3D-Printed Patient-Specific ACL Femoral Tunnel Guide from MRI

Augmented reality guidance improves accuracy of orthopedic drilling procedures

In several orthopedic procedures, the accurate use of surgical power tools is critical to avoid damage to surrounding tissues. As such, various guidance techniques and safety measures were developed. Augmented reality (AR) guidance shows promise but requires validation. We evaluated a new approach using an inside-out infrared tracking solution for the HoloLens to compensate for its limited tracking performance. Eighteen participants with varying levels of experience (student, trainee, expert) each drilled twelve trajectories (six perpendicular, six oblique) in equidimensional wooden logs. Three different techniques were evaluated: freehand drilling; proprioception-guided drilling towards the contralateral index finger; and AR-guided drilling using a tracked drill and a virtual overlay of the log with predefined guidance vectors. The angular errors between planned and performed trajectories were compared using a mixed-design ANOVA. The results demonstrated that guidance technique (p < 0.001) and drilling direction (p < 0.001) significantly affected drilling accuracy, while experience (p = 0.75) did not. AR outperformed both other techniques, particularly for oblique trajectories (p < 0.001). For perpendicular trajectories, it only outperformed proprioception guidance (p = 0.04). Target plots revealed an important scatter perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the log during freehand and proprioception-guided drilling, especially for oblique trajectories. This inaccuracy disappeared during AR-guided drilling. As such, we were able to conclude that AR guidance using inside-out infrared tracking reduced angular uncertainty during directional drilling, resulting in improved drilling accuracy. This improvement was particularly noticeable for complex trajectories and angles. The benefits of AR guidance were observed across all experience levels, highlighting its potential for orthopedic applications. We believe this study opens the way for the methodical evaluation of AR guidance in specific orthopedic use cases.

A comparative study on 3D printing-assisted arthroscopic IDEAL point femoral tunnel positioning for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus conventional arthroscopic positioning

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and precision of using a 3D-printed template for femoral tunnel placement in guiding the optimal positioning of the Internal anatomical stop and Low tension maintenance (IDEAL) bone tunnel during single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 patients who underwent arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction at our hospital between April 2021 and November 2021. In the direct vision group, the IDEAL bone tunnel was positioned using radiofrequency localization directly visualized at the stump. In the 3D-printed positioning group, preoperative CT scans and Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data were employed. Following the Quadrant method by Bernard, the femoral tunnel's depth was set at 25% and its height at 29%. Postoperative plain CT scans enabled the reconstruction of 3D models for both groups. The accuracy of femoral tunnel placement was then compared.

RESULTS

The central locations of the bone tunnels in the direct vision group were at a mean depth of 25.74 ± 1.84% and a height of 29.22 ± 2.97%. In the 3D printing localization group, these values were 25.39 ± 2.98% for depth and 28.89 ± 2.50% for height, respectively. No significant differences were found in tunnel positioning between the groups. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) and Lysholm scores postoperatively, with no significant differences observed 12 months post-surgery.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that 3D printing-assisted arthroscopic IDEAL point femoral tunnel positioning and conventional arthroscopic positioning are feasible and effective for ACL reconstruction. Using 3D printing technology to design femoral anchor points in ACL reconstruction allows for the customization of anterior fork reconstruction and precise bone tunnel positioning, supporting the goal of individualized and accurate reconstruction.

[Research progress of femoral bone tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction]

Objective

To review the concept and methods of femoral bone tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, in order to provide a reference for clinical treatment.

Methods

The relevant literature on the concept and methods of femoral bone tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction in domestic and international research was extensively reviewed.

Results

The position of the femoral bone tunnel is a key factor in determining the prognosis of ACL reconstruction. The concept of femoral bone tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction has experienced isometric reconstruction, anatomical reconstruction, Ribbon-like theory, I.D.E.A.L. theory, and nearly isometric reconstruction theory. The femoral bone tunnel positioning technique is also changing with the in-depth study of the anatomy and biomechanics of the ACL, and each bone tunnel positioning technique has its own advantages and disadvantages. Over-The-Top technique is now mainly used for ACL revision; the clock-face positioning method is basically no longer applicable due to the large error, poor stability, and low retrievability; the bone landmarks positioning method (the lateral condyle of the femur's Resident's ridge and bifurcation ridge, and the the apex of the deep cartilage), which is now mostly used clinically due to the more constant anatomical landmarks. The quadrant method under X-ray fluoroscopy is more cumbersome to implement intraoperatively, so it is mainly used for academic research; computer navigation-assisted positioning has gradually become popular in recent years, which is highly accurate, avoids the influence of human factors on the positioning of the bone tunnel, and has a very good prospect of application; three-dimensional printing-assisted positioning technology, which is accurate in positioning, with a high degree of reproducibility and a short learning curve.

Conclusion

The concept of femoral bone tunnel positioning for ACL reconstruction has undergone several evolutions, reflecting the deepening of the understanding of ACL and the improvement of the clinical results of reconstruction. The precision, personalization, and intelligence of positioning techniques are the focus of current and future development.

Patient specific instrumentation in ACL reconstruction: a proof-of-concept cadaver experiment assessing drilling accuracy when using 3D printed guides

INTRODUCTION

Accurate positioning of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction is of the utmost importance to reduce the risk of graft failure. Limited visibility during arthroscopy and a wide anatomical variance attribute to femoral tunnel malposition using conventional surgical techniques. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a patient specific 3D printed surgical guide allows for in vitro femoral tunnel positioning within 2 mm of the planned tunnel position.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A patient specific guide for femoral tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction was created for four human cadaveric knee specimens based on routine clinical MRI data. Fitting properties were judged by two orthopedic surgeons. MRI scanning was performed both pre- and post-procedure. The planned tunnel endpoint was compared to the actual drilled femoral tunnel.

RESULTS

This patient specific 3D printed guide showed a mean deviation of 5.0 mm from the center of the planned femoral ACL origin.

CONCLUSION

In search to improve accuracy and consistency of femoral tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction, the use of a patient specific 3D printed surgical guide is a viable option to explore further. The results are comparable to those of conventional techniques; however, further design improvements are necessary to improve accuracy and enhance reproducibility.

Multi-color and Multi-Material 3D Printing of Knee Joint models

Objective

This study reports on a new method for the development of multi-color and multi-material realistic Knee Joint anatomical models with unique features. In particular, the design of a fibers matrix structure that mimics the soft tissue anatomy.

Methods

Various Computer-Aided Design (CAD) systems and the PolyJet 3D printing were used in the fabrication of three anatomical models wherein fibers matrix structure is mimicked: (i) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) model used in the previous study. (ii) ACL-R model, incorporating orientations, directions, locations, and dimensions of the tunnels, as well as a custom-made surgical guide (SG) for avoiding graft tunnel length mismatch. (iii) Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) model, including custom-made implants. Before models 3D printing, uni-axial tensile tests were conducted to obtain the mechanical behaviors for individual No. 1 (A60-A50), No. 2 (A50-A50), No. 3 (A50-A40), and No. 4 (A70-A60) soft tissue-mimicking polymers. Each material combination represents different shore-hardness values between fiber and matrix respectively.

Results

We correlated the pattern of stress-strain curves in the elastic region, stiffness, and elastic modulus of proposed combinations with published literature. Accordingly, material combinations No. 1 and No. 4 with elastic modules of 0.76-1.82 MPa were chosen for the soft tissues 3D printing. Finally, 3D printing Knee Joint models were tested manually simulating 50 flexo-extension cycles without presenting ruptures.

Conclusion

The proposed anatomical models offer a diverse range of applications. These may be considered as an alternative to replacing cadaver specimens for medical training, pre-operative planning, research and education purposes, and predictive models validation. The soft tissue anatomy-mimicking materials are strong enough to withstand the stretching during the flexo-extension. The methodology reported for the design of the fiber-matrix structure might be considered as a start to develop new patterns and typologies that may mimic soft tissues.

[Current concepts and new developments of 3D printing in trauma surgery]

The use of 3D printing (synonyms "rapid prototyping" and "additive manufacturing") has played an increasing role in the industry for many years and finds more and more interest and application in musculoskeletal surgery, especially orthopedic trauma surgery.In this article the current literature is systematically reviewed, presented and evaluated in a condensed and comprehensive way according to anatomical (upper and lower extremities) and functional aspects. As many of the publications analyzed were feasibility studies, the degree of evidence is low and methodological weaknesses are obvious and numerous; however, this pioneering work is extremely stimulating and important for further development because the technical, medical and economic potential of this technology is huge and interesting for all those involved in the treatment of musculoskeletal problems.

3D printing and its applications in orthopaedic trauma: A technological marvel

BACKGROUND

With rapid emergence of 3D printing technology, surgeons have recently started to apply this for nearly all areas of orthopaedic trauma surgery. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance images of trauma patients can be utilized for making graspable objects from 3D reconstructed images. Patient specific anatomical models can thereby be created. They enhance surgeon's knowledge of their patients' precise patho-anatomy, regarding both traumatized bones and soft tissue as well as normal areas, and therefore help in accurate preoperative planning. 3D printed patient specific instrumentation can help to achieve precise implant placement, and better surgical results. Most importantly, customized implants, casts, orthoses and prosthetics can be manufactured to match an individual's anatomy. Three dimensional (3D) printing, also called as 'additive manufacturing' and 'rapid prototyping' is considered as the "second industrial revolution", and this appears to be especially true for orthopaedic trauma surgery.

METHODS

A literature search was performed for extracting all papers related to 3D Printing applications in orthopaedics and allied sciences on the Pubmed, and SCOPUS; using suitable key terms and Boolean operators ("3D Printing" OR "3 dimensional printing" OR "3D printed" OR "additive manufacturing" OR "rapid prototyping") AND (''Orthopaedics" OR "Orthopaedics'') AND ("Trauma" OR "Injury")in June 2018. Search was also performed in Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. No limits were set on the time period or evidence level, as 3D printing in orthopaedics is relatively recent and mainly low level evidence is available. Titles and abstracts were screened and all duplicate and unrelated papers were excluded. Papers related to orthopaedic trauma were manually selected for this review.

RESULTS

The search on Pubmed retrieved 144 Papers and similar search on SCOPUS retrieved 94 papers. Additional searches did not reveal more relevant papers. After excluding duplicates and unrelated papers, and on screening of titles and abstracts, 59 papers were considered for review. Papers related to spine fractures only were not included, as they have been covered in another paper in this journal issue.

CONCLUSION

All over the world, orthopaedic Surgeon's and allied professionals and scientists are enthusiastically using 3D printing technology for designing patient specific models, instrumentation, implants, orthosis and prosthesis, besides 3D bioprinting of bone and cartilage scaffolding, and the same has been applied for nearly all areas of orthopaedic trauma surgery, from head to foot.