Drug Therapies for Patients with IgA Nephropathy: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Drug Dosing in Critically Ill Adult Patients with Augmented Renal Clearance

Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is a phenomenon of enhanced renal function seen in critically ill patients. ARC alters the disposition of renally eliminated medications currently used in the intensive care unit, resulting in underdosing and potential therapy failure. Our review addresses the rising concern of inadequate dosing in patients with ARC by summarizing the currently available evidence. To our knowledge, this guide is the first to provide clinicians with dose recommendation insights for renally eliminated agents in adult critically ill patients with ARC. A comprehensive literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global was conducted until 3 November 2021. Screening and data extraction were conducted in two steps: title and abstract screening followed by full-text review. Full text review resulted in a total of 51 studies included in this review. The results demonstrated the need for higher-than-standard doses for meropenem, imipenem, and vancomycin and reduced dosing intervals for ceftriaxone in patients with ARC. The potential need for increased dosing frequency in patients with ARC was also found for both enoxaparin and levetiracetam. In conclusion, ARC has been shown to influence the probability of target attainment in several medications requiring dosing changes to mitigate the risk of therapeutic failure.

Immunosuppressants or corticosteroids compared with supportive therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety for IgA nephropathy treatment

Background

Corticosteroids or immunosuppressants and supportive treatment in reducing the risk of proteinuria and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy (IgAN) patients were still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants or corticosteroids compared with supportive therapy for treatment of IgAN in order to provide guidance for clinical practice.

Methods

We conducted an online search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to collect randomized control trials (RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants or corticosteroids compared with supportive therapy for treatment of IgA for relevant literature published from the databases' inception to August 21, 2021. The Cochrane risk assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies and analyzed by Revman 5.4 software, and Stata 15.0 statistical software was adopted for meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 10,622 related studies were retrieved, and 11 RCTs were finally included in the meta-analysis, with a total sample size of 809 cases. The primary outcome measures for immunosuppressants or corticosteroids were better than those for supportive therapy: proteinuria [weighted mean difference (WMD) =-0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.63, -0.44, Z =10.79, P<0.001] and ESKD [relative risk (RR) =0.189, 95% CI: 0.059, 0.605, Z =2.81, P=0.005]. The secondary outcome measures were also better than that for supportive treatment: glomerular filtration rate [standardized mean difference (SMD) =0.32, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.54, Z =2.48, P=0.013]. The incidence of adverse reactions was consistent with that of supportive treatment, and the difference was not statistically significant (RR =1.06, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.59, Z =0.28, P=0.777).

Discussion

Current evidence shows that immunosuppressants and corticosteroids can significantly reduce the risk of proteinuria and ESKD in IgAN patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are need to verify above conclusion. In addition, we hope that more rationally designed multicenter RCTs that are not limited to short-term treatment outcomes will be conducted in the future.