Biopsy of brain stem glioma using motor-evoked potential mapping by direct peduncular stimulation and individual adjuvant therapy. Case report

Brainstem Surgery: Functional Surgical Anatomy with the Use of an Advanced Modern Intraoperative Neurophysiological Procedure

Intraoperative neurophysiology (ION) in brainstem surgery evolved as brainstem surgery advanced.The original idea of brainstem mapping (BSM) is a neurophysiological procedure to locate cranial nerve motor nuclei (CNMN) on the floor of the fourth ventricle. With the introduction of various skull base approaches to the brainstem, BSM is carried out on any surface of the brainstem to expose the safe entry zone to the intrinsic brainstem lesion. It is the modern concept of BSM, a broader definition of BSM. BSM enables to avoid direct damage to the CNMN when approaching the brainstem through the negative mapping region.The corticobulbar tract (CBT) motor evoked potential (MEP) is another ION procedure in brainstem surgery. It enables monitoring of the functional integrity of the whole cranial motor pathway without interrupting surgical procedures. Combined application of both BSM and CBT-MEP monitoring is indispensable for the functional preservation of the CNMN and their supranuclear innervation during the brainstem surgery.In this paper, the neurophysiological aspect of BSM and the CBT-MEP was fully described. Normal anatomical background of the floor of the fourth ventricle and the detail of the CBT anatomy were demonstrated to better understand their clinical usefulness, limitations, and surgical implications derived from ION procedures. Finally, a future perspective in the role of ION procedures in brainstem surgery was presented. The latest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology can allow surgeons to find an "on the image" safe entry zone to the brainstem. However, the role of BSM and the CBT-MEP monitoring in terms of safe brainstem surgery stays unshakable. Special attention was paid for the recent trend of management in diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. A new role of BSM during a stereotactic biopsy was discussed.It is the authors' expectation that the paper enhances the clinical application of a contemporary standard of the ION in brainstem surgery and supports safer brainstem surgery more than ever and in the future.

Adult brainstem gliomas

Brainstem gliomas are uncommon in adults and account for only 1%-2% of intracranial gliomas. They represent a heterogeneous group of tumors that differ from those found in their pediatric counterparts. In adults, a low-grade phenotype predominates, which is a feature that likely explains their better prognosis compared to that in children. Because biopsies are rarely performed, classifications based on the radiological aspect of magnetic resonance imaging results have been proposed to establish treatment strategies and to determine outcomes: (a) diffuse intrinsic low-grade, (b) enhancing malignant glioma, (c) focal tectal gliomas, and (d) exophytic gliomas. Despite significant advances in neuroradiology techniques, a purely radiological classification remains imperfect in the absence of a histological diagnosis. Whereas a biopsy may often be reasonably avoided in the diffuse nonenhancing forms, obtaining histological proof seems necessary in many contrast-enhanced brainstem lesions because of the wide variety of differential diagnoses in adults. Conventional radiotherapy is the standard treatment for diffuse intrinsic low-grade brainstem gliomas in adults (the median survival is 5 years). In malignant brainstem gliomas, radiotherapy is the standard treatment. However, the possible benefit of combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy (temozolomide or other agents) has not been thoroughly evaluated in adults. The role of anti-angiogenic therapies in brainstem gliomas remains to be defined. A better understanding of the biology of these tumors is of primary importance for identifying homogeneous subgroups and for improving therapy options and outcomes.

Subtemporal transtentorial resection of cavernous malformations involving the pyramidal tract in the upper pons and mesencephalon

BACKGROUND

Lateral approaches to the brain stem for the resection of the cavernous malformations are preferred in order to avoid the structures within the floor of the fourth ventricle. The entry behind the pyramidal tract (PT) is usually carried out through the posterolateral surface of the brain stem. The more straightforward lateral approach below the temporal lobe is used rarely because of potential risks.

METHODS

The outcome after resection of the cavernomas involving the PT in the mesencephalon and the upper pons via the subtemporal transtentorial approach in nine patients was analysed. Mapping of the PT by direct electrical stimulation was used in the last four patients.

RESULTS

The subtemporal transtentorial approach enabled adequate exposure of the lateral and anterolateral surface of the midbrain and the upper pons. No adverse events from the elevation of the temporal lobe were encountered. Direct electrical stimulation using a bipolar electrode with the parameters of 100 Hz, 1 ms, and 3-9 mA evoked motor responses in three of four patients. It allowed placing the incision in the lateral surface of the midbrain behind the PT or between the fibres of the upper and the lower extremity. No worsening of the PT functions was observed in the series.

CONCLUSIONS

The subtemporal transtentorial approach enables adequate exposure of the lateral and the anterolateral surface of the mesencephalon and upper pons, allowing neurophysiological mapping of the PT and thus avoiding its damage during removal of the cavernoma.

Motor evoked potential mapping and monitoring by direct brainstem stimulation

✓Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) by direct brainstem stimulation were generated during 12 neurosurgical operations performed in five posterior fossa tumors, six vertebrobasilar aneurysms, and an arachnoid cyst. The anterior aspect of the brainstem was exposed using a subtemporal approach (in six cases), a presigmoid approach (one case), or a lateral suboccipital approach (five cases). A train of five monopolar 5 to 25 mA pulses was then applied, and MEPs were recorded from the extremities. Motor evoked potentials were recorded in all patients (four mappings and seven monitorings) except in a 12-year-old child who underwent surgery for a posterior cerebral artery aneurysm. Although he experienced postoperative motor palsy, the aneurysm ruptured before electrodes could be placed. Two patients with postoperative motor palsy, one with a clival meningioma and one with a basilar trunk aneurysm, had shown significant decreases in MEP amplitude and even complete disappearance of MEPs during intraoperative brainstem stimulation. Motor evoked potentials elicited by direct brainstem stimulation seem to be an accurate neurophysiological monitoring method during operations around the anterior and lateral aspects of the brainstem.