1
|
Mhaouty-Kodja S, Zalko D, Tait S, Testai E, Viguié C, Corsini E, Grova N, Buratti FM, Cabaton NJ, Coppola L, De la Vieja A, Dusinska M, El Yamani N, Galbiati V, Iglesias-Hernández P, Kohl Y, Maddalon A, Marcon F, Naulé L, Rundén-Pran E, Salani F, Santori N, Torres-Ruiz M, Turner JD, Adamovsky O, Aiello-Holden K, Dirven H, Louro H, Silva MJ. A critical review to identify data gaps and improve risk assessment of bisphenol A alternatives for human health. Crit Rev Toxicol 2024; 54:696-753. [PMID: 39436315 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2388712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Revised: 07/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/23/2024]
Abstract
Bisphenol A (BPA), a synthetic chemical widely used in the production of polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resins, has been associated with a variety of adverse effects in humans including metabolic, immunological, reproductive, and neurodevelopmental effects, raising concern about its health impact. In the EU, it has been classified as toxic to reproduction and as an endocrine disruptor and was thus included in the candidate list of substances of very high concern (SVHC). On this basis, its use has been banned or restricted in some products. As a consequence, industries turned to bisphenol alternatives, such as bisphenol S (BPS) and bisphenol F (BPF), which are now found in various consumer products, as well as in human matrices at a global scale. However, due to their toxicity, these two bisphenols are in the process of being regulated. Other BPA alternatives, whose potential toxicity remains largely unknown due to a knowledge gap, have also started to be used in manufacturing processes. The gradual restriction of the use of BPA underscores the importance of understanding the potential risks associated with its alternatives to avoid regrettable substitutions. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on the potential hazards related to BPA alternatives prioritized by European Regulatory Agencies based on their regulatory relevance and selected to be studied under the European Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC): BPE, BPAP, BPP, BPZ, BPS-MAE, and TCBPA. The focus is on data related to toxicokinetic, endocrine disruption, immunotoxicity, developmental neurotoxicity, and genotoxicity/carcinogenicity, which were considered the most relevant endpoints to assess the hazard related to those substances. The goal here is to identify the data gaps in BPA alternatives toxicology and hence formulate the future directions that will be taken in the frame of the PARC project, which seeks also to enhance chemical risk assessment methodologies using new approach methodologies (NAMs).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakina Mhaouty-Kodja
- CNRS UMR 8246, INSERM U1130, Neuroscience Paris Seine - Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Daniel Zalko
- INRAE, UMR1331 Toxalim (Research Center in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UT3, Toulouse, France
| | - Sabrina Tait
- Center for Gender-Specific Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuela Testai
- Department of Environment and Health, Mechanisms, Biomarkers and Models Unit, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Catherine Viguié
- INRAE, UMR1331 Toxalim (Research Center in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UT3, Toulouse, France
| | - Emanuela Corsini
- Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences 'Rodolfo Paoletti', Università degli Studi di Milano - School of Pharmacy, Milan, Italy
| | - Nathalie Grova
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Immune Endocrine Epigenetics Research Group, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-Sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Franca Maria Buratti
- Department of Environment and Health, Mechanisms, Biomarkers and Models Unit, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicolas J Cabaton
- INRAE, UMR1331 Toxalim (Research Center in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UT3, Toulouse, France
| | - Lucia Coppola
- Center for Gender-Specific Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio De la Vieja
- Endocrine Tumor Unit from Chronic Disease Program (UFIEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Dusinska
- Department for Environmental Chemistry, Health Effects Laboratory, NILU-Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller, Norway
| | - Naouale El Yamani
- Department for Environmental Chemistry, Health Effects Laboratory, NILU-Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller, Norway
| | - Valentina Galbiati
- Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences 'Rodolfo Paoletti', Università degli Studi di Milano - School of Pharmacy, Milan, Italy
| | - Patricia Iglesias-Hernández
- Endocrine Tumor Unit from Chronic Disease Program (UFIEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Yvonne Kohl
- Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering IBMT, Sulzbach, Germany
| | - Ambra Maddalon
- Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences 'Rodolfo Paoletti', Università degli Studi di Milano - School of Pharmacy, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Marcon
- Department of Environment and Health, Mechanisms, Biomarkers and Models Unit, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Lydie Naulé
- CNRS UMR 8246, INSERM U1130, Neuroscience Paris Seine - Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Elise Rundén-Pran
- Department for Environmental Chemistry, Health Effects Laboratory, NILU-Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller, Norway
| | - Francesca Salani
- Department of Environment and Health, Mechanisms, Biomarkers and Models Unit, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Santori
- Department of Environment and Health, Mechanisms, Biomarkers and Models Unit, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Mónica Torres-Ruiz
- National Center for Environmental Health (CNSA), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jonathan D Turner
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Immune Endocrine Epigenetics Research Group, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-Sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Ondrej Adamovsky
- Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, RECETOX, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | - Hubert Dirven
- Department of Chemical Toxicology - Division of Climate and the Environment, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Henriqueta Louro
- Department of Human Genetics, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal
- Centre for Toxicogenomics and Human Health, Nova Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Maria João Silva
- Department of Human Genetics, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal
- Centre for Toxicogenomics and Human Health, Nova Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cochrane S, Rajagopal R, Sheffield D, Stewart F, Hathaway L, Barnes NM, Qureshi O, Gordon J. Impact of a varied set of stimuli on a suite of immunological parameters within peripheral blood mononuclear cells: toward a non-animal approach for assessing immune modulation by materials intended for human use. FRONTIERS IN TOXICOLOGY 2024; 6:1335110. [PMID: 38737195 PMCID: PMC11082367 DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2024.1335110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: In toxicology, steps are being taken towards more mechanism-focused and human relevant approaches to risk assessment, requiring new approaches and methods. Additionally, there is increasing emphasis by regulators on risk assessment of immunotoxicity. Methods: Here we present data from a peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) system whereby a varied set of stimuli, including those against the TCR and Toll-like receptors, enable readouts of cytokine and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production with monocyte, T cell and B cell viability, proliferation, and associated activation markers. In addition to results on the impact of the stimuli used, initial profiling data for a case study chemical, curcumin, is presented, illustrating how the system can be used to generate information on the impact of exogenous materials on three major constituent immune cell subsets for use in risk assessment and to direct follow-on studies. Results: The different stimuli drove distinct responses, not only in relation to the "quantity" of the response but also the "quality". Curcumin had a limited impact on the B cell parameters measured, with the stimuli used, and it was noted that in contrast to T cells where there was either no impact or a reduction in viability and proliferation with increasing concentration, for B cells there was a small but significant increase in both measurements at curcumin concentrations below 20 µM. Similarly, whilst expression of activation markers by T cells was reduced by the highest concentration of curcumin, they were increased in B cells. Curcumin only impacted the viability of stimulated monocytes at the highest concentration and had differential impact on different activation markers. Levels of all cytokines and PGE2 were reduced at higher concentrations. Discussion: Although the platform has certain limitations, it nevertheless enables assessment of healthy baseline monocyte, T-, and B-cell responses, and scrutiny of the impact of different stimuli to detect potential immune suppression or enhancement from exogenous materials. In the case of curcumin, a pattern of responses indicative of immune suppressive / anti-inflammatory effects was detected. It is an accessible, highly modifiable system that can be used to screen materials and guide further studies, providing a holistic, integrated picture of effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stella Cochrane
- Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre (SEAC), Unilever, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, United Kingdom
| | - Ramya Rajagopal
- Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre (SEAC), Unilever, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, United Kingdom
| | - David Sheffield
- Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre (SEAC), Unilever, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, United Kingdom
| | - Fay Stewart
- Celentyx Ltd., Birmingham Research Park, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Lindsay Hathaway
- Celentyx Ltd., Birmingham Research Park, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas M. Barnes
- Celentyx Ltd., Birmingham Research Park, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Institute for Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Omar Qureshi
- Celentyx Ltd., Birmingham Research Park, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - John Gordon
- Celentyx Ltd., Birmingham Research Park, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pierzchalski A, Zenclussen AC, Herberth G. A comprehensive battery of flow cytometric immunoassays for the in vitro testing of chemical effects in human blood cells. Front Immunol 2024; 14:1327960. [PMID: 38229911 PMCID: PMC10790304 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1327960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background There is a growing need for immunological assays to test toxic and modulatory effects of chemicals. The assays should be easy to use, reproducible and superior to cell line-based assays. We have therefore developed a comprehensive portfolio of assays based on primary human blood cells that are suitable for testing chemical effects. Methods The flow cytometry-based assays were designed to target a wide range of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and whole blood, including T cells, NK cells, B cells, basophils and innate-like T cells such as γδT, MAIT and NKT cells. We have selected a set of activation markers for each immune cell, e.g: CD154 (T cells), CD137, CD107a (NK cells), CD63 (basophils), CD69, CD83 (B cells), CD69, IFN-γ (MAIT cells) and we selected cell specific stimuli: aCD3 antibodies (T cells); E. coli and cytokines IL-12/15/18 (MAIT cells); CpG ODN2006, R848 or aCD40 antibodies (B cells), fMLP or aFcϵR1 (basophils) or K562 cells (NK cells). Results By selecting immune cell-specific markers and cell-specific stimuli, we were able to induce particular immune responses from the targeted immune cells. For example, the response to stimulation with anti-CD3 antibodies was in 36.8% of CD107a+CD8+ cells. Cytokine stimulation induced the production of IFN-γ in 30% of MAIT cells. After stimulation with E. coli, around 50% of MAIT cells produced TNF. About 40% of basophils responded to aFcƐR1 stimulation. Similar activation ranges were achieved in K562-stimulated NK cells. Conclusion Our test portfolio covers the most relevant immune cells present in human blood, providing a solid basis for in vitro toxicity and immunomodulatory testing of chemicals. By using human blood, the natural composition of cells found in the blood can be determined and the effects of chemicals can be detected at the cellular level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arkadiusz Pierzchalski
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Environmental Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ana C. Zenclussen
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Environmental Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
- Perinatal Immunology Research Group, Medical Faculty, Saxonian Incubator for Clinical Translation (SIKT), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Gunda Herberth
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Environmental Immunology, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|