Solitary osteochondroma of the cervical spine with spinal cord compression--case report

Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment Options: A Cervical Spine Osteochondroma Meta-Analysis

Osteochondroma is described as a capped benign bony neoplasm that forms on the outer surface of bone. These tumors affect nearly 6 million people per year. Although osteochondromas most often involve the appendicular skeleton, many involve the spine, with many cases located in the cervical spine. When osteochondromas involve the spine, they can present with a variety of symptoms, including pain, radiculopathy, and myelopathy, which may necessitate surgical treatment. Spinal osteochondromas can be classified into 2 types: multiple osteochondromas in the context of patients with multiple hereditary exostosis (MHE) and solitary osteochondroma or solitary exostosis (SE). Previous reviews have captured only some of the available literature on cervical osteochondromas and have generally focused on either SE or those associated with MHE. The purpose of our review was to provide an extensive review of all previously reported cervical osteochondromas and to compare osteochondroma characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes in the context of MHE and SE.

Neurological manifestations, imaging characteristics, and surgical outcome of intraspinal osteochondroma

OBJECT

Spinal osteochondromas (OCs) are rare and can originate as solitary lesions or in the context of hereditary multiple exostoses. Concurrent spinal cord compression is a very rare entity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the authors' 10-year experience with the imaging characteristics and surgical outcome in patients with symptomatic spinal OC.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2007, 8 consecutive cases of symptomatic intraspinal OC with documented spinal cord compression were treated surgically. These patients were analyzed with regard to presentation, imaging, and outcome. The relevant English literature was reviewed using MEDLINE and Google search engines.

RESULTS

Three patients had cervical, 2 had thoracic, and 3 had lumbar lesions. Classic MR imaging characteristics were rarely found. Multiple hereditary exostoses were equally responsible for cervical, thoracic, and lumbar lesions (33%). The origin of the lesion was from the pedicle (25%), lamina (25%), vertebral body (25%), and superior or inferior facets (25%). A posterior approach to the spine was used in 6 patients, and a combined anterior and posterior approach with fusion was performed for 2 thoracic lesions. Surgical outcome was satisfactory in 75% of patients. The prognosis was poor in the patients with thoracic lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

In the authors' experience, early detection and surgical removal in cases of symptomatic spinal OC is a key element for the best outcome. Posterior approaches are generally sufficient. The chronicity of symptoms may limit functional recovery postoperatively, especially with cervical and thoracic lesions.