Initial Results of an Acetabular Center Axis Registration Technique in Navigated Hip Arthroplasty with Deformed Acetabular Rims

Acetabular cup positioning in primary routine total hip arthroplasty-a review of current concepts and technologies

INTRODUCTION

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has revolutionized the treatment of hip joint arthritis. With the increased popularity and success of the procedure, research has focused on improving implant survival and reducing surgical complications. Optimal component orientation has been a constant focus with various philosophies proposed. Regardless of the philosophy, achieving an accurate acetabular position for each clinical scenario is crucial. In this paper, we review the recent developments in improving the accuracy and ideal positioning of the acetabular cup in routine primary THA.

METHODOLOGY

A review of the recent scientific literature for acetabular cup placement in primary THA was performed, with available evidence for safe zones, spinopelvic relationship, preoperative planning, patient-specific instrumentation, navigation THA and robotic THA.

CONCLUSION

Though the applicability of Lewinnek safe zones has been questioned with an improved understanding of spinopelvic relationships, its role remains in positioning the acetabular cup in a patient with normal spinopelvic alignment and mobility. Evaluation of spinopelvic relationships and accordingly adjusting acetabular anteversion and inclination can significantly reduce the incidence of dislocation in patients with a rigid spine. In using preoperative radiography, the acetabular inclination, anteversion and intraoperative pelvic position should be evaluated. With improving technology and the advent of artificial intelligence, superior and more accurate preoperative planning is possible. Patient-specific instrumentation, navigated and robotic THA have been reported to improve accuracy in acetabular cup positioning as decided preoperatively but any significant clinical advantage over conventional THA is yet to be elucidated.

Direct Anatomic Registration in Computer-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty Improves Accuracy of Acetabular Cup Alignment

Background

Computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty using direct anatomic registration (DAR) with acetabular center axis software is an alternative method to the indirect anterior pelvic plane method. The software maps the center of hip rotation and orientation of the native acetabulum in 3 dimensions. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of acetabular cup alignment using DAR navigation combined with a mechanical guide device (MGD).

Methods

This prospective nonrandomized controlled study included 106 patients who underwent primary cementless total hip arthroplasty through the posterolateral approach. Fifty-four patients in the study group underwent DAR combined with MGD, whereas 52 patients underwent MGD only for acetabular cup positioning. Plain radiographs of both hips and computerized tomographic scans were obtained 2 months postoperatively for the evaluation of acetabular cup inclination and anteversion, respectively.

Results

The acetabular cup alignment in the study group was within the Lewinnek safe zone more than that in the control group (81.5% vs 59.6%, P < .05). The study group had a mean inclination angle of 43.88°° (standard deviation [SD] 5.38) and anteversion angle of 12.82° (SD 5.99), whereas the control group had 41.10° (SD 6.79) and 12.82° (SD 9.53), respectively. There were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, length of stay, and Harris hip scores at preoperative and 3 and 6 months postoperatively, except for the operative time, which was longer in the study group (P < .01). There was 1 posterior hip dislocation in each group.

Conclusions

DAR navigation combined with MGD provides better accuracy for acetabular cup positioning within the Lewinnek safe zone compared with the conventional technique.

Clinical efficacy of OrthoPilot navigation system versus conventional manual total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

This study was performed to compare the clinical efficacy between the OrthoPilot navigation system and conventional manual surgery in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

Methods

The Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched for clinical trials. The outcome measurements were the anteversion angle, inclination angle, and complications. Review Manager 5.3 statistical software was used for the data analysis.

Results

Significant differences were found in the femoral offset and overall complication rate between the conventional and navigation groups. Additionally, the conventional group had significantly less anteversion than the navigation group. However, the navigation group had significantly better inclination. The operation time was significantly shorter in the conventional than navigation group.

Conclusion

Both the OrthoPilot navigation system and conventional total hip arthroplasty result in significant improvements in patient function with similar overall complication rates and have their own advantages in achieving good cup position. The conventional procedure has a shorter operation time than does use of a navigation system.

Standardization of hemipelvis alignment for in vitro biomechanical testing

Although in vitro biomechanical tests are regularly performed, the definition of a suitable reference frame for hemipelvic specimens is still a challenge. The aims of the present study were to: (i) define a reference frame for the human hemipelvis suitable for in vitro applications, based on robust anatomical landmarks; (ii) identify the alignment of a hemipelvis based on the alignment of a whole pelvis (including right/left and male/female differences); (iii) identify the relative alignment of the proposed in vitro reference frame with respect to a reference frame commonly used in gait analysis; (iv) create an in vitro alignment procedure easy, robust and inexpensive; (v) quantify the intra-operator repeatability and inter-operator reproducibility of the procedure. A procedure to univocally identify the anatomical landmarks was created, exploiting the in vitro accessibility of the specimen's surface. Through the analysis on 53 CT scans (106 hemipelvises), the alignment of the hemipelvis based on the alignment of a whole pelvis was analyzed: differences between male/female and right/left hemipelvises were not statistically significant To overcome the uncertainty in the identification of the acetabular rim, a standard acetabular plane was defined. An alignment procedure was developed to implement such anatomical reference frame. The intra-operator repeatability and the inter-operator reproducibility were quantified with four operators, on male and female hemipelvises. The intra-operator repeatability was better than 1.5°. The inter-operator reproducibility was better than 2.0°. Alignment in the transverse plane was the most repeatable. The presented procedure to align hemipelvic specimens is sufficiently robust, standardized, and accessible. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:1645-1652, 2018.