Relapse After Drug Withdrawal in Patients with Epilepsy After Two Years of Seizure-Free: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Antiepileptic drugs are the first choice of treatment for patients with epilepsy. However, the withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs after seizure-free remains a significant focus for the majority of patients with epilepsy and their families. In this study, we evaluated the risk factors associated with relapse after drug withdrawal in patients with seizure free for 2 years. We aimed to guide patients in seizure-free to assess the risk of drug withdrawal.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Through screening, 452 patients with epilepsy were included in the study.Patients were followed up for at least 2 years or more. Analyzed their clinical data by applying the χ2-test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

423 patients completed follow-up, of which 304 cases recurred (71.9%).Related recurrence factors include age of onset, type of seizure, number of AEDs, seizure-free time before withdrawal, and electroencephalogram (EEG) results before drug withdrawal (P<0.05). The results of correlation analysis showed that age of onset, seizure frequency, seizure type, number of AEDs, the period from AEDs treatment to a seizure-free status, EEG results before drug withdrawal, and pre-medication course, were all significantly related to the recurrence of seizures after drug reduction and withdrawal (P<0.05). We identified a range of independent risk factors, including onset age, seizure frequency, Multiple AEDs and the period from AEDs treatment to a seizure-free status.

CONCLUSION

The overall recurrence rate of epilepsy in our patient cohort was high, and the peak recurrence period was within one-year of drug withdrawal. Patients with partial seizures, a short seizure-free time before withdrawal, severe EEG abnormalities before drug reduction, and a long course of the disease, are prone to relapse. Patients with an older age at onset and a high frequency of attack, those taking multi-drug combination therapy, and those that take a long time to gain control, should be managed carefully to AEDs withdrawal.

Ambulatory EEG: Crossing the divide during a pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic forced temporary closure of epilepsy monitoring units across the globe due to potential hospital-based contagion. As COVID-19 exposures and deaths continues to surge in the United States and around the world, other types of long-term EEG monitoring have risen to fill the gap and minimize hospital exposure. AEEG has high yield compared to standard EEG. Prolonged audio-visual video-EEG capability can record events and epileptiform activity with quality like inpatient video-EEG monitoring. Technological advances in AEEG using miniaturized hardware and wireless secure transmission have evolved to small portable devices that are perfect for people forced to stay at home during the pandemic. Application of seizure detection algorithms and Cloud-based storage with real-time access provides connectivity to AEEG interpreters during prolonged "shut-down". In this article we highlight the benefits of AEEG as an alternative to diagnostic inpatient VEM during the paradigm shift to mobile heath forced by the Coronavirus.

Ambulatory EEG Usefulness in Epilepsy Management

SUMMARY

Long-term video-EEG monitoring has been the gold standard for diagnosis of epileptic and nonepileptic events. Medication changes, safety, and a lack of recording EEG in one's habitual environment may interfere with diagnostic representation and subsequently affect management. Some spells defy standard EEG because of ultradian and circadian times of occurrence, manifest nocturnal expression of epileptiform activity, and require classification for clarifying diagnostic input to identify optimal treatment. Some patients may be unaware of seizures, have frequent events, or subclinical seizures that require quantification before optimal management. The influence on antiseizure drug management and clinical drug research can be enlightened by long-term outpatient ambulatory EEG monitoring. With recent governmental shifts to focus on mobile health, ambulatory EEG monitoring has grown beyond diagnostic capabilities to target the dynamic effects of medical and nonmedical treatment for patients with epilepsy in their natural environment. Furthermore, newer applications in ambulatory monitoring include additional physiologic parameters (e.g., sleep, detection of myogenic signals, etc.) and extend treatment relevance to patients beyond seizure reduction alone addressing comorbid conditions. It is with this focus in mind that we direct our discussion on the present and future aspects of using ambulatory EEG monitoring in the treatment of patients with epilepsy.

Long-term outcome of seizure-free patients and risk factors of relapse following antiepileptic drug withdrawal

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the long-term outcome in seizure-free patients and to explore the risk factors of seizure relapse following antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal.

METHODS

This study included 161 patients who had been seizure-free for at least 2 years. These patients were monitored over a follow-up period of at least 3 years or until seizure relapse after AED withdrawal. Patients were grouped into a seizure-free group and a relapse group. Risk factors of seizure relapse were analyzed.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, 72 patients (44.7%) relapsed while 89 patients (55.3%) did not. The average time of relapse was 19.12 ± 27.17 months after the initiation of AED withdrawal, and majority of cases occurred within the first 24 months of AED withdrawal (73.6%). Univariate analysis showed that the likelihood of relapse was higher in patients with uncontrolled seizures beyond the first 6 months of AED therapy initiation, patients with a history of perinatal injury, patients with multiple seizure types, and patients who had been treated with a combination of AEDs. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that uncontrolled seizures beyond the first 6 months of AED treatment and a history of perinatal injury were independent risk factors of seizure relapse.

CONCLUSION

In the majority of cases, epilepsy relapse occurred within the first two years after the initiation of AED withdrawal. The independent risk factors of seizure relapse were uncontrolled seizures beyond the first 6 months of AED therapy and cases with a history of perinatal injury.

Evaluation of Seizure Frequency Distribution in Epileptic Patients with Normal and Abnormal Electroencephalogram in Al-Zahra Hospital of Isfahan

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder characterized by seizure recurrence in patients. Electroencephalogram (EEG) has a diagnostic and prognostic role in the management of patients. Studies have shown a significant relation between seizure recurrence and abnormal EEG in newly diagnosed epileptic patients, and people with first episode of unprovoked seizure. The aim of this study is to evaluate seizure frequency in chronic epileptic patients on drug therapy based on normal or abnormal EEG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective cohort study examined seizure recurrence in 59 epileptic patients (50.8% generalized, 49.2% focal) with normal and abnormal EEG. Data were recorded in patient medical file, and patients were followed by telephone call or visiting by neurologist.

RESULTS

In this study, 59 patients with a mean age of 29.58 ± 10.37 years were assessed that 42.4% of them were males and 57.6% were females. Seizure frequency in patient with specific abnormal EEG was significantly more than other patients (specific abnormal: 78.9%, nonspecific abnormal: 45.5%, and normal: 31%, P = 0.005). Seizure recurrence in patients on polytherapy was significantly higher than others (polytherapy: 76.9% and monotherapy: 27.3%, P < 0.001). In patient with abnormal imaging seizure, frequency was more than other patients which was nearly significant (P = 0.054).

CONCLUSION

Abnormal EEG and number of anticonvulsant drugs have a role in seizure recurrence in epileptic patients.

[French guidelines on electroencephalogram]

Electroencephalography allows the functional analysis of electrical brain cortical activity and is the gold standard for analyzing electrophysiological processes involved in epilepsy but also in several other dysfunctions of the central nervous system. Morphological imaging yields complementary data, yet it cannot replace the essential functional analysis tool that is EEG. Furthermore, EEG has the great advantage of being non-invasive, easy to perform and allows control tests when follow-up is necessary, even at the patient's bedside. Faced with the advances in knowledge, techniques and indications, the Société de Neurophysiologie Clinique de Langue Française (SNCLF) and the Ligue Française Contre l'Épilepsie (LFCE) found it necessary to provide an update on EEG recommendations. This article will review the methodology applied to this work, refine the various topics detailed in the following chapters. It will go over the summary of recommendations for each of these chapters and underline proposals for writing an EEG report. Some questions could not be answered by the review of the literature; in those cases, an expert advice was given by the working and reading groups in addition to the guidelines.