Evaluation of the Effect of Light and Scanning Time Delay on The Image Quality of Intra Oral Photostimulable Phosphor Plates

Can Digital Enhancement Restore the Image Quality of Phosphor Plate-Based Radiographs Partially Damaged by Ambient Light?

To assess the effect of digital enhancement on the image quality of radiographs obtained with photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates partially damaged by ambient light. Radiographs of an aluminum step wedge were obtained using the VistaScan and Express systems. Half of the PSP plates was exposed to ambient light for 0, 10, 30, 60, or 90 s before being scanned. The resulting radiographs were exported with and without digital enhancement. Metrics for brightness, contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were derived, and the ratio of each metric between the exposed-to-light and non-exposed-to-light halves of the radiographs was calculated. The resulting ratios of the radiographs with digital enhancement were subtracted from those without digital enhancement and compared among each other. For the VistaScan system, digital enhancement partially restored brightness, contrast, and CNR. For the Express system, digital enhancement only restored CNR and not the impact of ambient light on brightness and contrast. Specifically, digital enhancement restored 23.48% of brightness for the VistaScan, while percentages below 1% were observed for the Express. Digital enhancement restored 53.25% of image contrast for the VistaScan and 5.79% for the Express; 40.71% of CNR was restored for the VistaScan, and 35% for the Express. Digital enhancement can partially restore the damage caused by ambient light on the brightness and contrast of PSP-based radiographs obtained with the VistaScan, as well as on CNR for the VistaScan and Express systems. The exposure of PSP plates to light can lead to unnecessary retakes and increased patient exposure to X-rays.

Could the radiographic image quality be affected by the excessive use of the photostimulable phosphor plate?

The study aimed to assess the influence of excessive use of a photostimulable phosphor plate (PSP) on the density, image noise, and contrast of radiographs. For that, radiographs of an acrylic block were acquired with a PSP of the Express intraoral system to assess the density and image noise. Initially, five images were obtained and exported (first group). After 400 exposures to X-rays and scannings of PSP, other five images were obtained and exported (second group). The same procedure was done after 800 (third group), 1200 (fourth group), 1600 (fifth group), and 2000 acquisitions (sixth group), resulting in 30 images to be evaluated. The mean and standard deviation of the gray values were calculated for the images using the ImageJ software. For contrast analysis, radiographs of an aluminum step-wedge were acquired with a new PSP following the same acquisition intervals. The percentage of contrast variation was calculated. Another two unused PSP receptors were employed to evaluate the method's reproducibility. The comparison of the results among the acquisition groups was performed with one-way Analysis of Variance (α=0.05). Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) assessed the reproducibility of the receptors. Image noise did not differ among the groups (p>0.05). There was a slight increase in density after 400 acquisitions and a slight difference in contrast for all acquisition groups without a pattern of increase or decrease (p<0.05). ICC showed excellent reliability for the methods. Therefore, excessive PSP use slightly affected the radiograph's density and contrast.

Influence of extensive use of a photostimulable phosphor receptor on the diagnosis of proximal carious lesions: An in vitro study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the extensive use of a photostimulable phosphor (PSP) receptor on the diagnosis of proximal carious lesions.

STUDY DESIGN

Forty posterior teeth were paired and mounted in 20 phantoms. Using a PSP receptor of the Express intraoral system, 1 radiograph of each phantom was acquired, totaling 20 radiographs (group 1). After 400 acquisitions, another radiograph of each phantom was obtained, totaling 20 new radiographs (group 2). This procedure was also done after 800 (group 3), 1,200 (group 4), and 1,600 (group 5) acquisitions, resulting in 100 radiographs. Another 40 radiographs (20 phantoms × 2 groups) were obtained with a second PSP sensor to evaluate the diagnostic replicability of the receptors. All 140 radiographs were assessed independently by 5 examiners for the presence of proximal caries. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated and compared among the groups by analysis of variance. The Student t test evaluated the diagnostic replicability of the receptors. The significance level was set at 5% (P < .05).

RESULTS

The diagnostic outcomes for proximal caries did not differ among the groups (P ≥ .37). The diagnostic values did not differ among the radiographs acquired with the 2 PSP receptors (P ≥ .75).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of proximal carious lesions was not affected by extensive use of the PSP receptor.

How Does Ambient Light Affect the Image Quality of Phosphor Plate Digital Radiography? A Quantitative Analysis Using Contemporary Digital Radiographic Systems

The aim of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the influence of the duration of ambient light exposure on the image quality of digital radiographs obtained with contemporary phosphor plate (PSP)-based systems. Radiographs of an aluminum step-wedge were obtained using VistaScan and Express systems at five X-ray exposure times: 0.10, 0.20, 0.32, 0.40, and 0.50 s; the resulting dose-area products were, respectively, 21.93, 43.87, 70.19, 87.75, and 109.6 mGycm². Before PSP read-out, half of the sensitive surface of the PSP plates was exposed to ambient light for 5, 10, 30, 60, and 90 s. The effect of light exposure on brightness, contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and image saturation was compared using ANOVA with the Tukey test (α = 0.05). Ambient light exposure increased brightness and contrast and reduced CNR and SNR in PSP-based radiographs of contemporary digital systems. At the longest X-ray exposure times, ambient light exposure reduced the dark saturation (mean gray values ≤ 1) observed in Express. In conclusion, the negative effects of ambient light observed on the image quality of PSP-based radiographs are directly proportional to the duration of exposure. Clinicians should be aware of such harmful effects when handling and scanning PSP plates in bright environments.

Evaluation of Two Dental Digital Imaging Systems Based on Quality Scorings, Burn-Out Effects and Cervical Width Determination

Background/Aim: The aim of the present study is to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of two generic image receptors with CMOS and PSP sensors for image quality scoring (IQS), burnout incidences (BI) and cervical widths (CW) with regard to four different exposure times.

Material and Methods: 43 incisor teeth within 15 paraffin block models were exposed at 4 different exposure times both for the CMOS and PSP groups, and a total number of 120 images were obtained. All images were evaluated by 3 dentomaxillofacial radiologists via 3 different criteria; IQS, BI, CW.

Results: Diagnostic quality scorings between groups displayed statistically significant difference for 0,1; 0,125 and 0,16 sec exposure times. PSP group revealed higher IQS. For 0,125 and 0,16 seconds exposure times, PSP group showed higher percentages of BI. Average CW were lower in PSP group. Although no statistically significant difference was found between average CW vs. exposure times in the CMOS group; PSP group revealed significant differences among exposure times. We can state that, the PSP system displayed higher image quality so exposure times can be reduced, alas, the same conclusion is not possible with CMOS system used.

Conclusions: Image quality perception is higher in PSP system we used, compared with CMOS system. PSP system display more burnout effects with increasing exposure times, while CMOS system is constant.