Meaningful Text: Total Hip Replacement Patients’ Lived Experience of a Nursing Care Plan Written in Lay Language

Clinical Significance of Protective Motivation Intervention Nursing on Functional Recovery of Patients after Hip Arthroplasty

Objective

To explore the clinical significance of protective motivation intervention nursing on functional recovery of patients after hip arthroplasty.

Methods

Sixty patients after hip arthroplasty treated in our hospital from February 2019 to April 2021 were selected. The patients were randomly divided into the control group and the research group. The routine nursing mode was adopted in the control group, and the protective motivation intervention nursing mode was adopted in the research group. Nursing satisfaction, FIM score, Harris hip function score, WOMAC score, Barthel index score, and quality of life score were compared between the two groups.

Results

The nursing satisfaction of the research group was higher than that of the control group, and there are statistically significant differences between the groups (P < 0.05). The FIM scores of the research group at discharge and 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after discharge were significantly higher than those in the control group. The Harris hip function score of the research group was significantly higher than that of the control group at discharge and 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after discharge. The WOMAC scores of the research group at discharge and 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after discharge were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The scores of the Barthel index at discharge and 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after discharge in the research group were significantly higher than those in the control group. The scores of physiological function, psychological function, social function, and health self-cognition in the research group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The nursing model of protective motivation intervention for patients after hip arthroplasty can effectively improve the function of hip joint, improve the quality of life, promote the establishment of harmonious nurse-patient relationship, and play a positive role in improving the prognosis of patients.

Perioperative Nursing of Vitrectomy for Ocular Trauma under the Guidance of Ophthalmoscope

To explore the perioperative nursing methods and clinical effects of vitrectomy under ophthalmoscope in the treatment of severe ocular rupture, this study reviews the clinical effects of vitrectomy in the treatment of severe ocular trauma in China, analyzes the perioperative nursing of vitrectomy for ocular trauma under the guidance of an ophthalmoscope, and analyzes the importance of stage I debridement and suture, the choice of operation time, and the advantages of vitrectomy and perioperative nursing care. The retrospective analysis of these data shows that the clinical effect of peri-vitrectomy for ocular trauma under the guidance of an ophthalmoscope is accurate, and surgical treatment should be carried out as soon as possible according to the patient's condition, which can reduce the complications of suppurative ophthalmitis, eyeball atrophy, and vitreous rebleeding. Perioperative nursing intervention is beneficial to the recovery of visual acuity in patients with severe ocular rupture treated by vitrectomy under the ophthalmoscope, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Nursing Methods and Experience of Local Anesthesia Patients under Arthroscope

In order to solve the nursing problems of local anesthesia patients under arthroscopy, a nursing method and experience based on local anesthesia patients under arthroscopy was proposed. From June 2019 to May 2021, 478 patients who underwent knee arthroscopy under spinal anesthesia or local anesthesia were retrospectively investigated, including 186 cases (38.9%) under local anesthesia and 292 cases (61.1%) under spinal anesthesia. 2% lidocaine plus epinephrine was injected locally and intra-articular in patients with local anesthesia, and 0.75% bupivacaine in patients with spinal anesthesia. It was found that in the local anesthesia group and spinal anesthesia group, 94.1% (175/186) and 98.3% (287/292) patients did not feel pain during operation. 93.0% (173/186 cases) and 96.2% (281/292 cases) of patients in the two groups were satisfied or very satisfied with the effect of anesthesia, respectively. The experimental results showed that local anesthesia was a simple and effective anesthesia method for knee arthroscopy, which was more reliable and safer than spinal anesthesia. Local anesthesia could be used for knee arthroscopy or cleaning and rinsing, free body removal, or even common meniscinoplasty.