Treatment of The Posterior Unstable Shoulder

Arthroscopic Posterior Bankart Repair Using the Wilmington Portal to Facilitate Suture Anchor Implantation

Posterior shoulder instability (PSI) accounts for 2% to 10% of all shoulder instability, with recurrent posterior subluxation being the most common type. One of the most important risk factors is the presence of an anterior humeral notch (so-called reverse Hill-Sachs lesion), and the most common lesion in PSI is a posterior labral lesion. When conservative treatment fails, surgery is recommended to provide long-term stability, manage pain, and enable a return to previous activity levels. Most posterior labral tears are treated by an arthroscopic posterior Bankart procedure. Visualization of the posterior aspect of the glenohumeral joint is technically challenging in this procedure. The instrumental portal is also a matter of concern because there is no rotator interval posteriorly for cannula placement. The purpose of this article is to propose a technique using a secondary posterolateral Wilmington instrumental portal to perform easy and reproducible placement of the posterior suture anchor at a 45° angle to the glenoid rim. We recommend implementing this technique in patients with painful PSI or with a type B2 lesion according to the Moroder classification.

Arthroscopic Coracoid Bone Block for Posterior Glenohumeral Instability: Description of Surgical Technique and a Case Report

This case report describes the surgical technique of posterior arthroscopic bone block using the coracoid graft to treat recurrent posterior dislocations and describes preliminary results. Performance of coracoid transfer as a graft for posterior arthroscopic bone block in one patient (two shoulders) with recurrent posterior glenohumeral instability refractory to clinical treatment for six months, excluding volition dislocation. The patient was followed up weekly for the first three weeks when the stitches were removed. Postoperative computed tomography was performed before the patient was authorized to practice contact and aquatic sports (3-4 months after surgery). Patient returned to previous activities without complaints or limitations. There were no neurovascular complications. The initial results using coracoid as a bone graft for posterior instability were positive, and the technique requires reproduction to investigate possible complications. To date, no study has been found in the literature that reports an open or arthroscopic coracoid bone block technique.

Open and arthroscopic posterior bone block with iliac crest autograft for posterior shoulder instability - systematic review of clinical and radiological outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Posterior shoulder instability (PSI) is a rare and challenging pathology to manage. The aim of this review was to assess and compare whether open and arthroscopic iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) bone block procedures succeeded in improving functional and clinical outcomes as well as radiological outcomes of union and graft resorption.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesised that there will be no difference in recurrence rate and functional outcome between open and arthroscopic procedures but there will be a higher complication rate with open bone block procedures.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using the online databases MEDLINE and Embase. The review was registered on the PROSPERO database. Studies of open or arthroscopic ICBG bone block procedures reporting patient reported outcome measures, recurrence, complications and progression to osteoarthritis and radiological outcomes of graft union and resorption were selected. Studies were appraised using the Methodical index for non-randomised studies (MINORS) tool.

RESULTS

14 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria; five studies were arthroscopic and nine used open techniques. A total of 183 patients and 201 shoulders were included, mean age was 25 years range (14-75 years). Recurrent instability ranged from 0% to 12.5% for arthroscopic and 0% to 36.4% for open studies. Arthroscopic studies had statistically significant increases in numerous functional outcome scores but there was no evidence for similar improvements in open studies. Osteoarthritis at follow-up ranged from 12.5% to 47% in arthroscopic and 0% to 81.8% for open studies. Arthroscopic complication rate ranged from 6.7% to 75% compared to 0% to 80% for open studies. Majority of complications were metalware related requiring surgical intervention. Partial graft resorption ranged from 7.7-100% after arthroscopic and 4.8-100% after open procedures. High union rates were seen with both open and arthroscopic techniques.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights a lack of high-level evidence for arthroscopic and open posterior bone block procedures using ICBG to manage PSI. Functional and instability outcome scores showed significant improvement with arthroscopic ICBG bone block procedures however limited evidence was available for open studies. Metalwork related complications requiring revision and radiographic progression to osteoarthritis was high in both arthroscopic and open studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review.

Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair and Capsular Closure via Single Working Portal for Posterior Shoulder Instability

Posterior shoulder instability (PSI) is a relatively less common form of instability that frequently affects young overhead or contact athletes. The etiology of PSI may be traumatic or atraumatic, with establishment of the diagnosis being more difficult in cases of atraumatic instability. Surgical management of PSI has evolved from open techniques to arthroscopic techniques. Posterior stabilization has commonly been performed with 2 posterior working portals with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. The objective of this Technical Note is to describe a technique for posterior labral repair using all-suture anchors with the patient in the beach-chair position via 1 working portal with capsular closure.

Comprehensive management of posterior shoulder instability: diagnosis, indications, and technique for arthroscopic bone block augmentation

Recurrent posterior glenohumeral instability is an entity that demands a high clinical suspicion and a detailed study for a correct approach and treatment. Its classification must consider its biomechanics, whether it is due to functional muscular imbalance or to structural changes, volition, and intentionality.

Due to its varied clinical presentations and different structural alterations, ranging from capsule-labral lesions and bone defects to glenoid dysplasia and retroversion, the different treatment alternatives available have historically had a high incidence of failure.

A detailed radiographic assessment, with both CT and MRI, with a precise assessment of glenoid and humeral bone defects and of glenoid morphology, is mandatory.

Physiotherapy focused on periscapular muscle reeducation and external rotator strengthening is always the first line of treatment. When conservative treatment fails, surgical treatment must be guided by the structural lesions present, ranging from soft tissue repair to posterior bone block techniques to restore or increase the articular surface.

Bone block procedures are indicated in cases of recurrent posterior instability after the failure of conservative treatment or soft tissue techniques, as well as symptomatic demonstrable nonintentional instability, presence of a posterior glenoid defect >10%, increased glenoid retroversion between 10 and 25°, and posterior rim dysplasia. Bone block fixation techniques that avoid screws and metal allow for satisfactory initial clinical results in a safe and reproducible way.

An algorithm for the approach and treatment of recurrent posterior glenohumeral instability is presented, as well as the author’s preferred surgical technique for arthroscopic posterior bone block.

Complex Posterior Glenohumeral Instability Case Management

A 21-year-old male patient suffering from insidious shoulder instability from neurogenic and structural attenuation of shoulder stabilizer, due to old minor cerebrovascular accident, presented with a two-year history of repetitive shoulder dislocation, operated by fixing the biceps tendon to its insertion on the superior labrum, correction of the glenoid version and reattaching the subscapular tendon along with a new technique for stabilization of the shoulder replicating the coracohumeral ligament with a ligament advanced reinforcement system (LARS) transplant. Following structured physical therapy, our patient returned to normal daily activities at 15 months.

Indications and outcomes of glenoid osteotomy for posterior shoulder instability: a systematic review

Background

There is limited evidence examining glenoid osteotomy as a treatment for posterior shoulder instability.

Methods

A search of Medline, Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted from the date of origin to 28th November 2019. Nine out of 3,408 retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria and quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies tool.

Results

In 356 shoulders, the main indication for osteotomy was excessive glenoid retroversion (greater than or equal to approximately −10°). The mean preoperative glenoid version was −15° (range, −35° to −5°). Post-operatively, the mean glenoid version was −6° (range, −28° to 13°) and an average correction of 10° (range, −1° to 30°) was observed. Range of motion increased significantly in most studies and all standardized outcome scores (Rowe, Constant–Murley, Oxford instability, Japan Shoulder Society Shoulder Instability Scoring and mean shoulder value) improved significantly with high rates of patient satisfaction (85%). A high complication rate (34%, n = 120) was reported post-surgery, with frequent cases of persistent instability (20%, n = 68) and fractures (e.g., glenoid neck and acromion) (4%, n = 12). However, the revision rate was low (0.6%, n = 2).

Conclusion

Glenoid osteotomy is an appropriate treatment for posterior shoulder instability secondary to excessive glenoid retroversion. However, the high rate of persistent instability should be considered when making treatment decisions. Level of Evidence: Systematic review; Level 4

Single-Portal Arthroscopic Posterior Shoulder Stabilization

Posterior shoulder instability occurs when the labrum detaches posteriorly from the glenoid owing to significant trauma and is a relatively uncommon type of shoulder dislocation. Although posterior instability has often been treated with open shoulder stabilization, modern arthroscopic procedures are being rapidly pursued by surgeons as an improved option because of decreased invasiveness and reduced operative times. Arthroscopic stabilization of the posterior glenoid labrum typically involves 2 working portals, but the procedure still yields successful results when performed with a single posterior portal and a suture passer. Our technique involves 1 less portal to reduce invasiveness, lower the risk of nerve damage, and decrease the operative time and postoperative pain. The purpose of this article is to describe an arthroscopic posterior stabilization technique with a single working portal.

Arthroscopic Knotless Subscapularis Bridge Technique for Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesion With Posterior Shoulder Instability

Posterior shoulder dislocations are an uncommon cause of glenohumeral instability; they are frequently missed and are associated with humeral head defects and capsulolabral lesions. Despite surgical treatment often being mandatory, there is still no standardized treatment for anterior impaction fractures of the humeral head (reverse Hill-Sachs lesions). Arthroscopic surgery is typically indicated, with a tendency toward resorting to knotless techniques in recent years. We present a method for the treatment of posterior shoulder dislocations with engaging reverse Hill-Sachs lesions that achieves full defect coverage using an arthroscopic all-in-the-box knotless subscapularis bridge technique with 2 anchors-with one crossing the subscapularis tendon and the other embracing it-along with posterior capsulolabral complex restoration. This promising technique is a potentially superior alternative for the treatment of these lesions that can also be used in the presence of concomitant partial subscapularis tears.

Arthroscopic "Bone Block Cerclage" Technique for Posterior Shoulder Instability

Many open and arthroscopic techniques have been described to treat posterior glenohumeral instability. Multifactorial features of posterior shoulder instability pathoanatomy and varied patient characteristics have challenged the understanding of this condition and have led to dissimilar results, without a strong consensus for the most adequate technique to treat it. We describe an arthroscopic anatomical metal-free posterior glenoid reconstruction technique, using a tricortical iliac crest allograft with 2 ultra-high strength sutures (FiberTape Cerclage System; Arthrex, Naples, FL) with concomitant posterior capsulolabral complex reconstruction procedure.

All-Arthroscopic McLaughlin's Procedure in Patients with Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesion Caused by Locked Posterior Shoulder Dislocation

Purpose  This study aims to investigate the clinical and functional outcomes of the all-arthroscopic McLaughlin procedure in a clinical series of patients suffering by neglected locked posterior shoulder dislocation. Methods  A retrospective clinical study based on prospectively collected data was conducted in a single center regarding 10 patients with neglected locked posterior shoulder dislocation and concomitant reverse Hill-Sachs lesion, who were treated with the all-arthroscopic Mclaughlin procedure. The average humeral bone defect was 39 ± 7% according to the preoperative computed tomography evaluation. The mean time of follow-up was 77 ± 16 months (range, 63-104 months). Results  No patient had suffered a new dislocation, whereas all of them were satisfied with the surgical outcome and returned to their previous activities of daily living. External rotation was restored to every patient studied from 0 degrees at the baseline. At the last follow-up, the median external rotation beside the body was 90 degrees (range, 50-90 degrees; p  < 0.01) and the respective measurement at 90 degrees of abduction was 90 degrees (range, 80-90 degrees; p  < 0.01). The active forward flexion was increased ( p  < 0.01), from 60 degrees (range, 30-180 degrees) at the baseline to 180 degrees (range, 160-180 degrees) at the last follow-up and the internal rotation was gained ( p  < 0.01) from the level of buttock (range, lateral thigh-T12) at the baseline to the T11 level (range, T7-L3) at the last follow-up. The median UCLA score was increased from 8 (range, 4-22) to 35 (range, 33-35; p  < 0.01) and the Oxford instability score from 5 (range, 3-16) to 46 (range, 43-48; p  < 0.01), respectively. Conclusion  The arthroscopic McLaughlin procedure in substantial reverse Hills-Sachs lesion caused by locked posterior dislocation leads to excellent clinical and functional results in the long-term follow-up. Level of Evidence  This is a therapeutic study, case series with no comparison group, Level IV.

Arthroscopic treatment of posterior instability of the shoulder with an associated reverse Hill-Sachs lesion using an iliac bone-block autograft

Posterior dislocation of the shoulder is often accompanied by an impression fracture in the anterior surface of the humeral head, called a reverse Hill-Sachs injury. This bone defect can engage on the posterior glenoid rim, which can lead to recurrent instability and progressive joint destruction. We describe a new arthroscopic procedure that fills the reverse Hill-Sachs lesion with an iliac bone-block autograft and repairs the posterior articular capsule arthroscopically, which can stabilize the posterior shoulder. It avoids the need to detach the subscapularis tendon and can reduce the risks associated with open procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, technical note.