A Mini-review of the Computational Methods Used in Identifying RNA 5-Methylcytosine Sites

Heuristic Analysis of Genomic Sequence Processing Models for High Efficiency Prediction: A Statistical Perspective

Genome sequences indicate a wide variety of characteristics, which include species and sub-species type, genotype, diseases, growth indicators, yield quality, etc. To analyze and study the characteristics of the genome sequences across different species, various deep learning models have been proposed by researchers, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Deep Belief Networks (DBNs), Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs), etc., which vary in terms of evaluation performance, area of application and species that are processed. Due to a wide differentiation between the algorithmic implementations, it becomes difficult for research programmers to select the best possible genome processing model for their application. In order to facilitate this selection, the paper reviews a wide variety of such models and compares their performance in terms of accuracy, area of application, computational complexity, processing delay, precision and recall. Thus, in the present review, various deep learning and machine learning models have been presented that possess different accuracies for different applications. For multiple genomic data, Repeated Incremental Pruning to Produce Error Reduction with Support Vector Machine (Ripper SVM) outputs 99.7% of accuracy, and for cancer genomic data, it exhibits 99.27% of accuracy using the CNN Bayesian method. Whereas for Covid genome analysis, Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory with CNN (BiLSTM CNN) exhibits the highest accuracy of 99.95%. A similar analysis of precision and recall of different models has been reviewed. Finally, this paper concludes with some interesting observations related to the genomic processing models and recommends applications for their efficient use.

BiLSTM-5mC: A Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory-Based Approach for Predicting 5-Methylcytosine Sites in Genome-Wide DNA Promoters

An important reason of cancer proliferation is the change in DNA methylation patterns, characterized by the localized hypermethylation of the promoters of tumor-suppressor genes together with an overall decrease in the level of 5-methylcytosine (5mC). Therefore, identifying the 5mC sites in the promoters is a critical step towards further understanding the diverse functions of DNA methylation in genetic diseases such as cancers and aging. However, most wet-lab experimental techniques are often time consuming and laborious for detecting 5mC sites. In this study, we proposed a deep learning-based approach, called BiLSTM-5mC, for accurately identifying 5mC sites in genome-wide DNA promoters. First, we randomly divided the negative samples into 11 subsets of equal size, one of which can form the balance subset by combining with the positive samples in the same amount. Then, two types of feature vectors encoded by the one-hot method, and the nucleotide property and frequency (NPF) methods were fed into a bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) network and a full connection layer to train the 22 submodels. Finally, the outputs of these models were integrated to predict 5mC sites by using the majority vote strategy. Our experimental results demonstrated that BiLSTM-5mC outperformed existing methods based on the same independent dataset.

Advances in mRNA 5-methylcytosine modifications: Detection, effectors, biological functions, and clinical relevance

5-methylcytosine (m⁵C) post-transcriptional modifications affect the maturation, stability, and translation of the mRNA molecule. These modifications play an important role in many physiological and pathological processes, including stress response, tumorigenesis, tumor cell migration, embryogenesis, and viral replication. Recently, there has been a better understanding of the biological implications of m⁵C modification owing to the rapid development and optimization of detection technologies, including liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and RNA-BisSeq. Further, predictive models (such as PEA-m⁵C, m⁵C-PseDNC, and DeepMRMP) for the identification of potential m⁵C modification sites have also emerged. In this review, we summarize the current experimental detection methods and predictive models for mRNA m⁵C modifications, focusing on their advantages and limitations. We systematically surveyed the latest research on the effectors related to mRNA m⁵C modifications and their biological functions in multiple species. Finally, we discuss the physiological effects and pathological significance of m⁵C modifications in multiple diseases, as well as their therapeutic potential, thereby providing new perspectives for disease treatment and prognosis.

The Regulation of RNA Modification Systems: The Next Frontier in Epitranscriptomics?

RNA modifications, long considered to be molecular curiosities embellishing just abundant and non-coding RNAs, have now moved into the focus of both academic and applied research. Dedicated research efforts (epitranscriptomics) aim at deciphering the underlying principles by determining RNA modification landscapes and investigating the molecular mechanisms that establish, interpret and modulate the information potential of RNA beyond the combination of four canonical nucleotides. This has resulted in mapping various epitranscriptomes at high resolution and in cataloguing the effects caused by aberrant RNA modification circuitry. While the scope of the obtained insights has been complex and exciting, most of current epitranscriptomics appears to be stuck in the process of producing data, with very few efforts to disentangle cause from consequence when studying a specific RNA modification system. This article discusses various knowledge gaps in this field with the aim to raise one specific question: how are the enzymes regulated that dynamically install and modify RNA modifications? Furthermore, various technologies will be highlighted whose development and use might allow identifying specific and context-dependent regulators of epitranscriptomic mechanisms. Given the complexity of individual epitranscriptomes, determining their regulatory principles will become crucially important, especially when aiming at modifying specific aspects of an epitranscriptome both for experimental and, potentially, therapeutic purposes.