Use of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Gastric Cancer Staging

Hemostatic Radiotherapy for Gastric Cancer: MRI as an Alternative to Endoscopy for Post-Treatment Evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Pretreatment diagnosis by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is useful to determine the effect of chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Here, we investigated the relationship among DW-MRI, endoscopy, and tumor markers.

PATIENTS

Eight patients underwent hemostatic radiotherapy (RT) for gastric cancer in this prospective study from 2019 to 2021. The patients completed MRI, endoscopy, and blood tests before RT; MRI, endoscopy, and blood tests 1 month after RT; and MRI and blood tests 3 months after RT. Correlations between changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from DW-MRI and the tumor marker carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were investigated.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis of overall survival showed that sex and chemotherapy treatment were statistically significant factors. The CEA values before and 1 month after RT decreased significantly. There was no statistical difference between the CEA value 1 and 3 months after RT. The ADC value before and 1 month after RT increased significantly but not between 1 and 3 months after RT. Comparing the ratio of ADC before RT to 1 (or 3) month(s) after RT with that of CEA before RT to 1 (or 3) month(s) after RT, we found an inverse relationship between the two ratios.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, changes in ADC and CEA are correlated. Additionally, 3 months after RT, the decrease in ADC appeared earlier than the decrease in CEA. ADC may indicate a biological change earlier than CEA, and the ratios of ADC and CEA may be important factors. These aspects warrant further confirmation in a larger sample population.

Comparison of whole-body DW-MRI with 2-[18F]FDG PET for staging and treatment monitoring of children with Langerhans cell histiocytosis

PURPOSE

To assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body (WB) DW-MRI with 2-[18F]FDG PET for staging and treatment monitoring of children with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH).

METHODS

Twenty-three children with LCH underwent 2-[18F]FDG PET and WB DW-MRI at baseline. Two nuclear medicine physicians and two radiologists independently assessed presence/absence of tumors in 8 anatomical areas. Sixteen children also performed 2-[18F]FDG PET and WB DW-MRI at follow-up. One radiologist and one nuclear medicine physician revised follow-up scans and collected changes in tumor apparent diffusion (ADC) and standardized uptake values (SUV) before and after therapy in all detectable lesions. 2-[18F]FDG PET results were considered the standard of reference for tumor detection and evaluation of treatment response according to Lugano criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy of WB DW-MRI at baseline were calculated, and the 95% confidence intervals were estimated by using the Clopper-Pearson (exact) method; changes in tumor SUVs and ADC were compared using a Mann-Whitney U test. Agreement between reviewers was assessed with a Cohen's weighted kappa coefficient. Analyses were conducted using SAS software version 9.4.

RESULTS

Agreement between reviewers was perfect (kappa coefficient = 1) for all analyzed regions but spine and neck (kappa coefficient = 0.89 and 0.83, respectively) for 2-[18F]FDG PET images, and abdomen and pelvis (kappa coefficient = 0.65 and 0.88, respectively) for WB DW-MRI. Sensitivity and specificity were 95.5% and 100% for WB DW-MRI compared to 2-[18F]FDG PET. Pre to post-treatment changes in SUVratio and ADCmean were inversely correlated for all lesions (r: -0.27, p = 0·06) and significantly different between responders and non-responders to chemotherapy (p = 0.0006 and p = 0·003 for SUVratio and ADCmean, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that WB DW-MRI has similar accuracy to 2-[18F]FDG PET for staging and treatment monitoring of LCH in children. While 2-[18F]FDG PET remains an approved radiological examination for assessing metabolically active disease, WB DW-MRI could be considered as an alternative approach without radiation exposure. The combination of both modalities might have advantages over either approach alone.

Imaging in Gastric Cancer: Current Practice and Future Perspectives

Gastric cancer represents one of the most common oncological causes of death worldwide. In order to treat patients in the best possible way, the staging of gastric cancer should be accurate. In this regard, endoscopy ultrasound (EUS) has been considered the reference standard for tumor (T) and nodal (N) statuses in recent decades. However, thanks to technological improvements, computed tomography (CT) has gained an important role, not only in the assessment of distant metastases (M status) but also in T and N staging. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can contribute to the detection and staging of primary gastric tumors thanks to its excellent soft tissue contrast and multiple imaging sequences without radiation-related risks. In addition, MRI can help with the detection of liver metastases, especially small lesions. Finally, positron emission tomography (PET) is still considered a useful diagnostic tool for the staging of gastric cancer patients, with a focus on nodal metastases and peritoneal carcinomatosis. In addition, it may play a role in the treatment of gastric cancer in the coming years thanks to the introduction of new labeling peptides. This review aims to summarize the most common advantages and pitfalls of EUS, CT, MRI and PET in the TNM staging of gastric cancer patients.

Diagnostic Accuracy of 2-[18F]FDG-PET and whole-body DW-MRI for the detection of bone marrow metastases in children and young adults

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-enhanced positron emission tomography (2-[18F]FDG-PET) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for the detection of bone marrow metastases in children and young adults with solid malignancies.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional single-center institutional review board-approved study, we investigated twenty-three children and young adults (mean age, 16.8 years ± 5.1 [standard deviation]; age range, 7-25 years; 16 males, 7 females) with 925 bone marrow metastases who underwent 66 simultaneous 2-[18F]FDG-PET and DW-MRI scans including 23 baseline scans and 43 follow-up scans after chemotherapy between May 2015 and July 2020. Four reviewers evaluated all foci of bone marrow metastasis on 2-[18F]FDG-PET and DW-MRI to assess concordance and measured the tumor-to-bone marrow contrast. Results were assessed with a one-sample Wilcoxon test and generalized estimation equation. Bone marrow biopsies and follow-up imaging served as the standard of reference.

RESULTS

The reviewers detected 884 (884/925, 95.5%) bone marrow metastases on 2-[18F]FDG-PET and 893 (893/925, 96.5%) bone marrow metastases on DW-MRI. We found different "blind spots" for 2-[18F]FDG-PET and MRI: 2-[18F]FDG-PET missed subcentimeter lesions while DW-MRI missed lesions in small bones. Sensitivity and specificity were 91.0% and 100% for 18F-FDG-PET, 89.1% and 100.0% for DW-MRI, and 100.0% and 100.0% for combined modalities, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of combined 2-[18F]FDG-PET/MRI (100.0%) was significantly higher compared to either 2-[18F]FDG-PET (96.9%, p < 0.001) or DW-MRI (96.3%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both 2-[18F]FDG-PET and DW-MRI can miss bone marrow metastases. The combination of both imaging techniques detected significantly more lesions than either technique alone.

KEY POINTS

• DW-MRI and 2-[18F]FDG-PET have different strengths and limitations for the detection of bone marrow metastases in children and young adults with solid tumors. • Both modalities can miss bone marrow metastases, although the "blind spot" of each modality is different. • A combined PET/MR imaging approach will achieve maximum sensitivity and specificity for the detection of bone marrow metastases in children with solid tumors.

Gastric Cancer Staging: Is It Time for Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

Gastric cancer (GC) is a common cancer worldwide. Its incidence and mortality vary depending on geographic area, with the highest rates in Asian countries, particularly in China, Japan, and South Korea. Accurate imaging staging has become crucial for the application of various treatment strategies, especially for curative treatments in early stages. Unfortunately, most GCs are still diagnosed at an advanced stage, with the peritoneum (61-80%), distant lymph nodes (44-50%), and liver (26-38%) as the most common metastatic locations. Metastatic disease is limited to the peritoneum in 58% of cases; in nonperitoneal distant metastases, the most involved GC metastasization site is the liver (82%). The eighth edition of the tumor-node-metastasis staging system is the most commonly used system for determining GC prognosis. Endoscopic ultrasonography, computed tomography, and 18-fluorideoxyglucose positron emission tomography are historically the most accurate imaging techniques for GC staging. However, studies have recently shown renewed interest in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a useful tool in GC staging, especially for distant metastasis assessment. The technical improvement of diffusion-weighted imaging and the increasing use of hepatobiliary contrast agents have been shown to increase the diagnostic performance of MRI, particularly for detecting peritoneal and liver metastasis. However, no principal oncological guidelines have included the use of MRI as a first-line technique for distant metastasis evaluation during the GC staging process, such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines. This review analyzed the role of the principal imaging techniques in GC diagnosis and staging, focusing on the potential role of MRI, especially for assessing peritoneal and liver metastases.