Torque Loss After Miniscrew Placement: An In-Vitro Study Followed by a Clinical Trial

Biomechanics of sacroiliac joint fixation using lag screws: a cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

Iliosacral screw placement is ubiquitous and now part of the surgeon's pelvic trauma armamentarium. More recent evidence supports sacroiliac arthrodesis for treating sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction in select patients. Regardless of the surgical indication, there are currently no studies examining lag screw compression biomechanics across the SIJ. The objective of this biomechanical investigation was to quantify iliosacral implant compressive loads and to examine the insertion torque and compressive load profile over time.

METHODS

Eight human cadaveric pelvic specimens underwent SIJ fixation at S1 and S2 using 11.5 and 10.0 mm iFuse-TORQ Lag implants, respectively, and standard 7.3 mm trauma lag screws. Load decay analysis was performed, and insertion and removal torques were measured.

RESULTS

For both implants at S1 and S2 levels, the load relaxed 50% in approximately 67 min. Compressive load decay was approximately 70% on average occurring approximately 15 h post-insertion. Average insertion torque for the 11.5 mm TORQ implant at S1 was significantly greater than the trauma lag screw. Similarly, at S2, insertion torque of the 10.0 mm TORQ implant was greater than the trauma lag screw. At S1, removal torque for the 11.5 mm TORQ implant was higher than the trauma lag screw; there was no significant difference in the removal torque at S2.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found that a novel posterior pelvic implant with a larger diameter, roughened surface, and dual pitch threads achieved improved insertion and removal torques compared to a standard screw. Load relaxation characteristics were similar between all implants.

Three dimensional movement analysis of maxillary impacted canine using TADs: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare two different anchorage systems efficiency to disinclude impacted maxillary canines using as evaluation tool superimposed Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCTs).

METHODS

The study has been conducted with two parallel groups with an allocation ratio of 1:1. Group test received treatment using as anchorage a miniscrew, control group was treated using an anchorage unit a trans palatal arch (TPA). Both groups received a calibrated traction force of 50 g. CBCT before treatment and 3 months after traction were superimposed and canine tip and root movement were evaluated in mm/month ratio.

RESULTS

No differences were observed between groups for apex displacement, tip displacement and observation timespan. Twenty-two patients (12 female, 10 male, mean age:13.4 years) undergoing orthodontic treatment for impacted maxillary canines were recruited for this study. No differences were observed between groups for apex displacement, tip displacement and observation timespan.

CONCLUSIONS

The present pilot study provided no evidence that indirect anchorage on miniscrews could make canine disimpaction faster than anchorage on a TPA. An apex root movement of 0.4-0.8 mm per month was found, while average canine tip movement ranged between 1.08 mm and 1.96 mm per month. No miniscrews failures were observed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study reports the preliminary results of the randomized clinical trial registered at www.register.clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT01717417 ).

Mechanical Evaluation of the Stability of One or Two Miniscrews under Loading on Synthetic Bone

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the primary stability of a two-miniscrew system inserted into a synthetic bone and to compare the system with the traditional one. Forty-five bi-layered polyurethane blocks were used to simulate maxillary cancellous and cortical bone densities. Samples were randomly assigned to three groups—one-miniscrew system (Group A, N = 23), two-miniscrew system (Group B, N = 22) and archwire-only (Group C, N = 10). A total of 67 new miniscrews were subdivided into Group A (23 singles) and Group B (22 couples). 30 mm of 19″ × 25″ archwires were tied to the miniscrew. The load was applied perpendicularly to the archwire. Maximum Load Value (MLV), Yield Load (YL) and Loosening Load (LL) were recorded for each group. The YL of Group B and C had a mean value respectively of 4.189 ± 0.390 N and 3.652 ± 0.064 N. The MLV of Group A, B and C had a mean value respectively of 1.871 ± 0.318N, of 4.843 ± 0.515 N and 4.150 ± 0.086 N. The LL of Group A and B had a mean value respectively of 1.871 ± 0.318 N and of 2.294 ± 0.333 N. A two- temporary anchorage device (TAD) system is on average stiffer than a one-TAD system under orthodontic loading.

Primary Stability of Orthodontic Titanium Miniscrews due to Cortical Bone Density and Re-Insertion

The increasing demand for orthodontic treatment over recent years has led to a growing need for the retrieval and reuse of titanium-based miniscrews to reduce the cost of treatment, especially in patients with early treatment failure due to insufficient primary stability. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate differences in the primary stability between initially inserted and re-inserted miniscrews within different cortical bone densities. Artificial bone was used to simulate cortical bone of different densities, namely 20, 30, 40, and 50 pound per cubic foot (pcf), where primary stability was evaluated based on maximum insertion torque (MIT), maximum removal torque (MRT), horizontal resistance, and micromotion. Scanning electron microscopy was used to evaluate morphological changes in the retrieved miniscrews. The MIT, MRT, horizontal resistance, and micromotion was better in samples with higher cortical bone density, thereby indicating better primary stability (P < 0.05). Furthermore, a significant reduction of MIT, MRT, and horizontal resistance was observed during re-insertion compared with the initial insertion, especially in the higher density cortical bone groups. However, there was no significant change in micromotion. While higher cortical bone density led to better primary stability, it also caused more abrasion to the miniscrews, thereby decreasing the primary stability during re-insertion.

On the stability efficiency of anchorage self-tapping screws: Ex vivo experiments on miniscrew implants used in orthodontics

BACKGROUND

The clinical success of orthodontic miniscrews is strictly related to primary stability, which depends on bone viscoelastic properties too. In this study, we evaluated the short time mechanical response of native bone to miniscrews, by a laboratory test based on dynamic loading.

METHODS

Thirty-six segments of porcine ribs were first scanned by cone-beam computerized tomography to obtain insertion-site cortical thickness, cortical and marrow bone density. Twelve different types of miniscrews were implanted in the bone samples to evaluate the elastic compliance of the implants in response to a point force applied at the screw head normally to the screw axis. The compliance was measured dynamically in a Dynamic Mechanical Analysis apparatus as the Fourier Response Function between the signals of displacement and force. The measurements were repeated in five days successive to the insertion of the miniscrew.

FINDINGS

The elastic compliance was positively related to observation timepoints, but it was not related neither to the screw type nor to the value of the insertion torque.

INTERPRETATION

Stability behavior is significantly related to the short time response of native bone rather than to the screw design or the insertion torque values.

[Orthodontic correction of malpositioned teeth before restorative treatment: efficiency improvement using Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs)]

INTRODUCTION

Orthodontic treatment is a fundamental tool when approaching in a multidisciplinary manner a prosthetic rehabilitation, thanks to the possibility to place in an ideal position the involved teeth and to improve or even correct any periodontal defects. Several orthodontic tricks and version have been developed to limit as much as possible orthodontic appliances extension and treatment duration. However, it is not always easy to control teeth movements and manage anchorage when only few teeth are involved. Furthermore, treatment duration can increase due to the need to apply light forces and to correct adverse dental movements that eventually could appear.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Different clinical cases are presented.

RESULTS

These exemples illustrate how, with the addition of the TADs in clinical practice, the biomechanics of the multidisciplinary treatment can be simplified, the result becomes highly predictable and the treatment time can often be reduced.