Liver Fibrosis Staging with Gadolinium Ethoxybenzyl Diethylenetriamine Penta-Acetic Acid-enhanced: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Native and Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced T1 mapping for Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in NAFLD: Comparative Analysis of Modified Look-Locker Inversion Recovery and Water-specific T1 mapping

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the diagnostic performance of water-specific T1 mapping for staging liver fibrosis in a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) rabbit model, in comparison to Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (MOLLI) T1 mapping.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

60 rabbits were randomly divided into the control group (12 rabbits) and NAFLD model groups (eight rabbits per subgroup) corresponding to different durations of high-fat high cholesterol diet feeding. All rabbits underwent MRI examination including MOLLI T1 mapping and 3D multi-echo variable flip angle (VFAME- GRE) sequences were acquired before and 20 min after the administration of Gd- EOB-DTPA. Histological assessments were performed to evaluate steatosis, inflammation, ballooning, and fibrosis. Statistical analysis included the intraclass correlation coefficient, analysis of variance, spearman correlation, multiple linear regression, and receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

A moderate correlation was observed between conventional native T1 and MRI-PDFF (r = -0.513, P < 0.001), as well as between conventional native T1 and liver steatosis grades (r = -0.319, P = 0.016). However, no significant correlation was found between the native wT1 and PDFF (r = 0.137, P = 0.314), or between the native wT1 and steatosis grades (r = 0.106, P = 0.435). In the multiple regression analysis, liver fibrosis, and hepatocellular ballooning were identified as independent factors influencing native wT1 in this study (R2 =0.545, P < 0.05), while steatosis was independently associated with conventional native T1 (R2 =0.321, P < 0.05). The AUC values for native T1, native wT1, HBP T1, and HBP wT1 were 0.549(0.410-0.682), 0.811(0.684-0.903), 0.775(0.644-0.876), and 0.752(0.619-0.858) for F1 or higher, 0.581(0.441-0.711), 0.828(0.704-0.916), 0.832(0.708-0.919), and 0.854(0.734-0.934) for F2 or higher, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The native wT1 may provide a more reliable assessment of early liver fibrosis in the context of NAFLD compared to conventional native T1.

Non-contrast T1ρ dispersion versus Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced T1mapping for the risk stratification of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in rabbit models

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of T1ρ dispersion and Gd-EOB-DTPAenhanced T1mapping in the identification of early liver fibrosis (LF) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) rabbit model induced by a high-fat diet using histopathological findings as the standard reference.

METHODS

A total of sixty rabbits were randomly allocated into the standard control group (n = 12) and the NAFLD model groups (8 rabbits per group) corresponding to different high-fat high cholesterol diet feeding weeks. All rabbits underwent noncontrast transverse T1ρ mapping with varying spin-locking frequencies (FSL = 0 Hz and 500 Hz), native T1 mapping, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced T1 mapping during the hepatobiliary phase. The histopathological findings were assessed based on the NASH CRN Scoring System. Statistical analyses were conducted using the intraclass correlation coefficient, analysis of variance, multiple linear regression, and receiver operating characteristics.

RESULTS

Except for native T1, T1ρ, T1ρ dispersion, HBP T1, and △T1 values significantly differed among different liver fibrosis groups (F = 14.414, 18.736, 10.15, and 9.799, respectively; all P < 0.05). T1ρ, T1ρ dispersion, HBP T1, and △T1 values also exhibited significant differences among different NASH groups (F = 4.138, 4.594, 21.868, and 22.678, respectively; all P < 0.05). In the multiple regression analysis, liver fibrosis was the only factor that independently influenced T1ρ dispersion (R2 = 0.746, P = 0.000). Among all metrics, T1ρ dispersion demonstrated the best area under curve (AUC) for identifying early LF (≥ F1 stage) and significant LF (≥ F2 stage) (AUC, 0.849 and 0.916, respectively). The performance of △T1 and HBP T1 (AUC, 0.948 and 0.936, respectively) were better than that of T1ρ and T1ρ dispersion (AUC, 0.762 and 0.769, respectively) for diagnosing NASH.

CONCLUSION

T1⍴ dispersion may be suitable for detecting liver fibrosis in the complex background of NAFLD, while Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced T1 mapping is superior to nonenhanced T1⍴ mapping (T1⍴ and T1⍴ dispersion) for identifying NASH.