Feasibility and Evaluation of Automated Methods for Radiolabeling of Radiopharmaceutical Kits with Gallium-68

Modern Developments in Bifunctional Chelator Design for Gallium Radiopharmaceuticals

The positron-emitting radionuclide gallium-68 has become increasingly utilised in both preclinical and clinical settings with positron emission tomography (PET). The synthesis of radiochemically pure gallium-68 radiopharmaceuticals relies on careful consideration of the coordination chemistry. The short half-life of 68 min necessitates rapid quantitative radiolabelling (≤10 min). Desirable radiolabelling conditions include near-neutral pH, ambient temperatures, and low chelator concentrations to achieve the desired apparent molar activity. This review presents a broad overview of the requirements of an efficient bifunctional chelator in relation to the aqueous coordination chemistry of gallium. Developments in bifunctional chelator design and application are then presented and grouped according to eight categories of bifunctional chelator: the macrocyclic chelators DOTA and TACN; the acyclic HBED, pyridinecarboxylates, siderophores, tris(hydroxypyridinones), and DTPA; and the mesocyclic diazepines.

Cold Kit Labeling: The Future of 68Ga Radiopharmaceuticals?

Over the last couple of decades, gallium-68 (68Ga) has gained a formidable interest for PET molecular imaging of various conditions, from cancer to infection, through cardiac pathologies or neuropathies. It has gained routine use, with successful radiopharmaceuticals such as somatostatin analogs ([68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC and [68Ga]GaDOTATATE) for neuroendocrine tumors, and PSMA ligands for prostate cancer. It represents a major clinical impact, particularly in the context of theranostics, coupled with their 177Lu-labeled counterparts. Beside those, a bunch of new 68Ga-labeled molecules are in the preclinical and clinical pipelines, with some of them showing great promise for patient care. Increasing clinical demand and regulatory issues have led to the development of automated procedures for the production of 68Ga radiopharmaceuticals. However, the widespread use of these radiopharmaceuticals may rely on simple and efficient radiolabeling methods, undemanding in terms of equipment and infrastructure. To make them technically and economically accessible to the medical community and its patients, it appears mandatory to develop a procedure similar to the well-established kit-based 99mTc chemistry. Already available commercial kits for the production of 68Ga radiopharmaceuticals have demonstrated the feasibility of using such an approach, thus paving the way for more kit-based 68Ga radiopharmaceuticals to be developed. This article discusses the development of 68Ga cold kit radiopharmacy, including technical issues, and regulatory aspects.

Production of [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA: Comparing a manual kit-based method with a module-based automated synthesis approach

The labeling of peptides with gallium-68 is often initially performed by manual labeling, but with high clinical demand, other alternatives are needed. Cold-kits or automated synthesis are viable options for standardized methods and deemed pharmaceutically more acceptable. This study compares these [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 production methods. Data from 40 kit-based and 40 automated syntheses of [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 were analyzed. Pre-set criteria were evaluated including radiochemical purity, radionuclidic purity, chemical purity, physiological acceptability and sterility. The operator time and radiation dose received were measured. The robustness and repeatability of each method were assessed and a comparison of the running costs of each method is also provided. For both the methods all the analyzed products met the release criteria. No differences were found in radiochemical purity, radiochemical identity, radionuclidic purity, and sterility. However, radiochemical yield and apparent molar activity showed significant differences. For both methods, whole body radiation exposure to operators was lower than with manual labeling (25 - 40 μSv). The exposure during kit-based labeling (14.5 ± μSv) was seven times higher than that of automated synthesis (2.05 ± 0.99 μSv). The automated synthesis was the more expensive method. Both methods are sound alternatives to manual synthesis and offer higher quality, better radiation protection and a more reliable manufacturing of radiopharmaceuticals.

Design and Challenges of Radiopharmaceuticals

This review describes general concepts with regard to radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic or therapeutic applications that help to understand the specific challenges encountered during the design, (radio)synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation and clinical translation of novel radiopharmaceuticals. The design of a radiopharmaceutical requires upfront decisions with regard to combining a suitable vector molecule with an appropriate radionuclide, considering the type and location of the molecular target, the desired application, and the time constraints imposed by the relatively short half-life of radionuclides. Well-designed in vitro and in vivo experiments allow nonclinical validation of radiotracers. Ultimately, in combination with a limited toxicology package, the radiotracer becomes a radiopharmaceutical for clinical evaluation, produced in compliance with regulatory requirements for medicines for intravenous (IV) injection.