1
|
Alongi P, Laudicella R, Lanzafame H, Farolfi A, Mapelli P, Picchio M, Burger IA, Iagaru A, Minutoli F, Evangelista L. PSMA and Choline PET for the Assessment of Response to Therapy and Survival Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review from the Literature. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071770. [PMID: 35406542 PMCID: PMC8997431 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiolabeled choline and PSMA PET have been largely tested in the initial staging of prostate cancer and for biochemical recurrence. Moreover, diverse data are now available about their role in the evaluation of response to local and systematic therapies, and their predictive impact on the prognosis, before and after therapy. Therefore, in the present systematic review, we aimed to describe the available data, to summarize the current evidence in these settings of disease. Abstract The aims of this systematic review were to (1) assess the utility of PSMA-PET and choline-PET in the assessment of response to systemic and local therapy, and to (2) determine the value of both tracers for the prediction of response to therapy and survival outcomes in prostate cancer. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed/Scopus/Google Scholar/Cochrane/EMBASE databases (between January 2010 and October 2021) accordingly. The quality of the included studies was evaluated following the “Quality Assessment of Prognostic Accuracy Studies” tool (QUAPAS-2). We selected 40 articles: 23 articles discussed the use of PET imaging with [68Ga]PSMA-11 (16 articles/1123 patients) or [11C]/[18F]Choline (7 articles/356 patients) for the prediction of response to radiotherapy (RT) and survival outcomes. Seven articles (three with [68Ga]PSMA-11, three with [11C]Choline, one with [18F]Choline) assessed the role of PET imaging in the evaluation of response to docetaxel (as neoadjuvant therapy in one study, as first-line therapy in five studies, and as a palliative regimen in one study). Seven papers with radiolabeled [18F]Choline PET/CT (n = 121 patients) and three with [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET (n = 87 patients) were selected before and after enzalutamide/abiraterone acetate. Finally, [18F]Choline and [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT as gatekeepers for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with Radium-223 were assessed in three papers. In conclusion, in patients undergoing RT, radiolabeled choline and [68Ga]PSMA-11 have an important prognostic role. In the case of systemic therapies, the role of such new-generation imaging techniques is still controversial without sufficient data, thus requiring additional in this scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierpaolo Alongi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, A.R.N.A.S. Ospedale Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, 90127 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Riccardo Laudicella
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione Istituto G.Giglio, 90015 Cefalù, Italy;
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
| | - Helena Lanzafame
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Paola Mapelli
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (M.P.)
| | - Maria Picchio
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (M.P.)
| | - Irene A. Burger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kantonsspital Baden, 5404 Baden, Switzerland
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94035, USA;
| | - Fabio Minutoli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy;
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0498211310
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kaushik D, Jangra P, Verma R, Purohit D, Pandey P, Sharma S, Sharma RK. Radiopharmaceuticals: An insight into the latest advances in medical uses and regulatory perspectives. J Biosci 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12038-021-00147-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
3
|
Marzec J, Becker J, Paulsen F, Wegener D, Olthof SC, Pfannenberg C, Schwenck J, Bedke J, Stenzl A, Nikolaou K, la Fougère C, Zips D, Müller AC. 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT-directed IGRT/SBRT for oligometastases of recurrent prostate cancer after initial surgery. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:149-156. [PMID: 31559880 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1669816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Background: We evaluated efficacy and toxicity of 68Ga-PSMA-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT)-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy (SBRT/IGRT) for oligometastases of prostate cancer recurrences after previous surgery.Methods: Nineteen patients were analyzed within a prospective PET-registry study (064/2013BO1) and retrospectively analyzed (807/2017BO2) fulfilling the following inclusion criteria: biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy, ≤five 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT positive lesions. Biochemical control was evaluated with EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer)- and Phenix-definitions. Toxicity was scored according to CTCAE-criteria v. 4.03.Results: A total of 38 oligometastases (19 patients, 2 with re-treatment) were treated with SBRT/IGRT from October 2014 to July 2017. 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT-positive lesions were detected on average 39 months (5-139) after prostatectomy (pT2b-3b pN0-1 cM0). Mean PSA (Prostate-specific antigen)-level at time of imaging reached 2.2 ng/mL (range 0.2-10.1). PET/CT-positive lesions were treated with different fractionation schedules reaching biological equivalent doses (BED) of 116.7-230.0 Gy. Concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was given in seven patients. After a median follow-up of 17 months (4-42) all patients were alive. Estimated 1-year PSA- control (n = 19) reached 80.8% (Phenix) and 67.5% (EORTC). A PSA-decline (≥50%) was detected in 16/19 patients after radiotherapy. Higher graded G3+-acute toxicity did not occur. Temporary late G3-proctitis was detected in one patient.Conclusions: Reaching of nadir ≤0.1 or 0.2 ng/mL was associated by improved DMFS (distant metastases free survival) and could serve as a surrogate endpoint for RT of oligometastases after initial prostatectomy. Short term effects of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT-based ablative radiotherapy for oligometastases demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile and favorable biochemical response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Marzec
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - J. Becker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - F. Paulsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - D. Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - S.-C. Olthof
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - C. Pfannenberg
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - J. Schwenck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellnence iFIT (EXC 2180) “Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies”, University of Tuebingen, Germany
| | - J. Bedke
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - A. Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - K. Nikolaou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - C. la Fougère
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Cluster of Excellnence iFIT (EXC 2180) “Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies”, University of Tuebingen, Germany
| | - D. Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A.-C. Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|