Differential Gene Expression of ASUN, NEMF, PTPRC and DHX29: Candidate Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Active and Latent Tuberculosis

Exploring Early Physical Examination Diagnostic Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease Based on Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator

Neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are an increasing public health challenge. There is an urgent need to shift the focus to accurate detection of clinical AD at the physical examination stage. The purpose of this study was to identify biomarkers for AD diagnosis. Differential expression analysis was performed on a dataset including prefrontal cortical samples and peripheral blood samples of AD to identify shared differentially expressed genes (DEGs) shared between the two datasets. In addition, a minimum absolute contraction and selection operator (LASSO) model based on shared-DEGs identified nine signature genes (MT1X, IGF1, DLEU7, TRIM36, PTPRC, WNK2, SPG20, C8orf59, and BRWD1) that accurately predict AD occurrence. Enrichment analysis showed that the signature gene was significantly associated with the AD-related p53 signaling pathway, T-cell receptor signaling pathway, HIF-1 signaling pathway, AMPK signaling pathway, and FoxO signaling pathway. Thus, our results identify not only biomarkers for diagnosing AD but also potentially specific pathways. The AD biomarkers proposed in this study could serve as indicators for prevention and diagnosis during physical examination.

Systematic review of host genomic biomarkers of invasive bacterial disease: Distinguishing bacterial from non-bacterial causes of acute febrile illness

Background

Infectious diseases play a significant role in the global burden of disease. The gold standard for the diagnosis of bacterial infection, bacterial culture, can lead to diagnostic delays and inappropriate antibiotic use. The advent of high- throughput technologies has led to the discovery of host-based genomic biomarkers of infection, capable of differentiating bacterial from other causes of infection, but few have achieved validation for use in a clinical setting.

Methods

A systematic review was performed. PubMed/Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and Scopus databases were searched for relevant studies from inception up to 30/03/2022 with forward and backward citation searching of key references. Studies assessing the diagnostic performance of human host genomic biomarkers of bacterial infection were included. Study selection and assessment of quality were conducted by two independent reviewers. A meta-analysis was undertaken using a diagnostic random-effects model. The review was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021208462).

Findings

Seventy-two studies evaluating the performance of 116 biomarkers in 16,216 patients were included. Forty-six studies examined TB-specific biomarker performance and twenty-four studies assessed biomarker performance in a paediatric population. The results of pooled sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of genomic biomarkers of bacterial infection were 0.80 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.82), 0.86 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.88), 0.18 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.21), 5.5 (95% CI 4.9 to 6.3), 30.1 (95% CI 24 to 37), respectively. Significant between-study heterogeneity (I² 77%) was present.

Interpretation

Host derived genomic biomarkers show significant potential for clinical use as diagnostic tests of bacterial infection however, further validation and attention to test platform is warranted before clinical implementation can be achieved.

Funding

No funding received.