Non-uremic Calciphylaxis: A Rare and Late Adverse Reaction of Warfarin

Breast fat necrosis secondary to warfarin-induced calciphylaxis, a rare mimicker of breast cancer: A case report and a review of literature

Breast fat necrosis (BFN) is usually a benign inflammatory response to breast trauma. However, an extremely rare cause of fat necrosis is calciphylaxis, a calcification of small- and medium-sized arteries causing thrombosis and ischemia. It is classified into (A) uremic (B) nonuremic-induced calciphylaxis. Calciphylaxis has been reported to be encountered in different parts of the body. However, to the best of our knowledge there is only one case in the English literature of BFN 2ry to warfarin-induced calciphylaxis. We report a 65-year-old female, known case of atrial fibrillation on warfarin, presented with a left breast mass of 4-month duration. The mass was painful and progressively enlarging. Examination of the left breast showed 7 × 4 cm mass, spanning from 10-2 o'clock, free from surrounding structures, with preserved overlying skin. However, the mass was not visualized on mammogram. Ultrasound showed a left breast lobulated hypoechoic mass containing a hyperechoic component. Biopsy showed fat necrosis. After 1 month, she presented with ulceration of the overlying skin. After wide local excision, histopathology demonstrated a calciphylaxis-induced fat necrosis. Considering the patient's background, the diagnosis was BFN secondary to warfarin-induced calciphylaxis. Hence, the warfarin was shifted to Rivaroxaban, 6 months follow-up showed no evidence of recurrence. In conclusion, the rarity of nonuremic calciphylaxis is reflected on the delay of diagnosis in some of the reported cases and the lack of grading system used to guide the management of such difficult wounds. However, keeping a high index of suspicion is important whenever such wounds are encountered with presence of risk factors other than end-stage kidney disease.

Effects of Anti-vitamin k oral anticoagulants on bone and cardiovascular health

Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (VKAs) have been proven over 50 years to be highly effective and acceptably safe in many settings and are still used by millions of people worldwide. The main concern about the safety of VKAs regards the risk of bleeding, but there is accumulation evidence of their potentially negative effects beyond hemostasis. Indeed, VKAs impair the action of several Vitamin-K Dependent Proteins (VKDP), such as Bone Gla protein, Matrix Gla protein, Gas6 Protein, Periostin and Gla-Ric Protein, involved in bone and vascular metabolism, thus exerting a detrimental effect on bone and vascular health. Indeed, although the evidence regarding this issue is not compelling, it has been shown that VKAs use decreases bone mass density, increases the risk of bone fractures and accelerates the process of vascular and valvular calcification. Vascular calcification is a major concern in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) patients, also in absence of VKAs, because of mineral metabolism derangement, chronic inflammation and oxidative stress. Direct Oral AntiCoagulants (DOACs) do not affect VKDP involved in vascular and valvular calcification, and do not induce calcific valve degeneration in animal models, being a possible alternative to AVK for CKD patients. However, the efficacy and safety of DOACs in this population, suggested by some recent observations, requires confirmation by dedicated, randomized study. We reviewed here the effects of VKAs in bone and vascular health as compared to DOACs, in order to provide the physicians with some data useful to wisely choose the most suitable anticoagulant for every patient.