Efficacy and Safety of Lobaplatin-TACE in the Treatment of Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

Lobaplatin induces apoptosis in T24 and 5637 bladder cancer cells by regulating Bcl-2 and Bax expression and inhibiting the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway

Background

Lobaplatin (LBP) is a third-generation platinum-based drug that has been approved only in China for the treatment of several cancer types. Nonetheless, its efficacy in treating bladder cancer (BC) is unclear thus far. Through in vitro and in vivo experiments, this study aimed to explore whether LBP has an antitumor effect on T24 and 5637 BC cells and whether the effect is related to B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2), Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax) and regulation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt) pathway.

Methods

For in vitro experiments, the cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) method was used to determine how different concentrations of LBP affect the viability of two types of BC cells. A wound healing assay was used to test the inhibitory effect of LBP on the migration of the two cell lines. Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate isomer I (V-FITC)/propidium iodide (PI) staining was used to detect changes in cell apoptosis before and after LBP treatment, and Western blotting was used to detect the expression of apoptosis-related proteins and PI3K/Akt pathway proteins. For in vivo experiments, a cell-derived xenograft (CDX) model was employed, and the weight of nude mice and the tumor size were measured. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the effect of LBP on the expression of apoptosis-related proteins in tumor xenografts.

Results

In vitro, LBP reduced proliferation (P<0.05), inhibited migration (P<0.05), and induced apoptosis in T24 (31.25%±1.20%, P<0.01) and 5637 (14.3%±2.24%, P<0.05) BC cells, in a dose-dependent manner (P<0.05); increased the expression of proapoptotic proteins, including Bax, caspase-3 and cleaved caspase-3 (P<0.05); and suppressed the expression of antiapoptotic proteins, including Bcl-2, PI3K, Akt and phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt). The in vivo experiment confirmed that LBP can reduce the size of subcutaneous tumors in nude mice (P<0.05), increase the expression levels of Bax and cleaved caspase-3 and lower the expression of Bcl-2 (P<0.05) in bladder tumor tissue.

Conclusions

The results obtained from both experiments suggest that LBP can inhibit the proliferation of T24 and 5637 BC cells, which might be credited to its effects in regulating Bcl-2 and Bax expression and inhibiting the PI3K/Akt pathway.

Efficacy and Safety of TACE Combined with Regorafenib versus TACE in the Third-Line Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

The liver is the most common site of metastasis in colorectal cancer. In patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases, the 5-year survival rate is less than 5%. Many patients with colorectal liver metastases require effective subsequent therapy after the failure of standard first-line/second-line therapy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with Regorafenib versus TACE in the third-line treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases.

METHOD

The clinical data of 132 patients with colorectal liver metastases were collected. There were two groups: TACE + Regorafenib group (N = 63); TACE group (N = 69). TACE uses CalliSpheres® drug-loaded microspheres (loaded with irinotecan). Regorafenib is administered at a dose of 120 mg once daily. If the patient is severely intolerable, the regorafenib dose is adjusted to 80 mg once daily. Primary study endpoints were (1) to evaluate the tumor response, ORR, and DCR and (2) to evaluate OS and PFS in the two groups. Secondary study endpoints were (1) to compare the performance status, CEA, CA19-9 after treatment between the two groups and (2) to compare the incidence of adverse events between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in tumor response, ORR, DCR, OS, and PFS after treatment between the two groups. TACE combined with the Regorafenib group versus the TACE group: ORR (57.1% vs 33.3%), DCR (82.5% vs 68.1%), mOS (18.2 months vs 11.3 months), and mPFS (8.9 months vs 5.3 months). The performance status after treatment was better in the TACE + Regorafenib group than in the TACE group (P < 0.05). The CEA and CA19-9 negative rates after treatment were higher in the TACE + Regorafenib group than in the TACE group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For the third-line treatment of colorectal liver metastases, the combination of TACE + Regorafenib had better tumor response, OS, and PFS than TACE TACE + Regorafenib combination could be considered as salvage therapy for colorectal liver metastases who failed the first- and second-line standard therapy.