly patients and those who underwent pleurodesis while receiving EGFR-TKI therapy or who started EGFR-TKI therapy within 30 days after pleurodesis.